What is the Meaning of “Just Deserts”? + the Upcoming Release of “Lady Christiana and the Colonel,” Arriving 18 November 2026

My regular editor is very good at finding phrases that I have forgotten to check when writing my stories. Some are appropriate for the time period. Some are not. What about “Just deserts”?

The phrase “just deserts” means receiving the exact punishment or reward that one’s actions have earned. The single ‘s’ spelling is correct. It is unrelated to a sandy wilderness or sweet food.

According to the South China Morning Post, “I don’t mean dessert, with double ‘s,’ the last course of a meal, usually sweet. Dessert – entering English at the start of the 17th century – comes from the French dessert, originating in desservir, from the Latin dis + servīre, meaning to remove what has been served, that is, to clear the table of the main dishes and put out sweet dishes or fruit to end the meal.

“In the phrase ‘just deserts,’ the word – also stressed on it second syllable [‘de-ZERT’], thus homophonous with dessert – is, however, spelt with a single ‘s,’ and comes from a different French word, ‘desert’ [masculine]/ deserte [feminine]. derivatives of deservir ‘to deserve.’ This also originates in the Latin servīre ‘to serve,’ but the prefix dē meaning ‘completely, zealously.'” [Language Matters]

Check out its origins and details:

Etymological Roots: The word “desert” (pronounced dih-ZERT) comes from the Old French word deservir, which shares the same root as the modern English verb “deserve”. [Just Deserts vs. Just Desserts]

Origin and History: Dating back to the late 1200s, the noun “desert” originally meant “that which one deserves”. By the early 1500s, the full phrase “just desert(s)” emerged, utilizing “just” in the sense of being fitting or appropriate. [Wiktionary]

The Single ‘S’: The expression is frequently misspelled as “just desserts” (with a double ‘s’) because people confuse it with the after-dinner sweet treat. However, the post-meal dessert entered the English language around 1600 from a completely different French word (desservir, meaning to clear the table). [Merriam Webster]

Excerpt from Chapter Thirteen:

“I am confident you are correct, Grandfather,” she said obediently. She chose not to remind him that the colonel had viewed her in a state of near nudity when he removed the bullet fragment from her arm. Colonel Fitzwilliam’s weight had held her down while he cut into her skin. A man and a woman who had shared such an intimate moment were beyond a glimpse of bare leg.

“I pray we will soon be free of this madness,” her grandfather said from his place outside the open door. 

“There are more than a handful of the aristocracy attempting to bring Lord Whitmorris to some form of justice,” she assured. 

“Whether Whitmorris receives his just deserts or not, I want your mother and your brother to come stay with us at Kirkland Manor,” he said. 

“Us? Am I to come? If the government cannot prove Lord Whitmorris has acted against British interests, what occurs with the agreement my mother made with his lordship?” she asked as she dragged the blanket upward to cover herself better. 

“You are not yet of age,” he declared. “You were born in England to English parents. Such makes you an English citizen, who has been living abroad,” he reasoned as he cracked the door a bit wider so she might view him and his obvious determination. “As such, with your father’s passing, you became the ward of either the Kirkland earldom or the Summerville baronetcy. I have drafted a letter to Sir Jasper to inform him of my plan to bring your mother and your brother to England and ask for his and Lady Anna’s support in returning our joint family to English shores. As Grayson is to inherit the Kirkland earldom, I believe he should stay at my home estate. At his age, he should learn the ins and outs of the estate, as well as his responsibility to the earldom.”

“In truth, Grandfather, I doubt Grayson has considered all you mentioned. Despite his age, he still heavily depends on mother’s opinions. If she chose to return to her parents’ home, I would expect Grayson would follow.” 

Her grandfather did not speak for several minutes. “You will stay in Derbyshire, will you not, Christiana? I have so many things I wish to show you.”

Posted in book excerpts, book release, books, British history, excerpt, family, Georgian England, Georgian Era, hero, heroines, historical fiction, Inheritance, Jane Austen, laws of the land, legacy, Living in the Regency, Pride and Prejudice, publishing, reading, Regency era, Regency romance, research, word choices, writing | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Traitor Tuesday ~ Celebrating 250 Years of the United States as a Separate Nation: William Paca, Rabble Rouser and Signer of the Declaration of Independence

paca.jpg

William Paca was a 35 years old lawyer and plantation owner when he placed his name on the Declaration of Independence. Married twice and father of five, he lived to the age of 58, passing in October of 1799.

William Paca was born in Abington, Maryland, on October 30, 1740, at his family’s home in what is now Harford County, north of Baltimore. He was the second son of John and Elizabeth Smith Paca and the fourth generation of Pacas in Maryland. His great-grandfather Robert Paca had emigrated from England. Robert Paca was brought to the colonies before 1660 by a man named John Hall, who owned an estate in Anne Arundel County. To pay his transportation costs, Paca most likely indentured himself to Hall as a servant. After Hall’s death, Robert Paca married his widow, and thus acquired a family, position, and considerable property. Though Robert Paca did not die a wealthy man, he was able to put his family on the path to becoming landowners, planters, and public servants.

William Paca was tutored at home in the classics. In 1752, William and his brother were sent to attend school at the Academy and Charity School. He attended the Inner Temple in London. When he had finished his general studies, he attended the College of Philadelphia and later graduated with a bachelor of the arts degree in 1759. In 1762, he achieved a master of the arts degree. He then studied law, under Stephen Bradley, in Annapolis at the office of an eminent lawyer.

Before seeking admission to the Bar of Maryland, he attended training at the Inner Temple in England.In 1764, he was admitted to the bar in Maryland. As his career took off, William Paca asked Mary Chaw to be his wife. They married on May 26, 1763. Together, they had three children.

220px-William_paca.jpgHis political engagement began in his interest in the law. He wrote and organized against a poll-tax originated by the royal governor just prior to the outbreak of hostilities. He was a local leader in the patriot movement in the late 1770s.

As the British continued to agitate the colonies, William began forming a friendship with Samuel Chase (another signer of the Declaration of Independence). In 1765, the two men started the Sons of Liberty in Annapolis as a response to the Stamp Act. After this, the two men became very close friends.In 1771, William Paca was elected to the Maryland Legislature, where he stayed until 1774. In 1774, William was asked to go to the Continental Congress a delegate for Maryland. He spent thousands of dollars of his own money to supply Maryland’s troops during the war. 

William_Paca_signature.png

Paca and his friends, Samuel Chase and Thomas Stone, were rabble rousers. They often raged at the wrong doing executed by the British controlled government. They were known to burn various figures in effigy. Denise Kiernan and Joseph D’Agnest in Signing Their Lives Away (Quirk Books, ©2009, ppl 158 -159) relate a humorous tale. “In one public demonstration, the two [Chase and Paca] staged a mock execution of an unpopular law that the royal governor had just passed. They inscribed the law on a sheet of paper, marched it to a mock gallows, strung it up as if they were hanging it by the neck, waited until it was ‘dead,’ cut it down, lay it in a coffin, and buried it under the gibbet. A ship parked in Chesapeake Bay fired a small cannon to cap off the ceremony. Paca owned the ship, and he no doubt settled the bar tab wherever the protestors partied afterward.

“Later, the duo objected to a tax paid by citizens to support the Church of England. Chase’s father was a clergyman, but he and Paca thought it was rong for the government to collect a tax that benefited a single religion. The letters and articles Paca and Chase wrote and published branded them as rebels in the eyes of the Tories and as patriots in the eyes of the Whigs. The legal eagles had their first big test case when a political friend was arrested and fined for refusing to pay the tax. The jury found for their client, awarded him £60 in damages, and Paca and Chase were hailed as heroes. Their adversary in the courtroom was friend and fellow signer Thomas Stone.”

He was reelected and served there until 1779 when he was appointed chief justice of the State of Maryland. In 1782 he was elected governor of that state. George Washington appointed Paca as Chief Justice of the United States Supreme Court for the district of Maryland from 1789, until his death at “Wye Hall,” Queen Anne County, Maryland, on October 23, 1799. Paca cared deeply for the issues of war veterans and worked to provide assistance to those who sacrificed for the nation.  He is interned in the family burial ground, Queen Anne County. During his term as governor he championed education in religion and literature and said this to the general assembly of Maryland:

It is far from our intention, to embarrass your deliberations with a variety of objects; but we cannot pass over matters of so high concernment as religion and learning. The sufferings of the ministers of the gospel of all denominations, during the war, have been very considerable; and the perseverance and firmness of those who discharged their sacred functions under many discouraging circumstances, claim our acknowledgments and thanks. The bill of rights and form of government recognize the principle of public support for the ministers of the gospel, and ascertain the mode. Anxiously solicitous for the blessings of government, and the welfare and happiness of our citizens, and thoroughly convinced of the powerful influence of religion, when diffused by its respectable teachers, we beg leave most seriously and warmly to recommend, among the first objects of your attention on the return of peace, the making such provision as the constitution, in this case, authorizes and approves.

WilliamPaca-184x300.jpgCharles Wilson Peale’s famous portrait of William Paca, painted in 1772, says much about the man. With arm akimbo, he is very much the self-assured diplomat, lawyer, planter, and patriot. An extremely attractive, tall, yet large, man, he exudes the charm, fashionable demeanor, and educated manner for which he was known. With a bust of Cicero beside him and his Annapolis garden and summerhouse in the background, Paca fills the seven and a half foot canvas with the presence and confidence that would help win independence for the colonies. Many years later, Peale described his famous commission in these words: “A handsome man, more than six feet high, of portly appearance, being well educated and accustomed to the best company, [Paca] was graceful in his movements and complaisant to everyone; in short, his manners were of the first polish. In the early period when the people’s eyes first became opened to their rights,[he] made the first stand for the Independence of the People.”

Later in his life, Paca claimed a child he had sired out of wedlock with a freed black woman. His first died ten years into their marriage. Two of their children also passed. He remarried, but the second wife and their child also died. Therefore, he chose to raise his “bastard” child, a girl named Hester. He sent her to the finest schools. 

2811_1062890857.jpg

2811_1062890889

Resources: 

“William Paca,” Biographical Directory of the United States Congress

“William Paca,” Find a Grave 

“William Paca,” Revolutionary War 

“William Paca,” The History Junkie 

“William Paca,” The Society for the Descendants of the Signers of the Declaration of Independence

“William Paca,” U. S. History

Posted in American History, Declaration of Independence, Georgian England, real life tales | Tagged , , , , , | 6 Comments

What Was the Proper Name for a “Deck” Jutting Out Over the Water During the Regency? + the Upcoming Release of “Lady Christiana and the Colonel”

When writing a story, I tend to mark all words that I do not think was used in Regency England. I label them with the word “origin” so I can remember to look them up when I begin to type the tale, and, in that matter, I do not lose my “train of thought.” In my tale, the main characters do not spend leisurely time on the lake. It is something more sinister.

So what is the proper name for a “deck” stretching out over the banks of a lake or pond? In Regency England, a wooden structure or deck jutting out over a lake would primarily be called a jetty or a landing-stage. If it was intended to serve as a scenic viewing platform rather than purely for boat mooring, it might also be casually referred to as a prospect, a viewing platform, or a water pavilion. [Accurate British English term for an oblong deck from shore out into a lake where you tie your rowing boat]

Here is a breakdown of the terms depending on the structure’s purpose:

Jetty: The most common term for a wooden, bridge-like walkway extending over the water used for fishing, relaxing, or mooring.

Landing-stage: A specific type of platform designed to rise and fall with the water level to easily embark or disembark from rowboats, punts, or skiffs.

Prospect: An architectural or landscape term used frequently during the Regency era for an elevated or extended spot offering a prime, unobstructed view of the estate’s features (such as an artificial lake).

Posted in book release, British history, buildings and structures, Georgian England, Georgian Era, hero, heroines, historical fiction, Jane Austen, language choices, Living in the Regency, Pride and Prejudice, publishing, Regency era, Regency romance, research, terminology, word choices, writing | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Origin of the Phrase “Ins and Outs” + the Upcoming Release of “Lady Christiana and the Colonel,” Arriving 18 November 2026

The phrase “ins and outs” dates back to the mid-17th century. It originally alluded to the twisting and turning paths of a winding road, before evolving to describe politicians who are either holding office (in) or out of power. [Dictionary.com]

Over time, these concepts naturally merged to describe the intricate details, complexities, and full workings of a process or subject. [Longman]

What is the origin of the idiom “the ins and outs of something” and when to use it?

The idiom “the ins and outs of something” refers to a comprehensive understanding of a particular subject, including all its details, complexities, and nuances. The origin of this phrase is derived from the idea that “ins” represent the inner or intricate aspects, while “outs” pertain to the outer or surface aspects of a subject or situation. Together, it signifies a thorough knowledge of a topic, situation, or process. This phrase is used to convey that someone possesses a deep and comprehensive understanding of a subject or can navigate through complex situations with ease, having explored all facets of it. https://dictionary.langeek.co/en/word/214128?entry=ins%20and%20outs

Excerpt from Chapter Thirteen:

You are not yet of age,” he declared. “You were born in England to English parents. Such makes you an English citizen, who has been living abroad,” he reasoned as he cracked the door a bit wider so she might view him and his obvious determination. “As such, with your father’s passing, you became the ward of either the Kirkland earldom or the Summerville baronetcy. I have drafted a letter to Sir Jasper to inform him of my plan to bring your mother and your brother to England and ask for his and Lady Anna’s support in returning our joint family to English shores. As Grayson is to inherit the Kirkland earldom, I believe he should stay at my home estate. At his age, he should learn the ins and outs of the estate, as well as his responsibility to the earldom.”

“In truth, Grandfather, I doubt Grayson has considered all you mentioned. Despite his age, he still heavily depends on mother’s opinions. If she chose to return to her parents’ home, I would expect Grayson would follow.” 

Her grandfather did not speak for several minutes. “You will stay in Derbyshire, will you not, Christiana? I have so many things I wish to show you.” 

“I can think of no place I would rather be, Grandfather, but, if this plan by Lord Liverpool proves faulty, I would rather be in a different part of England, to assure both my well being and yours. If the marriage contract is ruled as null, Lord Whitmorris will come for me again and, the next time, I could end up in the same condition as his lordship’s man of business.  I shan’t place you or the others in danger. Lord Whitmorris is not one to forgive and forget.” 

“Then we see that Lord Whitmorris does not know success. When the Lowerys called on me and found me in despair, I made myself a promise not to permit Whitmorris to win. You were my hope. You were in England, and I finally had an opportunity to look upon you again. As I dressed for our reunion, I stopped to speak to your grandmother’s portrait to tell her what I planned. I told Christine that I . . .” 

“Christine?” She asked. “I did not realize father’s mother was a Christine. Surely he must have said so when I was young, but I cannot recall his doing so. Was I named for her?” 

Her grandfather’s voice sounded as if it was watery with his tears. “You were.” 

“Why did no one tell me? I have lost—my family has lost—so much of our history.” 

His lordship cleared his voice. “Your parents insisted on naming you after both your grandmothers. You are ‘Christiana’ after my wife ‘Christine’ and Sir Jasper’s ‘Lady Anna.’ We all agreed that as the first born you should have the name of both your grandmothers. It was hoped there would be multiple sons to carry the other names. Yours, as the first born, tied us together forever. Unfortunately, after the death of Mr. Greenville, the Pavlicks feared the wrath of others in society, especially after the accusations against your father became known. They claimed their distance from me and from the earldom. It would have been my son’s wish for both them and me to know a clearing of his name.” 

“My wish also,” Christiana whispered through her own tears. “I want a full and loud family—no more hiding in shame. “ 

Posted in book excerpts, book release, books, British history, excerpt, Georgian England, Georgian Era, hero, heroines, historical fiction, history, Jane Austen, language choices, Living in the Regency, Pride and Prejudice, publishing, Regency era, Regency romance, research, word choices, word play, writing | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Did Men’s Trousers in the Regency Era Have a Waistband? + the Upcoming Release of “Lady Christiana and the Colonel,” Arriving 18 November 2026

I know this is probably a crazy idea for a post, but before I wrote the scene I needed to know if men’s trousers in the Regency era had a waistband. So here goes…

Yes, men’s trousers in 1813 did have a waistband. According to the Victoria and Albert Museum site, “When trousers became fashionable in the first decade of the 19th century, they retained wide fall-front closure commonly used in the late 18th century. This began to narrow in the 1820s, and by the 1830s a fly-front closure, as seen in this example, became the most usual form. Buttons on the waistband allow the attachment of braces. Linen and cotton in pale colours were a popular choice for summer wear. These trousers are reputed to have been worn by William Pierson Johnes, a linen merchant of New York City.

Trousers, circa 1805-1815, silk, cotton, linen, leather, bone, Maryland Historical Society, Gift of Misses Frances and Jean H. Gilmore, 1954.60.3.

“These trousers are likely from the first quarter of the nineteenth century. They are made of cream silk fabric with bone buttons and leather straps that button to the pant leg as stirrups. They are neither the most tightly fitted nor the fullest pant leg seen in the period, but somewhere in the middle. The fabric has a sturdiness that we don’t associate with silk clothes today and the soil on the stirrups shows these were definitely worn. They are entirely hand stitched and there are several places where the fabric has been pieced. In a time when fabric could be very expensive, these small extensions that maximized fabric were common and not looked at as patching.” [Inside Mr. Darcy’s Drawers]

However, they were constructed very differently from modern pants:

The Fall Front: Instead of a zipper fly, trousers in 1813 used a “fall front” (a wide, rectangular flap over the crotch) that buttoned securely to the top of the waistband. [“Who Wears the Pants?”]

High-Waisted: The waistband was worn very high—often reaching up to the wearer’s navel. [Regency Men’s Breeches, Pantaloons, and Trousers]

Held Up by Braces: Because belts were not worn with this style of clothing, the waistbands featured buttons designed specifically to attach to suspenders (known as braces). [Kirsten Koster]

Cossack Trousers: A highly popular variation introduced around this time was the “Cossack” trouser, which featured voluminous fabric pleated directly into the waistband and gathered at the ankles. [Fashion History Timeline: 1810 – 1819]

You can read more about period-accurate menswear tailoring and see extant examples in the Victoria and Albert Museum Collection.

Posted in aristocracy, book release, customs and tradiitons, Georgian England, hero, heroines, historical fiction, Jane Austen, Living in the Regency, Pride and Prejudice, reading, Regency era, Regency romance, research, word choices, writing | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Traitor Tuesday ~ Celebrating 250 Years of the United States as a Separate Nation: Francis Lightfoot Lee, Part of Virginia’s Lee Family Dynasty and Signer of the Declaration of Independence

2809_1470050164.jpg

Francis Lightfoot Lee was a 41 years old planation owner when he signed the Declaration of Independence. Though married, we do not know of any children. He was 62 years of age when he passed on 11 January 1797.

Francis Lightfoot Lee (brother of Richard Henry Lee) was born on the fourteenth of October, 1734, at Stratford Hall plantation in Westmoreland County, Virginia.He was the fourth surviving son of Thomas Lee and Hannah Harrison Ludwell Lee. After Lee’s parents died in 1750, he was left under the guardianship of his oldest brother, Philip Ludwell Lee. Philip Lee decided that Francis Lee was best suited for the life of a farmer and ended his formal education. Consequently, Lee was not educated in England, as his older brothers had been; his schooling never progressed beyond that acquired under the tutelage of a Reverend Craig, who lived at Stratford Hall in the mid-1740s. He was educated  in the manner of an enlightened country gentleman.

leeThe relationship between Lee and his oldest brother steadily worsened over the next few years. In 1754 Lee and his siblings brought suit against Philip Lee for not immediately dividing Thomas Lee’s estate according to his will. The lawsuit failed—Philip Lee had wanted to settle his father’s debts before dividing up his property—but Francis Lee and his younger siblings did successfully petition the court to have their cousin Henry Lee appointed as their guardian. When the familial discord threatened to undermine the Lees’ social and political position in colonial Virginia, Francis Lee set aside his differences with his oldest brother and focused on restoring the family’s rank in the colony. Although Lee’s relationship with his oldest brother remained strained, he developed a close bond with his other siblings, brothers Thomas Ludwell Lee, Richard Henry Lee, William Lee, and Arthur Lee, and sisters Hannah Lee and Alice Lee. When Philip Lee finally gave Frank Lee the land he had inherited in far-off Loudoun County, he eagerly took up residence there and was soon called to public service.

In July 1758, after Lee had established his residency in Loudoun County, he won election to the House of Burgesses. Lee joined his brothers Thomas Lee and Richard Henry Lee and his cousins Richard “Squire” Lee and Henry Lee to create a powerful voting bloc in the House. Lee himself, however, initiated little or no legislation other than items that specifically concerned his constituents—for example, he helped draft a bill that allowed Loudoun County residents to pay their taxes in money or commodities. He served, along with his brothers, on the Committee of Propositions and Grievances, and in 1766 was appointed to the Committee of Privileges and Elections. The most significant political development during Lee’s service as Loudoun County representative was the Stamp Act crisis of 1765 and 1766, during which he maintained an inconspicuous role other than to join the Westmoreland Association, formed to protest the act, and sign the Westmoreland Resolves, which outlined the association’s major arguments against the Stamp Act. Lee continued to represent Loudoun County until 1768.

8897393_orig.pngIn 1769, Lee married Rebecca Tayloe, the sixteen-year-old daughter of John Tayloe, of Mount Airy. Frank was in his thirties at the time. Rebecca Tayloe was one of the eight daughters of John Tayloe II. In providing his blessing, Rebecca’s father made a wedding gift to the couple of a plantation of 1,000 acres. Frank and Rebecca moved to Richmond County. He soon began overseeing the construction of a new residence, Menokin. That same year, residents of Richmond County elected him to the Virginia House of Burgesses; once again, he maintained an inactive role and attended sessions sporadically. He also served the county as a justice of the peace from 1770 until the collapse of Virginia’s colonial government in 1774, and, for a brief time in 1771, was justice of the peace for both Richmond and Loudoun counties.

The union with Rebecca was a marriage of love, and the letters they exchanged while Frank served in the House of Burgesses in Williamsburg reveal how much the separation cost them. He served reluctantly at first, preferring to spend time with his new wife and the building of their home, a Georgian mansion, Menokin. But as the Revolution neared, Frank cast his lot with the Virginia patriots.

francis-lee-sig.pngHe became a close associate of Thomas Jefferson and Patrick Henry, though he preferred library discussions and back-room strategy to the limelight of public debate. Frank’s contributions to the formation of the American Republic, though subtle and often overlooked, were nonetheless critical. His staid countenance offered stability to the sometimes fractious debate among the delegates and, importantly, he modulated the fiery and sometimes divisive speech of his brother, Richard Henry. “He was,” as his youngest brother Arthur attested, “calmness and philosophy itself.”

Lee left Virginia for Philadelphia in 1775, after accepting an appointment to serve in the Second Continental Congress. There, he and Rebecca Tayloe Lee lived for a brief time with his sister Alice Lee Shippen and her husband, Dr. William Shippen, before leasing a house. As a member of Congress, Lee continued to watch with increasing concern the activities of Virginia’s Royal Governor, John Murray, Earl of Dunmore. When Lord Dunmore placed the colony under martial law and offered slaves and indentured servants their freedom in exchange for service to King George III,  Lee moved more decisively in favor of declaring independence from Britain. As his first term in Congress came to a close, delegates to theVirginia Convention appointed Lee to a second one-year term in Congress, which he accepted in June 1776.

Frank Lee was a noted radical, on the side of Patrick Henry in opposing the Stamp Act. He Joined the group who called for a general congress and a Virginia Convention in 1774. He attended that convention and that year was sent to the First Continental Congress. He represented his state there until 1779, working on numerous committees.

Francis remained a member of Congress until 1779. He was also a member of the Virginia committee that framed the Articles of Confederation. He retired from the Congress in the spring of 1779 and returned to his home and enjoy his family. However, his fellow citizens again elected him to public office, this time to the Virginia Senate. When he retired for good, he spent his time in agricultural pursuits. He died of pleurisy at age 63. His wife also died of pleurisy within a week of Francis’s death. lee-grave-marker.jpg

Resources:

Cause of Liberty Blogspot 

Encyclopedia Virginia 

Find a Grave

Geni.com

Stratford Hall

U. S. History

Wikipedia 

Posted in American History, British history, Georgian England, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , | 3 Comments

Cattails, Great Reedmace, Bulrush – What are the Differences? + the Upcoming Release of “Lady Christiana and the Colonel,” Arriving 18 November 2026

In the story, Darcy’s men find a body floating in a lake on Pemberley estate. The men must determine WHO the man is? What happened to him? When it happened? Where? How? and Why? When I was writing the scene, my first thought was there were cattails in the water, but was I in error or not? Let us find out.

It turns out I was correct, but still wrong. Yes, one would commonly find cattails in a lake or pond in Derbyshire, England. However, in the UK, they are not referred to as cattails; instead, they are generally known as reedmace or bulrush.

You can find the common reedmace (Typha latifolia) growing in the shallow, muddy edges of still waters, including reservoirs, lakes, and nature reserves throughout the county.




Both cattails and bulrushes are marsh-dwelling wetland plants, but they belong to entirely different botanical families. The easiest way to tell them apart is by looking at their flower heads: cattails feature a distinct, dense “hot dog” shaped cylinder, while bulrushes have spiky, star-shaped or globe-like clusters.
A side-by-side comparison highlights the key differences:


1. Flower Heads
Cattail (Typha): Distinct, fuzzy, cylindrical brown flower spikes that resemble a hot dog on a stick. In the fall, they explode into fluffy, cotton-like seeds.
Bulrush (Scirpus): Produces small, spiky, star-shaped or round clusters of florets. They do not form thick, brown sausages.


2. Leaves & Stems
Cattail: Flat, wide, and elongated leaves that grow primarily from the base of the plant.
Bulrush: The leaves can look much more grass-like, and some bulrush species have triangular or rounded stems rather than flat, sword-like leaves.


3. Height & Location
Cattail: Can grow up to 8–10 feet tall and typically thrives in very shallow, muddy waters along the edges of ponds and marshes.
Bulrush: Varies widely in height (often 3 to 6 feet) and tends to tolerate growing in slightly deeper water than cattails.


4. Naming Confusion
Regional Naming: The confusion is often geographical. In North America, the brown “hot dog” plant is called a cattail, while in the UK and Australia, people colloquially refer to the exact same plant (the cattail) as a bulrush.

If you are looking to spot them in person, you can easily find dense stands of them at local spots such as:

Kirk Hallam Lake & Meadows in Ilkeston (about 6 miles northeast of Derby)

Carr Vale Nature Reserve near Chesterfield

Tansley Pond near Matlock

Shallow edges of larger bodies of water like Carsington Water

These plants thrive in shallow water and serve as excellent habitats for local wildlife and wetland birds.

Posted in book release, books, eBooks, Georgian England, Georgian Era, hero, heroines, historical fiction, Jane Austen, Living in the Regency, Pride and Prejudice, publishing, real life tales, Regency era, Regency romance, research, science, suspense, word choices, writing | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Chemicals Used for Fertilizers in the Regency + the Upcoming Release of “Lady Christiana and the Colonel,” Arriving 18 November 2026

On Monday, we had a brief discussion on the use of the four-crop rotation in England, a movement that changed England forever and brought it greater success around the world.

During the Regency era (roughly 1811–1820), “chemical” or artificial fertilizers had not yet been invented. Instead, farmers relied on naturally occurring minerals and organic materials. To enrich their fields, farmers applied exact raw materials like wood ash (for potassium), marl/ground limestone (for calcium), gypsum (for sulfur), and night soil or guano (for nitrogen).

If you would like to know more about the History of Fertilizers, I would recommend this information from Argus.

There is also a Historical Overview of Fertilizer Use.

Rock Ledge Gardens gives us “From Organic to Synthetic and Back Again: The History of Fertilizer Use.“

Because synthetic, nitrogen-based fertilizers were not created until the early 20th century, the chemical soil amendments of the Regency period were primarily basic salts and organic matter. They used …

Wood Ash: Rich in soluble potash (potassium carbonate), used by farmers to improve soil alkalinity and provide essential potassium for crops.

Gypsum (Calcium Sulfate): Popularized in the late 18th century, this provided critical sulfur to the soil and helped improve soil structure for legumes and grasses.

Marl: A mixture of clays and calcium carbonate, widely used to neutralize acidic soils and provide a slow-release source of calcium.

Saltpeter (Potassium Nitrate): Used experimentally by wealthy agricultural reformers who were beginning to study agricultural chemistry, though it was generally too expensive for widespread use.

Organic Composts: The bulk of “fertilization” relied on farmyard manure (livestock dung and urine), crushed animal bones, dried fish, and seaweed in coastal areas to replenish nitrogen and phosphorus.

Posted in book release, British history, commerce, customs and tradiitons, Georgian Era, Great Britain, hero, heroines, historical fiction, Industrial Revolution, Jane Austen, Living in the Regency, Pride and Prejudice, reading, Regency era, Regency romance, research, science, writing | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Four-Crop Rotation System, a Major Step Forward for the Regency Era + the Upcoming Release of “Lady Christiana and the Colonel,” Arriving 18 November 2026

One of the major plot points in “Lady Christiana and the Colonel” is Mr. Darcy’s use of a Four-Crop Rotation of his fields. I have used this point in previous Austen variations, having Darcy learning the system from his Scottish cousins. In this book, Lord Whitmorris has a government contract to send food, etc., to the British forces on the Continent, who are fighting Napoleon’s armies, but all involved, including the British Prime Minister, Lord Liverpool, learn Whitmorris is a double agent and is assisting the French more than the British. This all comes to a “different” climax than what I assume many will expect.

During the Regency era (1811–1820), the Norfolk four-course system was the most vital agricultural innovation in Britain. It completely replaced the inefficient medieval three-field system by eliminating the need to leave land fallow. Instead, farmers continuously rotated four specific crops on a four-year cycle to naturally restore soil nutrients and maximize land utility.

Nowadays, it is common practice to use this type of rotation. I live in a rural county of North Carolina, row crop farmers predominantly utilize a Corn → Wheat → Soybean sequence. The most common approach is a 3-crop, 2-year cycle where soft red winter wheat is planted in the fall and harvested in early summer, immediately followed by “double-cropped” soybeans. There are some who use a Corn-Soybean Rotation: The classic two-year cycle. Rotating soybeans after corn dramatically helps manage pests (like the soybean cyst nematode) and breaks up disease cycles. Those in the northern part of the state who plant tobacco, generally, rotated with non-host crops like corn, cotton, or small grains to suppress black shank and root-knot nematodes.

The strict, scientifically designed sequence of crops for those grown during the Regency included:

Year 1: Wheat. This was the primary cash crop, sold at market to make bread.

Year 2: Turnips. A crucial fodder crop. Turnips were planted in rows and hoed, which helped clear the land of weeds. They were used to feed and fatten livestock during the winter months.

Year 3: Barley. Another profitable cash crop, which was largely sold to breweries to make ale.

Year 4: Clover or Ryegrass. These were usually planted alongside the barley in Year 3 and left to grow through Year 4. They were used to graze livestock or cut for hay. Crucially, legumes like clover fix nitrogen into the earth, which heavily fertilized the soil for the wheat in Year 1.

This system was a core pillar of the British Agricultural Revolution. It benefited Regency society in multiple ways:

Year-Round Livestock: By harvesting turnips and clover, farmers could feed their sheep and cattle through the winter. This meant farmers no longer had to slaughter their herds in the autumn just to save on feed.

Abundant Manure: Because animals were well-fed all year, farmers produced massive amounts of high-quality fertilizer, which drastically increased subsequent crop yields.

  • Economic Boom: The surplus of grains and fodder provided a reliable income for large landowners and helped sustain Britain’s rapidly growing population and industrial expansion.
Posted in book release, books, British history, commerce, finance, food, Georgian England, Georgian Era, Great Britain, historical fiction, history, Industrial Revolution, Jane Austen, Living in the Regency, Pride and Prejudice, publishing, reading, real life tales, Regency romance, writing | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Traitor Tuesday ~ Celebrating 250 Years of the United States as a Separate Nation: Francis Hopkinson, Designer of the U. S. Flag and Signer of the Declaration of Independence

 
20040426008x250
Song of America 

Francis Hopkinson was born to an elite, well-off family. He graduated in the first class of the College of Philadelphia (which later became the University of Pennsylvania) in 1757.Soon after earning his A.B. in 1757, Hopkinson published a number of verses criticizing the work of John Beveridge, a former professor, titled, “Errata or the Art of Printing Incorrectly,” and “The Grammarians: or Scoto and the Doctor, a new Ballad.” Later, he apprenticed under Benjamin Chew, who later was Chief Justice of Pennsylvania. Hopkinson set up his own practice in 1761. Hopkinson then spent two years studying under his mother’s relative, the Bishop of Worcester, in London, before returning to the colonies with a lucrative royal appointment as the collector of customs for Salem, New Jersey, in 1763. He added New Castle, Delaware, to his responsibilities in 1772. In 1774, Hopkinson’s revolutionary sentiments caused him to resign his post and return to private legal practice in Bordentown, New Jersey. A talented musician, Hopkinson composed many pieces over his lifetime, including “My Days Have Been So Wondrous Free” (1759)—the earliest surviving non-religious song composed in the American colonies.In 1774, he was appointed to the governor’s council in New Jersey. However, Hopkinson would soon join those who supported American independence. As the American Revolution raged, Hopkinson returned to serve in the colony of his birth in 1777, first on the Navy Board at Philadelphia, then as treasurer of the Continental Loan Office in 1778 and finally with a seat on the Admiralty court in Pennsylvania in 1779. He joined Pennsylvania’s ratification convention in 1787, and served on the bench of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania from 1789 until his death.


20040203005x200

Hopkinson represented New Jersey at the Continental Congress in 1776, and was one of the 56 men who signed the Declaration of Independence. During the Revolutionary War, he served on the Navy Board at Philadelphia, as treasurer of the Continental Loan Office and as a judge for the Admiralty Court of Pennsylvania. Hopkinson also demonstrated his support for independence with songs like “The Battle of the Kegs,” a popular Revolutionary War ballad that mocked the panicked British reaction when powder-filled barrels floated by their ships on the Delaware River, and “A Pretty Story,” which is a skeptical examination of the relationship between Great Britain and the coloniesAfter the fight for independence had been won, a Constitutional Convention was held in 1787 in order to create a stronger governing document for the new country. Some opposed a more powerful central government, but Hopkinson actively supported the new Constitution and argued in favor of the its ratification. He also wrote “The New Roof,” an allegory that detailed why a new government (roof) was needed to protect its citizens. In the end, the new Constitution was adopted.

hopkinsonThough evidence shows that Hopkinson worked on the design of the U.S. flag, Congress turned down his request for “a quarter cask of the public wine” as payment for its creation. There is no definitive answer about who was responsible for the placement and style of the flag’s stars, but Hopkinson’s other design work, which includes contributing to the design of the Great Seal of the United States, lends credence to his bid for credit.

In 1789, George Washington nominated Hopkinson as a U.S. district judge for eastern Pennsylvania—a position that Hopkinson would hold until his death on May 9, 1791, at the age of 53. He died very suddenly of a massive epileptic seizure. He left behind a widow and five children.

Hopkinson’s lifetime output included inventions, musical compositions and writing that ranged from satire to serious essays. Most importantly, having signed the Declaration of Independence, worked on the U.S. flag and supported ratification of the Constitution, his contributions to the United States live on to this day.

hopgr4

francis_hopkinson_plate-philadelphia5524

According to Signing Their Lives Away (Denise Kiernan and Joseph D’Agnest, 2009, Quirk Books, pp. 89-91), “No sketches of Hopkinson’s flag design exist, but we do have the original description, which called for thirteen red and white alternating stripes and thirteen white stars on a field of blue. In Hopkinson’s original design, the stars were six-pointed and arranged in row.

“The staggered arrangement of stars proved to be somewhat controversial. Look closely at the stars, and you’ll see that they easily form crosses and diagonals. To the eyes of early Americans, this was comfortably similar to the design of Great Britain’s flag. 

imgres   kings_colors.gif

“So the stars on Hopkinson’s flag were configured into a circle, which banished the similarity to the British flag and also suggested that no one colony or state was greater than an of the others. Of course, this version looks remarkably similar to the one supposedly sewn by Betsy Ross.” 

the-united-states-corporate-flag-revisited-L-_7NH81.jpeg
Resources: 
Biography 
On This Day 
University of Pennsylvania Archives and Record Center
U.S. Flag
U. S. History 

Posted in American History, British history, Declaration of Independence | Tagged , , , , , , | 10 Comments