Barouche, Gig, Curricle, Phaeton? Regency Coaches, and Celebrating the Release of “Lyon on the Inside” from Dragonblade Publishers, Arriving 17 June 2026

Readers are always asking me questions regarding which is which when it comes to Regency era coaches. Today, I am offering a short primer.

Barouche, Gig, Curricle, and Phaeton are types of 18th & 19th-century horse-drawn carriages, differing in wheels (two vs. four), number of horses, and design, with Barouche a large four-seater open carriage with a folding hood, Curricle a light, two-wheeled vehicle for two horses, Gig a lighter, often single-horse two-wheeled carriage, and Phaeton a sporty, open four-wheeled carriage for owner-drivers, known for its high perch and instability. 

Barouche

  • Wheels: Four.
  • Design: A large, open carriage with seats for four, a separate driver’s seat, and a folding hood, but only covering the rear passengers, leaving the front open.
  • Key Feature: A large, elegant carriage for social outings, often pulled by four horses. 

Curricle

Wikipedia
  • Wheels: Two.
  • Design: A light, open carriage for two, notable for being pulled by a pair of perfectly matched horses.
  • Key Feature: A fashionable but potentially dangerous vehicle, popular with young gentlemen. 

Gig

Wikipedia
  • Wheels: Two.
  • Design: A small, light vehicle, often for one or two people, used by doctors and others for practical travel.
  • Key Feature: Simpler and cheaper than a curricle, sometimes built to resemble one but usually pulled by a single horse. 

Phaeton

Public Domain ~ Print, one of a series of nine showing early 19th century carriages, published by R Ackermann, 101 Strand, London.
  • Wheels: Four, with smaller front wheels.
  • Design: An open, lightweight carriage for the owner-driver, with a high seat and often no side protection.
  • Key Feature: Sporty, fast, and sometimes unstable, named after the mythical Phaethon; came in high-perch (risky) and lower (safer) styles. 

An Aside: Here in the Charlotte, NC area, we have a local weather man [FOX network] whose name is Ted Phaeton. I imagine I am one of the few who spell his last name correctly, and do not get me going on Southern pronunciations of his name!

Posted in aristocracy, book release, books, British history, Dragonblade Publishers, eBooks, fashion, Georgian England, Georgian Era, hero, heroines, historical fiction, history, Living in the Regency, publishing, Regency era, Regency romance, research, travel, writing | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

“Bonus” Traitor Thursday ~ Celebrating 250 Years of the United States as a Separate Nation: Benjamin Harrison, Congressional “Falstaff” and Signer of the Declaration of Independence

800px-Berkeley_plantation_harrison_home

Public Domain – via Wikipedia Berkeley Plantation, home of the Harrison family (two Presidents), initial construction of Georgian mansion in 1726. In Charles City County, Virginia.

Benjamin Harrison was 50 years of age when he signed the Declaration of Independence. He was a plantation owner and father of seven children from Virginia. He died at age 65 in 1791.

Born on 5 April 1726, Benjamin Harrison V lived the life guaranteed him by his wealthy parents. He was the eldest son of Benjamin Harrison IV and Ann Carter and took over the family’s extensive holdings at the age of 19, when his father and two sisters were killed in a lightning storm. Berkeley Plantation is located west of Williamsburg, Virginia, upon the James River. Although young, Harrison V built the family fortune, eventually claiming eight plantations and an extensive shipping business. “Benjamin’s great-great-grandfather, Benjamin Harrison I, first stepped on American soil on March 15, 1633. He emigrated from the Isle of Wight in England, became a tobacco planter, and was the first clerk of the Royal Council. Benjamin’s mother, Ann Carter, was the daughter of Robert “King” Carter whose family like the Harrisons was a force in Virginia and American politics. He served for many years as treasurer of the Colony and member of the King’s Council. The “King” was a wealthy and influential member of the Virginia aristocracy and owned over 300,000 acres and a thousand slaves. Ann’s great-grandfather, William Carter, a resident of Casstown, Hereford County and the Middle Temple in England, came to Virginia about 1649 and built the ancestral home Corotoman in Lancaster County, Virginia.” (The Society of the Descendants of the Signers of the Declaration of Independence)

He was a classmate of Patrick Henry and of Thomas Jefferson at William and Mary College. He married his second cousin Elizabeth Bassett, the niece of Martha Washington. “Eight of the Harrisons’ children survived to adulthood. Their most famous son was William Henry Harrison, the American general in the victory over the Indians at Tippecanoe, and who was elected President of the United States in 1840. [He died after only one month in office.] Their great-grandson, Benjamin Harrison, a Civil War general, was also elected President, in 1888. Politics was a way of life for the Harrisons. As early as the 1640s, the First Family of Virginia had a reputation of arguing with British authorities over individual rights. One Harrison was imprisoned for six years for complaining about tyranny and treason.”(The Society of the Descendants of the Signers of the Declaration of Independence)

At age 21, Harrison began his political career as a representative in the Virginia House of Burgesses. He spent a quarter of a century in the Burgesses, often leading the group as Speaker. He was most outspoken against the Stamp Act and assisted in penning Virginia’s protest. Even so, he opposed Patrick Henry’s civil disobedience stance. He supported taxes for the importation of slaves. Eventually, he was elected to the First Continental Congress. He helped to write the Articles of Association. He was said to have roomed with George Washington and Peyton Randolph during those early of days of the revolution. Benjamin was grandson of “King” Carter, and therefore, cousin to Thomas Nelson and Carter Braxton, who also signed the Declaration of Independence. He often served as Chairman of the Whole. 

 Benjamin Harrison was highly regarded in Congress, and was frequently appointed Chairman of the Whole from March 1776 to August, 1777. He remained in Congress until 1778, when he became speaker in the Virginia legislature. He was a vocal advocate for the Bill of Rights being in place before the ratification of the U. S. Constitution.

“Benjamin Rush noted that Harrison “had strong state prejudices and was hostile to the leading men from the New England states.” But Harrison appreciated the evenhandedness of the new President, John Hancock, complimenting him as “noble, disinterested and generous to a very great degree.” On the important date of June 7, 1776 Benjamin Harrison was chosen to introduce fellow Virginian Richard Henry Lee whose resolution called for independence from England. He was selected to read Jefferson’s draft of the Declaration of Independence to the assembled delegates on July 1, and served as Chairman of the Whole during the debate over independence on July 2.” (The Society of the Descendants of the Signers of the Declaration of Independence)

Harrison was well known for his sense of humor, and many tales are remarked upon. From Denise Kiernan and Joseph D’Agnest in Signing Their Lives Away, we learn “Once the story goes, when the members needed to select a new president of Congress, some liked Hancock for the job, but Hancock pooh-poohed the notion. Six-foot-four Harrison crossed the room in a bound, physically lifted the smaller Hancock, and plopped him down in the President’s chair. ‘We shall show Mother Britain how little we care for her,” Harrison reportedly said, ‘by making a Massachusetts man our president, who she has excluded from pardon by public proclamation.’ (At this point in history, Hancock and Samuel Adams were reportedly wanted for treason by the Crown.)”

“On August 2, while preparing to sign the Declaration of Independence, Harrison famously quipped to Elbridge Gerry who had taken his place at the table to sign: ‘I shall have a great advantage over you, Mr. Gerry, when we are all hung for what we are now doing. From the size and weight of my body I shall die in a few minutes and be with the Angels, but from the lightness of your body you will dance in the air an hour or two before you are dead.'” (The Society of the Descendants of the Signers of the Declaration of Independence) [Note that Gerry was not in Philadelphia On August 2, 1776, when this supposedly took place, but it is a wonderful story, nonetheless.]

In Congress Harrison solicited financial and other assistance from other countries as a member of the Secret Correspondence Committee. He also worked closely with General Washington as part of the Marine and War and Ordinances Committees in planning the American army. During the war he also took care of matters at home by serving as a lieutenant in the county militia, and took the job of chief magistrate as well.

After the war, Harrison remained active in Virginia politics. Soon after his 65th birthday he suffered from a severe case of gout, and on April 24, the disease took his life. He is buried at his beloved Berkeley Plantation. Because of Harrison’s 240-pound, six foot four stature, he was often referred to as the “Falstaff of Congress.” 

_________________________

BenjaminHarrison.1968.28.1-VHS-220x300“The miniature at left is the only surviving life portrait of Harrison. It was apparently survived only because one of Harrison’s family carried it it with them when they fled their house at Berkeley Plantation just before the traitor Benedict Arnold and his men landed their boats at next door Westover in January, 1781.

Redcoats-at-Berkeley2“The Redcoats proceeded to pillage from Berkeley to Richmond.  While at Berkeley, Arnold’s men built a bonfire of all the Harrison family portraits and took rifle practice using his cows. They were repaid on October 19th, when the British Army surrendered at nearby Yorktown, effectively ending the Revolutionary War.” (The Society of the Descendants of the Signers of the Declaration of Independence)
Posted in American History, British history, Declaration of Independence, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , | 5 Comments

Sith, Trows, and Other Enchanted Folks from Scotland + the Upcoming Release of “Lyon on the Inside” from Dragonblade Publishing, Arriving 17 June 2026

In this last book of my Lyon’s Den series, both the hero and the heroine are from Scotland. 27% of my DNA is directly from Central Scotland. My 9th Great-Grandfather on my father’s side was the 7th Chieftain of the Clan MacThomas. John Mccomie (Iain Mòr), my 9x great-grandfather, has passed into the folklore of Perthshire. 40% of my DNA claims Celtic/Gaelic roots. According to the tale of the Mccomies, my 9th great-grandfather objected to the taxes the Earl of Atholl had placed on them. One must remember that the Mormaer or Earl of Atholl was the title of the holder of a medieval comital lordship straddling the highland province of Atholl (Ath Fodhla), now in northern Perthshire. Atholl is a special Mormaerdom, because a King of Atholl is reported from the Pictish period. ANYWAY, the Earl of Atholl thought to be done away with my great-grandfather by employing a champion swordsman from Italy. One problem existed; Mccomie slew the swordsman instead.

Let us have a look at some of the superstitions. These come from Spooky Scotland.

Baobhan Sìth: A particularly evil and dangerous female vampire from the highlands of Scotland who preyed on unwary male travellers in the glens and mountains. [I used the Baobhan Sìth in my vampiric Pride and Prejudice tale.]

Bodachan Sabhail (Little Old Man of the Barn): A brownie who would come to the aid of aging farmers and thresh their grain for them.

Brown Man of the Muirs: A dwarf from the Scottish borders who serves as a guardian spirit over the wild animals. He wore brown clothes and had a shock of frizzy red hair and wild looking eyes.

Cailleach Bheur: A blue-faced hag found in the Scottish Highlands or is known as the Carlin in eastern Scotland.  She is also known as Beira, Queen of the Winter. She is ill-tempered and dangerous and is seen with a crow on her left shoulder. Associated with winter, she was reborn at Samhain or Halloween and ruled over winter when she brought the winter snows. She carried a magical staff which froze the ground with every tap. She also guarded animals in winter. A wooden log was burned at Yule in her honour.

Cailleachan: The Cailleachan are the eight hag sisters of the Cailleach. They are giantesses and are powerful thunder, storm or sea hags.

Dhu Guisch/ Beast of the Charred Forest/ The Dragon of Dornoch: The Beast of the Charred Forests, or Dhu Guisch, is a fearsome, fire-breathing dragon from Sutherland, Scotland, said to have incinerated vast ancient woodlands. This terrifying monster could only be slain by someone who saw it before it saw them, a feat achieved by Saint Gilbert of Dornoch.

Domhnull Mor Bad an t-Sithean (Big Donald, King of the Faeries): Big Donald, King of the Fairies, resides in Glen More’s Loch Morlich area. He’s known for playing invisible bagpipes and once drove away lowlanders by pelting them with sticks and stones.

Fachan (Peg-Leg-Jack/ Direach): A giant/ cruel, malevolent faerie with improbable deformities. One hand emerges from his chest; one leg is attached to his haunch; one eye rests in his head, one tooth juts from his mouth and one tuft of rigidly inflexible hair grows from that head.

Gentle Annie/ Gentle Annie: The nature spirit and Hag controlling the southwesterly gales and winds in the Cromarty Firth. The Firth is guarded against the wind on the north and east by tall hills, but a gap allows sporadic and violent wind bursts to rush through, earning the fay a reputation for treachery. It is thought that this might be another manifestation of the Cailleach or Carlin.

Muc-sheilch: A kin to the famed Nessie yet unmistakably its own beast, the Muc-sheilch haunts the waters of Loch Maree in Wester Ross. Described as a loch-dwelling monster with a distinctive form, it was said to slip between neighbouring lochs.

Sìthichean (Faeries): Often called “the wee folk,” faeries or the sìthichean as they are called in Gaelic, are central to Scottish folklore and appear in many forms under many names. They are commonly divided into two courts: the Seelie, dangerous yet less malevolent, whose members are mischievous but often harmless; and the Unseelie, malicious beings known to harm humans for sport. There have been many human encounters with faeries, including kidnappings, faery tithes and the infamous faery rade.

Trow: A malignant or mischievous fairy or spirit in the folkloric traditions of the Orkney and Shetland Islands. They are generally inclined to be short of stature, ugly, and shy. Trows are nocturnal creatures and are similar to Scandinavian trolls. They venture out of their ‘trowie knowes’ (earthen mound dwellings) solely in the evening, and often enter households as the inhabitants sleep. Trows traditionally have a fondness for music. Thus, folktales tell of their habit of kidnapping musicians or luring them to their dens.

Posted in book release, books, British history, Dragonblade Publishers, England, Georgian England, Georgian Era, gothic and paranormal, hero, heroines, historical fiction, history, legends, legends and myths, Living in the Regency, medieval, paranormal, publishing, Regency era, research, romance, Scotland, spooky tales, tradtions, vampires, writing | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Traitor Tuesday ~ Celebrating 250 Years of the United States as a Separate Nation: Lewis Morris, Lord of Morrisania Manor and Signer of the Declaration of Independence

200xNxlewis-morris.jpg.pagespeed.ic.k4yStpLJLg

Lewis Morris Public domain image.

Lewis Morris was a 50 year old plantation owner from New York when he signed the Declaration of Independence. The father of 10 children, Morris died in 1798 at the age of 71.

Lewis Morris III was born on April 8, 1726, in Morrisania, New York, into a rich and privileged family. In 1762, upon the death of his father, Lewis inherited the family estate, Morrisania, which covered about 2000 acres, and resembled a small town, with farmers who rented land, blacksmiths, carpenters and others who worked the estate for wages. Lewis attended Yale College, but left without earning a degree. As the eldest son, he was expected to devote his time into running Morrisania. For many years, he would follow the typical pattern of a wealthy gentleman.

Following the footsteps of his grandfather, who had been Royal Governor of New Jersey, and his father, who had been a judge, Lewis decided to enter public service. He was elected to the New York Legislature in 1769.

In 1749, at age 23, he married Mary Beekman Walton. Together Lewis and Mary had ten children: Catherine, Mary, Lewis, Jacob, Sarah (who died as a child), William, Helena, James, Staats, and Richard.

“As a wealthy landowner, most people expected him to support Britain, but he surprised everyone by supporting the patriot cause. When New York selected its first delegates to the Continental Congress, Lewis Morris was not selected, because he did not support Great Britain. When electing delegates for the Second Continental Congress in May 1775, this time he was elected, since the majority of New Yorkers had changed their minds. During the critical vote for independence on July 2, 1776, Morris was back home in New York, but he attended the NY Convention in White Plains, NY, which approved the Declaration on July 9, and returned to Philadelphia to sign the document after its approval.” (Find a Grave)

So, why would a man who certainly did not suffer from the British actions in the Americas take such a stance? His discontent grew slowly, but steadily. For example, New York housed a large garrison of British troops, who were supposed to protect the American colonies, but the British decided to tax New York citizens to pay for this protection. The New York assembly refused these actions from the Crown, but the New York governor requisitioned the funds without consent. This action upset Morris, and he became quite vocal about the outcome. This was only the beginning of his change of mind. 

” To prevent an intercourse between the citizens and the fleet, so injurious to the patriotic cause, timely measures were adopted by the committee of safety; but for a long time no efforts were availing, and even after General Washington had established his headquarters at New York, he was obliged to issue his proclamation, interdicting all intercourse and correspondence with the ships of war and other vessels belonging to the king of Great Britain.

“But, notwithstanding this prevalent aversion to a separation from Great Britain, there were many in the colony who believed that a declaration of independence was not only a point of political expediency, but a matter of paramount duty. Of this latter class, Mr. Morris was one; and, in giving his vote for that declaration, he exhibited a patriotism and disinterestedness which few had it in their power to display. He was at this time in possession of an extensive domain, within a few miles of the city of New York. A British army had already landed from their ships, which lay within cannon shot of the dwelling of his family. A signature to the Declaration of Independence would insure the devastation of the former, and the destruction of the latter. But, upon the ruin of his individual property, he could look with comparative indifference, while he knew that his honor was untarnished, and the interests of his country were safe. He voted, therefore, for a separation from the mother country, in the spirit of a man of honor, and of enlarged benevolence.” (Colonial Hall)

In 1769, Lewis Morris was elected to the Colonial Assembly in New York. In 1774, he resigned his position as judge to focus on the oncoming war. Lewis was elected to the New York Provincial Congress. While he was a member of this Congress, they sent him to Continental Congress as a delegate for New York.

2767_1053997062“He served in the Continental Congress from 1775 to 1777, where he worked on the committees that supervised supplies of ammunition and military stores for the Army. During the war, the British burned and wrecked Morrisania. Lewis would spend many years after the war rebuilding his estate. Morris then served in the New York Legislature from 1777 to 1790. He was also a Major General of the New York State Militia during the Revolutionary War. In 1787, Lewis’s brother, Gouverneur Morris wrote much of the final draft of the US Constitution. Lewis attended the convention in Poughkeepsie, NY, to determine if New York would accept the Constitution. Thanks largely to Lewis Morris’s efforts, a narrow vote of 30 in favor to 27 opposed, was achieved, bringing New York into the union as the 11th state.” (Find a Grave)

From the start, Lewis Morris was an active advocate for independence in Congress. In 1776, he was among the 56 men who signed the Declaration of Independence. Lewis Morris’ most famous quote came from a conversation he had with his half-brother, Gouverneur Morris. Gouverneur, a politician and a signatory of the Articles of Confederation, warned him about what would happen if he signed the Declaration and advised him against it. Lewis’s reply was “Damn the consequences. Give me the pen.” With that, he fearlessly scratched his name on the document.

Morris’s three eldest sons followed their father’s example for service to their country. One served for a time as aid-de-camp to General Sullivan, but afterwards entered the family of General Greene, and was with that officer during his brilliant campaign in the Carolinas; the second son was appointed aid-de-camp to General Charles Lee, and was present at the gallant defense of Fort Moultrie, where he greatly distinguished himself. The youngest of these sons, though but a youth, entered the army as a lieutenant of artillery, and honorably served during the war.

2767_132838647249

gravesite for Lewis Morris St. Ann’s Episcopal Church http://www.findagrave.com/ cgi-bin/fg.cgi?page= pv&GRid=2767&PIpi=55231153

morrislewis

http://www.findagrave.com /cgi-bin/fg.cgi?page= pv&GRid=2767&PIpi= 55231153

One would find it a bit odd that Morris’s fabulous estate of the late 1700s is now the site of public housing projects and boarded-up buildings. Morrisania was located in what is now the South Bronx, a poverty-stricken neighborhood. The British army trashed the original as retribution for Morris’s stance during the Revolutionary War. An invasion of New York by the British during the war took the British troops right to Morris’s door. The house suffered extensive damage, stands of trees were burned, cattle were slaughtered, and tenants and slaves were run off. Benjamin Rush, another signer of the Declaration of Independence, said of the loss, “[Morris] suffered the loss of many thousand pounds by the depredations of the British arm, upon his property new New York without repining. Every attachment of his heart yielded to his love of his country.” 

In 1777, Lewis became a member of the New York Senate. He held this position until 1790. After this Lewis retired to his home and his family. Lewis Morris died on January 22, 1798. he was buried at Morrisania. The family vault can be found in what is known today as the Mott Haven neighborhood of the Bronx. This family vault is in the churchyard of what became St. Ann’s Church of Morrisania and is now known as St. Ann’s Episcopal Church. The manor house stands no more. 

Resources: 

Find a Grave: Lewis Morris 

Geni 

Colonial Hall

The Society of Descendants of Signers of the Declaration of Independence

Posted in American History, British history, Declaration of Independence, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | 2 Comments

Early Attempts at Plaster of Paris + the Upcoming Release of “Lyon on the Inside” from Dragonblade Publishing, Arriving 17 June 2026

In my romantic suspense series for Dragonblade Publishing, in several of the books, I mention individuals with broken limbs, as well as have my heroes attempt to make a mold of a prominent footprint found in book 5. Lord Benjamin Thompson from book 4, who initially trained as a surgeon, advises them to use resin, wax, and gypsum, but was that the going mixture.

Early attempts at using Plaster of Paris (gypsum-based) date back thousands of years, with evidence found in Egyptian pyramids and ancient construction, where it was valued for molding and fire resistance. In the 19th century, it was famously adopted for orthopedic casts, initially using “plâtre coulé” (heavy wooden boxes) in Europe, and later in bandages perfected by Antonius Mathijsen in 1852. 

Early Medical and Technical Uses

  • Early Orthopedic Casting (c. 1800s): Before 1852, practitioners used a technique where limbs were placed in wooden containers filled with plaster. This method, known as plâtre coulé, was heavy and limited patient mobility, prompting searches for better methods.
  • The Bandage Method (1852): Dutch surgeon Antonius Mathijsen revolutionized early adoption by using cotton bandages impregnated with dry, powdered plaster of Paris, which only needed to be moistened to set.
  • Archaeological Preservation (1860s): Giuseppe Fiorelli, at Pompeii, used plaster injected into cavities in volcanic ash to create casts of the bodies of victims.
  • Sculpture (18th/19th Century): Artists like John Flaxman (1755–1826) were pioneers in consistently using plaster for models and casts. 

Composition and Challenges

  • Material Origin: It was derived from gypsum mined in Montmartre, Paris.
  • Rapid Setting: Early mixtures set very rapidly. To manage this in artistic or repair work, mixtures sometimes included additives like glue.
  • Initial Failures: Before the standardization of, and success with, the plaster bandage, attempts to use starch, wax, or clay to immobilize limbs often failed. 

Early applications were, therefore, a transition from heavy, constructive molding to lighter, more versatile, and, in medicine, more functional cast-based immobilization. 

Posted in book release, books, Dragonblade Publishers, eBooks, Georgian England, Georgian Era, hero, heroines, historical fiction, history, inventions, Living in the Regency, medicine, mystery, publishing, Regency era, Regency romance, research, science, suspense, terminology, writing | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Scottish Marriages without the Benefit of Clergy + the Upcoming Release of “Lyon on the Inside” from Dragonblade Publishing, Arriving 17 June 2026

In book 3 of my Dragonblade romantic suspense series, Lord Navan Beaufort suggests, in order to save time, that he and Lady Annalise Dutton simply marry in Gretna Green, but her ladyship refuses because she wants no one, especially her brother, Alexander Dutton, Lord Marksman, to try to overturn the marriage vows. Therefore, the pair travel on to Lord Aaran Graham’s estate is is married in a Church of England service. Exactly, what was the difference if Scotland was part of the United Kingdom at the time?

During the Regency era (1811–1820), the Church of England did not operate as the established church in Scotland, where the Presbyterian Church of Scotland (the Kirk) held sway. Instead, Anglicanism was represented by the Scottish Episcopal Church and “Qualified Chapels” for English residents. By 1792, penal laws against Episcopalians were repealed, allowing for more open worship. 

  • Relationship with the Kirk: The Church of Scotland was the national, established church, often viewed as more thoroughly reformed than the Church of England.
  • The Scottish Episcopal Church: This was the indigenous, historic Episcopalian body. Following the 1745 Jacobite rising, it faced severe restrictions, but by the Regency, it had largely moved past its Jacobite-aligned “non-juror” status to recognize the House of Hanover.
  • Qualified Chapels: Before the 1792 repeal of penal laws, “Qualified Chapels” existed for those who followed the English Book of Common Prayer and prayed for the Hanoverians, serving English residents and non-Jacobite Scots.
  • Post-1792 Situation: After the 1792 repeal, the Scottish Episcopal Church and the independent Qualified Chapels began to merge or operate under the same episcopal oversight.
  • Influence: While the Church of England was not the state church in Scotland, it maintained a presence for the English aristocracy and military personnel stationed there, sometimes in communion with the local Scottish Episcopal leaders. 

Scottish marriages without clergy in the Regency era (approx. 1811–1820) were largely “irregular marriages,” valid under Scots law by mere mutual consent and public declaration before witnesses, often bypassing the strict Hardwicke Marriage Act of 1753 that governed England. Famous for “anvil weddings” at Gretna Green, these unions required no banns, parental consent, or ordained minister. 

Key Aspects of Scottish Irregular Marriages (1810s):

  • Legal Standing: Scots law recognized “declaration of consent” (consensual marriage) as perfectly legal, making them binding, though not performed in a church.
  • The “Anvil Priest”: While any witness made the marriage legal, self-appointed “priests” or blacksmiths, such as Robert Elliot or the smith at Gretna Green, grew famous for conducting these ceremonies, often symbolizing the union by hammering on an anvil.
  • Location: Due to its proximity to the English border, Gretna Green was the premier destination for runaway couples. Other locations included toll houses and coaching inns.
  • Requirements: No specific, elaborate, or religious ceremony was required, though a spoken vow and witnesses were necessary.
  • Significance: These marriages provided an escape from the 1753 Hardwicke Act, which mandated that English weddings take place before noon in a church, requiring parental consent for those under 21. 

Types of Irregular Marriages in Scotland:

  1. Declaration of Consent: Simply stating in front of witnesses that they were married.
  2. Promise and Subsequent Copula: A promise to marry followed by sexual intercourse.
  3. Habit and Repute: Living together as man and wife for a period, which implied a marriage had occurred. 

While often scandalous, these marriages were legally binding in Scotland during the Regency era. It is with this loophole in Scottish law that Lord Macdonald Duncan has Lord Aaran Graham declared as legitimate. Duncan brings witnesses before the court that swear they heard the elder Lord Graham declare that he and the then Miss Magdeline Bellton were husband and wife. Under Scottish law, the pair were married and the consummation of their vows, which produced a son for the earldom, was a legal marriage.

Posted in Act of Parliament, book release, books, British history, Church of England, customs and tradiitons, Dragonblade Publishers, eBooks, Georgian England, Georgian Era, hero, heroines, historical fiction, history, laws of the land, Living in the Regency, marriage, marriage customs, mystery, publishing, Regency era, Regency romance, religion, research, tradtions, writing | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Scottish Jig vs Highland Fling + the Upcoming Release of “Lyon on the Inside” from Dragonblade Publishing, Arriving 17 June 2026

The Scottish Fling is a vigorous, historic Highland dance characterized by intricate steps performed on one spot in a 4/4 time, often acting as a victory dance. In contrast, a Scottish Jig is a quick, lively dance in 6/8 time, often mimicking an agitated character with fast, playful footwork

Key Differences:

  • Dance Type: The Fling is a core Highland dance (high on toes, rigid torso), while the Jig is categorized as a “Character” or “Country” dance.
  • Tempo & Rhythm: Fling is in 4/4 time (moderate/fast), while the Jig is in 6/8 compound time (very fast, jig rhythm).
  • Movement: The Fling emphasizes high-toed endurance and precision in one spot. The Jig is more theatrical and fast-paced.
  • Origin/Style: The Highland Fling is a traditional Scottish dance, often solo. The Jig, though popular in Scotland, is often performed as a parody of an Irish dancer. 

Highland Fling

  • Style: Very traditional, performed in a kilt.
  • Origin: Likely a victory dance performed on a shield.
  • Action: Involves intricate steps, often including the “fling” (a kick) and a high degree of precision on one spot. 

Britannica tells us, “highland fling, national dance of Scotland. A vigorous dance requiring delicate balance and precision, it was probably originally a victory dance for a solo male dancer, performed after battle. It is performed in 4/4 time and consists of a series of intricate steps performed on one spot. Especially characteristic is a light step in which the dancer hops on one foot while moving the other foot in front of and in back of the calf. The dance is regularly performed in competition at the Highland Games held throughout Scotland.


Video of Great Highland Fling performance by competitors at Kenmore Highland Games in Perthshire, Scotland

Scottish Jig

  • Style: Lively, often humorous, and character-driven.
  • Origin: Common in both Scotland and Ireland; Scottish versions often include specific, often caricatured, arm movements.
  • Action: Rapid, lively footwork, sometimes part of a, or a, reel. 

Video of Irish Vs. Scottish Jig

Posted in Appalachia, book release, British history, customs and tradiitons, dancing, Dragonblade Publishers, eBooks, Georgian England, Georgian Era, Great Britain, hero, heroines, historical fiction, history, Living in the Regency, mystery, publishing, Regency era, Regency romance, research, Scotland, series, tradtions, writing | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Traitor Tuesday: Celebrating 250 Years of the United States as a Separate Nation: Thomas Jefferson, the Signer Who Wrote the Declaration of Independence

03_thomas_jefferson

Thomas Jefferson was a plantation owner, but also a lawyer and a scientist. He was only 33 years of age when he signed the Declaration of Independence. He was the father of 6 and lived to age 83, not leaving this world until 1826, which means he was alive during the next war with Britain, that of the War of 1812.

Thomas Jefferson, author of the American Declaration of Independence and the third U.S. president, was born on April 13, 1743, at the Shadwell plantation located just outside of Charlottesville, Virginia.

Jefferson was born into one of the most prominent families of Virginia’s planter elite. His mother, Jane Randolph Jefferson, was a member of the proud Randolph clan, a family claiming descent from English and Scottish royalty. His father, Peter Jefferson, was a successful farmer as well as a skilled surveyor and cartographer who produced the first accurate map of the Province of Virginia. The young Jefferson was the third born of ten siblings. His father died when Jefferson was in his teens. Thomas received an estate and slaves. 

He began his formal education at the age of nine, studying Latin and Greek at a local private school run by the Reverend William Douglas. In 1757, at the age of 14, he took up further study of the classical languages as well as literature and mathematics with the Reverend James Maury. 

In 1760, having learned all he could from Maury, Jefferson left home to attend the College of William and Mary in Williamsburg, Virginia’s capital. Although it was the second oldest college in America (after only Harvard), William and Mary was not at that time an especially rigorous academic institution. Jefferson was dismayed to discover that his classmates expended their energies betting on horse races, playing cards and courting women rather than studying. Nevertheless, the serious and precocious Jefferson fell in with a circle of older scholars that included Professor William Small, Lieutenant Governor Francis Fauquier and lawyer George Wythe, and it was from them that he received his true education.

SC809After three years at William and Mary, Jefferson decided to read law under Wythe, one of the preeminent lawyers of the American colonies. There were no law schools at this time; instead aspiring attorneys “read law” under the supervision of an established lawyer before being examined by the bar. Wythe guided Jefferson through an extraordinarily rigorous five-year course of study (more than double the typical duration); by the time Jefferson won admission to the Virginia bar in 1767, he was already one of the most learned lawyers in America. Jefferson said of Wythe, “No man ever left behind him a character more venerated than George Wythe.” 

In 1768, he began building Monticello. It was not completed until after he was president. Eventually, he also met and fell in love with Martha Wayles Skelton, a recent widow and one of the wealthiest women in Virginia. Needless to say, her dowry added to Jefferson’s already sizable fortune. The pair married on January 1, 1772. Thomas and Martha Jefferson had six children together, but only two survived into adulthood: Martha, their firstborn, and Mary, their fourth. Only Martha survived her father.

monticello_Jefferson was tall and thin, but athletic in build. He had red hair and was known to be shy. He was said to be no “public” speaker, but his ability to compose written works was exemplary. He was a diplomat and an architect. He invented the first swivel chair. Beside designing Monticello, he also designed his own tomb. He played the violin. He cultivated tomatoes in a time when others thought them to be poisonous. He also planted extensive vineyards when many thought the American soil would not tolerate the vines. He enjoyed the study of archaeology and developed a better lock and key system. Jefferson was a student of climates and was constantly making measurements and recording the data. He invented a portal writing desk (which he used to draft the Declaration of Independence).

washingtonjeffersonThomas Jefferson was one of the earliest and most fervent supporters of the cause of American independence from Great Britain. He was elected to the Virginia House of Burgesses in 1768 and joined its radical bloc, led by Patrick Henry and George Washington. In 1774, Jefferson penned his first major political work, “A Summary View of the Rights of British America,” which established his reputation as one of the most eloquent advocates of the American cause. A year later, in 1775, Jefferson attended the Second Continental Congress, which created the Continental Army and appointed Jefferson’s fellow Virginian, George Washington, as its commander-in-chief. However, the Congress’s most significant work fell to Jefferson himself.

In June 1776, the Congress appointed a five-man committee (Jefferson, John Adams, Benjamin Franklin, Roger Sherman and Robert Livingston) to draft a Declaration of Independence. The committee then chose Jefferson to author the declaration’s first draft, selecting him for what John Adams called his “happy talent for composition and singular felicity of expression.” In truth, Jefferson had fewer enemies in the Richard Henry Lee, who originally called for independence. Realizing the document would be read aloud to the masses, Jefferson was most attentive of the accented and unaccented syllables of the piece. In one of the surviving drafts of the document, one can view how he marked the cadence. He took his inspiration from the philosopher John Locke. Virginia’s Declaration of Rights, which was written by George Mason (another signer), also was a strong influence. 

Committees edited Jefferson’s work once the vote to pass it was taken. Some 86 changes later, John Hancock and secretary of Congress Charles Thomson signed. Some historians say that Jefferson escorted the document to the printer and proofread each draft as it came off the presses. 

Returning to Virginia, Jefferson served as its governor for two years. When the British invaded Virginia, Jefferson resigned and suggested a man with a strong military background take his place. General Thomas Nelson, Jr., succeeded him. Martha Jefferson died shortly after his resignation. In 1784, Jefferson was sent to France to replace Benjamin Franklin. He was not as gregarious as was Franklin, and although he was well respected for his intelligence, his social skills were lacking according to French standards of the time. 

When he returned to the United States, Washington made him the country’s first Secretary of State, which placed him in contention with his “archrival,” Secretary of the Treasury Alexander Hamilton. Jefferson purported the right of men to govern themselves – the ideals of republicanism – while Hamilton took a more federalist stance of a strong central government. The feud continued until Jefferson won the 1800 election on the Democratic-Republican ticket, while Jefferson’s vice-president Aaron Burr shot Hamilton in the gut. 

Jefferson lost the second election for the presidency by 3 electoral votes to John Adams, which made him Adams’s vice president. This connection brought a wedge of disagreement with his former friend. Their political views had diverged. When Jefferson became the country’s third president, Adams undermined Jefferson’s tenure by appointing many of his followers to high positions before he made his exit. Jefferson and Adams refused to speak to each other for over a decade. Jefferson served two terms as president and oversaw the Louisiana Purchase and the Lewis and Clark expedition, which greatly increased the size of the new country. 

After his presidency, although he was hurting for money, Jefferson returned to the social life required of his position. He helped to found the University of Virginia. He and Adams reconciled in their old age and wrote letters back and forth for many years. Jefferson died on 4 July 1826, just hours before John Adams also passed. 

Other than the children he sired with Martha, he is thought to have fathered at least one of Sally Hemings six children. Mayhap all six. Hemings was one of Jefferson’s slaves. Although his paternal obligations is debated, these are facts we do know. Jefferson argued for the emancipation of slaves in the Virginia’s House of Burgesses. He did not, however, free the majority of his own slaves. He did free two (both with the last name of Hemings). Three more departed Monticello with his “tacit” permission. (They were also named Hemings.) Five others were freed with the reading of his will…three of those five held the name of Hemings. He never freed Sally, but his daughter Martha released Sally after Jefferson’s death. 100+ slaves were sold at the estate sale following his death. 9dd732b768d0b86789f0eef43a8cb9cd

You might also enjoy these other posts that I have written about Thomas Jefferson: 

The Amazing Wisdom of Thomas Jefferson: The Man. The Myth.

The Mecklenburg Declaration of Independence, a Year Before Thomas Jefferson’s Document

The Inventions of Thomas Jefferson Found in “Mr. Darcy and the Designing Woman”

Resources:

Biography.com 

History.com 

Library of Congress

PBS

Society of the Descendants of the Signers of the Declaration of Independence 

Thomas Jefferson’s Monticello 

Posted in American History, architecture, British history, buildings and structures, Declaration of Independence, Georgian England, Georgian Era, Great Britain, political stance | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | 7 Comments

Scottish Words for Kicking Someone’s Behind + the Upcoming Release of “Lyon on the Inside” from Dragonblade Publishing, Arriving 17 June 2026

I know some of you will think this odd, but as I was writing “Lyon on the Inside” I needed a Scottish term appropriate for the Regency era for what we might nowadays say “kick someone’s ass.” You see, Dragonblade, like other publishers are sensitive to certain words. For example, you will, generally, see me use “arse” instead of a**. Therefore, I got the bright idea that as two Scottish lords [Duncan and Graham] thought that another Scottish lord [Cunningham] required a good thumping that I should seek out an appropriate Scottish phrase. Unfortunately, or fortunately, depending upon how one looks upon it, this is what I discovered.

Yes, all these words could be used in Scotland for an actual “butt kicking” experience. These are specifically often Glaswegian, terms for a physical beating, fight, or severe thrashing. Now, whether they are period appropriate or not, I cannot say with any assurance, but I did find them amusing. I hope you will also. Please note that my first instinct was to use “a doing” or “a gubbing”.

  • A Skelping: A smack, slap, or spanking, often used in the context of chastisement (e.g., “Ah’ll skelp yer bahookie”).
  • A Doing: A beating or being heavily defeated in a fight.
  • A Gubbing: To be severely beaten or defeated.
  • A Tanning: To thrash or soundly beat someone.
  • A Leathering: A severe beating or hiding. 

Additional common Scottish equivalents for a beating include a laldy (or “getting a laldy”), a malky, a hiding, or a belting

I was not thinking of using a tawse. For those of you who do not know, the tawse, sometimes formerly spelled taws (the plural of Scots taw, a thong or a whip) is an implement for corporal punishment applied either to the buttocks or the palm of the hand. The tawse is a leather strap that has one end split into one or more prongs. A spanking administered with a tawse is technically known as tawsing, although the terms strapping and belting may be used to describe it. [Unrelated to this meaning, Tawse is also a genealogical branch of the Scottish Clan Farquharson through Clan Mackintosh [as is Craig Ferguson’s character in the Pixar film “Brave.”] The Farquharson clan is also associated with my own MacThomas clan.

The tawse is associated with Scotland, particularly in educational discipline, but it was also used in schools in a few English cities, e.g., Newcastle upon Tyne, Gateshead, Liverpool, Manchester and Walsall. In this British educational context, the official name “tawse” was hardly ever used in conversation by either teachers or pupils, who instead referred to it as either the school strap or the belt.

Posted in book release, British history, Dragonblade Publishers, Georgian England, Georgian Era, hero, heroines, historical fiction, history, lexicon, Living in the Regency, publishing, Regency era, Regency romance, research, Scotland, series, suspense, word origins, word play, writing | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 4 Comments

Purchasing Commissions During the Napoleonic Wars

We often read of a young gentleman purchasing a commission in either the militia or the regulars during the Regency era, but did conditions exist when a commission could not be secured? The answer is “Yes,” but there were rules and exceptions.

Not all regiments were open to purchase of rank!

According to the “History” section of the British Army website, “The Royal Military Academy Sandhurst (RMAS) was formed in 1947. It was descended from two older institutions, the Royal Military Academy (RMA) and the Royal Military College (RMC).

“The RMA had been founded in 1741 at Woolwich to train gentlemen cadets for the Royal Artillery and Royal Engineers, and later for the Royal Corps of Signals and some for the Royal Tank Corps. It remained there until it was closed on mobilisation in 1939.

“The RMC began in 1800 as a school for staff officers which later became the Staff College, Camberley. A Junior Department was formed in 1802, to train gentlemen cadets as officers of the Line. A new college was built at Sandhurst, into which the cadets moved in 1812. After 1860, the RMC succeeded the East India Company’s Military Seminary as the establishment where most officers of the Indian Army were trained. Following the abolition of the purchase system in 1870, attendance at Sandhurst became the usual route to a commission. The college was enlarged in 1912, when New College was built.”

The purchasing of an officer commission in the British Army was a common practice throughout British history. Originally, the commission served as a cash bond guaranteeing the man’s good behavior, and it was forfeited if he acted with cowardice, gross misbehavior, or deserted his position. The practice began as early as the reign of Charles II and continued until it was officially abolished on 1 November 1871 by the Cardwell Reforms. 

Commissions in cavalry and infantry regiments were the only ones available, and officer ranks could only be purchased up to the rank of colonel. Those who graduated from a course at the Royal Military Academy at Woolrich were presented commissions in the Royal Engineers and the Royal Artillery. These men were subsequently promoted by seniority. This was a means for those of the middle class or the trade class to enter the “gentlemen ranks” as officers, but they were still shunned by many as being “not quite gentlemen” by those of the Army of the British East India Company and those of the aristocratic class who purchased their commissions. 

The British Royal Navy never entertained the idea of the sale of commissions. Officers of the Navy advanced by merit and/or seniority. Even so, nepotism was not dead among British officers. A young gentleman could advance quicker if he was fortunate enough to have an admiral or vice admiral in his family, assuming he passed the relevant exams/tests.

According to Wikipedia’s article on the Purchase of Commissions, “There were several key reasons behind the sale of commissions:

  • It preserved the social exclusivity of the officer class.
  • It served as a form of collateral against abuse of authority or gross negligence or incompetence. Disgraced officers could be cashiered by the crown (that is, stripped of their commission without reimbursement).
  • It ensured that the officer class was largely populated by persons having a vested interest in maintaining the status quo, thereby reducing the possibility of Army units taking part in a revolution or coup.
  • It ensured that officers had private means and were less likely to engage in looting or pillaging, or to cheat the soldiers under their command by engaging in profiteering using army supplies.
  • It provided honourably retired officers with an immediate source of capital.

The official values of commissions varied by regiment, usually in line with the differing levels of social prestige of different regiments. 

In 1837 for example, the costs of commissions were:

Rank Life Guards Cavalry Foot Guards Infantry Half pay difference
Cornet (or)

Ensign

£1,260 £840 £1,200 £450 £150
Lieutenant £1,785 £1,190 £2,050 £700 £365
Captain £3,500 £3,225 £4,800 £1,800 £511
Major £5,350 £4,575 £8,300 £3,200 £949
Lieutenant Colonel £7,250 £6,175 £9,000 £4,500 £1,314

PWAssaulton0theBreechatSanSebastian.jpgThese prices were not incremental. To purchase a promotion, an officer only had to pay the difference in price between his existing rank and the desired rank. [Goldsmith, Jeremy (May 2007), “A gentleman and an officer – Army commissions”, Family Tree Magazine, 23 (7), pp. 10–13.]

If an officer wished to sell out his commission, he could do so, but only for the official value of the commission. He had to offer it to the next highest ranking officer of his regiment. Unfortunately, some of the lower ranks could not afford the commission, for there were also other costs operating among the officers. These were known as the “over-regulation price” or the “regimental value.” Occasionally, the commissions were auctioned off, especially those in the “more fashionable” regiments. As many officers were second or third sons and would have little beyond their “pensions” to live upon once they exited service, they often drove up the price. It was not unknown for officers who incurred or inherited debts to sell their commission to raise funds.

Colonels of fashionable regiments were also known to refuse the sale of commission if the person purchasing it were not of the colonel’s social status or to his liking. “This was especially the case in the Household and Guards regiments, which were dominated by aristocrats. Elsewhere however, it was not unknown for Colonels to lend deserving senior non-commissioned officers or warrant officers the funds necessary to purchase commissions.

19th-LD-RS

20th Light Dragoons at the Battle of Vimeiro on 21st August 1808 in the Peninsular War

“Not all first commissions or promotions were paid for. If an officer was killed in action or was appointed to the Staff (usually through being promoted to Major General), this created a series of “non-purchase vacancies” within his regiment. (These could also arise when new regiments or battalions were created, or when the establishments of existing units were expanded.) However, all vacancies arising from officers dying of disease, retiring (whether on full or half pay) or resigning their commissions were “purchase vacancies”. A period, usually of several years, had to elapse before an officer who succeeded to a non-purchase vacancy could sell his commission e.g. if a Captain were promoted to Major to fill a non-purchase vacancy but decided to leave the Army immediately afterwards, he would receive only the value of his Captain’s commission.” [Purchase of Commissions in the British Army]

Regulations required minimum lengths of service for the various ranks. These restricted officers from selling or exchanging their commissions to avoid active service. This would be in the case of the militia. Exceptions were at the discretion of the Commander in Chief. In 1806, Mary Anne Clarke, the mistress of the Duke of York, the acting Commander in Chief at the time, brought scandal to the York’s door when she was accused of selling commissions to plump up her own purse.

“The worst potential effects of the system were mitigated during intensive conflicts such as the Napoleonic Wars by heavy casualties among senior ranks, which resulted in many non-purchase vacancies, and also discouraged wealthy dilettantes who were not keen on active service, thereby ensuring that many commissions were exchanged for their face value only. There was also the possibility of promotion to brevet army ranks for deserving officers. An officer might be a subaltern or Captain in his regiment, but might hold a higher local rank if attached to other units or allied armies, or might be given a higher Army rank by the Commander-in-Chief or the Monarch in recognition of meritorious service or a notable feat of bravery. Officers bearing dispatches giving news of a victory (such as Waterloo), often received such promotion, and might be specially selected by a General in the field for this purpose.” [Purchase of Commissions in the British Army]

Additional Resources:

Allen, Douglas. “Compatible Incentives and the Purchase of Military Commissions.” 

Goldsmith, Jeremy (May 2007), “A gentleman and an officer – Army commissions”, Family Tree Magazine, 23 (7), pp. 10–13.

Holmes, Richard. “The Soldier’s Trade in a Changing World,” BBC – History.

Military Officers in the Napoleonic Wars,” Reddit – Ask Historians 

“Purchase of Commissions in the British Army,” Wikipedia

Posted in British history, British Navy, Georgian England, military, Napoleonic Wars, war | Tagged , , , , , , | 15 Comments