What Exactly Was a “Modiste” in Regency England + the Upcoming Release of “Lyon on the Inside” from Dragonblade Publishing, Arriving 17 June 2026

First, I should say, I have created a modiste who appears in many of my Regency based stories. Her back story says that the name of “Madame Emmeline” has nothing to do with her being French. Like many of my fellow authors, I have a woman in this position presenting the reader a “history” of a different sort. If you were astute, you might have learned something of the woman in my “Lyon in Disguise” when Lady Annalise learns of her husband’s previous mistress. Anyway, what do we know a “modiste” in the Regency?

In the Regency era, a modiste was a fashionable, often French-influenced, female dressmaker or fashion merchant who designed, made, and styled women’s high-end clothing, serving as both couturier and stylist, creating gowns for balls, daywear, and bridal wear, and holding significant influence over fashion trends. 

Key Aspects of a Modiste:

  • Fashion Authority: They were key figures in disseminating fashion, advising ladies on what was appropriate and stylish, and having designs featured in magazines like Ackermann’s Repository.
  • Skilled Craftswomen: Modistes ran businesses with teams of seamstresses, creating complex garments from scratch, often working long hours to meet client demands for new dresses.
  • French Connection: The term itself is French, and many prominent modistes had French origins or adopted French styles, adding to their allure and exclusivity.
  • High-End Clientele: They catered to the ton (high society) and wealthy middle-class women seeking the latest styles, with some building famous brands like Madame Lanchester or Miss Pierpoint.
  • Business & Influence: Successful modistes were savvy entrepreneurs who used fashion plates and magazines to build their brand, though they often faced financial risks from clients. 

In essence, a modiste was the Regency equivalent of today’s high-fashion designer and personal stylist, crucial for any woman wanting to be seen as fashionable. 

https://beatriceknight.com/regency-modistes/#:~:text=Fascinating%20Regency%20Modistes,Who%20can%20say%20if%20Mrs.

Beatrice Knight in a piece entitled “Fascinating Regency Modistes” tells us, “Fashion was a tough business in Regency London. Most dressmakers labored in anonymity, but a few entrepreneurial women built brands synonymous with high fashion. Success could be a mixed blessing, however.

“Just as today’s A-listers gad about in clothing and jewelry loaned by designers eager for exposure, ladies of the beau monde were the influencers of their era, and many  kept up appearances at the expense of the tradespeople who served them.  Cutting back was inconceivable to the aristocratic fashionable who fell on hard times, and their unpaid bills could be ruinous. Two of the most celebrated modistes of the era, Madame Lanchester and Miss Pierpoint, were in and out of bankruptcy; others, like Court dressmaker Miss Letitia Collins, simply closed up shop.

“Anyone interested in 19th century fashion will have seen plates published by  La Belle Assemblée, Ackermann’s Repository of Arts, the Lady’s Magazine, and Lady’s Monthly Museum, among others. If you were an entrepreneurial modiste running a magazin des modes in London, you might kill to have a design featured in one of these avidly-devoured publications. Who can say if Mrs. Mary Ann Bell would have spent 20 years as a top Regency modiste without her continuous exposure in La Belle Assemblée, which was owned by her father-in-law. “

Posted in aristocracy, book release, books, customs and tradiitons, Dragonblade Publishers, England, fashion, Georgian England, Georgian Era, hero, heroines, historical fiction, Living in the Regency, Living in the UK, mystery, publishing, Regency era, Regency romance, research, romance, Scotland, writing | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Traitor Tuesday ~ Celebrating 250 Years of the United States as a Separate Nation: John Penn: A Man Who Aided in Cornwallis’s Defeat and Signer of the Declaration of Independence

John-Penn-227x300

John Penn was 36 years of age when he signed the Declaration of Independence. He was a lawyer by trade and the father of three children. He died early on in 1788 at the age of 48.

Patriot, Continental Congress member, and North Carolina signer of the Declaration of Independence, John Penn was a native of Caroline County, Virginia.  Like many others who risked their lives to bring freedom to the American states, Penn’s contributions are often overlooked in the historical context.

“John Penn was born on May 17, 1741, at Port Royal, Caroline County, Virginia, the only child of Moses Penn and Catherine (Taylor) Penn. Penn’s grandfather, also named John Penn, was born about 1690 and died in 1741, but it is not known when the Penn family came to America. John’s great-grandfather on his mother’s side, James Taylor, was born in his ancestral home, Pennington Castle, about 20 miles from Carlisle in England. He was a descendant of Baron Taillefer who fought at the Battle of Hastings in 1066 and became the Earl of Pennington. James Taylor arrived in Virginia in 1635 at the age of 20 and established the estate of Hare Forest on Chesapeake Bay between the James and North Rivers. He married Frances Walker, and two of their descendants became presidents of the United States—James Madison and Zachary Taylor.” (The Society of the Descendants of the Signers of the Declaration of Independence)

At age 18, Penn’s life changed when his father died suddenly. He required an occupation to support his mother and their farm. 

Although he achieved only a limited, formal education, Penn read many books from the library of Edmund Pendleton, a member of the Virginia House of Burgesses’ and Penn’s uncle. Pendleton was an accomplished attorney, described by his friend Thomas Jefferson as “the greatest orator” in the colonies. Pendleton moved people both by knowledge and empathy, and wrote George Washington’s will the night before Washington was appointed Commander in Chief by the Continental Congress.

Under the tutelage of Pendleton, Penn served as a legal apprentice. Under Pendleton’s auspices Penn had the opportunity to observe some of Virginia’s finest lawyers, learning both the fine points of the law and techniques. Just three years after the death of his father, in 1762, John Penn was licensed to practice law in Virginia, and did so for the next twelve years. Penn first practiced law in Virginia before traveling to Granville County, North Carolina, and establishing a law practice. 

On July 28, 1763, Penn married Susanna Lyne and they raised two children. Following many of his relatives, in 1774, Penn moved his family to Granville County, North Carolina, taking up residence near Williamsboro. Ironically, also in 1774, “Penn found himself brought into court on charges of disrespectful and perhaps treasonous remarks about King George. Taxes and duties without representation were the issues, and Penn was in the vanguard of those colonials wanting immediate redress of the wrong or to break away from the mother country. It seems that Penn had been intemperate in remarks about the king in a public meeting. Someone present reported him to royal authorities, and Penn was duly charged. Although tried before friendly townsmen, Penn was found guilty by the perhaps intimidated jury. The judge, perhaps less fearful, limited Penn’s punishment to a one penny fine. A man of principle, John Penn refused to pay the fine, thus sticking his neck out even further.” (DSDI)

In truth, Penn was more progressive than his Uncle Pendleton (who was a judge). Pendleton still hoped the American states might claim the same rights as the citizens in Great Britain, while Penn early on saw the need to separate from the England. 

Penn’s involvement in public affairs began with his 1775 election to the Continental Congress. He was reelected in 1777, 1778, and 1779 and served on various committees.

During the American Revolution, Penn contributions to the war effort were noteworthy.  Before signing the Declaration of Independence, Penn and Joseph Hewes, both North Carolina delegates, voted on July 2, 1776 for independence from Great Britain.  Although absent from voting, another North Carolina delegate, William Hooper, signed the Declaration of Independence with Hewes and Penn.  In 1778, Penn signed the Articles of Confederation, and Governor Abner Nash appointed the Tar Heel to serve on the North Carolina Board of War from 1780-1781. 

screen_4cb4bcf29a3a4“What was quite out of character for John Penn occurred during the summer heat of a Congressional session when Henry Laurens, the President of Congress, and John Penn agreed to a duel over some murky matter which history does not record. The day of the dual found the antagonists and their party of seconds having breakfast together at the same hotel. A previous rain had turned Philadelphia’s unpaved streets into a treacherous quagmire. After breakfast Penn and Laurens were walking together toward their appointed meeting place when the two men came to a crossing deep in mud. In a compassionate moment, Penn offered the older man his arm for support before they attempted to cross the street. History does not record the exact words exchanged but they quickly forgot their disagreement and returned to the hotel without firing a shot—probably exchanging a few toasts afterwards to complete the proceedings.

“In 1780 the British embarked on their attempt to win the Revolutionary War in the South, defeating the American army under General Gates at Camden on August 16, 1780. Colonel Otto Williams, a combatant, gave a vivid description of the desertions and looting that took place: “Leading a torrent of unarmed militia who fled the scene was General Gates and Richard Caswell (a general who later became governor of North Caroline) who fled non-stop on horseback to Charlotte, 60 miles or so away….Another general had his sword stolen from his tent…Another group helped themselves to Caswell’s mess, drinking a pipe of excellent Madeira.”

“On August 23, 1780, at Hillsborough, the General Assembly appointed Penn and two others to the three-man Board of War in North Carolina to prepare for the British invasion. John Penn stepped forward to take charge, when the other two members of the Board proved incompetent. He established effective communication with General Greene (who replaced General Gates), raised recruits, found funding for the military, provided transportation and supplies, disarmed Tories, and generally spurred the people into action.

“John Taylor of Caroline described Penn’s accomplishments during this period: “He (Penn) was surrounded by discouraged friends, helpless citizens, or inveterate foes—but he had a task to discharge—and an arduous one. But nature had formed him for the effort. Indefatigable, cheerful, extremely courteous in his manners, firm in his political principles, and invigorated by an inextinguishable ardor, he went through the crisis with honor to himself, to the satisfaction of the state, and rendered service inestimable to the prosecution of the war.”

“American victories at King’s Mountain and Cowpens, and Greene’s standoff with the British at the Battle of Guilford Courthouse compelled the British Army under Cornwallis to begin a retreat through North Carolina and Virginia that ended with the victory at Yorktown. Jealous perhaps of Penn’s success, and feeling that his actions impinged on his own authority, Governor Burke recalled Penn and persuaded the legislature to abolish the Board of War in 1781.”(DSDI)

Penn proved to be the most active member of the Board; he supplied war materials to Nathanael Greene’s Continentals and Francis Marion’s guerrillas.  As a result of these actions, Penn has been credited for Charles Cornwallis’s ultimate defeat.

Following the American Revolution, the Declaration of Independence signatory was appointed in April 1783 by Robert Morris, another signer of the Declaration of Independence, as North Carolina’s receiver of taxes for the Confederation government.  One month later, however, Penn resigned not given sufficient authority to collect taxes.  Penn then returned to practicing law until his death. 

Penn went to the Lord on September 14, 1788. He was buried at his home a few miles northeast of Stovall in Granville County, North Carolina. On April 25, 1894, his remains were re-interred under the Signers Monument, together with the remains of William Hooper, close by the equestrian statue of General Nathaniel Greene at the Guilford Courthouse National Military Park.

In addition to the materials from the Society of the Descendants of the Signers of the Declaration of Independence noted above this post includes details from these Resources:

“John Penn,” Colonial Hall 

“John Penn,” American History from the Revolution to Reconstruction and Beyond

“John Penn,” U. S. History

“John Penn,” North Carolina History Project 

Posted in America, American History, Declaration of Independence, history, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | 2 Comments

The Thames Estuary and Its Role in the Upcoming Release of “Lyon on the Inside” from Dragonblade Publishers, Arriving 17 June 2026

One of the antagonists, in this final book of the series, mentions leaving our hero’s and heroine’s bodies in the Thames Estuary and permitting them to wash out into the North Sea, but was that really a possibility? I know the answer, but it part of the mystery of the story. However, here is some actual information so you will also know the truth.

Historic England tells us, “The Greater Thames Estuary is the narrow strip of soft coastline between the Swale Estuary on the Kent coast and the River Stour on the Essex-Suffolk border. This is a low-lying coastal landscape extending along the Thames into inner London. It is a landscape of shallow creeks, drowned estuaries, mudflats and broad tracts of tidal salt-marsh with sand and shingle beaches along the coastal edge. Just over half the land area nowadays (56%) is agricultural and 21% is urban, including the riverside part of east London.

Historic character
■ Estates based further inland used the coastal marshes for grazing sheep and cattle, the reclamation of marshland for farmland having a long history documented as far back as the 8th century.
■ This area has a low density of farmsteads scattered across the landscape, relating to drainage and enclosure by ditches and hedgerows dating from the medieval period and earlier and set within a landscape that was sparsely settled until the development of coastal towns and industries from the late
19th century.
■ Large high-status farmsteads, some of them (especially between Southend and the river Crouch in Essex) moated, are intermixed with relatively high densities of much smaller farmsteads which have been subject to much more change.
■ There are many remains of sheep folds and routeways for moving stock in the marshes.

Significance
■ Farmsteads Mapping in Kent has shown that survival of pre-1700 farm buildings is relatively. low; 21% of recorded farmsteads in the Kent part of this area retain a pre-1700 farmhouse and 4% retain a pre-1700 working building.
The latter are all concentrated in the area east of Gillingham whilst 3% retain both a pre-1700
farmhouse and working building. These sites have potential to be of high significance.
■ Farmstead groups that retain some or all of their traditional buildings are very rare in a national context – only 53% of recorded farmsteads in Kent retain some traditional farmstead character. Of recorded farmsteads, 27% retain more than 50% of their historic form, well below the average of 52% for all the mapped areas in the south-east.
■ There are some rare survivals of early multiyard layouts fringing the coastal marshes, with shelter sheds and other buildings relating to the feeding of cattle and growing of corn on higher land.
■ Buildings of the 18th century and earlier mostly comprise large aisled or unaisled barns, with some rare surviving examples of small three-bay barns associated with the smaller farms that developed along the fringes of the marshland.”

Posted in book release, books, British history, commerce, Dragonblade Publishers, eBooks, England, estates, Georgian England, Georgian Era, hero, heroines, historical fiction, history, Living in the Regency, publishing, reading, real life tales, Regency romance, research, series, travel, writing | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Barouche, Gig, Curricle, Phaeton? Regency Coaches, and Celebrating the Release of “Lyon on the Inside” from Dragonblade Publishers, Arriving 17 June 2026

Readers are always asking me questions regarding which is which when it comes to Regency era coaches. Today, I am offering a short primer.

Barouche, Gig, Curricle, and Phaeton are types of 18th & 19th-century horse-drawn carriages, differing in wheels (two vs. four), number of horses, and design, with Barouche a large four-seater open carriage with a folding hood, Curricle a light, two-wheeled vehicle for two horses, Gig a lighter, often single-horse two-wheeled carriage, and Phaeton a sporty, open four-wheeled carriage for owner-drivers, known for its high perch and instability. 

Barouche

  • Wheels: Four.
  • Design: A large, open carriage with seats for four, a separate driver’s seat, and a folding hood, but only covering the rear passengers, leaving the front open.
  • Key Feature: A large, elegant carriage for social outings, often pulled by four horses. 

Curricle

Wikipedia
  • Wheels: Two.
  • Design: A light, open carriage for two, notable for being pulled by a pair of perfectly matched horses.
  • Key Feature: A fashionable but potentially dangerous vehicle, popular with young gentlemen. 

Gig

Wikipedia
  • Wheels: Two.
  • Design: A small, light vehicle, often for one or two people, used by doctors and others for practical travel.
  • Key Feature: Simpler and cheaper than a curricle, sometimes built to resemble one but usually pulled by a single horse. 

Phaeton

Public Domain ~ Print, one of a series of nine showing early 19th century carriages, published by R Ackermann, 101 Strand, London.
  • Wheels: Four, with smaller front wheels.
  • Design: An open, lightweight carriage for the owner-driver, with a high seat and often no side protection.
  • Key Feature: Sporty, fast, and sometimes unstable, named after the mythical Phaethon; came in high-perch (risky) and lower (safer) styles. 

An Aside: Here in the Charlotte, NC area, we have a local weather man [FOX network] whose name is Ted Phaeton. I imagine I am one of the few who spell his last name correctly, and do not get me going on Southern pronunciations of his name!

Posted in aristocracy, book release, books, British history, Dragonblade Publishers, eBooks, fashion, Georgian England, Georgian Era, hero, heroines, historical fiction, history, Living in the Regency, publishing, Regency era, Regency romance, research, travel, writing | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

“Bonus” Traitor Thursday ~ Celebrating 250 Years of the United States as a Separate Nation: Benjamin Harrison, Congressional “Falstaff” and Signer of the Declaration of Independence

800px-Berkeley_plantation_harrison_home

Public Domain – via Wikipedia Berkeley Plantation, home of the Harrison family (two Presidents), initial construction of Georgian mansion in 1726. In Charles City County, Virginia.

Benjamin Harrison was 50 years of age when he signed the Declaration of Independence. He was a plantation owner and father of seven children from Virginia. He died at age 65 in 1791.

Born on 5 April 1726, Benjamin Harrison V lived the life guaranteed him by his wealthy parents. He was the eldest son of Benjamin Harrison IV and Ann Carter and took over the family’s extensive holdings at the age of 19, when his father and two sisters were killed in a lightning storm. Berkeley Plantation is located west of Williamsburg, Virginia, upon the James River. Although young, Harrison V built the family fortune, eventually claiming eight plantations and an extensive shipping business. “Benjamin’s great-great-grandfather, Benjamin Harrison I, first stepped on American soil on March 15, 1633. He emigrated from the Isle of Wight in England, became a tobacco planter, and was the first clerk of the Royal Council. Benjamin’s mother, Ann Carter, was the daughter of Robert “King” Carter whose family like the Harrisons was a force in Virginia and American politics. He served for many years as treasurer of the Colony and member of the King’s Council. The “King” was a wealthy and influential member of the Virginia aristocracy and owned over 300,000 acres and a thousand slaves. Ann’s great-grandfather, William Carter, a resident of Casstown, Hereford County and the Middle Temple in England, came to Virginia about 1649 and built the ancestral home Corotoman in Lancaster County, Virginia.” (The Society of the Descendants of the Signers of the Declaration of Independence)

He was a classmate of Patrick Henry and of Thomas Jefferson at William and Mary College. He married his second cousin Elizabeth Bassett, the niece of Martha Washington. “Eight of the Harrisons’ children survived to adulthood. Their most famous son was William Henry Harrison, the American general in the victory over the Indians at Tippecanoe, and who was elected President of the United States in 1840. [He died after only one month in office.] Their great-grandson, Benjamin Harrison, a Civil War general, was also elected President, in 1888. Politics was a way of life for the Harrisons. As early as the 1640s, the First Family of Virginia had a reputation of arguing with British authorities over individual rights. One Harrison was imprisoned for six years for complaining about tyranny and treason.”(The Society of the Descendants of the Signers of the Declaration of Independence)

At age 21, Harrison began his political career as a representative in the Virginia House of Burgesses. He spent a quarter of a century in the Burgesses, often leading the group as Speaker. He was most outspoken against the Stamp Act and assisted in penning Virginia’s protest. Even so, he opposed Patrick Henry’s civil disobedience stance. He supported taxes for the importation of slaves. Eventually, he was elected to the First Continental Congress. He helped to write the Articles of Association. He was said to have roomed with George Washington and Peyton Randolph during those early of days of the revolution. Benjamin was grandson of “King” Carter, and therefore, cousin to Thomas Nelson and Carter Braxton, who also signed the Declaration of Independence. He often served as Chairman of the Whole. 

 Benjamin Harrison was highly regarded in Congress, and was frequently appointed Chairman of the Whole from March 1776 to August, 1777. He remained in Congress until 1778, when he became speaker in the Virginia legislature. He was a vocal advocate for the Bill of Rights being in place before the ratification of the U. S. Constitution.

“Benjamin Rush noted that Harrison “had strong state prejudices and was hostile to the leading men from the New England states.” But Harrison appreciated the evenhandedness of the new President, John Hancock, complimenting him as “noble, disinterested and generous to a very great degree.” On the important date of June 7, 1776 Benjamin Harrison was chosen to introduce fellow Virginian Richard Henry Lee whose resolution called for independence from England. He was selected to read Jefferson’s draft of the Declaration of Independence to the assembled delegates on July 1, and served as Chairman of the Whole during the debate over independence on July 2.” (The Society of the Descendants of the Signers of the Declaration of Independence)

Harrison was well known for his sense of humor, and many tales are remarked upon. From Denise Kiernan and Joseph D’Agnest in Signing Their Lives Away, we learn “Once the story goes, when the members needed to select a new president of Congress, some liked Hancock for the job, but Hancock pooh-poohed the notion. Six-foot-four Harrison crossed the room in a bound, physically lifted the smaller Hancock, and plopped him down in the President’s chair. ‘We shall show Mother Britain how little we care for her,” Harrison reportedly said, ‘by making a Massachusetts man our president, who she has excluded from pardon by public proclamation.’ (At this point in history, Hancock and Samuel Adams were reportedly wanted for treason by the Crown.)”

“On August 2, while preparing to sign the Declaration of Independence, Harrison famously quipped to Elbridge Gerry who had taken his place at the table to sign: ‘I shall have a great advantage over you, Mr. Gerry, when we are all hung for what we are now doing. From the size and weight of my body I shall die in a few minutes and be with the Angels, but from the lightness of your body you will dance in the air an hour or two before you are dead.'” (The Society of the Descendants of the Signers of the Declaration of Independence) [Note that Gerry was not in Philadelphia On August 2, 1776, when this supposedly took place, but it is a wonderful story, nonetheless.]

In Congress Harrison solicited financial and other assistance from other countries as a member of the Secret Correspondence Committee. He also worked closely with General Washington as part of the Marine and War and Ordinances Committees in planning the American army. During the war he also took care of matters at home by serving as a lieutenant in the county militia, and took the job of chief magistrate as well.

After the war, Harrison remained active in Virginia politics. Soon after his 65th birthday he suffered from a severe case of gout, and on April 24, the disease took his life. He is buried at his beloved Berkeley Plantation. Because of Harrison’s 240-pound, six foot four stature, he was often referred to as the “Falstaff of Congress.” 

_________________________

BenjaminHarrison.1968.28.1-VHS-220x300“The miniature at left is the only surviving life portrait of Harrison. It was apparently survived only because one of Harrison’s family carried it it with them when they fled their house at Berkeley Plantation just before the traitor Benedict Arnold and his men landed their boats at next door Westover in January, 1781.

Redcoats-at-Berkeley2“The Redcoats proceeded to pillage from Berkeley to Richmond.  While at Berkeley, Arnold’s men built a bonfire of all the Harrison family portraits and took rifle practice using his cows. They were repaid on October 19th, when the British Army surrendered at nearby Yorktown, effectively ending the Revolutionary War.” (The Society of the Descendants of the Signers of the Declaration of Independence)
Posted in American History, British history, Declaration of Independence, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , | 5 Comments

Sith, Trows, and Other Enchanted Folks from Scotland + the Upcoming Release of “Lyon on the Inside” from Dragonblade Publishing, Arriving 17 June 2026

In this last book of my Lyon’s Den series, both the hero and the heroine are from Scotland. 27% of my DNA is directly from Central Scotland. My 9th Great-Grandfather on my father’s side was the 7th Chieftain of the Clan MacThomas. John Mccomie (Iain Mòr), my 9x great-grandfather, has passed into the folklore of Perthshire. 40% of my DNA claims Celtic/Gaelic roots. According to the tale of the Mccomies, my 9th great-grandfather objected to the taxes the Earl of Atholl had placed on them. One must remember that the Mormaer or Earl of Atholl was the title of the holder of a medieval comital lordship straddling the highland province of Atholl (Ath Fodhla), now in northern Perthshire. Atholl is a special Mormaerdom, because a King of Atholl is reported from the Pictish period. ANYWAY, the Earl of Atholl thought to be done away with my great-grandfather by employing a champion swordsman from Italy. One problem existed; Mccomie slew the swordsman instead.

Let us have a look at some of the superstitions. These come from Spooky Scotland.

Baobhan Sìth: A particularly evil and dangerous female vampire from the highlands of Scotland who preyed on unwary male travellers in the glens and mountains. [I used the Baobhan Sìth in my vampiric Pride and Prejudice tale.]

Bodachan Sabhail (Little Old Man of the Barn): A brownie who would come to the aid of aging farmers and thresh their grain for them.

Brown Man of the Muirs: A dwarf from the Scottish borders who serves as a guardian spirit over the wild animals. He wore brown clothes and had a shock of frizzy red hair and wild looking eyes.

Cailleach Bheur: A blue-faced hag found in the Scottish Highlands or is known as the Carlin in eastern Scotland.  She is also known as Beira, Queen of the Winter. She is ill-tempered and dangerous and is seen with a crow on her left shoulder. Associated with winter, she was reborn at Samhain or Halloween and ruled over winter when she brought the winter snows. She carried a magical staff which froze the ground with every tap. She also guarded animals in winter. A wooden log was burned at Yule in her honour.

Cailleachan: The Cailleachan are the eight hag sisters of the Cailleach. They are giantesses and are powerful thunder, storm or sea hags.

Dhu Guisch/ Beast of the Charred Forest/ The Dragon of Dornoch: The Beast of the Charred Forests, or Dhu Guisch, is a fearsome, fire-breathing dragon from Sutherland, Scotland, said to have incinerated vast ancient woodlands. This terrifying monster could only be slain by someone who saw it before it saw them, a feat achieved by Saint Gilbert of Dornoch.

Domhnull Mor Bad an t-Sithean (Big Donald, King of the Faeries): Big Donald, King of the Fairies, resides in Glen More’s Loch Morlich area. He’s known for playing invisible bagpipes and once drove away lowlanders by pelting them with sticks and stones.

Fachan (Peg-Leg-Jack/ Direach): A giant/ cruel, malevolent faerie with improbable deformities. One hand emerges from his chest; one leg is attached to his haunch; one eye rests in his head, one tooth juts from his mouth and one tuft of rigidly inflexible hair grows from that head.

Gentle Annie/ Gentle Annie: The nature spirit and Hag controlling the southwesterly gales and winds in the Cromarty Firth. The Firth is guarded against the wind on the north and east by tall hills, but a gap allows sporadic and violent wind bursts to rush through, earning the fay a reputation for treachery. It is thought that this might be another manifestation of the Cailleach or Carlin.

Muc-sheilch: A kin to the famed Nessie yet unmistakably its own beast, the Muc-sheilch haunts the waters of Loch Maree in Wester Ross. Described as a loch-dwelling monster with a distinctive form, it was said to slip between neighbouring lochs.

Sìthichean (Faeries): Often called “the wee folk,” faeries or the sìthichean as they are called in Gaelic, are central to Scottish folklore and appear in many forms under many names. They are commonly divided into two courts: the Seelie, dangerous yet less malevolent, whose members are mischievous but often harmless; and the Unseelie, malicious beings known to harm humans for sport. There have been many human encounters with faeries, including kidnappings, faery tithes and the infamous faery rade.

Trow: A malignant or mischievous fairy or spirit in the folkloric traditions of the Orkney and Shetland Islands. They are generally inclined to be short of stature, ugly, and shy. Trows are nocturnal creatures and are similar to Scandinavian trolls. They venture out of their ‘trowie knowes’ (earthen mound dwellings) solely in the evening, and often enter households as the inhabitants sleep. Trows traditionally have a fondness for music. Thus, folktales tell of their habit of kidnapping musicians or luring them to their dens.

Posted in book release, books, British history, Dragonblade Publishers, England, Georgian England, Georgian Era, gothic and paranormal, hero, heroines, historical fiction, history, legends, legends and myths, Living in the Regency, medieval, paranormal, publishing, Regency era, research, romance, Scotland, spooky tales, tradtions, vampires, writing | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Traitor Tuesday ~ Celebrating 250 Years of the United States as a Separate Nation: Lewis Morris, Lord of Morrisania Manor and Signer of the Declaration of Independence

200xNxlewis-morris.jpg.pagespeed.ic.k4yStpLJLg

Lewis Morris Public domain image.

Lewis Morris was a 50 year old plantation owner from New York when he signed the Declaration of Independence. The father of 10 children, Morris died in 1798 at the age of 71.

Lewis Morris III was born on April 8, 1726, in Morrisania, New York, into a rich and privileged family. In 1762, upon the death of his father, Lewis inherited the family estate, Morrisania, which covered about 2000 acres, and resembled a small town, with farmers who rented land, blacksmiths, carpenters and others who worked the estate for wages. Lewis attended Yale College, but left without earning a degree. As the eldest son, he was expected to devote his time into running Morrisania. For many years, he would follow the typical pattern of a wealthy gentleman.

Following the footsteps of his grandfather, who had been Royal Governor of New Jersey, and his father, who had been a judge, Lewis decided to enter public service. He was elected to the New York Legislature in 1769.

In 1749, at age 23, he married Mary Beekman Walton. Together Lewis and Mary had ten children: Catherine, Mary, Lewis, Jacob, Sarah (who died as a child), William, Helena, James, Staats, and Richard.

“As a wealthy landowner, most people expected him to support Britain, but he surprised everyone by supporting the patriot cause. When New York selected its first delegates to the Continental Congress, Lewis Morris was not selected, because he did not support Great Britain. When electing delegates for the Second Continental Congress in May 1775, this time he was elected, since the majority of New Yorkers had changed their minds. During the critical vote for independence on July 2, 1776, Morris was back home in New York, but he attended the NY Convention in White Plains, NY, which approved the Declaration on July 9, and returned to Philadelphia to sign the document after its approval.” (Find a Grave)

So, why would a man who certainly did not suffer from the British actions in the Americas take such a stance? His discontent grew slowly, but steadily. For example, New York housed a large garrison of British troops, who were supposed to protect the American colonies, but the British decided to tax New York citizens to pay for this protection. The New York assembly refused these actions from the Crown, but the New York governor requisitioned the funds without consent. This action upset Morris, and he became quite vocal about the outcome. This was only the beginning of his change of mind. 

” To prevent an intercourse between the citizens and the fleet, so injurious to the patriotic cause, timely measures were adopted by the committee of safety; but for a long time no efforts were availing, and even after General Washington had established his headquarters at New York, he was obliged to issue his proclamation, interdicting all intercourse and correspondence with the ships of war and other vessels belonging to the king of Great Britain.

“But, notwithstanding this prevalent aversion to a separation from Great Britain, there were many in the colony who believed that a declaration of independence was not only a point of political expediency, but a matter of paramount duty. Of this latter class, Mr. Morris was one; and, in giving his vote for that declaration, he exhibited a patriotism and disinterestedness which few had it in their power to display. He was at this time in possession of an extensive domain, within a few miles of the city of New York. A British army had already landed from their ships, which lay within cannon shot of the dwelling of his family. A signature to the Declaration of Independence would insure the devastation of the former, and the destruction of the latter. But, upon the ruin of his individual property, he could look with comparative indifference, while he knew that his honor was untarnished, and the interests of his country were safe. He voted, therefore, for a separation from the mother country, in the spirit of a man of honor, and of enlarged benevolence.” (Colonial Hall)

In 1769, Lewis Morris was elected to the Colonial Assembly in New York. In 1774, he resigned his position as judge to focus on the oncoming war. Lewis was elected to the New York Provincial Congress. While he was a member of this Congress, they sent him to Continental Congress as a delegate for New York.

2767_1053997062“He served in the Continental Congress from 1775 to 1777, where he worked on the committees that supervised supplies of ammunition and military stores for the Army. During the war, the British burned and wrecked Morrisania. Lewis would spend many years after the war rebuilding his estate. Morris then served in the New York Legislature from 1777 to 1790. He was also a Major General of the New York State Militia during the Revolutionary War. In 1787, Lewis’s brother, Gouverneur Morris wrote much of the final draft of the US Constitution. Lewis attended the convention in Poughkeepsie, NY, to determine if New York would accept the Constitution. Thanks largely to Lewis Morris’s efforts, a narrow vote of 30 in favor to 27 opposed, was achieved, bringing New York into the union as the 11th state.” (Find a Grave)

From the start, Lewis Morris was an active advocate for independence in Congress. In 1776, he was among the 56 men who signed the Declaration of Independence. Lewis Morris’ most famous quote came from a conversation he had with his half-brother, Gouverneur Morris. Gouverneur, a politician and a signatory of the Articles of Confederation, warned him about what would happen if he signed the Declaration and advised him against it. Lewis’s reply was “Damn the consequences. Give me the pen.” With that, he fearlessly scratched his name on the document.

Morris’s three eldest sons followed their father’s example for service to their country. One served for a time as aid-de-camp to General Sullivan, but afterwards entered the family of General Greene, and was with that officer during his brilliant campaign in the Carolinas; the second son was appointed aid-de-camp to General Charles Lee, and was present at the gallant defense of Fort Moultrie, where he greatly distinguished himself. The youngest of these sons, though but a youth, entered the army as a lieutenant of artillery, and honorably served during the war.

2767_132838647249

gravesite for Lewis Morris St. Ann’s Episcopal Church http://www.findagrave.com/ cgi-bin/fg.cgi?page= pv&GRid=2767&PIpi=55231153

morrislewis

http://www.findagrave.com /cgi-bin/fg.cgi?page= pv&GRid=2767&PIpi= 55231153

One would find it a bit odd that Morris’s fabulous estate of the late 1700s is now the site of public housing projects and boarded-up buildings. Morrisania was located in what is now the South Bronx, a poverty-stricken neighborhood. The British army trashed the original as retribution for Morris’s stance during the Revolutionary War. An invasion of New York by the British during the war took the British troops right to Morris’s door. The house suffered extensive damage, stands of trees were burned, cattle were slaughtered, and tenants and slaves were run off. Benjamin Rush, another signer of the Declaration of Independence, said of the loss, “[Morris] suffered the loss of many thousand pounds by the depredations of the British arm, upon his property new New York without repining. Every attachment of his heart yielded to his love of his country.” 

In 1777, Lewis became a member of the New York Senate. He held this position until 1790. After this Lewis retired to his home and his family. Lewis Morris died on January 22, 1798. he was buried at Morrisania. The family vault can be found in what is known today as the Mott Haven neighborhood of the Bronx. This family vault is in the churchyard of what became St. Ann’s Church of Morrisania and is now known as St. Ann’s Episcopal Church. The manor house stands no more. 

Resources: 

Find a Grave: Lewis Morris 

Geni 

Colonial Hall

The Society of Descendants of Signers of the Declaration of Independence

Posted in American History, British history, Declaration of Independence, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | 2 Comments

Early Attempts at Plaster of Paris + the Upcoming Release of “Lyon on the Inside” from Dragonblade Publishing, Arriving 17 June 2026

In my romantic suspense series for Dragonblade Publishing, in several of the books, I mention individuals with broken limbs, as well as have my heroes attempt to make a mold of a prominent footprint found in book 5. Lord Benjamin Thompson from book 4, who initially trained as a surgeon, advises them to use resin, wax, and gypsum, but was that the going mixture.

Early attempts at using Plaster of Paris (gypsum-based) date back thousands of years, with evidence found in Egyptian pyramids and ancient construction, where it was valued for molding and fire resistance. In the 19th century, it was famously adopted for orthopedic casts, initially using “plâtre coulé” (heavy wooden boxes) in Europe, and later in bandages perfected by Antonius Mathijsen in 1852. 

Early Medical and Technical Uses

  • Early Orthopedic Casting (c. 1800s): Before 1852, practitioners used a technique where limbs were placed in wooden containers filled with plaster. This method, known as plâtre coulé, was heavy and limited patient mobility, prompting searches for better methods.
  • The Bandage Method (1852): Dutch surgeon Antonius Mathijsen revolutionized early adoption by using cotton bandages impregnated with dry, powdered plaster of Paris, which only needed to be moistened to set.
  • Archaeological Preservation (1860s): Giuseppe Fiorelli, at Pompeii, used plaster injected into cavities in volcanic ash to create casts of the bodies of victims.
  • Sculpture (18th/19th Century): Artists like John Flaxman (1755–1826) were pioneers in consistently using plaster for models and casts. 

Composition and Challenges

  • Material Origin: It was derived from gypsum mined in Montmartre, Paris.
  • Rapid Setting: Early mixtures set very rapidly. To manage this in artistic or repair work, mixtures sometimes included additives like glue.
  • Initial Failures: Before the standardization of, and success with, the plaster bandage, attempts to use starch, wax, or clay to immobilize limbs often failed. 

Early applications were, therefore, a transition from heavy, constructive molding to lighter, more versatile, and, in medicine, more functional cast-based immobilization. 

Posted in book release, books, Dragonblade Publishers, eBooks, Georgian England, Georgian Era, hero, heroines, historical fiction, history, inventions, Living in the Regency, medicine, mystery, publishing, Regency era, Regency romance, research, science, suspense, terminology, writing | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Scottish Marriages without the Benefit of Clergy + the Upcoming Release of “Lyon on the Inside” from Dragonblade Publishing, Arriving 17 June 2026

In book 3 of my Dragonblade romantic suspense series, Lord Navan Beaufort suggests, in order to save time, that he and Lady Annalise Dutton simply marry in Gretna Green, but her ladyship refuses because she wants no one, especially her brother, Alexander Dutton, Lord Marksman, to try to overturn the marriage vows. Therefore, the pair travel on to Lord Aaran Graham’s estate is is married in a Church of England service. Exactly, what was the difference if Scotland was part of the United Kingdom at the time?

During the Regency era (1811–1820), the Church of England did not operate as the established church in Scotland, where the Presbyterian Church of Scotland (the Kirk) held sway. Instead, Anglicanism was represented by the Scottish Episcopal Church and “Qualified Chapels” for English residents. By 1792, penal laws against Episcopalians were repealed, allowing for more open worship. 

  • Relationship with the Kirk: The Church of Scotland was the national, established church, often viewed as more thoroughly reformed than the Church of England.
  • The Scottish Episcopal Church: This was the indigenous, historic Episcopalian body. Following the 1745 Jacobite rising, it faced severe restrictions, but by the Regency, it had largely moved past its Jacobite-aligned “non-juror” status to recognize the House of Hanover.
  • Qualified Chapels: Before the 1792 repeal of penal laws, “Qualified Chapels” existed for those who followed the English Book of Common Prayer and prayed for the Hanoverians, serving English residents and non-Jacobite Scots.
  • Post-1792 Situation: After the 1792 repeal, the Scottish Episcopal Church and the independent Qualified Chapels began to merge or operate under the same episcopal oversight.
  • Influence: While the Church of England was not the state church in Scotland, it maintained a presence for the English aristocracy and military personnel stationed there, sometimes in communion with the local Scottish Episcopal leaders. 

Scottish marriages without clergy in the Regency era (approx. 1811–1820) were largely “irregular marriages,” valid under Scots law by mere mutual consent and public declaration before witnesses, often bypassing the strict Hardwicke Marriage Act of 1753 that governed England. Famous for “anvil weddings” at Gretna Green, these unions required no banns, parental consent, or ordained minister. 

Key Aspects of Scottish Irregular Marriages (1810s):

  • Legal Standing: Scots law recognized “declaration of consent” (consensual marriage) as perfectly legal, making them binding, though not performed in a church.
  • The “Anvil Priest”: While any witness made the marriage legal, self-appointed “priests” or blacksmiths, such as Robert Elliot or the smith at Gretna Green, grew famous for conducting these ceremonies, often symbolizing the union by hammering on an anvil.
  • Location: Due to its proximity to the English border, Gretna Green was the premier destination for runaway couples. Other locations included toll houses and coaching inns.
  • Requirements: No specific, elaborate, or religious ceremony was required, though a spoken vow and witnesses were necessary.
  • Significance: These marriages provided an escape from the 1753 Hardwicke Act, which mandated that English weddings take place before noon in a church, requiring parental consent for those under 21. 

Types of Irregular Marriages in Scotland:

  1. Declaration of Consent: Simply stating in front of witnesses that they were married.
  2. Promise and Subsequent Copula: A promise to marry followed by sexual intercourse.
  3. Habit and Repute: Living together as man and wife for a period, which implied a marriage had occurred. 

While often scandalous, these marriages were legally binding in Scotland during the Regency era. It is with this loophole in Scottish law that Lord Macdonald Duncan has Lord Aaran Graham declared as legitimate. Duncan brings witnesses before the court that swear they heard the elder Lord Graham declare that he and the then Miss Magdeline Bellton were husband and wife. Under Scottish law, the pair were married and the consummation of their vows, which produced a son for the earldom, was a legal marriage.

Posted in Act of Parliament, book release, books, British history, Church of England, customs and tradiitons, Dragonblade Publishers, eBooks, Georgian England, Georgian Era, hero, heroines, historical fiction, history, laws of the land, Living in the Regency, marriage, marriage customs, mystery, publishing, Regency era, Regency romance, religion, research, tradtions, writing | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Scottish Jig vs Highland Fling + the Upcoming Release of “Lyon on the Inside” from Dragonblade Publishing, Arriving 17 June 2026

The Scottish Fling is a vigorous, historic Highland dance characterized by intricate steps performed on one spot in a 4/4 time, often acting as a victory dance. In contrast, a Scottish Jig is a quick, lively dance in 6/8 time, often mimicking an agitated character with fast, playful footwork

Key Differences:

  • Dance Type: The Fling is a core Highland dance (high on toes, rigid torso), while the Jig is categorized as a “Character” or “Country” dance.
  • Tempo & Rhythm: Fling is in 4/4 time (moderate/fast), while the Jig is in 6/8 compound time (very fast, jig rhythm).
  • Movement: The Fling emphasizes high-toed endurance and precision in one spot. The Jig is more theatrical and fast-paced.
  • Origin/Style: The Highland Fling is a traditional Scottish dance, often solo. The Jig, though popular in Scotland, is often performed as a parody of an Irish dancer. 

Highland Fling

  • Style: Very traditional, performed in a kilt.
  • Origin: Likely a victory dance performed on a shield.
  • Action: Involves intricate steps, often including the “fling” (a kick) and a high degree of precision on one spot. 

Britannica tells us, “highland fling, national dance of Scotland. A vigorous dance requiring delicate balance and precision, it was probably originally a victory dance for a solo male dancer, performed after battle. It is performed in 4/4 time and consists of a series of intricate steps performed on one spot. Especially characteristic is a light step in which the dancer hops on one foot while moving the other foot in front of and in back of the calf. The dance is regularly performed in competition at the Highland Games held throughout Scotland.


Video of Great Highland Fling performance by competitors at Kenmore Highland Games in Perthshire, Scotland

Scottish Jig

  • Style: Lively, often humorous, and character-driven.
  • Origin: Common in both Scotland and Ireland; Scottish versions often include specific, often caricatured, arm movements.
  • Action: Rapid, lively footwork, sometimes part of a, or a, reel. 

Video of Irish Vs. Scottish Jig

Posted in Appalachia, book release, British history, customs and tradiitons, dancing, Dragonblade Publishers, eBooks, Georgian England, Georgian Era, Great Britain, hero, heroines, historical fiction, history, Living in the Regency, mystery, publishing, Regency era, Regency romance, research, Scotland, series, tradtions, writing | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Scottish Jig vs Highland Fling + the Upcoming Release of “Lyon on the Inside” from Dragonblade Publishing, Arriving 17 June 2026