Traitor Tuesday ~ Celebrating 250 Years of the United States as a Separate Nation: Stephen Hopkins, Surveyor, Astronomer, and Signer of the Declaration of Independence

search

Stephen Hopkins was 69 years of age when signed the Declaration of Independence. He had been married twice and had fathered seven children. He died in 1785 at the age of 78.

Stephen Hopkins was born on 7 March 1707 in Providence, Rhode Island, the son of William Hopkins and Ruth (Wilkinson) Hopkins. He was a colonial governor, educator, judge, merchant ship owner, surveyor, patriot and cousin to Benedict Arnold. “Hopkins’ great grandfather, Thomas Hopkins, was born in 1616 and came to Providence in 1641, having followed Roger Williams there from Plymouth, England. In 1651 he moved to Newport and was appointed a member of the town committee in 1661. His mother, Ruth Wilkinson, was the granddaughter of Lawrence Wilkinson, a lieutenant in the army of Charles I, who was taken prisoner October 22, 1644 by the Scots and parliamentary troops at the surrender of Newcastle-on-Tyne. Deprived of his property, he came to New England sometime between 1645 and 1647 and was at Providence in 1652. He became a freeman in 1658, was chosen deputy to the General Court, was a soldier in the Indian wars, and became a member of the Colonial Assembly in 1659.” (The Society of the Descendants of the Signers of the Declaration of Independence)

Growing up in Scituate, Rhode Island, Hopkins had little formal education and his mother taught him his first lessons. His grandfather and uncle instructed him in elementary mathematics, and he read the English classics in his grandfather’s small but well-selected library. As a child Stephen Hopkins was a voracious reader, becoming a serious student of the sciences, mathematics, and literature. He became a surveyor and astronomer, and was involved in taking measurements during the 1769 transit of Venus across the sun. (Stephen Hopkins) Hopkins married Sarah Scott on October 9, 1726, when they were both just 19, and they had five sons and two daughters. Sarah was the youngest daughter of Major Sylvanus Scott and Joanna Jenks.” (SDSDI)

“Besides reading, Hopkins also gained skills in surveying from his grandfather, Samuel Wilkinson. He used his surveying skills to revise the streets and create a map of Scituate, and later did the same for Providence. Because of his responsibility as a youth, at the age of 19 Hopkins was given 70 acres (28 ha) of land by his father, after which his grandfather Hopkins bestowed an additional 90 acres (36 ha) upon him. Hopkins’ interest in surveying spilled over into an interest in astronomy and other scientific endeavors as well, which was illustrated by an event when he was much older. Before the American Revolutionary War, on June 3, 1769, Hopkins was involved in the observation of a rare astronomical event, the transit of Venus across the face of the sun. This event was used to determine the distance of the earth from the sun, and also in this case to improve the measure of the latitude of Providence. Joseph Brown noted for his scientific accomplishments as well as his commercial enterprise, was able to obtain a complete set of necessary instruments, including a reflecting telescope, a micrometer, and a sextant.  An observatory was erected on a hill in Providence where a street, later named ‘Transit Street’ in honor of the event, was laid out. Brown was assisted by a group of individuals, including Hopkins, Dr. Benjamin West, and others who were also interested in science. The observation was able to very accurately determine the latitude of Providence (to the nearest second of arc), after which the longitude was determined by comparing observations of the moons of Jupiter with similar observations made in Cambridge, England.” (Stephen Hopkins)

At age 24, Hopkins became a surveyor. In 1732 he became the Scituate town clerk. Later, he president of the Town Council. In 1742, he was named Speaker of the Rhode Island General Assembly. He joined his brother Esek Hopkins in shipping firm and moved to Providence in 1742. They built and fit out vessels. Stephen served in the General Assembly from 1744 to 1751, was assistant justice of the Rhode Island Superior Court from 1747 to 1749, and became Chief Justice in 1751.

Stephen_Hopkins_House_2014 (Governor Stephens Hopkins House, 15 Hopkins Street, Providence, via Wikipedia) “Hopkins was largely responsible for transforming Providence from a small village with muddy streets to a thriving commercial center. He was also instrumental in establishing Rhode Island’s present day boundaries. Besides his political and civic interest, Hopkins had interested in education and science. About 1754 he was influential in establishing a public subscription library, and he was the first chancellor of Rhode Island College, which was to become Brown University. He helped found the Providence Gazette and Country Journal in 1762, held membership in the American Philosophical Society of Newport, and was involved in erecting a telescope in Providence for observing the transit of Venus, which occurred in June 1769.

“Stephen Hopkins won the governorship of Rhode Island in 1755, and was governor several times through 1766, competing with Samuel Ward for the annual election for the governorship. Hopkins attended the Albany Congress of 1754 where he first met Benjamin Franklin, who promoted the Albany Plan for uniting the colonies. The plan failed, but Stephen and Benjamin became friends and were to become the two most elderly signers of the Declaration of Independence in 1776.

RightsColoniesExamined.cropped ( image via Stephen Hopkins) “After the passage of the hated Stamp Act by Parliament, Hopkins wrote The Rights of Colonies Examined, published in 1764, a pamphlet in which he attacked the Sugar Act and the Stamp Act, stating: ‘British subjects are to be governed only agreeable to laws which they themselves have in some way consented.’ It predated John Dickinson’s more widely distributed Letters from a Farmer by three years.” (The Society of the Descendants of the Signers of the Declaration of Independence)

“Stephen Hopkins voted to approve the Declaration of Independence on July 4 and signed the engrossed copy on August 2. He suffered from the “shaking palsy” which caused his signature on the Declaration to appear unsteady, and he used his left hand to steady his right. He stated at the signing, ‘My hand trembles, but my heart does not.’ Hopkins’ palsy affliction was of long standing, causing him to rely upon a clerk to write for him in his businesses and public life.

“In June of the same year Hopkins was appointed to the 13 member committee (one from each state) to draft the country’s first constitution, The Articles of Confederation. His health failing, he returned to Rhode Island soon thereafter.

“Hopkins died on July 13, 1785 and is buried in the North Burying Ground at Providence. An extensive cortege and assembly of notable persons followed the funeral procession of Hopkins to the cemetery, including court judges, the President, professors and students of the College, citizens of the town and inhabitants of the state. The Rhode Island legislature dedicated a special monument at his gravesite in his honor, and it provides an elaborate testimony to the life of the patriot.

“On the west side the inscription says, ‘Sacred to the memory of the illustrious Stephen Hopkins, of revolutionary fame, attested by his signature to the Declaration of our National Independence, Great in Council from sagacity of mind; Magnanimous in sentiment, firm in purpose, and good, as great, from benevolence of heart; He stood in the front rank of statesmen and patriots. Self-educated, yet among the most learned of men; His vast treasury of useful knowledge, his great retentive and reflective powers, combined with his social nature, made him the most interesting of companions in private life.

“On the south side the inscription continues: ‘His name is engraved on the immortal records of the Revolution, and can never die: His titles to that distinction are engraved on this monument, reared by the grateful admiration of his native state, in honor of her favorite son.’

“And on the east side: ‘Hopkins, born March 7, 1707, Died July 13, 1785.’

“And on the north side: ‘Here lies the man in fateful hour,
Who boldly stemm’d tyrannic pow’r,
And held his hand in the decree,
which bade America BE FREE!'” (The Society of the Descendants of the Signers of the Declaration of Independence)

Stephen_Hopkins_signatureThe signature of Mr. Hopkins is remarkable, and appears as if written by one greatly agitated by fear. But fea was no part of Mr. Hopkins’ character. The cause of the tremulous appearance of his signature, was a bodily infirmity, called “shaking palsy,” with which he had been afflicted many years, and which obliged him to employ an amanuensis to do his writing… (Adherents)

Posted in American History, British history, buildings and structures, commerce, Declaration of Independence, Great Britain, history, real life tales | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Question from a Reader: What Happened to Someone Who Stole Cloth from a Shopkeeper?

I am glad you asked this question. It made me think again of book I have started where the heroine is accused of stealing cloth, though she is innocent. I have it drafted with main points, but have yet to find time to write it.

To answer your question, first, you should know how the name of such a person might identified to the public. How will others know that someone they thought respectable is an actual thief? How would others find out about the crime? One could, for example, sometimes find the names of those caught stealing in the Hue and Cry. However, that publication was mostly used to tell others of wanted criminals but could possibly have also been used to list stolen items of value. This newspaper later became the Police Gazette so be aware of the year in which your story is placed.

QUESTION 1: Did merchants mark a “whole bolt of cloth.”?

If the cloth was commissioned for that Merchant, from the weavers who made it, then it could have the merchant’s name woven into the selvedge, repeating for the entire length of the bolt.  You can see bolts of cloth today that have that sort of marking.  When the cloth is used, that quarter inch or so on the edge is either cut off or turned into a hem or seam, so the final product is not affected by its existence.

QUESTION 2: I couldn’t think of a way to mark the cloth other than an ink blot on the edge or something or a thread could be pulled loose. Any suggestions?

The first thing a thief would do would be to throw away the board or roll on which it was wrapped if he had taken that. Pictures of drapers of the time show most of the material on large rolls on the wall.

I think there will be problems convicting unless the pattern was woven specifically for that merchant. That would be a very expensive roll of cloth. More value equals more substantial charges against the person. Unless the thief was caught red handed within feet of the shop or where there was no possibility of his having gone into another draper’s shop and bought the cloth, it would be difficult to make a charge of theft stick.

A person could be hanged for stealing goods worth forty shillings, meaning approximately 2 pounds, which was quite a bit in the Regency era. Jurors and barristers often  brought the value down to something like 38 shillings so that the man was transported instead of hanged. They did not like convicting a person for stealing. Even children were hanged for stealing food, though usually  an attempt was made to lower the value of the item.

Back to your idea of marking the cloth in some manner, if you want to be able to identify a bolt of linen cloth, the weaver may have put a couple of coloured threads into the selvedge. Though I would suggest that you tread carefully, for I recall reading something about some sort of legislation, at least, in regards to wool cloth, something regarding selvedge indications as to what was for export. I will see if I can find the exact legislation, but you may want to look out for the information. Another alternative to recognize the cloth is have it be a particular pattern. This could be for linen damask, which would be very expensive or for a simpler weave used for toweling, not terry toweling as we think of it today, or table linen, although there were not so many varieties of patterns for those. Alternatively, there may be some identifying merchant’s mark on the board that the fabric is wrapped around.

Unfortunately, as I was doing something similar for the Regency era, I doubt this would be the case with linen cloth then. I really liked the tale I had concocted in my head, sort of a follow up book to my The Road to Understanding, but I needed to find something a bit more realistic to proceed. Most linen at this time would be woven on 2 or 4 shaft looms, and you cannot weave a name into the selvedge with that few shafts, without doing a special and complicated pick up on every throw of the shuttle, which would make the weaving at least 4 times as slow. You technically could do it with a draw loom or Jacquard loom, but draw looms were very expensive and Jacquard looms were not invented until about 1803 and did not spread to the UK for, at least, a decade or so afterwards, and would only have been used for weaving linen damasks, not everyday linens. I am happy to be corrected by someone with more knowledge than I, but I just cannot see how it would be possible given the looms being used at the time for anything but a damask.

If you want to be able to identify a bolt of linen cloth and have the weaver put a couple of coloured threads into the selvedge, you should do more research first. If I recall correctly, there was some legislation, at least for wool cloth, regarding selvedge indications as to what was for export.

QUESTION 3: Do you know how many feet or ells were usually on a bolt?

One source I have describes cloth for dresses as being an ell long by 27 inches wide. An ell was 45 inches. Jane Austen uses “ells” in a poem to describe the amount of lace on a wrist: “And twelve ells of lace on my wrist …”

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Sewing Needles + the Upcoming Release of “Lost in the Lyon’s Garden” from Dragonblade Publishing [Arriving 18 March 2026]

The heroine in this tale becomes a seamstress out of necessity, though she is a lady of the gentry. That sent me on a search for more about needles. Adam and Eve reportedly sewed fig leafs together to cover their nakedness, but the Bible does not mention the type of needle or thread used by the pair. Genesis 3:7 is the only verse detailing this event, and it simply states, “they sewed fig leaves together and made themselves coverings.’ Many theologians focus on the symbolic nature of this passage rather than the physical details of the sewing process. Their handmade “coverings” represent a futile attempt by humanity to cover its own sin and shame through self-effort. This act is contrasted with God’s provision in the very next verses. In Genesis 3:21, God rejects their fig-leaf coverings and makes tunics of animal skin for Adam and Eve. This event introduces the concept of sacrifice and atonement, where blood must be shed to provide a proper covering for sin. But you did not come here for a Biblical lesson. You wanted to know something of needles in the Regency Era.

Sewing needles originated in the Paleolithic period, with the oldest examples made from bone found around 50,000 years ago in Siberia, used by Denisovans. Humans developed eyed needles for tasks like making insulated clothing by the Upper Paleolithic period, around 45,000 years ago in Eurasia. Later, needles were made from ivory, and eventually from copper, bronze, and steel. The invention of the sewing machine in the 19th century revolutionized sewing, though hand sewing and finishing remain important. 

Early Needles (Pre-history)

  • Denisovan Needles: The earliest known sewing needles, made from bird bone and dating back approximately 50,000 years, were discovered in Siberia’s Denisova Cave and were crafted by the Denisovans, an extinct human species. 
  • Materials: Early needles were crafted from animal bones, antlers, and tusks. 
  • Purpose: These tools allowed humans to create fitted clothing, extending their ability to settle in cooler climates after the Ice Age. 
  • “Needle Bones”: The naturally needle-like back bones of deer also served as early needles, requiring only minimal modification. 

The Development of the Eye

  • Need for an Eye: Creating a practical eyed needle was a significant innovation. 
  • First Eyed Needles: The earliest known needles with a defined eye date back to the Gravettian period, around 25,000 years ago in Russia. 
  • Independent Invention: Research suggests that the concept of eyed needles may have been developed independently in different regions, such as Siberia and China. 

From Bone to Metal

  • Bronze Age: The transition to metal needles began around 7000 BC during the Bronze Age, with copper being the first metal used. 
  • Iron Age: Later, iron and bronze needles were developed. 
  • Steel Needles: The invention of steel needles was a crucial development, leading to the mass production of the tools we use today. 

Modern History

  • Specialized Needle Making: By the 16th century, skilled Spanish and German artisans were known for their mastery in needle manufacturing. 
  • Sewing Machines: The 19th century saw the invention of the first practical sewing machine, which fundamentally changed how clothing was made. 
  • Contemporary Use: While most sewing is now done by machine, hand sewing continues to be used for fine work, detail, and finishing. 

For more detailed information regarding the history of needles, please see The Sewing Needle: A History Through the 16th to 19th Century.

Posted in book release, books, British history, customs and tradiitons, Dragonblade Publishers, eBooks, family, Georgian England, Georgian Era, Gretna Green, hero, heroines, historical fiction, history, Living in the Regency, publishing, Regency era, Regency romance, research, suspense, tradtions, writing | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Adoption in the Regency Era + the Upcoming Release of “Lost in the Lyon’s Garden” from Dragonblade Publishing [Arriving 18 March 2026]

In this tale, our hero and heroine must come together to save a newborn child’s life. They do not adopt the child, however, for there was no formal adoptions in the Regency Era.

There was no legal adoption until 1826. Before that time, it was just an agreement between the people. Bastards were legally the children of no one, and, after age seven, the  mother was not required to support the child. If the children agreed to stay with the family, no one cared to intervene, as long as the child did not depend upon the parish for support.

There was no legal process of adoption in England before the early 20th century. However, the custom of sending a child of the family to live with and often become the heir of another family was an old one.

That was true for Jane Austen’s older brother Edward. When Edward was twelve years old he was presented to Thomas and Catherine Knight, who were relatives of his father and were wealthy. Thomas had given George Austen the living at Steventon in 1761. They were childless and took an interest in Edward, making him their legal heir in about 1783. When Thomas died in 1794 he left the Godmersham Park estate to his wife for her life, with the remainder going to Edward. She left Godmersham before her death to move to Canterbury, and gave up the estates to Edward. Remember that was not a peerage, simply the estate of a landed gentleman. The rectory at Steventon, where the Austen family had spent their time growing up, and Jane is said to have written the first drafts of several of her books, was severely damaged by flooding and was knocked down by Edward in about 1823, and a new rectory was built by Edward for his son, William Knight, who had taken on the living.

As it was with Edward Austen, the disposition of what to do with the child was to send him to live with another family who saw to his training as a knight or an orphan taken in by a relative.

When people spoke of someone being “adopted” in the past it causes confusion today because the word has changed its meaning over the centuries.

Previous to 1926, the child was considered the child of the birth parents until he died.  If the child wanted to marry while still a minor, it was the birth father’s permission which would have to be sought. I solved that problem in the book, for both parents die, and our hero and heroine can see to the child’s upbringing.

So, though we speak of Edward Austen being adopted by the Knights, he was never legally considered their son. Jane Austen mentioned adopted children in several of her books. The best known is probably Fanny Price in Mansfield Park. There is no hint that Fanny was promised any legacy from her uncle nor anything at all except an education and a place to live. 

In a book called  The Watsons, an unfinished by Jane Austen, Emma Watson was adopted by an aunt. The expectation was that the aunt would provide for Emma and give her a dowry or possibly leave her a greater legacy. The aunt decides to marry, and Emma has to return to her family, living out her days on the edge of poverty.

Frank Weston, in Emma, was taken over by his aunt and uncle after his mother died and his father did not have the means to support him at that time. He was called Frank Churchill, and not Frank Weston. However, he is not assured of a legacy from his aunt and uncle, as he would have been if he had really been their son.

The argument has been made that in the past that nobles have had their peerages and property go to someone not related by blood. Quite often it was the child of a sister or the husband of a daughter or some distant relative that a peer had “adopted.” There were many oddities and odd circumstances  through history. Usually what happened in such cases was that the peer died without an heir to his title, but with daughters who receive his money and property. In such a case, one of the husbands petitioned the King and was granted the title. Some peerages have been recreated several times. In no case did a peerage automatically go to an unrelated person.

Posted in aristocracy, book release, books, British history, Dragonblade Publishers, eBooks, Georgian England, Georgian Era, hero, heroines, historical fiction, history, Inheritance, Jane Austen, laws of the land, Living in the Regency, mystery, peerage, primogenture, publishing, real life tales, Regency era, Regency romance, research, series, suspense, writing | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Traitor Tuesday: Celebrating 250 Years of the United States as a Separate Nation: George Clymer, Captain of the “Silk Stockings” and Signer of the Declaration of Independence

clymer_george

George Clymer http://www.let.rug.nl/ usa/biographies/ george-clymer/

George Clymer was 37 years old when he signed the Declaration of Independence. He was a merchant by trade and the father of 8 children. He saw part of the War of 1812, also against Great Britain, for he died at the age 73 in January 1813.

The Society of the Descendants of the Signers of the Declaration of Independence says, “A grandson of one of the original settlers of the Penn colony, George Clymer established himself as a major figure in both the struggle for independence and then the formation of a new nation. He is one of only 6 men who signed both the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution. He was an ardent and vocal advocate of independence from Britain and a tireless proponent of a strong, united central government – both views putting him in frequent conflict with the more cautious Quaker-led powers of the Pennsylvania colony.” 

Orphaned in 1740, only a year after his birth in Philadelphia, Clymer lived with a wealthy uncle, who informally educated him and advanced him from clerk to partner in his mercantile firm. The uncle bequeathed the establishment to Clymer upon his death. He combined his firm with the Merediths, a prominent business family, and cemented the relationship by marrying his senior partner’s daughter, Elizabeth, in 1765.

clymer

Signers of the Declaration of Independence: George Clymer http://www.ushistory.org

The British economic restrictions on American trade affected his business; therefore, Clymer adopted the Revolutionary cause and was one of the first to recommend independence. Early on, he served on the Pennsylvania council of safety, and in 1773 headed a committee that forced the resignation of Philadelphia tea consignees appointed by Britain under the Tea Act. Clymer’s talents rested in financial matters. In 1775-76 he acted as one of the first two Continental treasurers, even personally underwriting the war by exchanging all his own specie for Continental currency.

From Signing Their Lives Away (Denise Kiernan and Joseph D’Agnest, Quirk Books, 2009, page 122, we learn, “In 1773, Clymer saw some service as captain in corps of volunteer troops nicknamed the ‘Silk Stockings,’ because so many of its members were from well-heeled, blueblood families. It’s unlikely they saw battle because the war had not yet begun, but they did use their military might to force local merchants to stop selling British tea.”

“During the war he served twice in the Continental Congress, chairing committees that addressed the various and pressing issues of maintaining a constant flow of materiel and food for the perpetually undersupplied army, often volunteering to make trips at great personal risk to ascertain first-hand the conditions on the battlefront when others refused to go. When, Congress left Philadelphia for Baltimore during the winter of 1776 in panic at the advance of the British, Clymer stayed as one of three [along with George Walton and Robert Morris] in an Executive Committee to ensure that the army was supplied and the government continued to function. Late in the war, as the army was running out of such basic stocks as flour, and the funds to resupply were not to be found, he was instrumental in chartering a bank to raise the money privately, a service that according to the Commissioner General of the Continental Army quite literally saved the army from dissolution.” (The Society of the Descendants of the Signers of the Declaration of Independence)

“During the War for Independence, Clymer served on a series of commissions that conducted important field investigations.  Within a year, after their victory at the Battle of Brandywine, Pa. (September 11, 1777), British troops advancing on Philadelphia detoured for the purpose of vandalizing Clymer’s home in Chester County about 25 miles outside the city. His wife and children hid nearby in the woods.

“After a brief retirement following his last term in the Continental Congress, Clymer was reelected for the years 1784-88 to the Pennsylvania legislature, where he had also served part time in 1780-82 while still in Congress. As a state legislator, he advocated a bicameral legislature and reform of the penal code and opposed capital punishment. At the Constitutional Convention, where he rarely missed a meeting, he spoke seldom but effectively and played a modest role in shaping the final document.

“The next phase of Clymer’s career consisted of service in the U.S. House of Representatives in the First Congress (1789-91), followed by appointment as collector of excise taxes on alcoholic beverages in Pennsylvania (1791-94). In 1795-96 he sat on a Presidential commission that negotiated a treaty with the Cherokee and Creek Indians in Georgia. During his retirement, Clymer advanced various community projects, including the Philadelphia Society for Promoting Agriculture and the Pennsylvania Academy of the Fine Arts, and served as the first president of the Philadelphia Bank. At the age of 73, in 1813, he died at Summerseat, an estate a few miles outside Philadelphia at Morrisville that he had purchased and moved to in 1806. His grave is in the Friends Meeting House Cemetery at Trenton, NJ.” (American History from Revolution to Reconstruction and Beyond)

Posted in American History, British history, Declaration of Independence | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Linen Drapers and Shops in Regency London + the Upcoming Release of “Lost in the Lyon’s Garden” from Dragonblade Publishing [Arriving 18 March 2026]

Although the heroine in this tale is a gentleman’s daughter, she has taken a position in a draper’s shop while she attempts to assist her sister. What might that entail?

In England, a draper was a merchant or retailer who sold cloth, and sometimes clothing and other dry goods. They were an important part of the textile trade, buying cloth from manufacturers or importers and then reselling it by the yard to the public. Drapers operated shops and were often members of trade guilds, serving as a crucial link between cloth producers and consumers. 

  • Retailer of Cloth: Their primary business was selling fabric by the yard, which customers would then use to make clothes at home or with a local tailor. 
  • Dry Goods: In addition to cloth, drapers often sold other items, such as curtains and dry goods, in their shops. 

This second choice of furnishing dry goods is how Miss Victoria Whitchurch is employed. She has convinced the shop owner that providing custom made drapes would bring him additional business.

By the beginning of the 19th Century, it is estimated that 200 different shops could be found in London. These shops kept long hours, generally, 12-hour days. The shopkeepers and their assistants often lived on the premises. Warehouses were located in Covent Garden. Mercers and linen drapers could be found in Cheapside. Shops lined the streets with shopkeepers living above. We know that ladies of Society shopped on Oxford Street an Bond Street in Mayfair. Men frequented the shops and gentlemen’s clubs in St. James. Newer styled shops sprung up along the Strand.

The idea that Cheapside served many was part of my inspiration to place the hero living in a home in Cheapside, not because he lacked the wealth of his fellow lords, but because he has a great desire to further the economic prospects of his fellow man. Both Lord Benjamin Thompson and Miss Victoria Whitchurch are children of vicars, and they take their pledge to assist their neighbors seriously. They write their own “life’s plan,” one they will travel together.

Drapers, or linen drapers, used to be the supervisors of the makers of woollen and other types of cloth since only they were allowed to buy from the manufacturers or to import it. The wholesale draper (or dealer) would buy imported cloths from the merchants, and also British-produced goods from manufacturers in, say Manchester or Paisley. He acted as the middleman by reselling these to the retail linen drapers throughout his chosen territory in Britain, through his travellers (travelling salesmen). Hurley (The Book of Trades or Library of the Useful Arts. Vol III. Wiltshire Family History Society, 1994) lists the specialties of each of the manufacturing towns in 1818.

The retail linen draper actually draped selected fabrics across his doorway so they could be seen and felt (Bebb 2002). Since ready-to-wear clothes were not readily available until the mid-19th century drapers were in great demand by seamstresses and tailors. The London establishments were sometimes huge, with dozens of live-in staff called draper’s assistants, as can be seen from the census returns. Brownrigg (The Linen-Draper’s Assistant in Portraits of the English Vol V: Working Lives edited and published by COLLINS, Audrey. 1999-1. Original published by Robert Tyas, London, 1840) presents a fascinating glimpse into their world.

Haberdashers dealt in the accoutrements needed for sewing, such as lace, buttons and ribbons, and as they imported the better quality items from Milan they were also known as Milaners, which later gave rise to the term milliner, one who decorated dresses and ladies’ hats. Pins were among the articles introduced by haberdashers and at first were expensive as they were individually hand made, giving rise to the term pin money, for that used to buy fashionable frippery.”[England Mercantile Occupations, Merchants, Retailers, Clothing Materials, Dress, Drapers, Haberdashers – International Institute]

Other sources:

Linen Drapers During the Regency Era

Regency Shopping: Fashion and Fabric

Shopping in London During Jane Austen’s Time

Posted in book release, books, British history, Dragonblade Publishers, Georgian England, Georgian Era, hero, heroines, historical fiction, history, Living in the Regency, mystery, publishing, Regency era, Regency romance, research, romance, suspense, writing | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Medical Advancements in Early 1800s England + the Upcoming Release of “Lost in the Lyon’s Garden” from Dragonblade Publishing [Arriving 18 March 2026]

Though they all faced danger as children, some of Lord Macdonald Duncan’s sons were not meant to inherit. Benjamin Thompson’s uncle was Lord Louis Thompson, 9th Earl Thompson. If Louis had married and sired a son, then that son would have been the next earl. However, Louis was killed, along with Benjamin’s father, Ernest Thompson, a vicar. Duncan shielded Benjamin until the boy could inherit the earldom, but Benjamin’s heart was elsewhere. He always wished to serve mankind, and he held an interest in science and nature. Therefore, after Cambridge, Duncan sent Benjamin to Edinburgh to study medicine and surgery before he claimed his earldom. Throughout this fourth book and the series, the reader will notice Benjamin’s “mind” works a bit differently from those of his brothers.

In the early 18th century, Englishmen relied heavily on English medicines and remedies. The term ‘patent medicine’ itself originated from English patent medicines, whose ingredients were granted royal protection and exclusivity. 

Advances in early 1800s English medicine included the isolation of morphine (1803), which was a significant step in understanding active ingredients, the groundbreaking invention of the stethoscope in 1816, the first practical human blood transfusion in 1818, and the development of anesthetics like ether and nitrous oxide. The smallpox vaccine, developed in the late 1700s, began to be widely implemented, paving the way for modern immunology and vaccination programs. These advancements moved medicine away from ancient theories like the humoral theory and closer to a more scientific and measurable understanding of the body. 

René Laennec invented the stethoscope in 1816, allowing doctors to listen to the internal workings of the body, a significant leap forward in diagnosis. The anesthetic properties of nitrous oxide were announced in 1800, and the first surgical operations using ether as an anesthetic were performed shortly after. 

Edward Jenner’s work in the late 18th century on cowpox as a vaccine for smallpox led to the development of vaccination programs in the early 19th century, saving countless lives and laying the groundwork for future immunology. 

But such did not mean that there was a predominant method to surgery, etc. “Even in the 18th century the search for a simple way of healing the sick continued. In Edinburgh the writer and lecturer John Brown expounded his view that there were only two diseases, sthenic (strong) and asthenic (weak), and two treatments, stimulant and sedative; his chief remedies were alcohol and opium. Lively and heated debates took place between his followers, the Brunonians, and the more orthodox Cullenians (followers of William Cullen, a professor of medicine at Glasgow), and the controversy spread to the medical centers of Europe.”

By the 18th century the medical school at Leiden (in the Netherlands) had grown to rival that of Padua, and many students were attracted there from abroad. By the beginning of the 19th century, the structure of the human body was almost fully known, due to new methods of microscopy and of injections. 

History of Medicine tells us, “There was perhaps some danger that in the search for bacteria other causes of disease would escape detection. Many physicians, however, were working along different lines in the 19th century. Among them were a group attached to Guy’s Hospital in London: Richard Bright, Thomas Addison, and Sir William Gull. Bright contributed significantly to the knowledge of kidney diseases, including Bright disease, and Addison gave his name to disorders of the adrenal glands and the blood. Gull, a famous clinical teacher, left a legacy of pithy aphorisms that might well rank with those of Hippocrates.

“In Dublin, Robert Graves and William Stokes introduced new methods in clinical diagnosis and medical training, while in Paris a leading clinician, Pierre-Charles-Alexandre Louis, was attracting many students from America by the excellence of his teaching. By the early 19th century the United States was ready to send back the results of its own researches and breakthroughs. In 1809, in a small Kentucky town, Ephraim McDowell boldly operated on a woman—without anesthesia or antisepsis—and successfully removed a large ovarian tumor. William Beaumont, in treating a shotgun wound of the stomach, was led to make many original observations that were published in 1833 as Experiments and Observations on the Gastric Juice and the Physiology of Digestion.”

Other Resources:

There’s a Cure for That

Posted in aristocracy, book release, books, British history, Dragonblade Publishers, eBooks, Georgian England, Georgian Era, Great Britain, hero, heroines, historical fiction, history, Living in the Regency, mystery, publishing, Regency era, Regency romance, research, science, Scotland, suspense, writing | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

“Bonus” Traitor Thursday ~ Celebrating 250 Years of the United States as a Separate Nation: Richard Stockton, A Signer of the Declaration of Independence, Who Was Reviled for Recanting His Allegiance

stockton.jpg

Richard Stockton was a 45 years old lawyer when he signed the Declaration of Independence. A father of six children, he died in February 1781 at the age of 50.

Richard Stockton was born near Princeton, New Jersey to John Stockton on October 1, 1730. John Stockton was the founder of the College of New Jersey. Richard attended the West Nottingham Academy under Dr. Samuel Finley, and then earned his degree at the College of New Jersey (Now Princeton) in 1748. He studied law with David Ogden of Newark, the most prominent lawyer in the area at the time. He was admitted to the bar at the age of twenty-four and quickly gained a reputation for being an excellent attorney. Stockton became an eminent lawyer with one of the largest practices in the colonies.

During this time Richard made many influential friends. He was a long-time friend of George Washington and had a close relationship with Benjamin Rush. It was his unique relationship with Rush that led to the acquisition of John Witherspoon. Witherspoon was given the position of President of the College of New Jersey and made it a university that rivaled Harvard and Yale. He also had friendships with James Madison and Aaron Burr. Even though he had many friends of influence and was considered one of the brightest attorneys in the Middle Colonies, Stockton had no use for politics and displayed a distrust in the public. It would be the Stamp Act that would begin to push him into politics.

3454548730_8005805d8dHe applied his talents and person to the Revolutionary cause when the day came. He was appointed to the Royal Council of New Jersey in 1765 and remained a member until the government was reformed. He was a moderate with regard to Colonial autonomy. He argued that the colonies should be represented in the Parliament. With the passage of the Stamp Act, such arguments were overcome by Colonial backlash.

Stockton was a moderate at the Second Continental Congress and disagreed with the more extreme points of both views. He wanted reconciliation, but he saw the reality of independence. He was more of a realist in a convention full of idealist and was not easily taken in by their rhetoric. He struggled with how they would pay for the war, raise an army, support an army, and govern themselves. These were all things that needed to take place before independence could be declared. He drafted a plan to give the colonies their independence without renouncing the British crown. King George III rejected it. This took place in 1774 and by 1775 Stockton was now in favor of independence.

richard stockton signature.JPGIn 1774, he was appointed Justice of the Supreme Court of New Jersey. In 1776, the New Jersey delegates to the Congress were holding out against Independence. When news of this reached the constituents, New Jersey elected Richard Stockton and Dr. Witherspoon to replace two of the five New Jersey delegates. They were sent with instructions to vote for Independence. Accounts indicate that, despite clear instruction, Justice Stockton wished to hear the arguments on either side of the issue. Once he was satisfied, the New Jersey delegates voted for Independence. After the Declaration of Independence had been penned by Thomas Jefferson and edited by the committee it needed to be signed. Richard Stockton would become the first to sign the Declaration of Independence. He would pay the price for placing his signature on that document.

stockton-1Stockton was appointed to committees supporting the war effort. He was dispatched on a fact finding tour to the Northern army. The Continental Congress sent George Clymer and Richard Stockton to Fort Ticonderoga, Saratoga and Albany to help the Continental Army. On his return to the Continental Congress he took a detour and visited his friend John Covenhoven. New Jersey was overrun by the British in November of ’76, when he was returning from the mission. He managed to move his family to safety, but he and John were captured by loyalists. Stockton was stripped of his property and sent on a forced march to Perth Amboy. It was at Perth Amboy where he was given to the British. General William Howe offered Stockton and other prisoners a free pardon if they were renounce the Declaration of Independence and swear allegiance to the King. Stockton refused.  Shortly after he was beaten, interrogated, and intentionally starved. Stockton was then moved to Provost Prison in New York where he was subjected to freezing cold weather. After nearly five weeks of abusive treatment, Stockton was released on parole, his health was battered.His old friend, George Washington, negotiated his release, but Stockton’s health was already destroyed. He was required to sign a paper that would forbid him to help the war in any way after his parole. Upon his release he resigned from Congress in 1777 and according to his close friend Benjamin Rush it took him two years to fully regain his health. He returned to his estate, Morven, in Princeton, which had been occupied by General Cornwallis during Stockton’s imprisonment. All his furniture, all household belongings, crops and livestock were taken or destroyed by the British. His library, one of the finest in the colonies, was burned.

imagesTo earn a living Stockton reopened his law practice and taught new students. Two years after his parole from prison he developed cancer of the lip that spread to his throat. He was never free of pain until he died on February 28, 1781.In the last years of his life Stockton was tried in the court of public opinion as to whether or not he took an oath to the King for his release. John Witherspoon quickly dispersed these false accusations. 

Resources: 

Colonial Hall

The History Junkie 

Princeton University 

“Richard Stockton,” Wikipedia 

The Society of the Descendants of the Signers of the Declaration of Independence

U. S. History 

Posted in American History, British currency, Declaration of Independence, Do You Remember? | Tagged , , , , , , | 3 Comments

Shakespeare’s “The Two Noble Kinsmen” + the Upcoming Release of “Lost in the Lyon’s Garden” from Dragonblade Publishing [Arriving 18 March 2026]

In this story, the hero and heroine take on tending to her missing sister’s baby. The boy is fascinated by the sound of the hero’s voice. In this shorty scene, Lord Benjamin Thompson is reading Shakespeare to the infant.

from Chapter Seventeen:

She did not know how long she slept—not long enough to be refreshed fully, but enough that her mind was no longer a pot of gruel. “Where is the boy?” she asked when she found Mrs. Sullivan alone in one of the sitting rooms. 

“His lordship took the boy with him into his study. Lord Thompson said he did not want the boy waking you up.” 

“That was sweet of him,” she replied. “Perhaps I shall join them for a few minutes. His lordship is a busy man with many interests and should not be expected to tend to a babe not of his family.” 

“As you say, miss,” Miss Sullivan said as she set her next row of stitches. 

Victoria caught up her shawl and ran her damp hands across the wrinkles of her day dress to smooth them out. Her head was still more than fuzzy with having had only a bit over four hours of sleep, but she was exceedingly eager to learn how his lordship would treat her now that they had shared a kiss. 

In reality, she was losing track of how long she had been at Macalhey House. Though she had unconsciously begun to feel as if the sparse second part of Lord Thompson’s terrace house was the home she never knew she required. She was living in a dream. “What woman did not wish to encounter a strong and caring man and a sweet babe nestled together as a family, while knowing security under one roof.” 

She paused briefly before entering his half of the house. “You must not consider his life as yours,” she silently warned her heart. “Lord Duncan’s sons are not your family. Lord Thompson is not your husband nor even your betrothed. Yet, could they be?”

Despite a renewal of her qualms, Victoria was still eager to look upon her two favorite people in the world: his lordship and the child. Therefore, she placed her doubts aside to experience one more cherished memory. She found the pair in his lordship’s study. Lord Thompson was at his desk, the boy laid out on a cloth mat before him. His lordship was reading aloud, but she was not confident “what” he was reading, for she had never heard the passage before, though she thought it might be Shakespeare. Yet, it was no Shakespeare of which she was aware. The baby batted the air with his fists to the timbre of his lordship’s voice. 

Ladies, if we have been merry, 

And have pleased ye with a derry, 

And a derry, and a down, 

Say the Schoolmaster’s no Clown

Duke, if we have pleased thee too, 

And have done as Boys should do, 

His lordship ran his finger along the page of the book he was holding out of the child’s reach. Meanwhile, the boy followed his lordship’s reading. Gurgling. And swinging his hands about to the rhythm of Lord Thompson’s recitation. 

Give us but a tree or twain 

For a Maypole, and again

Ere another year run out, 

We’ll make thee laugh and all this rout. 

“You are reading him what sounds of Shakespeare, but not the Shakespeare I know,” she said from the open door’s portal. 

“You said the child appears to like the sound of my voice. Should not the boy enjoy what many believe to be a John Fletcher and William Shakespeare collaboration? This one would be near the end of the Bard’s career.” 

“And what is the name of this play?” she asked. “I am most curious.” 

“‘The Two Noble Kinsmen,’” he responded. “First published in 1634 with the names of John Fletcher and William Shakespeare on the title page.” He held up the book for her to see. “However, most scholars believe, because parts are borrowed from Beaumont’s 1613 masque and referred to in 1614’s Bartholomew Fair, it was written earlier and was revised merely by Fletcher.” 

“Both the boy and I learned something new today,” she said softly, while marveling at the man who possessed a heart of gold and was a champion for those, like her, who required a hand up. 

She circled the desk to look down upon the child, whose eyes were opening and slowly closing as sleep called his name.

<<<>>>

The Two Noble Kinsmen is a Jacobean tragicomedy, first published in 1634 and attributed jointly to John Fletcher and William Shakespeare. Its plot derives from “The Knight’s Tale” in Geoffrey Chaucer’s The Canterbury Tales (1387–1400), which had already been dramatised at least twice before, and itself was a shortened version of Boccaccio’s epic poem Teseida. This play is believed to have been originally performed in 1613–1614, making it William Shakespeare’s final play before he retired to Stratford-upon-Avon, where he died in 1616.

Formerly a point of controversy, the dual attribution is now generally accepted by scholarly consensus. [Erdman, David V.; Fogel, Ephim G., eds. (1966). Evidence for Authorship: Essays on Problems of Attribution. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press. pp. 486–494, 433–435, 467–469.]

“Links between The Two Noble Kinsmen and contemporaneous works point to 1613–1614 as its date of composition and first performance. A reference to Palamon, one of the protagonists of Kinsmen, is contained in Ben Jonson’s play Bartholomew Fair (1614). In Jonson’s work, a passage in Act IV, scene iii, appears to indicate that Kinsmen was known and familiar to audiences at that time.

“In Francis Beaumont’s The Masque of the Inner Temple and Gray’s Inn (1613), the second anti-masque features this cast of rural characters: pedant, May Lord and Lady, servingman and chambermaid, tavern host and hostess, shepherd and his wench, and two “bavians” (male and female baboon). The same cast slightly simplified (minus wench and one “bavian”) enacts the Morris dance in Kinsmen, II, v, 120–138. A successful “special effect” in Beaumont’s masque, designed for a single performance, appears to have been adopted and adapted into Kinsmen, indicating that the play followed soon after the masque.” [Stone, John (September 2020). “The Two Noble Kinsmen and Eighteen Other Newly Discovered Early Modern English Quartos in an Hispano-Scottish Collection”. Notes and Queries67 (3): 367–374.]

Posted in acting, book excerpts, book release, British history, Canterbury tales, Chaucer, Dragonblade Publishers, eBooks, excerpt, Georgian England, Georgian Era, hero, heroines, historical fiction, history, literature, Living in the Regency, mystery, playwrights, publishing, Regency era, Regency romance, research, suspense, theatre, writing | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Traitor Tuesday ~ Celebrating 250 Years of the United States as a Separate Nation: Matthew Thornton, President of New Hampshire and Signer of the Declaration of Independence

thornton

Matthew Thorton was a 62 years old physician when he signed the Declaration of Independence. The father of 5 children, Thorton was one of two signers who had been born in Ireland. Thornton died at the age of 89 in 1803.

One of three New Hampshire men to sign the Declaration of Independence, Matthew Thornton, physician, soldier, patriot, agitated against the Stamp Act of 1765, presided over the Provincial Congress in 1775, served in the State Senate and as an associate justice of the Superior Court. His monument in Merrimack, NH honors his memory. He is buried in the adjacent cemetery. His homestead stands directly across the highway.

Matthew Thornton was born on 17 March 1713 in Kilskerry Parish, Tyrone, Ireland. He was the son – one of 10 children – of James Thorton, Jr., and Elizabeth Thorton. He was the husband of Hannah (Jack) Thornton and father to James, Mary, Matthew (Jr.), and Hannah. His parents emigrated to America when he was three. The Thornton family remained aboard the ship for the first six months they were in America. As Presbyterians, the Thorntons’ beliefs were often called upon for an explanation in their new home. They first settled at Wiscasset, in Maine, but soon went to Worcester, Massachusetts, where Mathew received an academic education. Thornton became a physician and was appointed surgeon to the New Hampshire Militia troops in an expedition against Fortress Louisbourg, Cape Breton (part of the French and Indian War). His medical practice was very successful and he acquired much land, becoming a leading member of the community in Londonderry. There he held many local offices while also representing Londonderry at the Provincial Assembly.

“But once Parliament enacted the Stamp Act, his politics reached a turning point. He became a very vocal and well-known advocate of independence and also served as chairman of the local Committee of Safety, which was typically charged with protecting citizens by mounting defenses. Thornton’s committee ended up assuming supreme executive power over the colony. 

“In 1774, as the situation worsened with the Mother Country, a mob attacked a royal fort in Portsmouth, swiping its stash of gunpowder and weapons and distributing them to the local militia. By the following summer, the Royal Governor John Wentworth and his family were hiding out in the very same fort – and perhaps seeing the writing on the way, they finally abandoned the colony and sailed for England. Not knowing if there would ever be a larger union, New Hampshire formed its own independent government, and Thornton was swiftly elected the colony’s president, or revolutionary executive – the first non-royal governor, so to speak.” (Denise Kiernan and Joseph D’Agnest, Signing Their Lives Away, @2009, Quirk Books, page 22)

He was first President of the New Hampshire House of Representatives and Associate Justice of the Superior Court of New Hampshire. He was elected to the Continental Congress after the debates on independence had occurred, arriving just in time to actually sign the Declaration of Independence. He was selected to attend Congress again in 1777, but declined to attend due to poor health. He held royal commissions as justice of the peace under the colonial administration of Gov. Benning Wentworth, as well as a colonel of militia. He became Londonderry Town Selectman, a representative to, and President of the Provincial Assembly, and a member of the Committee of Safety, drafting New Hampshire’s plan of government after dissolution of the royal government, which was the first state constitution adopted after the start of hostilities with England.  

After serving his term in Congress he became chief justice of the Court of Common Pleas in New Hampshire, and afterwards judge of the Superior Court. About 1762, he established a farm in New Boston, New Hampshire, remaining there 8 years, before returning to Londonderry. After 1776 he purchased a farm in that part of Merrimack known as Thornton’s Ferry, where, surrounded by his family and friends, he passed the remainder of his days in dignified repose. He served Merrimack, New Hampshire, as moderator and selectman, and on the 1787 tax list he is shown living in District 4. He died at the house of his daughter, Mrs. Hannah Thornton McGaw, in Newburyport, Mass., June 24, 1803, at the age of eighty-nine years.

Mr. Thornton was a man of commanding presence, but of a very genial nature, remarkable for his native wit and great fondness for anecdote. His remains were brought back to Merrimack, and they repose in the little burial ground at Thornton’s Ferry, with only a modest tombstone to mark his resting place (inscription: “An honest man). On August 28, 1885, an act of the legislature authorized the erection of a suitable monument to his memory, upon a site selected and donated by the town. Upon September 29, 1892, this monument was dedicated with appropriate ceremonies, the Hon. William T. Parker being president and Hon. Charles H. Burns the orator of the day. The town of Thornton, New Hampshire, is named in his honor, as is a Londonderry elementary school, as well as Thorntons Ferry School in Merrimack. Thornton’s residence in Derry, which was part of Londonderry at the time, is listed on the National Register of Historic Places. 

800px-Matthewthorntonhousederry

The Matthew Thornton House in Derry, New Hampshire wikipedia

800px-Thornton_Sign

Sources: 

Colonial Hall 

Geni 

NH Searchroots 

U. S. History: Signers of the Declaration of Independence 

Wikipedia 

Posted in American History, British history, Declaration of Independence, Georgian England, Georgian Era, history, Living in the Regency, medicine, military, Regency era | Tagged , , , , , , | 4 Comments