‘Kinder- un Hausmärchen’ + the Release of “Amending the Shades of Pemberley” + a Giveaway

When I was still teaching one of the courses assigned to me was World Literature. It was a tenth grade course and contained many of the world classics we treasure today. [Eleventh grade was American literature and twelfth grade was British literature, both of which I also taught, as well as journalism and an Advanced Placement Language course.] I really did not mind switching subjects for it forced me to be versatile. However, I will admit, when it came to teaching World Lit to the lower level classes (many with learning challenges – I have two advanced degrees as a Reading Specialist and another in the field of special education), we all struggled through some of the material, so I came up with this idea to develop a couple of units geared to the students learning needs, rather than to “dumb down” the curriculum. Instead, I brought in books on different cultures so my students could understand what influenced the writers of those countries. Books designed for the middle grade learner or above. Next, I created a simple in appearance (but complicated) unit on stories in common from around the world. One section of that program dealt with fairy tales. I purchased some twenty different versions of the “Cinderella” story. Children’s books, really.

Together the students and I created a chart of what was common knowledge in all the Cinderella versions of the tale they had read or viewed in movies: glass slipper, wicked stepmother, stroke of midnight, etc. For example, Korea.net tells us, “The story of Kongjwi and Patjwi is a beloved and popular Korean folktale made around the late Joseon period. The folktale is known to exist in 17 variant forms, and the novel version was first published in 1928. Often compared to the Western fairy tell of Cinderella for sharing common motifs, Kongjwi and Patjwi also features a wicked stepmother, a misplaced shoe, and helper-characters with magical powers. The universal theme of “good prevailing over evil” is also found in both. These commonalities appear in almost all variations of the more than 1,000 Cinderella-type stories known to exist worldwide.” My students learned about cultures and literature at the same time. No challenges they could not overcome because I broke it down into easy to achieve goals. Just simple love of learning.

https://www.korea.net/NewsFocus/Culture/view?articleId=120649

In my new Jane Austen Fan Fiction book, I do not use a Cinderella story, though many of us would compare Elizabeth Bennet to Cinderella and Mr. Darcy to the prince. Rather, I thought about both Elizabeth’s and Darcy’s love of reading and how they could often read each other’s minds, creating a connection which could not be broken. Last Friday, I spoke of Love’s Labour’s Lost from Shakespeare. In the book, they also share an oral reading of Taming of the Shrew. Yet, it is a brief mention of the tale of Hansel and Gretel, which might likely catch some off guard. Do not worry. I did my homework. I cannot have some reviewer telling me I made a mistake on when the book was published.

The first volume of the collected fairy tales from Jacob and Wilhelm Grimm was published in 1812 under the title Kinder- un Hausmärchen. By 1822, the Grimm brothers had three such volumes under their belts and containing some 170 tales. Their work had a great influence on other European countries. Even so, the Grimm “fairy” tales were not cleaned up, so to speak, until much later.

from Maude Frome @frome_maude ~ Hansel & Gretel originated in the Baltic Regions during the Great Famine of 1314 to 1322, a time of such hunger that children were often abandoned (like H & G) & even eaten – a fate Hansel narrowly avoids when Gretel pushes the witch into her own oven.

Jacob and Wilhelm Grimm published the first volume of their collected fairy tales in 1812 under the title Kinder- und Hausmärchen. By 1822, the brothers had published three volumes containing 170 tales total with subsequent editions bringing that number to over 200. Their work both in collecting and composing these tales had a great influence on other collectors in Europe who subsequently compiled and published stories from their own countries throughout the 19th century. 

The Illinois University Library tells us, “The early volumes of Grimm tales were criticized because they were not suitable for children and later editions were sanitized to make the stories more palatable. Wicked mothers became wicked stepmothers, likely due to the perceived sanctity of motherhood, and sexual references such as pregnancy were removed, as in “Rapunzel.” Despite these changes, Grimm fairy tales are much more violent than in modern adaptations, particularly when it comes to punishing villains.”

Upon first arriving at Pemberley, Elizabeth and Mary comment on leaving a trail of bread crumbs to find their way back to their quarters.

Entering the suite indicated, Elizabeth paused in awe. The broad corridor leading to this particular wing of the house had been lined with artwork from Sir Joshua Reynolds and Thomas Gainsborough and George Romney and others she did not recognize, but would study when the opportunity proved itself. 

Mrs. Reynolds opened the door to a large sitting room. “This is your suite, Mrs. Darcy, with the sitting room to be shared with the master. I will have your trunk brought up. Mr. Darcy indicated you would require a lady’s maid; therefore, I have taken the liberty to hire a girl from the village on a trial basis. You are under no obligation to retain her services if she does not please you.” 

While the woman bustled about the room, Elizabeth naturally gravitated to the large window, sporting a window seat and several pillows, which she knew would become one of her favorite places to look out upon the well-groomed lawns of the estate. “I am certain the girl will serve me well. I am not one to sit before a mirror for very long.” She turned from the window to run her fingers across the backs of two straight-back upholstered chairs seated before a fireplace, which had been set for her pleasure. The material used on the chairs complemented the green, such as that found in a forest, of the drapes. A compact desk occupied one corner alongside two floor-to-ceiling book shelves. A low table and a settee were available for sharing tea, and upon the floor stood a cream and green rug, likely from China. “Mama would be speechless,” she murmured. 

“Pardon?” Mrs. Reynolds asked. 

“Just ruminating on my mother’s delight in such a room.” Realizing Mary and the child still waited for the housekeeper, Elizabeth said, “I should add a few more pins to my hair while you show my sister and Miss Alice to their quarters.” 

“Certainly, Mrs. Darcy,” Mrs. Reynolds said as she pulled herself up royally to finish the task. “Mr. Darcy’s quarters are through the dressing room, ma’am.” She nodded to Mary and the child to follow her. 

Elizabeth stood looking at the door the housekeeper had indicated. Would this be the night Mr. Darcy finally claimed his husbandly duties? The idea both frightened and enticed her. “Pull yourself together, Elizabeth,” she chastised. “What is to be will be. You made a bargain to save yourself and Mary. You weighed your options, and this one proved the best. The house is magnificent and your husband is wealthy. For what more could you wish? What if Mr. Darcy does not hold you in affection? You would be no different from half the female population of England in that manner. You only asked for a place where you and Mary would be safe. God granted your wish: Do not ask for more.” 

She was nearly finished with her hair when Alice, carrying her doll tucked under one arm, bounded through the still open door. “Bis Lizbeth, I’ve a bowteaful room too. You’ll come to see it?”

“It is nearly time for your father to fetch us for our meal, but I promise to view both your and Mary’s rooms when we see the rest of the house.” 

“Did I hear my name?” Mary asked as she came through the door. 

“Alice wishes us to view her new quarters,” Elizabeth explained. “I suggested we wait until after our meal and Mr. Darcy’s tour of the house.” 

“I am rather hungry, are you not also, Alice?” Mary said perceptively before the child could lodge a protest.

“Will there be cakes?” Alice asked. “Biss Cassandra likes cakes.”

Mr. Darcy appeared in the open doorway. “If my daughter wishes cakes, she will have them,” he announced as he lifted the child to his arms. 

“Yet, not before Miss Alice eats a proper meal,” Elizabeth corrected. “Cake will not have you growing up, but rather out.” She gestured with her hands, and the child giggled. “Lead on, Mr. Darcy,” she instructed. Wrapping her arm through Mary’s, Elizabeth added, “All your ladies are at your disposal.” To Mary, she teasingly said, “We should steal a few of the bread rolls and leave a trail of bread crumbs to find our way back to our rooms.” 

Her husband said over his shoulder, “Despite the tale in Kinder- und Hausmärchen, your doing so will only earn one of the maids a good tongue-lashing from Mrs. Reynolds.” He grinned at Elizabeth.

Elizabeth remarked, “You really should smile more often, sir. It pleases me to see you thusly.” 

“Other than Alice, I have not had a reason to smile in many years.” His brows lifted in an apparent challenge. 

Elizabeth gently tugged Mary closer. “Then, we three ladies must provide you more reasons to know happiness.” 

The gentleman did not respond, but he looked upon her in a serious manner until Alice tapped his cheek to reclaim his attention, but Elizabeth thought, if only for a brief moment, he approved of her response.

Amending the Shades of Pemberley: A Pride and Prejudice Vagary 

“You have willfully misunderstood me, Miss Bennet. You have no worry of my releasing you, for I do not wish you to perform as a governess to my daughter, but rather as my wife and the mistress of my hereditary estate.”  

Elizabeth Bennet had thought the stranger quite handsome; yet, she had ignored those first tendrils of interest, for she was in no position for the gentleman to pursue her. She and her sister Mary were all who remained of their family. Moreover, Longbourn and its furnishings were to be sold. They were destitute, and, if fortunate, headed for service in some stranger’s household. 

Fitzwilliam Darcy’s proposal of marriage would save both Mary and her, for her sister had agreed to assist with the gentleman’s young daughter. But what of the man’s tale of having corresponded with her father and of Mr. Bennet having purported a marriage between this stranger and her? Elizabeth knew nothing of the arrangement nor of the man’s existence. Though their marriage would solve all her troubles, what if the man’s tale was not completely truthful? Would Mr. Darcy become her enemy or a man she could learn to love? 

GIVEAWAY: Amending the Shades of Pemberley releases next Wednesday, April 26. To be a part of the giveaway of 2 eBook copies of this tale, add a comment below. Winners will be notified by email.

Purchase Links:

Kindle https://www.amazon.com/Amending-Shades-Pemberley-Prejudice-Vagary-ebook/dp/B0C1HLTW2M/ref=tmm_kin_swatch_0?_encoding=UTF8&qid=&sr=

You will also be able to Read the book on Kindle Unlimited beginning April 26. 

Amazon Print Copy https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0C1J2GT3F/ref=tmm_pap_swatch_0?_encoding=UTF8&qid=&sr=

BookBub https://www.bookbub.com/books/amending-the-shades-of-pemberley-a-pride-and-prejudice-vagary-by-regina-jeffers

Releases April 26, 2023

Posted in book excerpts, book release, books, British history, customs and tradiitons, eBooks, excerpt, Georgian England, Georgian Era, giveaway, historical fiction, history, Jane Austen, literature, Pride and Prejudice, publishing, reading, reading habits, real life tales, Regency era, Regency romance, research, tall tales, Vagary, writing | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 4 Comments

Cecil Sharp’s Influence on “Amending the Shades of Pemberley” + a Giveaway

In my latest Jane Austen Fan Fiction, Amending the Shades of Pemberley, I bent the rules a bit, and had Elizabeth singing the song “Hush, Little Baby” (or also known as the “Mockingbird” song) to Mr. Darcy’s daughter. I explained it all away by having her grandfather Gardiner learning the song from some Scots and Irish immigrants in the southern states of the U.S.

As with many folk songs, the author and date of origin of “Hush, Little Baby” remain an unknown. The English folklorist Cecil Sharp collected and notated a version of this song found in Endicott, Franklin County, Virginia in 1918, but such simply means the song had been around much longer, passed down from generation to generation, with little changes in it depending on whether one’s ancestors were from Scotland, Ireland, England, Wales, or Northwest Europe. Sharp, himself, found a different version with complete lyrics in Micaville, North Carolina. A version recorded by James Madison Carpenter on a wax cylinder in the early 1930s in Durham, North Carolina, can be heard online at the Vaughan Williams Memorial Library website. Naturally, that date is well past the time of my story, but Cecil Sharp discovered such songs over and over again. If you have never heard of Sharp, you will be surprised by all he accomplished.

Cecil Sharp was an English born collector of folk songs, folk dances, and instrumental music. He was the man behind the folk-song revival in England during the Edwardian period. Sharp collected over 4000 songs from untutored rural singers in both Southwest England and the Southern Appalachian region of the U.S., where many have settled. “He published an extensive series of song books based on his fieldwork, often with piano arrangements, and wrote an influential theoretical work, English Folk Song: Some Conclusions. He also noted down surviving examples of English Morris dancing, and played an important role in the revival both of the Morris and English country dance.

I am going to take a side note here and speak of both a film and a book. The film is entitled Songcatcher, and although Songcatcher is a work of fiction, it is loosely based on the work of Olive Dame Campbell, founder of the John C. Campbell Folk School in Brasstown, North Carolina, and that of the English folk song collector Cecil Sharp, portrayed at the end of the film as professor Cyrus Whittle. A Lionsgate Film, Songcatcher about a woman whose drive to pursue the things she believes in leads her on an unexpected path to self-discovery. It is 1907, and musicologist Doctor Lily Penleric (Janet McTeer) has just been denied a promotion in the male-dominated world of her university. Frustrated and determined to get academic recognition, she heads to Appalachia with a recording device and writing materials. It also features Aidan Quinn and Emmy Rossum, along with Pat Carroll (the original voice of Ursula in “The Little Mermaid’). [Note: There is a situation in the story regarding homosexuality for which I offer a warning, but the tale itself is so beautifully told on how songs were preserved in the mountains of Appalachia, it is worth fast-forwarding through that part if you hold objections.]

The other is a book by Sharyn McCrumb entitled “The Songcatcher.” The Songcatcher traces one American family from the Revolutionary War to the present by following an English ballad as it is handed down through the generations. It is part of Ms. McCrumb’s ballad series, which I adored.

Amending the Shades of Pemberley: A Pride and Prejudice Vagary 

“You have willfully misunderstood me, Miss Bennet. You have no worry of my releasing you, for I do not wish you to perform as a governess to my daughter, but rather as my wife and the mistress of my hereditary estate.”  

Elizabeth Bennet had thought the stranger quite handsome; yet, she had ignored those first tendrils of interest, for she was in no position for the gentleman to pursue her. She and her sister Mary were all who remained of their family. Moreover, Longbourn and its furnishings were to be sold. They were destitute, and, if fortunate, headed for service in some stranger’s household. 

Fitzwilliam Darcy’s proposal of marriage would save both Mary and her, for her sister had agreed to assist with the gentleman’s young daughter. But what of the man’s tale of having corresponded with her father and of Mr. Bennet having purported a marriage between this stranger and her? Elizabeth knew nothing of the arrangement nor of the man’s existence. Though their marriage would solve all her troubles, what if the man’s tale was not completely truthful? Would Mr. Darcy become her enemy or a man she could learn to love? 

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

GIVEAWAY: I have another two eBook copies of Amending the Shades of Pemberley available for those who comment below. The book released on Wednesday, April 26.

Purchase Links:

Kindle https://www.amazon.com/Amending-Shades-Pemberley-Prejudice-Vagary-ebook/dp/B0C1HLTW2M/ref=tmm_kin_swatch_0?_encoding=UTF8&qid=&sr=

Also Available to Read on Kindle Unlimited 

Amazon https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0C1J2GT3F/ref=tmm_pap_swatch_0?_encoding=UTF8&qid=&sr=

BookBub https://www.bookbub.com/books/amending-the-shades-of-pemberley-a-pride-and-prejudice-vagary-by-regina-jeffers

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Now, back to my JAFF tale. In this scene, Darcy overhears Elizabeth singing the song “Hush, Little Baby” to Alice. At this point in the book, their relationship is quite strained.

“Hush little baby, don’t say a word, papa’s going to bring you a mockingbird,” Elizabeth softly sang the familiar lyrics as Alice nodded off to sleep. This was the third time she had sung the song this evening. The lullaby had quickly become Alice’s favorite. Elizabeth suspected it was because the lyrics spoke of what her father might bring her. 

“Papa,” the child whispered and reached out a hand. It was only then did Elizabeth realize Mr. Darcy stood in the open doorway. 

“Good evening, sweetheart.” He stepped inside and knelt beside the child’s bed. A gentle hand brushed the hair from Alice’s cheek. “It is good of Elizabeth to sing the lullaby so many times.” 

“One more,” the child said rolling her eyes upward to meet Elizabeth’s. “Peas.” 

“Last time,” Elizabeth warned, not because she disliked being with the child, but because she wished to avoid her husband. She began again, “Hush, little baby, don’t say a word. Papa’s going to bring you a mockingbird. If that mockingbird doesn’t sing, papa’s going to bring you a diamond ring. If that diamond ring turns to brass, papa’s going to bring you a looking glass. If that looking glass is broke, your papa will bring you a billy goat.” 

Thankfully, the child’s thumb found her mouth, and Elizabeth was not required to finish the song. 

The nursery maid slipped into the room where she would sleep nearby. “I’ll douse the candle, sir,” the girl whispered. 

Mr. Darcy nodded his agreement. He rose, but tarried a moment to look upon his child with an expression of longing Elizabeth could not identify, before he extended his hand to her. She did not want to touch him, for Elizabeth knew herself too susceptible to him; yet, she accepted the heat of his palm as it encircled her closed fist. Gently, he interlaced their fingers and led her from the room. As they walked away, hand-in-hand, she could not completely swallow the whimper rushing to her lips. 

Her husband paused, turning her to face him. “What bothers you so profoundly, love?” he asked as he reached to caress her cheek.

Elizabeth wished desperately for him to touch her in affection; however, she knew such would never occur. She managed to say, “The lullaby reminds me of my mother. She sang it to each of her children. I have both her and my father on my mind since the Holy Days. Like Alice, I always wondered when my papa would bring me each of the fairings.” 

“I have never heard the song before. Where did you learn it?” he asked, tucking her hand about his arm and directing their steps towards their quarters.

“From my Grandfather Gardiner. He was a tradesman, building what is now my Uncle Edward’s import and export business. At that time, Grandfather Gardiner often traveled to exotic and not so exotic places. Once, he made his way to the American continent, for he had heard of a place a bit north of what now is the port of Charleston. There were artisans there who created hand-crafted furniture, which my grandfather thought would be popular with many in London, for it was sturdy and made of an odd wood with lines, that when polish was added to it, made for a bit of what he liked to call a ‘masterpiece in wood and grit.’

“While he dealt with the fathers in a rudimentary village, GG heard a woman singing the song to her child. She had a Scottish accent.” 

“You called your grandfather ‘GG’?” he asked with a large smile.

“No, Jane called him such, for she had difficulty saying ‘Gardiner,’” she corrected. “For a bit he was ‘Grandfather G.’ By the time Mary came along, he was ‘GG.’” She paused, “Should I continue to speak of the lullaby or should we discuss what you called your grandparents when you were young, and do not forget, Alice calls me ‘Lizbet.’”

“My maternal grandparents were your lordship and your ladyship,” he said with that boyish grin which made him appear ten years younger. “However, I wish to know more of the song, Mrs. Darcy.” 

“The settlement was full of Irish and Scottish residents. Evidently, they both had a version of the song, which they gladly taught to him. By the time he returned to England, he had mixed up some of what they told him, but he enjoyed singing the song for first one grandchild and then another. As Mrs. Frances Bennet was the youngest of GG’s children, she heard it more often than her older brother and sister, and she shared it with us often.” 

“I like the idea Alice has a unique lullaby,” he admitted. “Thank you for providing my daughter a future. Such was one of my promises to her as a babe in the cradle, but I have always feared I had tempted the Fates one too many times.” 

Elizabeth wished to ask what other promises he had made to Alice and why the Fates would wish to destroy something so sacred for a child, but she swallowed her curiosity once more. 

“Sleep well, my dear,” he said as he bent to kiss her tenderly. 

“You as well, sir.” Elizabeth wished to tarry. To kiss him again and maybe one more time. Yet, she knew she could not share her bed with a man who took his pleasure elsewhere. Therefore, she turned quickly and entered her room, refusing to look back at the man who she had once thought would appreciate her efforts to please him. 

Posted in Appalachia, ballads, book excerpts, book release, British history, customs and tradiitons, eBooks, excerpt, Georgian England, Georgian Era, giveaway, historical fiction, Ireland, Jane Austen, Pride and Prejudice, publishing, real life tales, Regency era, Regency romance, research, tradtions, Vagary, writing | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 5 Comments

Could Longbourn Be Lost to Mortgage Debt? + the Release of “Amending the Shades of Pemberley” + a Giveaway

In many Regency novels, either the hero inherits an estate/title that is deep in debt, not of his making, or the heroine’s father has died and left his family destitute, due to his gaming debts or his poor investments. Both situations play well into the hands of a skilled author of Regencies, and, although they are somewhat cliché, that does not mean a reader will not enjoy the twists and turns all over again. However, of late, I have noted on several of the Facebook groups that people are confused about a particular plot point that mentions a debt-ridden inheritance. Therefore, I am taking on the topic today. 

Property could be tied up by entails, previous wills, marriage settlements, deeds, and other conditions accompanying a deed—we usually speak of all of these as being “entailed” property, but each could have a different line of descent. For quite a long time real property could not be devised by a person’s last will and testament, but had to be done by deeds or other means of transfer.

Only registered debts like mortgages and those on which the stamps and fees had been paid were legally enforceable. The law of the time said an heir was only liable for debts to the sum of the assets he inherited. Most mortgages could be continued, just by paying the interest. As I said above, much of this depends on whether the land was settled or not—deeded to another, entailed, passed by settlements—as to what happened to it. If the man inherited by entail, then he was stuck with the property and the debt. If by will and deed, he could refuse to accept the inheritance and let it be as though the man had died intestate. Then the solicitors would be involved and  go looking for the heir while the executor dealt with the creditors.

In my latest Jane Austen Fan Fiction tale, before his death, Mr. Bennet has invested in a mine, which supposedly has gone bust. He meant to present his daughters decent dowries so they might marry, but because the mine did not prove what he had hoped, Longbourn has been mortgaged. All would be well in Bennet’s mind, because after his death, the debt would be Mr. Collins’s responsibility. Yet, Fate has a way of wagging her finger at those who mean to tempt her. Mr. Bennet meets an untimely death due to a heart spasm, and Mr. Collins is brought down by the pox which took many lives in the neighborhood, including Mrs. Bennet, Lydia, and Kitty. Now, the debt falls on Elizabeth’s most honourable shoulders, and she agrees to auction off the household items to offset the mortgage debt.

Enjoy this scene from Chapter One of Amending the Shades of Pemberley, and then comment below to be a part of the GIVEAWAY. Today, we have another 2 eBook copies of the tale available for the chosen winners. Remember, Amending the Shades of Pemberley is currently on preorder on Amazon. It will release on Wednesday, April 26, 2023.

You may purchase the book at these links:

Kindle https://www.amazon.com/Amending-Shades-Pemberley-Prejudice-Vagary-ebook/dp/B0C1HLTW2M/ref=tmm_kin_swatch_0?_encoding=UTF8&qid=&sr=

Also Available to Read on Kindle Unlimited 

Amazon https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0C1J2GT3F/ref=tmm_pap_swatch_0?_encoding=UTF8&qid=&sr=

BookBub https://www.bookbub.com/books/amending-the-shades-of-pemberley-a-pride-and-prejudice-vagary-by-regina-jeffers

Amending the Shades of Pemberley: A Pride and Prejudice Vagary 

“You have willfully misunderstood me, Miss Bennet. You have no worry of my releasing you, for I do not wish you to perform as a governess to my daughter, but rather as my wife and the mistress of my hereditary estate.”  

Elizabeth Bennet had thought the stranger quite handsome; yet, she had ignored those first tendrils of interest, for she was in no position for the gentleman to pursue her. She and her sister Mary were all who remained of their family. Moreover, Longbourn and its furnishings were to be sold. They were destitute, and, if fortunate, headed for service in some stranger’s household. 

Fitzwilliam Darcy’s proposal of marriage would save both Mary and her, for her sister had agreed to assist with the gentleman’s young daughter. But what of the man’s tale of having corresponded with her father and of Mr. Bennet having purported a marriage between this stranger and her? Elizabeth knew nothing of the arrangement nor of the man’s existence. Though their marriage would solve all her troubles, what if the man’s tale was not completely truthful? Would Mr. Darcy become her enemy or a man she could learn to love? 

Excerpt from Chapter One

Chapter One

Early Autumn 1814

“How might I be of service, Sister Elizabeth?”

Elizabeth looked up to view the solemn face of Mr. Bingley. Today was the first time he had made an appearance at Longbourn since Jane’s untimely passing. Sadness still marked the man’s features, and Elizabeth reached out to take his hands in hers. “Thank you for coming. I know all this is difficult for you.” 

“No more so than it is for you and Miss Mary,” he said kindly. “Have all the arrangements been made? What of you and your sister?”

“Mary will stay with Aunt and Uncle Gardiner. The Phillipses have offered me a home, but I could not remain in Meryton and view Longbourn in the hands of another,” she admitted. “Aunt Gardiner’s second eldest brother is a vicar in the north. Her eldest brother passed at the same time as her father. Mr. Ericks has agreed to take me in until I can claim a position as a governess or a teacher at a girls’ school.” 

“There is no need for either you or Miss Mary to enter service. You are my sweet Jane’s sisters. You will always have a home with me,” he declared. 

Elizabeth wrapped her arm through his. “You are wonderfully generous and caring, and Mary and I are honored by your kindness; yet, we cannot accept. First and foremost, you do not require a constant reminder of your loss. You must eventually begin again, for you owe it to your family name to do so. I know you cannot yet think of taking another to wife, but you must some day act accordingly, and such would be quite awkward if your late wife’s sisters resided with you. No woman wishes to share her house with ‘reminders’ of another, especially a woman of Jane’s angelic beauty and kindness.” 

Elizabeth knew Mr. Bingley’s sisters would not approve of his attentions to Jane’s family. Although Jane’s being a gentleman’s daughter had raised Mr. Bingley’s status in society, Miss Bingley and Mrs. Hurst had never approved of their brother’s marriage to the woman he loved and was dearly loved in return. The sisters wanted their own tickets into society, riding their brother’s coattails into the haut ton

“There must be something of significance I may do for you,” he insisted. 

Elizabeth led him to a small sitting room. She purposely avoided her mother’s favorite drawing room. She and Mr. Bingley each had too many memories associated with the room. It was the room in which Bingley had proposed and in which her dear father had taken his last breath. “Would you like tea?” she asked. “Or something stronger?”

Mr. Bingley shook off the offer. “All I require is for you to speak to me honestly,” he instructed. 

Elizabeth heaved a weary sigh. “The news from Mr. Birkhead was worse than I initially thought,” she began without looking directly into Mr. Bingley’s eyes. “The area lost so many to the pox. Some saw whole families wiped out. Despite the passing of Lydia and Kitty and Mama, Papa was certain we could go on. I should not say this, but you will understand: Neither Mr. Bennet’s thoughts nor mine were meant to be malicious. Yet, with Mr. Collins’s passing and Charlotte delivering forth a daughter, Mr. Bennet believed he had been presented a reprieve. He could, assuredly, after a period of mourning, marry another and, perhaps, produce a son to keep the entailment alive.”

“Who is to inherit now?” Mr. Bingley asked. 

“If I understand it properly,” she began, “the entail will end, but a thorough search will be conducted to learn if another can make a claim. There are no male heirs coming from Mr. Bennet’s line, but perhaps that of another cousin.” 

“Could not you and Miss Mary inherit through some sort of common recovery? Or, perhaps, though not what you wish, even Mr. Collins’s daughter? Was not Collins’s claim through a female line some four generations removed?” Mr. Bingley asked. 

“I am not as well versed in Mr. Collins’s lineage as I should be, but Mr. Birkhead says otherwise. Moreover, I have spoken to Charlotte, and she will make no claim on the estate. In fact, it is my understanding, the gentleman who will replace Mr. Collins at Hunsford has requested to court Charlotte once Mrs. Collins’s mourning period has ended. It seems Lady Catherine de Bourgh believes Charlotte would be a good influence on her ladyship’s new rector.” 

“Then why cannot you and Miss Mary remain in Meryton?” Mr. Bingley asked. 

Elizabeth swallowed hard. “There is not enough money.” 

“I could . . .” Mr. Bingley began. 

However, she signaled for him to swallow his words. “It seems Mr. Bennet planned some sort of sweet revenge on Mr. Collins. As you may have concluded, my dear father greatly despised Mr. Collins’ father. When Mr. Bennet thought he held no chance of seeing his own line succeed, my father mortgaged Longbourn in order to invest in a mine. If the mine succeeded, Papa meant to provide all his daughters with enticing dowries and simply enjoy his final years in some luxury. According to his correspondence with Mr. Birkhead, if the investment failed, it would be Collins’s debt of honor. Unfortunately, when Mr. Collins passed, along with Mrs. Bennet and my younger sisters, Mr. Bennet’s prospects changed, but the gold mine vein was too weak to sustain the debt. My father’s revenge on Mr. Collins turned its ugly head on its server. The realization of his gambling away his heritage was enough to drive Mr. Bennet into a fit of anger and a spasm with his heart, one strong enough to kill him.” 

“How much?” Mr. Bingley asked. 

“Nearly ten thousand. Everything must be sold or else Mary and I will each inherit a debt we can never repay, no matter how many years we labor in service. Uncle Gardiner has offered to assist us, but neither of us can permit his family to suffer because of our father’s messy revenge on another claiming his beloved Longbourn.” 

Mr. Bingley appeared not to agree with her assessment, but he said, “In your note, you asked for my assistance: If I am not to see you well settled elsewhere, then I must return to my initial question: How might I be of service?”

“Mary and I discussed it. We hoped you might organize some sort of auction of the household goods. Surely my father’s books must be of interest to collectors. He has many first printings, and there is the china and artwork. I realize Longbourn is not a stylish house in Town, but, according to Mr. Birkhead, we should not simply walk away from all inside. The gentleman says we could greatly reduce the debt if we sold the household in ‘parts,’ rather than a whole. I thought with your import and export business . . .” 

“Your uncle’s business could serve you equally as well. Mayo’s is larger than mine in that manner,” Mr. Bingley argued. 

“Uncle Gardiner already holds several such obligations for others,” she explained. “Moreover, I thought it would be difficult for him to be required to see his youngest sister’s belongings sold to another, especially if someone offered less than the true worth.” 

Mr. Bingley smiled comfortably. “I have viewed more than one ‘heated disagreement’ at an auction, but never between those overseeing the sale and those bidding.” He sighed in regret. “Naturally, I will arrange it all. Leave it in my hands. It will be part of my debt to Jane. I will bring my staff from Netherfield to assist Mr. and Mrs. Hill in preparing the rooms. Once we have a list of the furniture and goods, I will have adverts printed and posted along the roads between here and London and throughout the neighboring shires. You should know,” he said in hesitation, “I have decided not to renew my lease at Netherfield. It is simply too hard.” He broke off with a sigh of grief. 

“I am greatly remorseful for not being in a position to offer you the necessary comfort you required with Jane’s passing,” she said in true sympathy. 

“You had your own hardships,” he returned. “All of Meryton had their own hardships.” 

“We all thought you and Jane would be together forever,” she assured. 

“So did I,” he said as tears misted his eyes. “If I had known having a child would steal away the woman I so dearly loved . . .”

“Each of us thought when you sealed off Netherfield from the rest of the community all would be well. It was quite a task to keep Mama from visiting Jane, but once she, too, took sick, Mrs. Bennet praised her own sensibility in protecting your child.” 

Mr. Bingley said with renewed sadness, “In the end, all our protections proved worthless. The pox did not take my Jane, but, rather, the gift with which God had blessed us did the job. I lost both Jane and my first child in one fell swoop. I cannot think upon how empty Netherfield appears without her within.” 

“You should have come to us,” Elizabeth declared, although, instinctively, she knew he could not, for Longbourn was in total chaos. 

“You had too much sorrow of your own,” he countered, “and I required time to permit my dear wife her leave-taking. I am not quite there yet, but, with God’s grace, I have reached some peace. It will do me well to serve Jane’s family.” He reached across to her and caught Elizabeth’s hand. “You must make me a promise, if your plans become too much for you as a genteel lady, you will send me word. I will come for you immediately. Inform Miss Mary of my offer. Anytime. No matter the circumstances. I will be your gallant.” 

IF YOU WISH A LONGER AND MORE DETAILED DISCUSSION OF A DEBT-RIDDEN INHERITANCE, CHECK OUT MY PIECE HERE.

Posted in aristocracy, book excerpts, book release, British history, eBooks, estates, finance, Georgian England, Georgian Era, giveaway, historical fiction, history, Inheritance, Jane Austen, laws of the land, Living in the Regency, Pride and Prejudice, primogenture, publishing, reading habits, real life tales, Regency era, Regency romance, research, Vagary, writing | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 8 Comments

Shakespeare’s “Love’s Labour’s Lost” + the Release of “Amending the Shades of Pemberley” + a Giveaway

My latest Jane Austen Fan Fiction, Amending the Shades of Pemberley, is currently up for preorder and will officially release on Saturday, May 13, 2023. Grab your copy before the price goes up. In it, Elizabeth and Darcy both use a quote from Shakespeare’s play, Love’s Labour’s Lost. It is not unusual for me to consider Darcy and Elizabeth quoting Shakespeare, for we know both to be great readers. Moreover, performing plays or pieces of plays was a common activity at house parties. We see one such scene in Austen’s Mansfield Park. However, for me, the play is customarily something along the lines of Taming of the Shrew or Much Ado About Nothing. [BTW, “Labour’s” is a contraction of “Labour is” for those of you who thought there were too many apostrophes.]

However, for this story, I chose Love’s Labour’s Lost. The reason for my choice deals something with the theme(s) of Shakespeare’s tale. First, we have the wise reluctance of women in believing in love at first sight, which likely makes sense for most of you who are reading this post. The second is the immaturity of men. Although Elizabeth Bennet is quite capable of managing a large estate, arranging the education and future of Mr. Darcy’s daughter, and saving herself and the child, in Regency England, she is still the “property” of her husband, and Mr. Darcy’s choice – good or bad and always without her input – controls the trajectory of her life. “The central conflicts in the play are (1) the struggle of Ferdinand, Berowne, Longaville, and Dumaine to remain faithful (or to appear to remain faithful) to their vow to give up women for three years while they pursue an austere life of learning; (2) the resistance of the women to commit to a relationship with the men after the men renounce their vow.” (Study Guide) I play with this concept, for Elizabeth worries over Darcy’s faithfulness to her and their marriage. (NO panic from those of you who hate angst. I did not say the unfaithfulness was founded, just suspected.)

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Love%27s_Labour%27s_Lost_Lithograph.jpg

The action of Shakespeare’s play takes place in Navarre (Spanish, Navarra), originally a region in northern Spain and southern France (département of Basses-Pyrénées). Most of you likely know something of the area, even if you think otherwise, for its capital, Pamplona is famous for the Festival of St. Fermin (July 6-14), in which a chief attraction is encierro—the running of bulls each morning through the streets of the city.

The Kindle Study Guide tells us, “Evidence indicates that Love’s Labour’s Lost was probably first performed in December 1597 at the court of Queen Elizabeth I, although G.B. Harrison notes that the New Cambridge Shakespeare says: “In our opinion its first performance had Christmas 1593 for date and for place some great private house, possibly the Earl of Southampton’s” (Shakespeare: The Complete Works. New York: Harcourt, 1952. page 395).  If the play was performed before the queen in 1597, an intriguing question for scholars might center on how the queen responded to the performance. When she viewed it, she would have been sixty-four and, of course, still a spinster. She had had many opportunities to marry—for love or for political advantage—but seized upon none of them. She died in 1603, still unmarried. All of love’s labours showered on her—and all of love’s labours she showered on others—were lost.”

Love’s Labour’s Lost is a romance comedy. Shakespeare depended heavily on wit rather than on character development, which I suppose is a good thing in this story, for at the end, the Princess of France asks that her love interest King Ferdinand wait a year in a hermitage before they can marry. Some sort of test of his love?

Amending the Shades of Pemberley: A Pride and Prejudice Vagary 

“You have willfully misunderstood me, Miss Bennet. You have no worry of my releasing you, for I do not wish you to perform as a governess to my daughter, but rather as my wife and the mistress of my hereditary estate.”  

Elizabeth Bennet had thought the stranger quite handsome; yet, she had ignored those first tendrils of interest, for she was in no position for the gentleman to pursue her. She and her sister Mary were all who remained of their family. Moreover, Longbourn and its furnishings were to be sold. They were destitute, and, if fortunate, headed for service in some stranger’s household. 

Fitzwilliam Darcy’s proposal of marriage would save both Mary and her, for her sister had agreed to assist with the gentleman’s young daughter. But what of the man’s tale of having corresponded with her father and of Mr. Bennet having purported a marriage between this stranger and her? Elizabeth knew nothing of the arrangement nor of the man’s existence. Though their marriage would solve all her troubles, what if the man’s tale was not completely truthful? Would Mr. Darcy become her enemy or a man she could learn to love? 

GIVEAWAY: Leave a comment below to be entered in the giveaway. I have 2 eBooks of Amending the Shades of Pemberley available each day of the promotion to those who follow the blog and this release.

This book releases on Wednesday, April 26, as an eBook. Print copies are already available.

Purchase Links:

Kindle https://www.amazon.com/Amending-Shades-Pemberley-Prejudice-Vagary-ebook/dp/B0C1HLTW2M/ref=tmm_kin_swatch_0?_encoding=UTF8&qid=&sr=

Also Available to Read on Kindle Unlimited 

Amazon https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0C1J2GT3F/ref=tmm_pap_swatch_0?_encoding=UTF8&qid=&sr=

BookBub https://www.bookbub.com/books/amending-the-shades-of-pemberley-a-pride-and-prejudice-vagary-by-regina-jeffers

Enjoy this excerpt from Chapter 7:

“What if I fall?” Alice questioned. 

“You will have a wet shoe, but I do not think you will fall,” Elizabeth assured. “You are magnificently brave, for you traveled from India to England. Surely a girl as brave as you can take one step without holding my hand. Miss Cassandra and your papa and Mary will all be so very proud of you. One step at a time, sweetheart.” 

Alice studied the stones, but she stood a bit taller. “One step, Lizbet.” 

“I shall be right behind you. You are the leader this time.” 

Without more coaxing required, Alice long stepped for the last stone, and Elizabeth reached a hand to prevent her fall, but there was no reason. The child wobbled, but quickly stood firmly on the stone. “Now up the bank, love, and to the ash tree. You were quite wonderful, you know.” And it was done. A lesson in bravery. 

Following Alice up the bank, she could hear her own father saying, “Well done, Elizabeth. You are a brave girl,” just as he had done all those years ago when he taught her to walk along a stone wall without falling. “One step at a time, child.” 

Experiencing her own bit of pride for teaching the child necessary skills, Elizabeth led Alice forward to stand beneath the tree. She pulled down one of the branches. “Let us continue our study. See the leaves always align opposite each other. Some of the smaller branches have three leaves on each side. See. Let us count them.” The child counted the pairs as Elizabeth pointed to each. Next, she reached for a longer branch. “The bigger branches have six leaves on each side. One. Two . . .” Alice finished counting to six. 

“Look, Miss Lizbet. That one has three. One. Two. Three. And there is ‘nother with six.” 

“Excellent. You may tell your Papa of these wonders this evening. Let us see what else we might tell him. First, the tree leaves follow the sun, even this winter sun.” 

The child’s face screwed up in confusion. 

“Permit me to show you.” She led the child back to the brick path and a few feet away. “Look up.” Alice did as she instructed. “See how the top of the tree appears as if it is leaning to the side.” 

“Like this.” Alice bent at the waist to lean to the side. 

Elizabeth smiled largely. “Many flowers and trees, and even people who travel, like on the silk roads in India, follow the sun. Have you not seen people pause to look up at the sun to enjoy the feel of it on their faces?” 

“Not in India,” the child said innocently. 

Elizabeth chuckled. “No, I do not imagine the sun is so kind there, at least not to Englishmen.” 

“Papa worked hard in the sun,” the child disclosed. “Would fall asleep before me.” 

Elizabeth did not comment, but she filed Alice’s observation away with the other tidbits she had learned of her husband—another piece of the puzzle. Someday, she hoped the image would be complete. 

“We will take a few leaves today. In the spring, we will find flowers on the branches. The twig, which is what we call a little branch—a ‘child’ branch, which has yet to grow to its full size, will have purple clusters close to the tip. Then the new leaves will appear. The flowers are sometimes purple and sometimes yellow. The new leaves will be a softer colored green, almost yellow in color.” 

She walked the child back towards the tree. “The bark, as you can see, is pale brown.” She pointed to the bark, peeling back a small piece to add to their collection. “Some parts appear grey.” She took Alice’s hand to direct it to the bark to explore. “In winter, which is quickly approaching our new home, twigs appear almost black, but we can see new buds forming. Feel the little bumps under your fingers when you touch it.” 

“Bumps,” the child declared with a grin. 

“Like that of each thing that in season grows. Yet, for today, we will only take a few leaves, but we will come back again and again. Each time we will claim something new. In the spring, we will add some flowers to our study and mayhap a bud or two. In late summer or early autumn, the flower clusters will change into seed pods. My sisters and I referred to them as ‘wings.’ The seed pods will fall to the ground. See, there are a few here. and few more over there.” 

The child scrambled to gather several clusters of the pods to carry them back to Elizabeth. 

She bent to share their find with Alice. “The birds pick them up and carry them to another place. They drop the seeds and often those seeds will take root and a new tree is born.” 

“God’s plan?” the child asked. 

“I would think so,” Elizabeth admitted. “Just as I think it was God’s plan that my father met your father years ago. Their friendship brought your papa to my door when I needed him most.” 

“And I need you and Miss Mary,” the girl spoke honestly. 

Elizabeth felt her eyes tearing up, so she simply said, “Exactly,” as she turned to point to the ground beneath them. “Notice, this plant here is called a ‘dog violet’ and this one,” she said as she pointed towards the other side of the tree, “is called ‘wild garlic.’ The ‘wild’ just means it grows outside of the planned garden Cook uses for our meals. It is not ‘wild,’ as if it cannot be tame. Mr. Farrin and the others in the stables have tamed the horses we ride, so they are no longer wild.” 

Alice’s expression spoke of the question forming in her thoughts before she spoke it. “Is the dog biolet not ‘wild’ then, and why you call it a ‘dog’?” 

Elizabeth’s laughter bubbled forth. “God was smart in permitting the tree and the plants to share the same place, but He might have made an error in permitting people to name the plants.” She turned the child in the direction of where they left their box. Elizabeth leaned over to say, almost as if it were a secret, “As I understand it, ‘dog’ refers to the fact this violet has no scent. Most violets are sweet smelling, but the dog violet has no scent. There are also pig violets and horse violets and even snake violets, but I have never seen any of those, but I assume they also possess no scent.” She nudged the child forward. “It is time for us to return to the house. Do you have your leaves and your ‘wings’ to share with your father after supper?”

“Yes, Lizbet.” 

Elizabeth took the larger items and placed them in a cloth sack, while Alice added the smaller ones to the wooden box. Once they were prepared to return to the house, she led Alice towards the manor. She said, “Did you know the wood from an ash tree is so strong, we make our carriages out of them? In Norway, which is another country, just as India is one and England is yet another, the Norwegians believe the ash tree is the Tree of Life, meaning it is where God made the first man.” 

“But forgot to tell the man what to call everything,” the child pronounced with pride. 

“Your father will enjoy your version of the tale of God making the first ash tree. I imagine it will delight him excessively.” 

* * *

Darcy had listened carefully to his child’s recitation regarding what she had learned on this particular day, but his mind was on the wonder of the moment. Not only did Alice share the facts of the ash tree, but his child proved, without a doubt, his decision to make Elizabeth Bennet his wife was a turn for the better in his life. His daughter was no longer frightened by her own shadow. She no longer clung to him in desperate pleas not to leave her. 

Alice was enjoying claiming Elizabeth as her “mother,” although the word still remained from the child’s lips. In his opinion, such was true because in English households in India, the children were raised by an Indian ayah, not the mistress of the house. In England, Alice should be raised by a governess. If his daughter claimed Elizabeth as “mother,” then Elizabeth might slip away from someone taking care of her to someone who supervised the caregiver. His arrangement with Elizabeth placed her as both “governess” and “mother,” a much better situation for his child. 

“The ash tree is related to olive trees,” he commented. 

“Do I like olive?” his child asked. 

“I seriously doubt it, but perhaps some day you will,” he responded with a grin. “Olives are not sweet like Cook’s cakes.” 

Alice smiled up at him. “Cook’s cakes make me happy.” 

“Like that of each thing in season grows,” he remarked. 

“Miss Lizbet say the same today,” his daughter shared. 

He looked up to Elizabeth to notice her smile. “Elizabeth and I often share similar thoughts.” He prayed she would be willing to share his bed this evening. “The line comes from a famous English writer who you, too, will read some day. Today, Elizabeth was speaking of how the ash tree changes with each ‘season.’ You likely heard her say the words ‘summer, autumn, winter, and spring.’ Those are the seasons for growing and playing in the sun. As for me, I was considering the writer’s purpose of the story.”

“Do you believe it will take a year?” his wife asked. “For it, for us, to be as it was for Navarre and the princess in Love’s Labour’s Lost? As they were at the end?”

“I pray not,” he admitted. “Would you not say we are more than halfway there already?”

Posted in book excerpts, book release, British history, eBooks, Georgian England, Georgian Era, giveaway, Jane Austen, love quotes, playwrights, Pride and Prejudice, publishing, reading habits, Regency era, research, romance, Vagary, writing | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 10 Comments

The Origin of “Humpty Dumpty” + the Release of “Amending the Shades of Pemberley” + a Giveaway

There is a sweet scene in my latest Jane Austen Fan Fiction tale between Elizabeth Bennet and Mr. Darcy’s daughter, and it involves the nursery rhyme of “Humpty Dumpty.” Therefore, I thought a piece on the meaning of the nursery rhyme might be of interest to others.

https://www.classicfm.com/discover-music/humpty-dumpty-sat-on-a-wall-lyrics-history/ ~ Classic fm Radio

The most common version is Humpty Dumpty is a representation of King Richard III of England, who was defeated at the Battle of Bosworth Field in 1485. The “egg” shape refers to King Richard supposedly being a “humpback,” as is portrayed in Shakespeare’s play. “Shakespeare called Richard III a ‘hunchback’, which means that he was hunching forward while walking. Richard III’s skeleton actually shows a sideways displacement of the spine, a heavy scoliosis, which made the king walk obliquely. So there is a certain match between the two: something unusual about the body.” (British Council) The “wall” falling is the loss of his reign as king. The king’s horses and men are the army who failed to defeat their enemy.

https://www.britishcouncil.org/voices-magazine/how-close-was-shakespeares-portrayal-richard#:~:text=Shakespeare%20called%20Richard%20III%20a,something%20unusual%20about%20the%20body.

Others relate the story of a cannon used during the English Civil War, which was supposedly nicknamed “Humpty Dumpty” for the difficulty of moving it about on the battle field. Anyway, according to the legend, a gunner named Thompson managed to drag Humpty Dumpty to the top of the tower of St Mary at the Walls church. The “at the walls” name may cause some confusion until one understands the church stands immediately beside the old Roman town wall of Colchester.

According to Britain Express, “Colchester was held for the king during the Civil War. Parliament besieged the town in 1648, an attack that lasted 12 weeks. During the siege, a one-eyed gunner named Thompson hauled his ‘saker’ (a small cannon) to the top of the tower of St Mary’s church. The vantage point allowed him to direct damaging fire onto the besieging troops under the command of Lord Fairfax. The Parliamentary gunners concentrated their fire on St Mary’s tower and eventually hit the unfortunate Thompson and sent the gunner and his weapon falling to the ground. A later twist on the tale of Thompson the one-eyed gunner is the idea the story was the origin of the nursery rhyme about Humpty Dumpty. There does not seem to be any truth to the tale that Thompson was the ‘egg’ who ‘had a great fall’, but it makes a nice story.”

Meanwhile, CLASSIC fM Radio tells us, “A professor David Daube once had a fourth theory to add. In 1956, he posited that ‘Humpty Dumpty’ might have been reference to an armoured siege engine that was deployed unsuccessfully in the 1643 Siege of Gloucester during the English Civil War. This one was soon dismissed as a bit of a spoof by academics – but not before English composer Richard Rodney Bennett took the plot and ran with it for his children’s opera, All the King’s Men.

As a point of reference, I must also mention Francis Grose‘s definition, for he was, in truth, my 6th Great-Uncle. CLASSIC fM says, “Interestingly, Francis Grose’s Classical Dictionary of the Vulgar Tongue from 1785 – we’re totally imagining this as the Urban Dictionary of its time – defines ‘Humpty Dumpty’ as ‘a short clumsy person of either sex; also ale boiled with brandy,’ so the rhyme could have derived from either meaning.”

Humpty Dumpty – oldest known lyrics (1797)

Humpty Dumpty sat on a wall,
Humpty Dumpty had a great fall.
Four-score Men and Four-score more,
Could not make Humpty Dumpty where he was before.

Amending the Shades of Pemberley: A Pride and Prejudice Vagary 

“You have willfully misunderstood me, Miss Bennet. You have no worry of my releasing you, for I do not wish you to perform as a governess to my daughter, but rather as my wife and the mistress of my hereditary estate.”  

Elizabeth Bennet had thought the stranger quite handsome; yet, she had ignored those first tendrils of interest, for she was in no position for the gentleman to pursue her. She and her sister Mary were all who remained of their family. Moreover, Longbourn and its furnishings were to be sold. They were destitute, and, if fortunate, headed for service in some stranger’s household. 

Fitzwilliam Darcy’s proposal of marriage would save both Mary and her, for her sister had agreed to assist with the gentleman’s young daughter. But what of the man’s tale of having corresponded with her father and of Mr. Bennet having purported a marriage between this stranger and her? Elizabeth knew nothing of the arrangement nor of the man’s existence. Though their marriage would solve all her troubles, what if the man’s tale was not completely truthful? Would Mr. Darcy become her enemy or a man she could learn to love? 

Just as I did on each of the last five posts, I have 2 eBook copies of Amending the Shades of Pemberley available to those who comment below. The book is available for purchase at these links:

Kindle https://www.amazon.com/Amending-Shades-Pemberley-Prejudice-Vagary-ebook/dp/B0C1HLTW2M/ref=tmm_kin_swatch_0?_encoding=UTF8&qid=&sr=

Also Available to Read on Kindle Unlimited 

Amazon https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0C1J2GT3F/ref=tmm_pap_swatch_0?_encoding=UTF8&qid=&sr=

BookBub https://www.bookbub.com/books/amending-the-shades-of-pemberley-a-pride-and-prejudice-vagary-by-regina-jeffers

Excerpt from Chapter 3. Enjoy!!

“I told her of you,” he said. 

“Of me?” she gasped. “What have you to say of me?”

“Only that I have extended my hand to you, and I believe the two of you might go on well together,” he explained. An awkward pause hung between them before he said, “If I am not being too presumptuous, might I bring my daughter inside? She is most desirous to know the lady whose house I visited earlier this week.” 

“Please tell me you did not promise the child I was to be her stepmother,” Elizabeth begged. “I have not presented you my response, sir.” 

“I simply described you as the daughter of a friend,” he assured. “I would not use my child as a pawn to have my way. If you agree to marry me, I pray you do so because you believe a future together is in our grasp.” 

“If all is as you described it, I would be pleased to greet the child,” she said with the slightest hesitation. 

“Pardon me a moment.” With a quick bow, he disappeared while Elizabeth claimed the interruption to pat her hair in place. Yet, before she was thoroughly prepared, the gentleman reappeared. He looked quite awkward as he bent to hold the child’s hand. He was tall, and the child appeared to be so very small, though, in reality, she had the build of Jane, when Jane was a child. 

“Who do we have here, Mr. Darcy?” Elizabeth asked with a smile. The child looked down, and Elizabeth instinctively knelt before her—not bending over, but going down on one knee to be at the child’s eye level. “How very beautiful you are.” The girl gazed shyly at her as she and her father came to stand before Elizabeth. Mr. Darcy knelt also. 

“Miss Elizabeth,” he said formally while watching his daughter, “may I present Miss Alice Darcy?”

The child frowned. “Biss Alice Faith Anne Darcy, Papa,” the child said precociously. 

“I stand corrected, my love,” he responded dutifully. “Miss Alice Faith Anne Darcy.” 

Elizabeth noted the faint violet shadows under the child’s eyes, belying her liveliness. “Your father told me what a wonderful daughter you are.” 

The child looked up to Mr. Darcy. “He says I’m his fav-or-right girl.” 

Elizabeth, too, looked to the gentleman. “I can understand his preference, and may I also have the acquaintance of your doll?” The child clutched a fine china doll with a head of blonde hair and blue glass for eyes. 

“This is Biss Cass Andra Darcy,” the child proudly pronounced. 

Elizabeth took the doll’s porcelain hand and shook it. “I am honored by the acquaintance, Miss Cassandra.” 

Before the child could respond, a few notes of music could be heard from the adjoining room. 

“What that?” the girl asked. 

Elizabeth assured, “Such is my sister Mary practicing her music. Would you like to greet her also?”

The child looked to her father. “I likes music, Papa.” 

Mr. Darcy’s features softened. “I know you do, love.” He nodded his permission for Elizabeth to escort his child into the other room, stood, and reached down a hand for Elizabeth to assist her to stand. Like it or not, Elizabeth enjoyed the warmth of his hand as it encircled hers. It was the first time she had felt safe in many months.

The child released her father’s hand and claimed Elizabeth’s free one, which, like it or not, had Elizabeth yearning for her own children. By the time she had led Alice into the small parlor, Elizabeth realized although he had risen, Mr. Darcy had not followed her. “Good day, Mary,” she said as the child slowed her pace. “We have a visitor.” 

Mary stopped her efforts to address the child. “My, I do not think I have ever had such a delightful audience. Do you like music?” 

The child nodded her agreement, but did not step closer. Elizabeth knelt again. “Should we ask Mary to play for us again?”

“Peas,” the child said softly. 

Mary nodded her agreement and set her fingers to playing a children’s chant. When she finished with a flourish, the child begged, “Again.” 

“I mean to please,” Mary responded and set about playing the tune once more. 

“Again,” the child ordered with a smile, which immediately melted Elizabeth’s heart. 

“Only if you ask Elizabeth to sing,” Mary countered. 

“Peas, Biss Lizbet,” the girl pleaded. 

Elizabeth asked, “Do you not know the rhyme?”

The child shook her head in the negative. 

“Then might I teach you?”

“Yes, peas.” 

“Very well. Listen first, and then we shall sing it together.” She looked to her sister. “The first phrase, if you would, Mary.” Elizabeth waited for Mary to finish playing before she sang, “Humpty Dumpty sat on a wall.” 

“Again,” the child ordered. 

“Humpty. Dumpty. Sat. On. A. Wall,” Elizabeth said slowly. “Will you try it with me?” The child nodded unsurely. Elizabeth began again, saying each word slowly. A third and a fourth time had the child mumbling some words while managing others. “Let us add line two. I shall permit you time to repeat each line until you are assured of yourself.” 

The child smiled weakly, but she did not look away. Elizabeth sang the first line, and the child repeated the words she knew. 

“Humpty Dumpty had a great fall.” Elizabeth enunciated each word slowly just as she had done with the opening line. 

Alice’s eyes widened. “I fells down once, but Papa not mad I torn my dress.” 

“I am pleased to hear it. My father never was angry when I tore my good dress,” Elizabeth shared. 

“Mama was,” Mary remarked before she realized what she said. 

“I no have a mama,” the child explained innocently. 

“Then we three are all alike,” Elizabeth assured. “Mary and I no longer have a mother either.” 

“Are you bonely?” the girl asked. 

“Sometimes,” Elizabeth admitted. “You are fortunate to have your Papa.” After an awkward moment, she sang the whole rhyme. “Humpty Dumpty sat on a wall. Humpty Dumpty had a great fall. All the King’s horses and all the King’s men could not put Humpty together again.” 

“Why Umpty break?” the child asked in concern. 

“Most people consider him to be an egg,” Elizabeth said as she looked to Mary who shrugged her response. “An egg would surely break if it fell from a wall.” 

The child giggled. “Spat.” 

Elizabeth bit her lip to keep from correcting the girl. “Shall we sing the lines again?”

Alice nodded her agreement and began the song herself. “Umpty, dumpty sat on a . . . wall. Umpty, dumpty, have a gre. . . at fall.” Unexpectedly, the child plopped down on the floor, but when she realized she still held her doll, she jumped up to carry the doll to her father. It was only then Elizabeth realized Mr. Darcy was standing in the open doorway. “Did you see me spat, Papa?”

Mr. Darcy’s smile widened. “I did, sweetheart.” 

“Biss Lizbet say she fell when she a little girl like me,” the child announced. 

Elizabeth noted how tears misted Mr. Darcy’s eyes. Therefore, she said, “Perhaps we might convince Mary to teach you the notes on the pianoforte while I speak to your father for a moment.” She shot a pleading glance to Mary, but Elizabeth need not worry, for Mary had already stood to move the bench closer. 

With Mary’s assistance, the girl climbed readily onto the bench.

“I will be near, Alice,” Mr. Darcy told the child.

“Leave Biss Cassie,” the child instructed without looking to her father. 

Elizabeth whispered her gratitude to Mary, but her sister was already leaning over the child to take the girl’s finger to play the first note. 

Posted in book excerpts, book release, British history, customs and tradiitons, eBooks, Georgian England, Georgian Era, giveaway, historical fiction, Jane Austen, Living in the Regency, marriage, music, Pride and Prejudice, publishing, reading, Regency era, Regency romance, research, Vagary, writing | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 13 Comments

Have You Ever Heard of a “Bachelor Tax”?

Tomorrow is tax day in the U.S. At one time in my life, I was a tax preparer for H&R Block and before that I worked for a private/personal tax preparer. I despise tax preparation nowadays, for an a self-employed author, I must keep every little scrap of paper which might hold a deduction. However, I have never encountered a Tax on Bachelors. Have you?

In the late 1600s (1695, to be more exact), the English parliament passed The Marriage Duty Act or Registration Tax, which imposed a tax on births, marriages, burials, childless widowers, and bachelors over the age of 25. The tax’s purpose was to rase revenue for the war with France. It was also to ensure proper records were kept by an Anglican church officials. The tax was found ineffective and abolished by 1706. 

Alan Taylor sparked my interest in this topic with this bit on the British History Georgian Lives Facebook page back on May 14, 2018: “Bachelor taxes have been common in many countries over the years. In late 17th/early 18th Century England women of marriageable age outnumbered men but many gentlemen of the upper and middle classes refused to commit to an expensive business when instead they could spend their time carousing in clubs, sit all day with their friends in coffee houses or even take a mistress or two. Women hit back at this selfish attitude and ‘three score thousand hands with never a cracked maidenhead amongst them” signed a petition deploring the laziness of their opposite sex complaining that: ‘they showed an aversion to the squalling of children..though the sot can sit a whole day at Wills(a coffee house) amidst the…quarrels of no wits’. The government was also keen to support marriage as the resulting children would make up for the appalling mortality rate of babies and youngsters (although a cynic might also add that politicians did not want females to assert their independence!!). Consequently they introduced a tax of 1 shilling a year on bachelors and widowers over 25, but apparently it did not work as it was repealed in 1706.”

The Act was initially implemented for a five-year period, but was extended (by 8 & 9 Wm. III, c. 20) to August 1, 1706. British History Online tells us: “Among Gregory King’s papers there is a printed broadsheet entitled A probable calculation of the annual income to be raised by a tax on marriages, burials, and legacies, with a note in King’s handwriting on the back — ‘Fryth’s Project of the Duty on Marriages, Births and Burials’. And after the Act had been passed, the Treasury received a petition from Richard Firth, claiming that he had (some six years earlier) suggested such taxes to the Duke of Shrewsbury, who had mentioned it to the King, and ‘in this sessions it was accepted by the House of Commons; praying their bounty for his charge and pains’. The Treasury comment was: ‘To be considered if there be any places to be disposed on this fond.’ No other supporting evidence has so far been found. The references in the Journals of the House of Commons are entirely formal and give no indication of the proposers or of the arguments they had in mind. Various amendments to the Bill were made during its passage through the House. One was to exempt from the tax on bachelors fellows and students of Oxford and Cambridge, ‘where, by the Statutes of their Colleges, they are to be displace, if they shall marry’. Another was concerned particularly with recording the deaths (and descent) of persons of quality. [Journals of the House of Commons, vol. 11, pp. 294-5.] But the Bill appears to have had an easy passage; introduced in the Committee on Ways and Means in February 1694/5, it was sent to the Lords on 8 April and their assent was notified on 12 April. Nevertheless, an aura of mystery still surrounds the Act. Three points arise, in particular.

“First, the apparatus required for implementing the Act was quite formidable, involving nothing less than a complete enumeration of the population and a comprehensive system of vital registration. Because some of the taxes fell upon individuals with specified characteristics (childless widowers and bachelors above the age of 25 years) it was necessary to know the names of all such individuals. In addition, the taxes were graduated in accordance with the social status of the individual — and graduated in a complex way. For example, the tax on the burial of a ‘common’ person was 4 shillings. For a Duke the tax was £50 4s for himself, the same for a Duchess, £30 4s for the eldest son or his wife, and £25 4s for a younger son or his wife or for an unmarried daughter. And similar variations applied to the duties on births and marriages and to the annual taxes on bachelors and widowers (Table 1a and b). The Act came into force on 1 May 1695 and on or before that date the Assessors were supposed to furnish the Commissioners with complete lists of the population in their areas, specifying their names and surnames, estates, degrees, titles and qualifications and indicating the taxes and duties to which they were liable, or would be liable if a specified event occurred (that is, a marriage, birth or death). Moreover, these lists were to be brought up to date each year, being corrected in respect of the ‘death change of quality or degree or removal of any person or persons or otherwise’ (Sections XI and XVI). Lodgers and servants were to be included in the enumeration, for they were to be taxed at their place of residence (Section XXIV). A further complication was that in London the basis of the enumeration was the parish, in contrast to the more usual ward basis. This may well have involved substantial problems, especially in the recruitment of a large and separate body of Assessors and Collectors.

“The parish basis was linked to the requirements for vital registration, for in order to prevent evasion it was necessary to improve the reliability and scope of the parochial system. A double check was provided. First, the scope of the parish register was widened to cover everyone married, buried, christened or born in a parish (Section XX), and stillbirths were to be notified (Section XXI). And persons in Holy Orders (and their substitutes) were instructed to keep accurate records of marriages and burials and of all persons ‘christened or born’, under penalty of a fine of £100 (Section XX). Secondly, a special responsibility was placed upon parents in respect of children born to them; it was their duty to notify the Collectors, within five days of the occurrence of the birth of a child, whether live or stillborn — and a stillbirth had to be attested by two or more persons (Section XXI). A similar duty was placed upon Quakers, Roman Catholics and Jews (and any other comparable individuals) to report their marriages to the Collectors within five days (Section LVII). And special arrangements were prescribed for ‘the better preserving the Genealogies Descents and Alliances of the Nobility and Gentry’. Upon the death of any of them (anyone liable to a burial duty of 20 shillings or more), the person responsible for paying the duty had to provide the Collectors with a certificate showing the ‘name surname quality office employment (if any) of such deceased person with the age time of death place of burial marriages and issue and the ages of such issue together with the names sirnames titles and qualities of the parents of such deceased persons. . .’. These certificates were to be sent to the Receiver-General or his deputies for transmission to the College of Arms, which institution was instructed to ‘number schedule and digest the same in alphabetical order in Books to bee provided for that purpose’ and to file the originals for public use (Section L).”

But this was not the only attempts in history to tax bachelors. The first bachelor tax was introduced in 9 AD by emperor Augustus to encourage marriage. It was called the ‘Lex Papia Poppaea’, and apart from taxing bachelors also taxed married people with no children, and those who were celibate. An exception was granted to Vestal Virgins (Ulp. Frag. xvii.1). In 1821, the US state of Missouri applied a $1 tax on all unmarried men. In 1921, the US state of Montana applied a $3 tax on all bachelors. In response to California’s low birth rate, in 1934 they proposed a $25 bachelor tax. The tax was never enacted. Benito Mussolini enacted a bachelor tax in Italy in 1927. The taxes twin objectives were to raise 50 million lira of revenue per year, and increase the Italian population. Mussolini was concerned that there were only 40 million Italians compared to 90 million Germans and 200 million Slavs. By 1936, Italian bachelors paid nearly double the normal income tax rate. To avoid the bachelor tax, the solution was simple, just get married. Italy’s bachelor tax was repealed in 1943. [Tax Fitness]

Even in the U. S. today, singles are taxed higher than say a single person able to file as “Head of Household.” The Head of Household filing status has some important tax advantages over theSingle filing status. If you qualify as Head of Household, you will have a lower tax rate and a higher standard deduction than a Single filer. Also, Heads of Household must have a higher income than Single filers before they owe income tax. While filing as head household gives you a higher standard deduction and usually a lower tax rate, than if you choose to file as single, one needsto qualify first. … To qualify, you must be able to claim a qualifying child or qualifying relative on your tax return.

On Google Books one can find Jane Frecknall-Hughes’s The Theory, Principles and Management of Taxation: An Introduction.  It says, 
Screen Shot 2018-10-16 at 12.14.28 PM.png
Screen Shot 2018-10-16 at 12.13.48 PM.png
512tnr5nuBL.jpg Want to mix a little romance with your history? You might try The Bachelor Tax by Carolyn Davidson. I have not read it, but I am adding it to my Want to Read List on Goodreads. 
Posted in British history, business, history, Living in the UK, marriage, real life tales, war, world history | Tagged , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Have You Ever Heard of a “Bachelor Tax”?

Jane Austen and Women’s History for Financial Independence, a Guest Post from E.M. Storm-Smith

A Celebration for Women’s History Month and Some Thoughts on Women’s Financial Independence

As a place to start, I’d like to ask how many people saw the twitter account Gender Pay Gap Bot (@PayGapApp) on International Women’s Day? Epic, right!?

For those who are not addicted to your twitter feed, this is an account that was set up to do exactly one thing – troll twitter for UK registered companies who made some post about how great their company is for women on International Women’s Day, and reply with that company’s gender pay gap. The information they used to make these tweets is public record in the UK. Starting in 2017, any company registered to do business in the UK with more than 250 employees is required to calculate their raw gender pay gap and report it annually to the UK Government Equalities Office. It is literally just what is the average salary paid to women and the average salary paid to men, no context, no questions, nothing but the raw numbers. There is a lot of good that has come from the gender pay gap reporting and also some legitimate criticism, but to solve a problem, we have to know the extent of the problem.

No matter your position on the policy of the gender pay gap reporting scheme in the UK, you have to go see the absolute chaos crated by the Gender Pay Gap Bot. At least one company deleted their entire social media account on multiple platforms after the bot tweeted out that their PUBLISHED gender pay gap was more that 80%. My biggest question is HOW? How in all that is holy can a company with at least 250 employees have a pay gap that big? This isn’t some small mom and pop shop with a handful of employees. These companies have to have at least 250 employees.

So, what has me thinking about all of this? Well, March is Women’s History Month, and I am currently sitting in my hotel room during a break at a professional conference and retreat for women with a large group of like-minded female colleagues acclaiming women’s accomplishments and encouraging each other for another year of kicking butt in a predominantly male field. It’s been inspiring and exhausting at the same time. While there is a lot to celebrate and seeing the successes of my fellow women is a huge boon to my mental health, there’s also a familiarity to the state of women in the workplace which feels stagnate. We seem to sit here every year and talk about the same problems: being silenced in the work place, sexual harassment, having to share credit with male counterparts/bosses, being paid less for the same work, having employers and colleagues ask when we’re going to be having the next baby, being passed over for promotions, not getting invited to the golf weekend, few to no women in positions of power in our communities and workplaces …….

Fifteen years after I entered the professional ranks, I don’t know if we can say that we’ve really moved the needle.

Sure, a lot has changed for women in the last couple generations. My life and opportunity as a 30-something working mom is drastically different than my mother’s and my grandmother’s. But somedays feel like we’re not moving nearly fast enough. I don’t want the next generation to still be watching whatever the equivalent of a twitter bot will be shame companies for empty proclamations of support for marginalized groups without doing any of the work necessary to reduce the harms caused by such marginalization.

So, here’s my work. I want to take this platform which has been shared with me by the women (and a couple of guys) who came before me, women who have done their part raising the voices of new, mostly female, writers, and talk about how the stigma of women’s work affected Jane Austen and continues to affect women writers today.

How many times have you heard someone say something derogatory about romance novels? That they aren’t “real books” or that they create unrealistic expectations for men in relationships, “chick-lit”, “word-porn”, “vapid”, “frivolous”. So many negative connections to romance. It’s very popular in intellectual circles to be seen as above reading such “drivel”. I’ve even seen it on social media. Some #bookstagram accounts are solely about the latest literary fiction and excludes anything that looks like an easy read women’s fiction novel. Of course, there are plenty of account that are solely dedicated to romance and erotica, but the bookish accounts with 10K+ followers tend to be really curated away from romance. Fantasy is fine, mystery and sci-fi is fine, but romance is still considered as lesser from the literary critics.

Forget the fact that, according to the Alliance of Independent Authors (https://selfpublishingadvice.org/what-readers-want-2022/ ), romance and erotica is the #1 selling genre in the world. Well over a billion dollars in just 2021. That’s more than Crime/Mystery PLUS Sci-Fi/Fantasy PLUS Horror.

Why do we deride romance? I think it’s a lot like McDonalds. Everyone wants to be seen as above eating at McDonalds. However, it’s painfully obvious that they sell billions of hamburgers each year. So, either they have a philosopher’s stone and can turn rocks into gold, or everyone is lying. I’m going to raise my hand right now and say, I eat at McDonalds. Not every day, not even every week, but if I’ve had a really bad day, chicken McNuggets are probably going to make an appearance in my life.

This opinion, that romance was beneath the serious intellectual, has its roots in the late 18th and early 19th century. Exactly the time that Jane Austen was writing her novels.

While there are earlier examples of female writers and novelists (see Love in Excess by Eliza Hayward), Jane Austen is one of the very first women to write in the style of realistic romance. The defining characteristics of realistic romance are a story centered on the development of the relationship between two or more people without the interference of fantastical or magical elements. It may seem like a simplistic definition, but it was very new at the time Austen was writing. Most of the popular romance novels at the turn of the 19th century centered on gothic elements (ex: Mrs. Radcliff’s The Mysteries of Udolpho) or followed the main character – most often a man – through some harrowing life journey while trying to get back to his faithful love in the style of Homer’s Odyssey. Stories about women, their lives, and their struggles, were virtually nonexistent when Austen started writing.

One significant reason for this was that a woman with a profession was seen as vulgar. Women were supposed to be wives and mothers, not working outside the home. Having a woman in your family as a published writer would have been scandalous. During her lifetime, all of Austen’s novels were published anonymously. It was only after her untimely death in 1817, when her brother Henry published her last two completed novels together, that he wrote a “Biographical Note” at the end of the book naming his sister as the author of all six published novels. As we have learned over and over again, representation matters. If you keep an entire group of people from telling their story, it will never be told correctly. Men cannot tell women’s stories.

Austen’s writings are riddled with references to the state of women’s opportunities and education in her own time. Not overtly, but just peppered into her novels every now and again. Take this exchange between Anne Elliott and Captain Harville at the end of Persuasion:

“I do not think I ever opened a book in my life which had not something to say upon woman’s inconstancy. Songs and proverbs, all talk of woman’s fickleness. But perhaps you will say, these were all written by men.” (Captain Harville)

“Perhaps I shall. Yes, yes, if you please, no reference to examples in books. Men have had every advantage of us in telling their own story. Education has been theirs in so much higher a degree; the pen has been in their hands. I will not allow books to prove anything.” (Anne Elliott, emphasis added)

Austen’s novels, like romance novels today, were significantly more popular with women of the time than men. The stories, which centered women’s lives and lived experiences, resonated with the educated upper class women of the 18th century. There was something of every lady in an Austen heroine. Therefore, Austen’s novels were largely ignored by reviewers at the time and if given any publicity at all, typically lauded as good reading for young women with strong moral value. This stigma, that women’s romance novels are just fluffy tripe, continues into today.

Even the circumstances surrounding how Austen was able to sell and publish her books tells an interesting story that highlights how stories about women were belittled. Her first finished novel, Northanger Abbey – which was originally titled Susan, was sold to a London publisher for only £10. Though there were promises made, it was never printed and distributed. She had to buy back the copyright in 1816, well after the 4 novels published in her lifetime had seen success. Her second novel, the first to be actually published, Sense and Sensibility, was taken on commission, where the publishers would advance the costs of publication, repay themselves as books were sold and then charge a 10% commission for each book sold, paying the rest to the author. If a novel did not recover its costs through sales, the author was responsible for them. It is not well documented whether Austen preferred this method after her experience with Susan, but we do know that the Austen family was not very well off, especially after her father’s death. It would have been a hardship had the book failed.

After Sense and Sensibility was profitable, the publisher then purchased the copyright for Pride and Prejudice outright, paying Austen a whopping £110. As a comparison, S&S, again published at Austen’s peril, was produced using “expensive paper and sold for 15 shillings”. However, P&P, published using the publisher’s money, was produced using “cheap paper and sold for 18 shillings.” Austen could have made nearly £500 if she had been given a commission on P&P.  (see: Irvine, Robert; Jane Austen. London: Routledge, 2005. ISBN 0-415-31435-6)

Austen was popular in her own time, but never made significant money from her works. The number of copies printed was small compared to other contemporary popular authors, and reprintings were not common at the time. She was known in some circles for her work, but hardly respected. Never able to do anything without one of her brothers playing the intermediary.

A funny, but all too familiar for women today, example of never gaining true respect is the advice (mansplaining) offered to her by the Prince Regent’s librarian, James Stanier Clarke. In November 1815, Austen was invited to visit the Prince’s London residence as he was a fan of her novels. She felt she could not refuse the invitation though she disapproved of Prinny’s licentious lifestyle. Shortly after her visit, Austen wrote a diatribe called Plan of a Novel, according to Hints from Various Quarters (https://pemberley.com/janeinfo/plannovl.html). This satiric outline of the “perfect novel” was based on the Clarke’s many suggestions for a future Austen novel. My favorite bit goes as follows:

“Wherever [the heroine] goes, somebody falls in love with her, and she receives repeated offers of Marriage — which she refers wholly to her Father, exceedingly angry that he should not be first applied to.”

It’s clear in these words that Austen was completely fed up with the feminine ideal created by men of her class and era. Unfortunately, this is a sentiment that many women today are still bemoaning.

Though our world continues to show signs that women are not viewed universally as equal to men, and the struggle for advancement is real, I want to end this post on a positive note.

Women all over the world are making ourselves heard. Most women toady can own property, open bank accounts, and make a really good living without the approval of any father, husband or brother. The advance of careers like self-publishing romance novels has given freedom to countless women. The ability to make money from our own artistic pursuits cuts out the power dynamics of the traditional workplace. More women are taking on “side-hustles” which turn into full time careers and lead to financial independence. Financial independence of women is the number one metric of social mobility according to the UN. When women begin earning a living wage, communities start to see rapid growth in healthcare infrastructure, access to education, and decreases in childhood mortality from food instability.

Maybe it doesn’t matter that “serious literary critics” call romance novels trash. As long as women continue to write our own stories, we will eventually silence the naysayers. One book at a time, we will command billions of dollars and leave a better world for our daughters.

My first novel is still available if you haven’t gotten your copy yet! Available wherever books are sold. Click Here to purchase. And do not forget to shop around. I have more books available.

I’d love to connect with you! Come find me in all the usual places:

Posted in Austen Authors, British currency, British history, Georgian England, Georgian Era, Guest Post | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Jane Austen and Women’s History for Financial Independence, a Guest Post from E.M. Storm-Smith

Playing Cards in Jane Austen’s England, Pleasant Pastime, as Well as Gambling + an Excerpt from “The Jewel Thief and the Earl”

A recent question from a reader asked of card playing at balls and gaming hells: I know many books mention card playing going on in designated rooms at balls, but I haven’t heard what they were playing? Would they be gambling and playing games for money like 21 (apparently one of the most popular games of the day, even among families) or would they stick to games like Whist (I know they played this for stakes, too)? Would there be a person who would play the bank, as there was at the various clubs or hells?

I read somewhere about Fox and how much he and his brother lost even at supposedly staid places like Almack’s.

Jane Austen’s World tells us this of Charles Fox: “The politician Charles Fox, able to play for long periods without sleep, lost his fortune at the gaming tables. Horace Walpole described one of Fox’s marathon gambling sessions:

“He had sat up playing Hazard at Almack’s from Tuesday evening, 4th February [1778], till five in the afternoon of Wednesday 5th. An hour before he had recovered £12,000 that he had lost, and by dinner, which was at five o’clock, he had ended losing £11,000. On Thursday he spoke, went to dinner at past eleven at night; from thence to White’s, where he drank till seven the next morning; thence to Almack’s, where he won £6,000; and between three and four in the afternoon he set out for Newmarket. His brother Stephen lost £11,000 two nights after, and Charles £10,000 more on the 13th; so that in three nights the two brothers, the eldest not twenty-five, lost £32,000. – Lowe, p 129.

“Fox’s father, Lord Holland, paid off his son’s debt to the princely tune of £140,000. (In today’s terms this sum would be astronomical – depending on the inflation converter you used, you would multiply the sum by 97 to get at the value of 1780 money today.) The Prince of Wales, in rebellion against his frugal father, modeled his own conduct after that of Fox. Known for his extravagant lifestyle, Prinny set the pace for hedonistic living as Regent and King.”

Charles James Fox from Historical and Posthumous Memoirs of Wraxall 1884 1a.jpg Supposedly, Charles James Fox, Whig MP and leader of the Opposition to William Pitt the Younger’s Tory government, and close personal friend of George, Prince of Wales, along with Georgiana Cavendish, Duchess of Devonshire, and Fox’s brother lost large sums even at supposedly staid places like Brooks’s. Please note that some accounts of Fox’s losses refer to his doing so at Almack’s. However, we must remember that Brooks’s, at one time was called “Almack’s,” in the late 1700s. So the place where Fox lost a large fortune was the gentleman’s club Almack’s, later called Brooks’s. (Absolutely confusing for those of us who are trying to keep our facts straight!!!)

The establishment most of us read about in Regency romances— Almack’s—was where couples met in the “Marriage Mart,” although this idea appears to be more of a early Victorian concept than Regency. It was run by the four Patronesses and was later called Willis’s Rooms. Moreover, the “Regency romance” Almack’s was not as staid as Georgette Heyer and many Regency romances make out:  It was not just a “marriage mart,” but also a club where the wheelers and dealers of Parliament “wheeled their deals (and dealt their wheels?”), and where one would meet everyone of importance on a Wednesday night.  So I expect there was some significant money lost and won at our Almack’s, too, upon occasion.

As I said above, the Almack’s of Regency fame was eventually called the Willis’s Rooms (somewhere in the late 1820s, I believe).

However, I will say that Almack’s was not as staid as Georgette Heyer and most Regency romances make out: it was not just a “marriage mart,” but also a club where the wheelers and dealers of Parliament made political alliances, etc., and where one could meet everyone of importance on a Wednesday night.  So I expect there was some significant money lost and won at our Almack’s, too, upon occasion. Almack’s also sometimes served as a gambling house that rented out rooms for private events and the assembly.

 

… the undeniably romantic allure of the richly decorated gaming clubs or the reckless gambling of dynastic fortunes [which] rather trump[s] the dingy and dull penny games played against street walls or in alehouses. (Arthur Pitt, MA dissertation, A Study Of Gamblers And Gaming Culture In London, c. 1780-1844)

5023327c90cc85e024e3715f00ed19ff.jpg

The idea of playing cards is one often explored in Regency Era-based books and novels. What type of games? Were these purely for passing time in pleasurable company? Or were they more for those, like Mr. George Wickham in Jane Austen’s Pride and Prejudice, who attempted to win his fortune? Or foolishly lose one’s inheritance? We hear mention of playing cards after suffer within families and playing cards at balls, a separate room set aside for those who wish to indulge in sometime more sedate than dancing a country dance. Card parties were a common way to while away an evening. Whether as a small group in a private home, or as an alternative to dancing at an assembly or ball, they were an acceptable pastime for anyone in any station. 

First, let us address the playing of cards outside the home. Many who indulged in this activity were serious gamesters, often times placing their families in ruin and “putting a period to his existence.” Naturally, such is not to say all men lost their fortunes, nor does the idea of “gaming hells” eliminate the fact that men (and some women) regularly bet on cock fights, bear baiting, horse races, fisticuffs, etc. Moreover, it was not necessary for the gentleman to go to a “gaming hell” to place his bet, for every gentleman’s club (White’s Brooks’s, Boodle’s, Watier’s, etc.) had a card room, and as mentioned above, every ball and house party hosted a game room. In those, the player could have reasonable hopes of an honest game of cards. The gaming hells were not so reputable as that. There, “Captain Sharps” often won huge fortunes. 

In Georgette Heyer’s Faro’s Daughter, the family has a gambling house where Faro [or Pharoah – or Basset] was played. It was a game with a bank that people played against the house. They had a bouncer and usually had people learned of the game and its location by word-of-mouth, because it was illegal to have a Faro bank. In other words, faro is not really a card game, but a game of chance using cards. Nowadays, it is played at a green baize table displaying pictures of playing cards. However, during the Regency, the dealer takes cards from a special wooden box and lays them face up on the table. One suit of the cards is pasted to the table in numerical order, and players place their bets by putting what they want to stake on one or more cards. Various rules decide whether a card drawn from the box wins for a player with a stake on the same number, or loses. Basically though, the player bets on whether a certain card will be dealt from the wooden box.

In the late 1700s, fashionable ladies set up Faro banks in their homes, but this practice fell out of favor by the Regency. Such did not mean they stopped completely. Some ladies supplemented their income by ‘holding the bank’ in private card parties held in their houses. As long as they retained the appearance of merely being a hostess, and not in business, such a venture would dent their reputation but might not ruin it.

The Jewel Thief and the Earl

Grandison Franklyn, 8th Earl Harlow, has earned the moniker “Grandison, the Great” for a variety of reasons: his well-honed attitude of superiority; his appearance; and a string of mistresses, most notably Lady Jenest, who created a “great” row when he cut her loose.

Miss Colleen Everley is the daughter of England’s most notorious thief, a man called “Brook’s Crook.” Colleen has been taught many of her father’s skills, along with an eye for the value of each item in a room. Unfortunately, the lady does not possess Thomas Everley’s daring.

Lord Harlow and Miss Everley must combine forces to return Queen Charlotte’s sapphire necklace before Her Majesty learns it is missing. Toss in a healthy sprinkling of quirky characters and missteps in the investigation, and the reader will find a delightful tale that goes beyond the “Cinderella” effect and opposites attract.

Kindle https://www.amazon.com/dp/B09Y9DWVGV?ref_=pe_3052080_276849420

Available to Read on Kindle Unlimited

BookBub https://www.bookbub.com/books/the-jewel-thief-and-the-earl-by-regina-jeffers

I used an in-home gaming situation in The Jewel Thief and the Earl. Enjoy this excerpt. 

Colleen still did not feel like keeping company with anyone, especially not Lionel Dostoff, but Lord Liverpool had sent his plans for the possible recovery of the necklace, and so, she had not sent her apologies to Dostoff and informing him that he would call upon her for their walk in Hyde Park. Instead, when he called upon her, she had greeted the man with a smile of welcome, although her heart said otherwise.

“You appear more than a bit pensive, my dear,” Mr. Dostoff said as they strolled together along one of the less used paths of the park.

“I am just spent. After leaving your establishment, I did not sleep until the following night. I spent my day at the Ever-Rising Home.”

“I admire the program you have established. It takes a special type of woman to give to those who are less fortunate than she, even accepting women others would shun without a second look at them. Hopefully, someday, your idea will become the model for charities assisting the downtrodden. If you wish to expand it, I would be willing to speak to a variety of possible investors in your behalf. Many among the ton are willing to purchase the moniker of being charitable by placing their money in the hands of those willing to do the work for them.”

“That would be truly spectacular, sir. I can only accommodate two dozen women with children at a time. As each woman must remain with me for a minimum of six months or until she can be placed in suitable employment, my numbers remain constant, but our waiting list increasing rapidly. As quickly as one is placed into a more proper environment, another is at the door to claim the empty space. It would be good for all if we had more than one facility available.”

Mr. Dostoff patted the back of her hand. “I will speak to my parents. They are known for their charitable work. If they lead, others will follow.”

Colleen had never asked the question she had wondered upon since she had taken Mr. Dostoff’s acquaintance. “Do your parents sanction the role you play for the British government?”

“My father is aware of the sacrifices I make for our great nation, and, although he cannot openly congratulate me, he has refused to turn me out, as many would have done in similar circumstances. My mother is not one to keep secrets, so my father and I have not explained it all to her. She simply loves me as a mother should, even with my so-called faults.”

“Then you are blessed,” she said softly, attempting to disguise how she wished her parents had made different choices. Colleen realized he wished to ask of her parents; therefore, she quickly changed the subject. “As we are to appear together this evening, we should discuss how best to proceed.”

“Naturally,” he said, lowering his voice. “We are to attend an at-home betting parlor.”

“I thought they were illegal,” she said innocently.

“They are,” he verified. “There has been a variety of legislation over the last fifty years or so against gaming hells such as the Red Hawk, as well as the more luxurious establishments; yet, enforcement is sporadic, at best. Several Society widows have chosen to open their homes a few times each month to those wishing to play faro, hazard, quinze-et-la-va, basset, and trente-et-la-va. Although some openly criticize such practices, Lady Jenest ignores the naysayers.”

“Lady Jenest?” Colleen gasped. “Lord Harlow’s former mistress?” Although she would never admit the facts to others, Colleen knew something of each of Harlow’s mistresses, including his current one: Susana Wisley, a former opera singer, who had caught his lordship’s eye, a year or so back.

“You are familiar with Lady Jenest?” Mr. Dostoff asked.

“Only what the newsprints provided,” she confessed.

“Obviously, Lord Harlow could not attend this evening’s event,” Dostoff explained. “Such is the reason Lord Liverpool arranged for you and I to attend together. I will play, while you will use your skills to learn something of the missing necklace.”

“How is Lady Jenest involved?” Colleen’s mind raced to place the missing pieces to the puzzle troubling her for several days.

Mr. Dostoff asked, “Did not Lord Harlow explain the situation?”

Colleen knew her brow furrowed in confusion. “When I asked, Lord Harlow repeatedly said he was not at liberty to say.”

Mr. Dostoff also frowned. “I suppose his lordship simply followed protocol.” The gentleman was quiet for several elongated moments before he said, “I imagine Lord Liverpool insisted on secrecy before the Prime Minister had made inroads into the investigation. As I understand it, the necklace disappeared from Lady Jenest’s home safe.”

“The the necklace belonged to her ladyship?” Colleen questioned.

“Like Lord Harlow, I have been instructed not to disclose the name of the owner of the necklace, but it was not the property of Lady Jenest or any of her inner circle.”

“How did it come to be in her ladyship’s safe?”

“As I understand it, the owner was deep in his cups when he called upon Lady Jenest. Her ladyship made the suggestion to secure the necklace once she was made aware of its presence on the gentleman. Reportedly, it was placed in the safe in the evening, but it was not within the safe in the morning.”

“Was this during one of her ladyship’s at-home gatherings?” she asked.

“Yes, which unfortunately leaves us with as many as fifty suspects, but, first, we must determine if Lady Jenest has placed the necklace away in order to sell it. According to all reports, her ladyship’s debts rise despite her efforts to produce more money with her gaming ‘business.’”

Colleen asked, “What role am I to play this evening?”

“Nothing too dangerous. Simply wander through the rooms. Determine how easily one could have accessed Lady Jenest’s private quarters and her safe.”

“And, I suppose, use my skills to learn whether Lady Jenest has stashed the necklace away for her own purposes once others have forgotten of its value?” she inquired with a lift of her brows.

“Despite what may first appear evident, Lady Jenest is not a suspect, for most doubt she would be so foolish as to set herself against the owner of the necklace—a man who could bring the authorities to her door with a simple flick of his wrist; yet, who is to say the reality of a desperate woman’s mind.”

* * *

Earlier, Colleen had begged off when Mr. Dostoff had suggested they enjoy tea at a nearby tea room. Now, she was again on the gentleman’s arm as they entered Lady Jenest’s lavish Town house. She had chosen a gown her father had ordered for her when they had been on the Continent. Ironically, although several years old, the cut of the gown was currently in fashion in England. A bit of lace had presented it new life.

In reality, despite wishing to look her best in order to play her role in this farce, she chose a gown with a fuller skirt than those with an empire waist so she might move more freely. She feared she would be required to escape detection in a hurry.

“Mr. Dostoff,” Lady Jenest said with a tip of her fan against Lionel’s sleeve. “I was so pleased you sent around a card today. Do you wish to play faro?”

Lionel frowned. “I was thinking I might choose hazard or basset for a hand or two.”

“Then you will wish to join those in the blue drawing room,” her ladyship said with another touch of Mr. Dostoff’s sleeve, obviously flirting with the man and completely ignoring Colleen’s presence beside the gentleman. Colleen knew she should be outraged by the woman’s audacity; however, she was not. First, she felt nothing romantic when it came to Lionel Dostoff, and, secondly, it was a sad business that Lady Jenest with a grown son would be required to hope for another patron’s protection.

“And you, my dear,” Lionel said looking down on Colleen and drawing her ladyship’s attention to the fact he had another woman on his arm.

“Oh, do forgive me, Miss—” Lady Jenest said around a well-placed, but most assuredly, fake smile.

Lionel answered for Colleen. “Miss Snowden. I should have realized you had not been properly introduced, my lady. With your permission, Lady Jenest, I would give you the acquaintance of Miss Snowden.”

“Are you new to London, Miss Snowden?” Lady Jenest asked.

“Not so terribly new, my lady,” Colleen responded evasively. “I simply possess a much smaller circle than does someone of your exalted position.”

“And what of your acquaintance with Mr. Dostoff?” Lady Jenest persisted, although other guests stood behind them waiting to be received.

Lionel placed his free hand over hers as it rested upon his arm to indicate he would respond. “I hold an acquaintance with Miss Snowden’s father.”

“And who is Mr. Snowden?” Lady Jenest inquired as people edged forward to have their share of the conversation.

“Just the younger son and brother of a gentleman from the southern shires,” Colleen said softly, very conscious that more than one of those behind her listened for her response. She had not wanted any notoriety, but she should have known London society thrived on every tidbit of gossip.

Lionel took the lead. “We should not keep you longer, Lady Jenest. I can see many wish a few minutes of your time. “With a brief bow on his part and a curtsey from Colleen, he led her away, but, first, he made certain she could move from room to room without censure by saying, “I know you prefer whist to basset, but I insist you keep me company for a little while before you seek your own entertainment, my dear.”

* * *

From a place in Lady Jenest’s garden, Grandison had watched her ladyship interact with Dostoff and Miss Everley. He was already hiding in the bushes when the lady had stepped down from Dostoff’s carriage. Grand refused to admit, even to himself, how his eyes drank in the simple beauty of the woman. Even without the jewels and ornamentation others wore, Miss Everley outshone all of the society ladies entering Lady Jenest’s home.

It went against all he held holy to stay hidden when he knew it should be he by Miss Everley’s side, rather than Lionel Dostoff. Unfortunately, Grand would have a high price to pay if Lord Liverpool learned of this bit of subterfuge that Grand had chosen to practice. He knew Lady Jenest’s house and grounds nearly as well as her ladyship did, and so, he placed himself nearby in order to be in a position to assist Miss Everley if the lady required his protection. Miss Everley may possess some of her father’s techniques, but Grand doubted she held even one-tenth of Thomas Everley’s bravado.

As Dostoff led the lady toward the blue sitting room, Grand paralleled their movements to a position outside the large open window where he could watch Miss Everley through the silky drapes and wait. His instincts told him this operation would not go as smoothly as the Prime Minister had hoped. Grand would make certain Miss Everley would not be destroyed by their country’s need to correct Prince George’s mistake in trusting the wrong people. She had paid a high enough price for her father’s mistakes. One of her own making would likely destroy her.

* * *

Colleen carefully watched Lionel’s skillful play. She held no doubt the man had the ability to memorize the cards as they were turned. She had seen such men when she had lived on the Continent, but this game was her first time in viewing a “master” up close. No wonder the man was so successful as an agent of the Crown and his current position at the Red Hawk, which she knew was a place where many involved in London’s more profitable crimes took refuge.

Mesmerized by his play, it took her a few minutes to recall the role she portrayed in this charade. She leaned forward to say softly, “I believe I shall join the other ladies in the room set aside for whist.”

Without looking away from the game, Mr. Dostoff said, “I will join you soon, my dear.” He caught the hand she had placed on his shoulder and brought it to his lips. Even through her gloves, Colleen could feel the heat of his mouth upon her skin. The feeling was not unpleasant; yet, she wished he did not play his role so well, for, although she enjoyed Mr. Dostoff’s company, she would not place a claim on the man. Doing so would betray her heart, which, if she were honest with herself, had been given away to a young man who had greeted her all those years prior with a simple, “Good day.” No one would ever take Grandison Franklyn’s place in her soul. His presence had been ingrained upon her heart years prior.

Posted in British history, customs and tradiitons, Georgian England, Georgian Era, Jane Austen, Living in the Regency, Mansfield Park, Northanger Abbey, Pride and Prejudice, quotes, Regency era, Regency romance, research, Sense & Sensibility, Whigs | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Playing Cards in Jane Austen’s England, Pleasant Pastime, as Well as Gambling + an Excerpt from “The Jewel Thief and the Earl”

When Might the Heir Style Himself With His New Title in Regency Romances?

First, for legal purposes, the man must present himself to the House of Lords to claim the title officially. After the will has been read and its stipulations executed, the new peer must petition the Lord Chancellor for a writ of summon to the House of Lords to be seated in the current or in the next session of Parliament. The new peer will be expected to prove that his parents were legally married, and he is the legal son and heir produced by that marriage. He must prove he has reached his majority (twenty-one years or older) and a member of the Church of England. No matter, whether the man is the heir apparent or the heir presumptive, he must prove how he is related to the deceased and prove that his father and all others with a claim to the peerage who preceded him are deceased and were legitimate children of the marriage of their parents.

If the proofs are accepted the new peer is issued a writ of summons to appear before the House of Lords, where he participates in an elaborate ceremony before accepting his seat in the Lords. 

However, all this pomp and ceremony is not necessary before the man is styled (addressed as) by his new title. In reality, this “tradition” is a matter of how the man chooses to style himself until the title is officially conferred. In romance novels, it often can be used to address the person’s true character. If he possesses a solid claim to the peerage, and everyone knows it, he might well assume the title at once as a form of address. He could do so to secure another’s security or protect the peerage from an unscrupulous outside force. Naturally, he would not have access to any of the estate or funds or rights of the title until it is legally confirmed, but he can conduct business in the name of the peerage. If his claim is a bit shaky, he or others might want to avoid that until it is proven.

For more on the ceremony, fees, etc., check out Nancy Regency Researcher

If he is a stickler for legal protocols, he might not assume it at once–but others might. And, naturally, one must keep in mind the author should avoid confusing the reader with references to both the title and his surname, which might seem like two different characters, so that becomes a bit tricky.

When a father dies, the transfer of power and title happens automatically.  The father’s will might require some wait for probate of some items, but usually the executor and a solicitor see to all of it. 

Notice of the death of the previous peer is customarily sent to the College of Arms and the name of the new peer recorded by them. All is straightforward and usually goes without a hitch.

Sometimes the process is excessively easy. For example, when Lord Byron succeeded to his great uncle’s peerage at age 10, he did nothing, and all simply assumed he  was entitled to the peerage. He was not brought up in aristocratic circles so he became very angry when he was told that in order to take his seat in the House of Lords he had to prove he was the rightful successor. This meant he had to show his father’s relationship to the previous peer and that his father was born of a valid marriage and that he was born in a valid marriage and that his great uncle’s sons were dead and without issue. As one might expect that process involved fees. Fortunately Byron only had to show proof of a couple of generations Sometimes the proofs had proof must go back six generations.

Wyllie, William Morrison; The House of Lords; Parliamentary Art Collection; http://www.artuk.org/artworks/the-house-of-lords-214311

When the Frederick Berkeley, 5th Earl of Berkley died, his oldest son applied for a Writ of Summons to the House of Lords. Berkeley and Mary Cole (who also passed under the name of Tudor), the daughter of a local publican and butcher, had seven sons and five daughters, but the disputed date of their marriage prevented their elder sons from succeeding as Earl of Berkeley and Baron Berkeley. The pair asserted their marriage had taken place on 30 March 1785, but the earliest ceremony of which there is incontrovertible proof was a wedding in Lambeth Church, Surrey, on 16 May 1796, at which date Mary was pregnant with their seventh child. Berkeley settled Berkeley Castle upon their eldest son, William FitzHardinge Berkeley, but William’s attempt to assume his father’s honours were disallowed by the House of Lords, who considered him illegitimate.

Therefore, the Committee on Privilege turned down the eldest’s request, saying he and the other brothers born before 1795 were illegitimate, and the earldom had fallen to the 16-year-old born in 1796. Berkeley’s titles devolved as a matter of law upon his fifth but first legitimate son, Thomas Morton Fitzhardinge Berkeley (1796–1882), but were never used by him and he did not take his seat in the House of Lords. Per his father’s will, he would have lost his small inheritance had he disputed his eldest brother’s claim to the titles. The boy was too young, for he had not reached his majority, to do anything about the matter, and his oldest brother and mother ran things. When he came of age, he still never put forth a claim to the earldom. However, he was, by right and law, the earl, so anything requiring the signature of the earl had to be signed by him. He signed responsibility over to his oldest brother, but the title itself went dormant until he died. The title was dormant for most of the  century. The oldest son was created a peer by William IV who also created his own eldest son a peer.

Other Sources: 

The Skinny on Abdicating a Title During the Regency Era 

What is the Difference Between a Peerage that is Dormant, Extinct or in Abeyance?

 

 

Posted in Act of Parliament, British history, buildings and structures, customs and tradiitons, Georgian England, Georgian Era, history, peerage, titles of aristocracy, writing | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on When Might the Heir Style Himself With His New Title in Regency Romances?

Kilts and Tartans and the Wearing of the Plaid (as we say in the U.S.)

More than 40% of my DNA is listed as Scottish, and I have always held a fascination with all things from Scotland. When my son was younger, we took a road trip to Fergus, Ontario, Canada, so he might experience a bit of the Scottish traditions. (I was married to a second-generation Italian-American at the time, and we regularly celebrated those traditions, but I wanted my son to view some things of the Scottish side first hand.) This year, the Fergus games will be held in August. You may find more information HERE. In North Carolina, where I currently live, we have a number of Highland style games to visit. If you have never attended one of these events, I highly recommend them.

Guess who is my favorite Disney princess.

The idea of identification of one tartan to a clan is fairly recent in a historical perspective.  Those of us who write Regency era based stories have a more difficult time than others historical periods to discover an actual clan name and its supporting colors. Most of the tartans identified to a clan came about in Victorian times, so just had to be careful. They were created by tailors during that time period.

Sam Heughan and Graham McTavis in kilts

Though we do not know the exact time period (reports vary from anywhere between the 6th C to 16th C), the philabeg, or what we now call a “kilt,” evolved from what was then known as a “belted plaid.” The belted plaid was a full length garment, also referred to in some documents as the “great kilt,” which was worn with the top half draped over the shoulder as a cloak. This long plaid was known in Gaelic as the feileadh mor.

Generally, it is believed, this belted plaid was made up of two large pieces of material, sewn together. The person would put it on by first placing the material on the ground with a belt underneath and pleating it in that manner into two “aprons.” He would then lie down on the aprons, which were at either end of the material, fold over the aprons and fasten the belt about his waist. When he stood again, he adjusted the “unpleated” sections about his body to protect himself from the weather, but leaving the part around his arm of preference for fighting free from being pinned in place.

The term “kilt” itself actually means to tuck up clothing around the body and is a derivation of an old Norse word kjilt.

Celtic Life tells us, “Actually one of the earliest references to the Scottish kilt came from Ireland. In 1594 a group of Scottish soldiers from the Hebridean islands had gone over to Ireland to fight for Red Hugh O’Donnell.

“They were recognized among the Irish Soldiers by the distinction of their arms and clothing, their habits and language, for their exterior dress was mottled cloaks of many colours (breacbhrait ioldathacha) with a fringe to their shins and calves, their belts over their loins outside their cloaks.

Many of them had swords with hafts of horn, large and warlike, over their shoulders. It was necessary for the soldier to grip the very haft of his sword with both hands when he would strike a blow with it. Others of them had bows of carved wood strong for use, with well-seasoned strings of hemp, and arrows sharp-pointed whizzing in flight.” (McClintock, Old Highland Dress, The Life of Aodh Ruadh O Domhnaill)

The first kilt with sewn in pleats, rather than folded ones, did not come about until 1792. Also, the brightly colored tartans we know today were typically black and white or a muddy brown and, if lucky, a green, for dying techniques were not developed to offer such varieties as we see today. Those developments came about through the 1800s (such is why it was the time of Queen Victoria before the modern tartan was available.

The tartan system as we now think of it was part of Sir Walter Scott’s vision, and it was the State visit of King George IV (the one we Regency writers often refer to as “Prinny” and for whom the “Regency” was named) which brought it to life.

“King George IV made a royal visit to Edinburgh in 1822. It was the first time a monarch had come to Scotland since 1641 and his tour was stage-managed by Sir Walter Scott. Scott engineered an image of Scotland similar to the country in his romantic novels for the visit. Highland Games were re-introduced, including at that time ‘twisting the four legs from a cow’, and Niel Gow entertained the King with his legendary fiddle playing. In the period approaching the visit, the wearing of kilts, trews and all other Highland garb became the height of fashion, accompanied by families finding historical reasons for claiming the various setts as their own.” [ScotClans]

Ironically, it had George IV’s grandfather, George II, who had outlawed the wearing of kilts. “King George II, imposed the dress act in 1746, primarily to suppress Highland culture. This act in essence outlawed the wearing of any items of Highland dress, which included the kilt. The Highland regiments were the only ones excluded from the act’s repression.

“… no man or boy within that part of Great Britain called Scotland, other than such as shall be employed as Officers and soldiers in His Majesty’s Forces, shall, … wear or put on the clothes commonly called Highland Clothes …”

“This marked a period during which the kilt was generally worn as a fashionable item by Scottish romantics and also as a form of protest against the English based government’s repression. Penalties for those who defied the ban included six months imprisonment, if it was a first offence or for those who re-offended, seven years transportation to the far off colonies.” [Celtic Life]

After Culloden (1745), wearing the kilt was banned by the government as part of the suppression of Scottish culture (no gaelic, no bagpipes, etc.). The law was repealed about 40 years later, and by then the great kilt had largely given way to a short, easier to work in kilt. After George IV’s appearance in Edinburg, Scotland stood proud again, and such is why there are so many kilt shops on Edinburgh’s Royal Mile doing a land-office business to this very day.  LOL!

As a footnote: For those of you who love Braveheart (yes, I am talking to you Wendy O.) one can see William Wallace and Robert the Bruce and others depicted as wearing kilts. Each clan had always worn certain colours to identify them. The intensity of or the arrangement of colors changed slightly with whatever dyes were available, or the skill of the weaver, or the price of the cloth. Clansmen in those days were not purchasing tartans/kilts for an evening out at some big event for charity or the arts. They were dressing for the weather in whatever garb they could afford, often made of rough wool. They did not worry about matching colors with their chief. Their belted plaid was designed to protect them from the weather and served as a blanket. They either word “brogues” without socks or went barefoot.

Posted in Act of Parliament, British history, fashion, film, Georgian England, history, Living in the Regency, medieval, military, Regency era, research, Scotland | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments