A Family Crest for the name Jeffers does not exist!!!!

I am doing research again for my latest novel, and I went to look for websites about surname meanings, etc. Choosing a name for a character in a book is very important to developing characterization. For example, the given name of Gabriel should evoke images of an avenging angel, but the surname is equally as important in developing the character. In my book, I planned an elaborate “family crest,” but much to my surprise that term is a misnomer. It appears that a coat of arms is bestowed upon an individual, not upon a family. So, there could be numerous forms of display for my name Jeffers. So, looking for a particular surname means that a researcher must also consider the derivation of the name, the location or region in which a person’s family originally lived, etc. I never realized how many variations there might be. I should have known this, but it was never clear. It appears that the best one can do is to trace his family history to the oldest ancestor to discover a Coat of Arms.

This is what I know of the name Jeffers. It is of Welsh descent, and my ancestors lived around Herefordshire, even before the Norman Conquest. Jeffers often became Jefferson (as in the son of Jeffers) or Jeffson or Jephison. All three are common spellings of the name. The Jeffers family was one of great antiquity. They were direct descendants from the great Tudor Trevor, Lord of Hereford, and Whittington, founder of the Welsh Tribe of Marches. They branched into neighboring Worcestershire at Earls Croom, having been granted land by King Edward VI. They established estates at Clifton Corncastle in Worcestershire. Eventually, they moved into Yorkshire and settled Thicket Priory and Ripon and intermarried with the Dunnington family. The Venerable Joseph Jefferson was Archdeacon of Colchester in 1821. Records of American ancestors include John Jefferson (1620 Virginia); Mary Jefferson (1653 Viriginia); Edmund Jefferson (1682 Pennsylvania); Robert Jefferson (1774 Nova Scotia); Thomas and John Jeffers ( 1642 Virginia); and the third U.S. President Thomas Jefferson. My family’s coat of arms contains a red and silver griffin and the motto “A Cruce Salus.”

Some of the sites I have explored are
Origin of Surnames:
http://surnames.behindthename.com/

http://www.searchforancestors.com/surnames/origin/

http://www.surnameguide.com/surnames.html (has links to genealogy sites)

http://genealogy.familyeducation.com/family-names?detoured=1 (has tabs for first names, as well as surnames)

Heraldry:

http://www.digiserve.com/heraldry/

http://www.fleurdelis.com/coatofarms.htm (good site – explains all the parts of a family crest – lots of basic information, but very helpful)

http://www.rarebooks.nd.edu/digital/heraldry/ (Heraldic Dictionary)

http://heraldry.net/ (5000 most popular family crests)

http://www.heraldica.org/

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , | 5 Comments

Education Nation – How Do You Learn Quiz

As a former educator, I have been keeping up with the information that NBC has highlighted all week long. Yesterday, I found it a bit ironic that the national push is for more “Career-Oriented” education, while my local school district has taken the stance to phase out these programs. As my son’s teaches what is known as CTE courses, my interest was piqued by the mixed messages. Of course, I sent him the link.
Today, I decided to use the “How Do Your Learn” online quiz offered by the University of Phoenix. It is very easy to do. One must sign on to www.howdoyoulearn.educationnation.com to take the quiz. It is around 20 questions in length and takes less than 10 minutes to complete. I have always considered myself a visual learner, but I must have adopted other learning modalities over the years.
27% of those taking the quiz are verbal … I was at the 20th percentile.
45 % are solitary … Again, I was at the 20th percentile.
25% are social … It did not surprise me to have my score at 17%.
16 % are logical … I was at 13%.
19% are physical … I was at 10%.
28% are visual learners … I was at 10%.
24% who took the test are aural learners … I was at 6%.
When one finishes, the site offers to send a person a more detailed analysis by just putting in an email address.
I am most anxious to hear the breakdown.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | 2 Comments

Reconnecting

Over the last few months, it seems I have reconnected with a great many former students and former classmates. At least half of my “friends” on my Facebook page are represented by these groups. Do not get me wrong. I really enjoy finding people on “The Social Network.” When one gets to a certain age, more and more of those “former” acquaintances are not available to us, and we are taken aback because we realize we did not say to them what we should have long ago.

Recently, a dear friend found me, and we are less than 40 miles apart – a miracle of sorts because we are both from a different state. We have corresponded by email and over the phone, but we have yet to see each other face-to-face. The anticipation rises, and I wonder if I have changed so dramatically that he will be disappointed when he first sees me. “First Impressions” are so important. What should I wear? How should I fix my hair? All are silly questions, but we all feel that moment when we must throw caution to the wind and to admit we are no longer young and thin and sparkling with potential.

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Reconnecting

September Birthdays for Austen-Related Actors

http://pf.kizoa.com/sflite.swf?did=1127901&k=P97420291&hk=1

This link will take you to a slideshow featuring actors from Jane Austen related films who have birthdays in September. I hope you enjoy it.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on September Birthdays for Austen-Related Actors

Characteristics of the Gothic in My Novels

First, those who read Gothic novels know that Horace Walpole started the phenomenon with his The Castle of Otranto way back in 1764. We define a Gothic novel based on the characteristics we find in Walpole’s work.

1. The setting is always based on an old castle. The castle may be occupied or not. It should contain secret passageways or secret rooms. (The Phantom of Pemberley) Ruined sections of the castle are often used as part of the story line. The darkened passageways and staircases adds to the mysterious flavor of the work. In more modern works, we find an old house or mansion. (Vampire Darcy’s Desire)
2. Speaking of mysteries, obviously, a true Gothic is laced with the fear of the unknown. This is usually enhanced by the plot involving an “unknown” secret (Vampire Darcy’s Desire), an “unknown” relative, an inexplicable event, or, best of all, a unexplained disappearance. (The Phantom of Pemberley)
3. Characters often have dream visions (Vampire Darcy’s Desire) or an omen of death occurs. Shadowy figures appear, but are often mistaken for a nightmare. (The Phantom of Pemberley)
4. An ancient prophecy is connected to the castle or the people who live there. (Vampire Darcy’s Desire). The prophecy is not readily explainable.
5. Supernatural elements are found in the book. (Vampire Darcy’s Desire)
6. Women at the mercy of a powerful male. (The Phantom of Pemberley)
The male manipulates the woman into committing an intolerable act. (Vampire Darcy’s Desire) The women in Gothic novels usually respond by crying or screaming. The woman is often a sympathetic character because her life is less than pristine. (The Phantom of Pemberley)
7. Emotions are readily displayed by the characters – terror, surprise, anger, etc. (The Phantom of Pemberley and Vampire Darcy’s Desire)
8. The text is loaded with the metonymy of a movie. There is a book entitled How to Read Literature Like a Professor. One of the chapters deals with “rain.” What we find is when it rains in literature or in the movies, someone is likely to die. That is metonymy, where something like rain equals death. It is an extended metaphor. (Vampire Darcy’s Desire)

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on Characteristics of the Gothic in My Novels

Many Film Versions of Jane Austen

Recently, I blogged about the latest film version of a Jane Austen novel to be released. I write Austen-related adaptation, as well as contemporary and Regency era books, but many of my readers come to me via an Austen film. They see the movie/TV adaptation and become hooked on the story lines.
In fact, on AustenAuthors.com, I shall be discussing the film’s language of various adaptations on the third Wednesday of each month. If this peaks your interest, I would love to talk specifics with you there.

Pride and Prejudice: A Modern Day Tale of First Impressions (2011) – Film
Jane Austen Handheld (2010) – Film based on the novel – told through a documentary-style film format
“Emma” (2009) a BBC TV mini-series
Sense and Sensibilidad (2008) – Film
“Lost in Austen” (2008) – TV mini-series that takes the main character into the novel’s pages
“Sense and Sensibility” (2008) – TV mini-series
Jane Austen Trilogy (2008) – a documentary with bibliographic intentions
Miss Austen Regrets (2008) – a made-for-TV show based on Austen’s letters
The Jane Austen Book Club (2007) – film based on the popular best-selling book
Mansfield Park (2007) – TV movie
Northanger Abbey (2007) – TV movie
Persuasion (2007) – TV movie
Becoming Jane (2007) – popular film based on Austen’s letters
Pride and Prejudice (2005) – Film
Bride and Prejudice (2004) – Indie film
Pride and Prejudice (2003) -modern adaptation film
The Real Jane Austen (2002) TV movie based on Jane Austen’s letters
Kandukondain, Kandukondain (2000) Film based on Sense and Sensibility
Mansfield Park (1998) – Film
“Wishbone”- “Pup Fiction” (1998) -an episode of the popular TV show based on Austen’s work
“Wishbone”- “Furst Impressions” (1997) – an episode of the popular TV show based on Austen’s work
“Emma” (1996) – TV movie
Emma (1996) – Film
Sense and Sensibility (1995) – Film
Persuasion (1995) – TV movie
“Pride and Prejudice” (1995) – TV mini-series
Sensibility and Sense (1990) – TV movie
Northanger Abbey (1987) -TV movie
Mansfield Park (1983) – TV mini-series
Sense and Sensibility (1981) – TV movie
Jane Austen in Manhattan (1980) – Film
“Pride and Prejudice” (1980) – TV mini-series
“Emma” (1972) – TV mini-series novel
“Novela” – “Persuasión” (1972) -TV series episode
Sense and Sensibility (1971) – TV movie
“Persuasion” (1971) -TV mini-series
“Novela” – “La abadía de Northanger” (1968) -TV series episode
“Pride and Prejudice (1967) – TV series
“Novela” – “Emma” (1967) – TV series episode
“Novela” – “Orgullo y prejuicio” (1966) -TV series episode
“Vier dochters Bennet, De” (1961) – TV mini-series based on Pride and Prejudice
Emma (1960) – TV movie
“Camera Three” (1960) – TV series based on Emma
“Persuasion” (1960) – TV mini-series
“Pride and Prejudice” (1958) – TV series
Pride and Prejudice (1958) – TV film
“General Motors Presents: Pride and Prejudice” (1958) – TV series episode
“Orgoglio e pregiudizio” (1957) – TV mini-series
“Matinee Theater: Pride and Prejudice” (1956) _ TV series episode
“Kraft Television Theatre: Emma” (1954) – TV series episode
“Pride and Prejudice” (1952) – TV mini-series
“The Philco Television Playhouse: Sense and Sensibility” (1950) – TV series episode
“The Philco Television Playhouse: Pride and Prejudice” (1949) – TV series episode
Emma (1948) -TV film
Pride and Prejudice (1940) – Film
Pride and Prejudice (1938) -TV

Jane Austen’s novels have never been out of print. It would seem that we might say the same thing of cinematic adaptations.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Many Film Versions of Jane Austen

Birth Order – Part II

My research continued, and I found some interesting trends.
Characteristics of Last Born or the Youngest Child:
These kids, according to a Time magazine article dated Oct. 29, 2007, are likely to be more adventurous and to participate in high-risk sporting events. They may take a turn towards comedy or satire in their professional lives, but those tendencies remain throughout their personal lives also. They get along better with others, especially when compared to the first born child.
The Middle Child’s Characteristics:
Because they are at one time the last born (before the youngest appears), the middle child’s personality changes. They end up being the peacemaker between the “bossy” first born and the “spoiled” last born in the family. They have a tendency to not want to make a decision (needing to please everyone). They are likely less connected to the family unit, being more independent than the others. Also, middle children take longer to choose an occupation, often going completely away from the one chosen by the first born. For example, if the first born chooses a white collar position (doctor, lawyer, etc.), the middle child will look to something not requiring as much education, but still requiring a specialization (firefighter, etc.)
The First Born’s Characteristics:
On an average, the first born is likely to be smarter than the other children. Most experts think it is because with the additional children, parents have less time to interact. Plus, the first born helps the younger siblings with homework, etc., and that reinforces his knowledge base. This is a hard characteristic to prove because family size may have as much to do with intelligence as does birth order. However, the first born is usually very motivated to succeed, and a college education is likely his way of doing so. Because of this, first borns usually earn more money than do his younger siblings. Look at high paying jobs, and one will find a predominance of first born children. They get a great deal of attention from parents and are often considered the “favorite” among the family unit. Think of “Everybody Loves Raymond,” and one will understand this concept.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Comments Off on Birth Order – Part II

Birth Order Research

For my newest book, I am doing some research in birth order and how it affects someone’s personality. Of course, I am one to believe that environment is more important to a person’s development. Knowing hardship, for example, makes a person “turn tail and run” or makes him the type to “face down adversity.” Yet, I do find these studies on birth order quite interesting.
I am an only child (have half brothers and sisters, but we were not raised in the same household). According to most of the research I have read, I am mature, a leader, very private, sensitive, dependable, demanding, and close to my parents. I would agree that this sums me up fairly well. I often say that “I was always the adult in charge,” even as a child. Unfortunately, that meant, growing up, I did not socialize with too many people of my own age. I, generally, dated guys older than I, etc.
First born and only children share some characteristics. First born children are generally very responsible, can be a bit of a know-it-all, are high achievers, are natural leaders, and they obey the rules.
Again, I see myself possessing many of these qualities. I always tried to live up to my mother’s expectations. Unfortunately, I failed quite often, but it was not for a lack of effort.
The youngest child, usually, is the “baby.” He can be financially irresponsible, bored easily, competitive, more outgoing, creative, and possessing a good sense of humor. Obviously, the youngest are more social. Without so much responsibility, they can be more carefree than their older siblings.
The middle child, which is what I am researching for my book, is independent and a bit secretive. He might think that “life is unfair.” He is usually the complete opposite of the oldest child, and he seeks his own identity, away from what the parents might expect. Unfortunately, the middle child often receives the least attention from his parents. That makes him the independent person mentioned earlier, and it also makes him a bit more flexible in his dealings with other people. However, he is easy-going and tends to be very generous.
So, which are you? Do the characteristics fit for your birth order? I would love to hear from you.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , | 4 Comments

Pink Bow Campaign

Locally, the Ballantyne Country Club conducts a fabulous “Race for the Cure” program. One of the things I especially like is the “Pink Bow” campaign. A person can purchase a large pink bow to place on mailboxes, trees, etc., to help raise awareness of breast cancer and to spread the message that early detection saves lives. The bows costs $5 and can be paid for with a Pay Pal account. I would encourage everyone to see if he/she has a similar program in his/her community. If not, one might want to take a look at the this one. Last year, the local program raised $11,000 for the breast cancer research.
http://www.bccrally.com

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Comments Off on Pink Bow Campaign

“Meet the Teacher”

Either write something worth reading or do something worth writing. – Benjamin Franklin

Let me introduce myself to you, dear readers. I am a product of the Finicky 50s, the Salacious 60s, and the Scathing 70s. I spent 40 years in the public classrooms of three different states, educating the “youth of America.” I have been a Time Warner Apple Award Finalist, twice Teacher of the Year, and a Martha Holden Jennings Scholar. I was recently a part of an Austen program at the Smithsonian. Besides Jane Austen, I am passionate about many things: my son Joshua, close friends, my God, yellow roses, period dramas, the NFL, track and field, martial arts, dancing, romance novels, dark chocolate, the scent of lavender, digging in my garden, words, words, and more words.

“What might I tell my readers that might give them a better idea of my personality?” I ask myself. First, I am a “lead, follow, or get out of my way” type of person. My OCD demands that I have six White Outs on my desk in a double row of 3. I went into labor six weeks early in the middle of my theatre class. Acting meets Marriage and Family Life! We do martial arts at my house. My half brother is Chuck Norris’s highest ranking instructor, and my son and I hold multiple ranking belts. Although I am a vegetarian, I craved Wendy’s hamburgers when I was pregnant. Go figure! I tell myself I needed the extra protein. A man once told me I had a “photogenic” memory. Needless to say, my “photographic” memory recalls distinctly how I told him to never call me again. I cannot carry a tune, so I sing in the shower and in the car. Because of rheumatic fever, I did part of my early schooling at home. I hate the words “said” and “that,” as well as the phrase “I can’t.” I possess a caustic sense of humor and sometimes do not think before I speak.

My late mother, literally, placed a book before me when I was no more than a babe propped up against a pillow. Reportedly, she would display a comic book on a makeshift stand, and I would contentedly “coo” my way through the pictures. When I created a fuss, she would turn the page. My mother read voraciously, as do I. Mixed with my choices of historical offerings (was obsessed with George Custer for several years), she suggested many of the classics: Dickens, Hemingway, Faulkner, the Brontës, Flaubert, etc., etc. Enter the incomparable Jane Austen. I was not quite 12 years of age, and I was hooked.

As I said earlier, I grew up during the Sputnik scare, when our educational system placed a premium on pushing U.S. students into advanced classes. Because I was an avid reader and because God saw fit to endow me with a high IQ, I was one of those chosen for the challenging courses. This was a heady experience, but it also increased my negative self image. It was not “cool” to be so smart among my friends. Compound that dilemma with Mother Nature’s cruel trick: I grew to 5’7″ by age 11, head and shoulders above my petite cousins, my 5’1″ mother, and every boy I wanted to meet in junior high school. I was “freaky” smart and terribly tall – too smart and too tall for any young man to seek me out.

Then Jane Austen introduced me to Fitzwilliam Darcy, a man who chose his “unsuitable”mate because she had a face “rendered uncommonly intelligent by the beautiful expression of her dark eyes,” because her figure was “light and pleasing,” because “he was caught” by her playful manners, and because of “the liveliness” of her mind. Austen convinced me that there must be a Darcy for me – someone who would embrace my intelligence and my lithe and majestic figure. (LOL!) Of course, I did not account for Jane’s humor. Miss Austen forgotten to mention how many “George Wickhams” a girl must encounter before Darcy appears. For years, I cursed Jane’s oversight.

Three years ago, my Advanced Placement English class challenged me to write my own book. “If you know all this, do it yourself.” They planted the seed, and I began to wonder if I could tell Pride and Prejudice from Mr. Darcy’s point of view. So, in semi-secret, I began to write a book of my own in the evenings. Three months later, when it was ready, I paid one of my students to draw the cover art, and with the help of a friend in the publishing business, I self-published the book. Darcy’s Passions was a gift to them and to me – a way of announcing, “I accepted your challenge; now you must accept mine.”

Darcy’s Passions rose quickly on the Amazon sales list, and Ulysses Press contacted me about publishing the book. The rest is history, so they say. We followed Passions with a sequel, Darcy’s Temptation (aka Darcy’s Dreams), which was a 2010 Booksellers’ Best Award finalist. Vampire Darcy’s Desire came next – a Gothic twist on the tale with Wickham as the purveyor of a 200-year old curse and Darcy as a dhampir, fighting his desire to possess Elizabeth as both a man and a vampire. Captain’s Wentworth’s Persuasion (aka Wayward Love) tells Austen’s Persuasion from Wentworth’s point of view. This month we released The Phantom of Pemberley: A Pride and Prejudice Murder Mystery. I also have a modern adaptation of P&P, entitled Honor and Hope, set in the North Carolina wine country. Soon I will release my first Regency romance, The Scandal of Lady Eleanor. It is the first in a five-part series about a secret British government unit known as the Realm.

If one examines my writing, he will discover my love of history incorporated in the pieces. In my works, the reader will find the Peterloo massacre, British naval supremacy, Regency era customs, the use of saturation bombing and chemical warfare, toys and games, the Abolitionist movement, the earliest case of DID, the Child ballads, and urban legends. The list goes on and on. Predictably, as a teacher, I make a point of explaining some key ideas within the story lines. I am aware that not everyone who reads my novels knows as much about Jane Austen and the Regency era as do I. One will also note that I use as much of Austen’s original wording as possible. My novels are quite liberally doused with Austen quotes.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Comments Off on “Meet the Teacher”