Eccentrics of the Regency Period Series: Sir John Lade

Sir John Lade, 2nd Baronet (1 August 1759 – 10 February 1838) was a prominent member of Regency society, notable as an owner and breeder of racehorses,  as an accomplished driver, associated with Samuel Johnson’s  circle, and one of George IV’s  closest friends. At the time he caused some sensation both because of the extent of his debts.

Sir_john_ladeSir John Lade managed the Prince’s racing stable and was renown for his tendency to dress and speak like a groom. Lade married the notorious “Letty,” a woman who began her life as a servant in a brothel and who at one time was the mistress of “Sixteen-String Jack,” a highwayman who was sent to the gallows in 1774. Lady Letitia Lade was also said to have been the mistress of the Duke of York and to have acted as procuress for Prince George.

He was born the posthumous child of the first Baronet, also named John. His mother was the sister of the brewer and MP Henry Thrale. He inherited from his father a vast fortune, also founded in brewing.

According to Abraham Hayward,  Samuel Johnson was consulted regularly on his upbringing; unfortunately Dr. Johnson had no very high opinion of the boy’s intellect. His original advice to Henry’s sister, Lady Lade, was “Endeavour, Madam, to procure him knowledge; for really ignorance to a rich man is like fat to a sick sheep, it only serves to call the rooks about him.” However, as Lade grew up, Dr. Johnson found himself disappointed; so much so that Hester Thrale  reports that when Sir John asked Johnson for advice on whether he should marry, the reply came as:

“I would advise no man to marry, Sir,” replied the Doctor in a very angry tone, “who is not likely to propagate understanding;” and so left the room.

This did not stop Johnson, however, from proposing “half in earnest” a marriage between Sir John and Fanny Burney  while the boy was still a minor.

On his attaining the age of twenty-one, he received control of his vast fortune. The event moved Dr. Johnson to write his poem “One-and-twenty”: which began:

Long-expected one-and-twenty/Ling’ring year, at length is flown/Pride and pleasure, pomp and plenty/Great Sir John, are now your own./ Loosen’d from the minor’s tether,/Free to mortgage or to sell.Wild as wind, and light as feather/Bid the sons of thrift farewell…..Lavish of your grandsire’s guineas/Show the spirit of an heir.

The poem, which ended with a – presumably satirical – reminder to “scorn the counsel” of “the guardian friend”, proved both prophetic and influential; the former in anticipating Sir John’s career, and the latter in influencing A. E. Housman’s A Shropshire Lad. 

Sir John swiftly proved Dr. Johnson right by losing large amounts of money at the races and at gambling; however, he simultaneously developed a reputation as a remarkable judge of horseflesh. Particularly notable in retrospect was his discovery and ownership of the horse Medley,  a grey which was one of the first thoroughbreds to be imported into America, and “the most important horse of the last quarter of the eighteenth century.” His colours, which unlike most others were piebald or “harlequin” were a familiar sight at races throughout the British isles.

Criticised for spending so much time in the stables and at race-meetings, Lade clearly did not help matters by dressing in riding clothes at all times – with many capes – and carrying a whip everywhere. According to the dandy Thomas Raikes,  his “ambition was to imitate the groom in dress and in language”. Raikes reports:

“I once heard him asking a friend on Egham racecourse to come home and dine. ‘I can give you a trout spotted all over like a coach-dog, a fillet of veal as white as alablaster (sic), a pantaloon cutlet, and plenty of pancakes – so help me!’ “

As possibly the finest horseman and driver of his time (in honour of which he was nicknamed ‘Jehu’), he was a leading light, and one of the founding members, of the ‘Four-Horse Club’ – also known as the “Four in Hand Club,”  after the number of horses’ reins held in one hand. His slapdash style of dressing gave rise to the simple knot for which the Club is remembered. He himself famously drove a team of six greys, except when he sat up with the Regent in place of the latter’s coachman, driving six matched bays on the road from Brighton  to London.

His fondness for the track and for driving, as well as for gambling caused him to wager vast sums of money on horses as well as on inconsequential feats of skill; he once bet a thousand guineas on one such performance against the Duke of Queensberry. The money was incidental, however, as he was equally willing to wager trifling sums on some absurdity: he once bet Lord Cholmondeley  that he could carry him on his back, from opposite the Brighton Pavilion twice round the Old Steine that faced it. Most of the bets revolved around feats of skill: he “would back himself to drive the off-wheels of his phaeton over a sixpence, and once for a bet successfully took a four-in-hand round Tattersall’s  Yard at Hyde Park Corner.” Tattersall’s cramped premises were in fact inextricably linked to Lade’s social pre-eminence, the phrase he used to describe “settling-up” day at Tattersall’s, when debts for the quarter were paid – “Black Monday” – has passed into the language as a descriptor for a day when fortunes are lost.

Letitia Derby (or Smith, the sources are unclear) was a woman of unclear origins who, prior to being discovered by the royal circle, was fairly definitely a member of the working class in the Drury Lane  district, and possibly a servant in a brothel. Subsequently she befriended and was probably the mistress of “Sixteen String Jack” Rann. After that notorious highwayman was hanged in 1774, she became the mistress of the Duke of York. Soon enough, however, her looks – and her seat on a horse and skills as a driver – attracted Lade’s attention and they were married, after a long affair and in spite of familial disapproval, in 1787. It is conjectured that Lade and Rann knew each other well, as Rann patronised races and had once been coachman of Hester Thrales’s sister.

Letitia Lade was a great favourite with the Regent and his set; she was more than willing to join in the culture of excess that they were infamous for, and once wagered on herself in a driving-contest at – scandalously – the Newmarket races; and also once bet five hundred guineas on an eight-mile race against another woman She took after her husband in dress and demeanour, and eventually overtook him: her casual use of profanity was so “overwhelming”, in fact, that it came to be acceptable to say of someone using particularly strong language that “he swears like Letty Lade.” She is the subject of a famous equestrian portrait by Stubbs  in the Royal Collection,  that was commissioned by the Regent to hand in his chambers; Lade and she were also the subject of a well-known pair of portraits by Sir Joshua Reynolds that now hang in the National Gallery. 

As Johnson predicted in verse on the day of Sir John’s majority, gambling, racing, women and moneylenders eventually combined to ensure that little remained of the once-remarkable Lade fortune. So much so that he spent some time in a debtor’s prison;  subsequently Lade was forced to accept the Regent’s generosity, and received a pension of three (later four, then five) hundred pounds a year as George’s “driving tutor”; to save face, the money was made out to the name of “the Rev. Dr. Tolly.”

Lade’s marriage and his debt, together with his disdain for the conventions of society caused him to be generally disreputable. Many of the stories of snubs that the Regent received on behalf of his friends centre around Lade, and most of them appear to have been delivered by the redoubtable Lord Thurlow,  a friend of George III.

The Lades, like so many leaders of Regency society, eventually faded from the scene when their money ran out and George IV was crowned and grew preoccupied with affairs of state. Letitia died in 1825, and is buried at St Mary’s, Staines. Lade, who lived quietly on his stud farm in Sussex, continued to receive his pension, though it tended to be a near-run thing on each change of reign; his relative Dorothy Nevill, the writer and horticulturist, wrote of him that “my poor crazy cousin” was dependent on the kindness of a court functionary and on hints dropped in suitable ears; Victoria, when a young girl fresh to the throne, records in her diaries that she discovered that she was paying “a Sir John Lade, one of George IV’s intimates.”

 

Posted in British history, legends and myths, Living in the Regency, real life tales, Regency era, Victorian era | Tagged , , , | 30 Comments

Gambling and the Fate of the Haute Ton’s “Club Widow”

Boodle's

Boodle’s

Being what was known as a “club widow” was a common situation for married women of the aristocracy in London. Men frequented their clubs more often than they did their homes. White’s, Brooks’s, and Boodle’s were the three great clubs of the era. White’s was the most exclusive of the three. It was a social club, which prided itself on remaining party politic free and was the most aristocratic of the three.

Brook’s was founded in 1778 by William Brooks, an ex-manager of Almack’s. The original members of the club numbered seven and twenty and were each young dandies of the time. Macaronis one and all, these men were known for their outrageous clothing choices and their enormous wigs. Quickly, the club earned a reputation for gambling, hard drinking, and sensational behavior. Men won and lost family fortunes at Brooks’s tables. Most of the original members were from Whig families and held liberal ideas. Soon, Brooks’s achieved another reputation, one as the ex-officio headquarters of the Whig party. Politics were the talk of each day, but Brooks also admitted artists and philanthropists and actors, etc. Garrick, Wilberforce, Reynolds, Sheridan, etc., along with the Prince of Wales called Brooks’s “home.”

Boodle’s belonged to the country squires and fox-hunters.

Boodle’s is a London gentlemen’s club,  founded in 1762, at 49-51 Pall Mall, London, by Lord Shelburne the future Marquess of Landsdowne and Prime Minister of the United Kingdom, and the club came to be known after the name of its head waiter Edward Boodle.

In 1782 Boodle’s took over the “Savoir Vivre” club house at 28 St. James’s Street, London,  and has been located there ever since.

The club-house was designed by John Crunden in 1775 and the ground floor was refurbished by John Buonarotti Papworth between 1821 and 1834. Although the three clubs claimed “individuality,” they shared clientele.

All three clubs offered gambling, a great passion of the era. The clubs of St. James’s were descended from the chocolate and coffee houses of the late seventeenth and early eighteenth century period. White’s was named after a popular chocolate house of the era. Lord Byron was a member of the Cocoa-Tree Club, which was originally a Tory chocolate house that held the reputation of being the headquarters of the Jacobite Party.  Because the coffee and chocolate houses were public, gambling became an attraction for card sharks. Making the clubs private eliminated that temptation. Aristocrats preferred to lose their fortunes to other “gentlemen.”

Brooks's

Brooks’s

The most popular games of the time were hazard and faro. Hazard was a dice game, in which the gamester threw the dice against a particular number between 5 and 9. It was a game of pure chance. Faro was a type of roulette, but it fell out of popularity because it was easy for the bank to rig the game. Card games, such as piquet or whist, knew their own heavy gamblers. Although losing one’s family fortune was never the purpose of a hand of cards, many a member of the aristocracy found himself on the steps of Howard and Gibbs, a fashionable money lender for those of the upper crust.

 

Posted in British history, Jane Austen, Living in the Regency, real life tales, Regency era, Victorian era | Tagged , , , , , , | 6 Comments

Banning Wordiness (or) Editing 102

Yesterday, we looked as some key phrases, which signal a need for editing. How often have you seen the ones I have listed below in your reading(s)? I am certain there are several in my books, which I should have recognized at the time, but I sometimes miss because I am so wrapped in the story/plot.

completely destroyed (“Destroyed” indicates beyond repair or completely.)

consensus of opinion (“Consensus” indicates a solidarity of opinion.)

end result

funeral service (A funeral is a “service.”)

final outcome

the reason is because

temporary reprieve (All reprieves are “temporary.”)

in a dozen different states (The difference is obvious.)

eyewitness

There are better ways of saying each of the following phrases:

as a general rule                  becomes       generally (or) as a rule

by the same token         becomes              likewise

at the same time as         becomes           simultaneously

as a matter of fact           becomes          in fact

extend an invitation          becomes         invited

with the exception of            becomes          except

absolutely certain                becomes          certain

during the course of             becomes           during

on account of                          becomes            because

at one fell swoop                  becomes             simultaneously

Again, add your favorites to the comments below. We each of a particular phrase, which sets our teeth grinding.

Posted in Industry News/Publishing, Uncategorized, writing | Tagged , , | 2 Comments

Banning Wordiness (or) Editing 101

Recently, I spent COUNTLESS hours editing two different novels. I ended many days with “crossed” eyes, my amblyopia pulling at my eye muscles. Often, I am chopping words from sentences and my professional editor in replacing them as fast as I remove them, especially the word “that.”

The suggestions below are ones, which were drilled into me when I was still working in journalism.

Words to Eliminate:

unpaid debt                                  free up

close down/up                             linger on

most/very/quite unique           convicted felon

past history                                   advanced planning/notice/warning

free gift                                           tuna fish

topple over                                    new innovation

Never add “together” to these words:

assemble, combine, bond, merge, link, splice, staple, mesh, huddle, weld 

Do not use these words together. Choose one or the other.

if and when                                  9 p.m. and tonight

hope and trust                            each and every

hopes and dreams/desires    first and foremost

true and accurate                     basic and fundamental

Are there other examples of which you can think? I’ll be back tomorrow for a few more examples. Feel free to add your “key phrases” to the comments below. I would love to hear them.

Posted in Industry News/Publishing, writing | Tagged , , | 9 Comments

Influence of the Napoleonic Wars and Violence on English Society in the Regency Period

Waterloo-by-William-Holmes-SullivanThe Napoleonic Wars (1803–1815) were a series of wars declared against Napoleon’s French Empire  by opposing coalitions. As a continuation of the wars sparked by the French Revolution of 1789, they revolutionised European armies and played out on an unprecedented scale, mainly owing to the application of modern mass conscription.  French power rose quickly as Napoleon’s armies conquered much of Europe but collapsed rapidly after France’s disastrous invasion of Russia in 1812. Napoleon’s empire ultimately suffered complete military defeat resulting in the restoration of the Bourbon monarchy in France and the creation of the Concert of Europe.

From the end of the Naploeonic Wars in 1815 until World War I in 1914, the United Kingdom  played the role of hegemon, where the balance of power was the main aim. It is also in this time that the British Empire became the largest empire of all time. Imposition of a “British Peace” on key maritime trade routes began in 1815 with the annexation of British Ceylon. The global superiority of British military and commerce was guaranteed by a divided and relatively weak continental Europe, and the presence of the Royal Navy on all of the world’s oceans and seas. Following the Congress of Vienna  the British Empire’s economic strength continued to develop through naval dominance  and diplomatic efforts to maintain the balance of power within a Europe that lacked a pre-eminent nation state. 

In this era of peace, it provided services such as suppression of piracy and slavery.  Sea power, however, did not project on land. Land wars fought between the major powers include the Crimean War, the Franco- Austrian War, the Austro-Prussian War, and the Franco-Prussian War,  as well as numerous conflicts between lesser powers. The Royal Navy prosecuted the Opium wars (1839 – 1842 and 1856 – 1860) against Imperial China,   and had no influence on the Russo-Japanese War (1904 – 05.) In 1905, the Royal Navy was superior to any other two navies in the world, combined. In 1906, it was considered that Britain’s only likely potential naval enemy was Germany.

The Pax Britannica was weakened by the breakdown of the continental order which had been established by the Congress of Vienna. Relations between the Great Powers of Europe were strained to breaking point by issues such as the decline of the Ottoman Empire, which led to the Crimean War, and later the emergence of new nation states in the form of Italy and Germany after the Franco-Prussian War. Both of these two wars involved Europe’s largest states and armies. The industrialisation of Germany, the Empire of Japan, and the United States of America further contributed to the decline of British industrial supremacy following the late 19th century.

Lady Caroline Lamb was one of the guests at the famous ball given by the Duchess of Richmond in Brussels on the eve of the Battle of Waterloo. Lady Caroline wrote to her mother-in-law Lady Melbourne. In the letter, Lady Caroline said, the “…fatal ball has been much censured; there never was such a Ball – so fine & so sad – all the young men who appeared there shot dead a few hours after.” Ironically, Lady Caroline added a bit of gossip to the letter (from In Whig Society page 172) by telling Lady Melbourne that Lady Frances Webster made the Duke of Wellington late for the battle.

The Allies lost 30,000 men on that fateful day. The majority of Wellington’s aide-de-camps, all members of the nobility were either killed or badly wounded.

Violence also found a home on English shores. People were subject to highwaymen, footpads, muggers, cut throats, etc. No centralized police force existed at the time. The Metropolitan Police Act did not pass until 1829. Even then, the rest of the country had no “established” form of constabulary practices in place for many more years.

The cost of funding the war, plus the open movement of the Industrial Revolution, added to the chaos on English shores. The poorer classes faced the economic crunch with vicious riots. The Luddite riots, a protest against the unemployment generated by new machinery, began in 1811. There were riotous situations over the next four years. Strikes occurred, which were followed by even more riots.

During those years of the Regency, the population of England doubled and nearly half of its citizens lived in cities. The high price of bread and other restrictions took its toll on the poorest of the population. The government responded by positioning troops to respond to the possibility of riots.

People displayed relics from the battlefields (skulls and bones) in their drawing rooms. Public executions were popular about many of the gentry and nobility. Bear-baiting and cock fights were “illegal” past times enjoyed by many of the ton. Men, who had once practiced their marksmanship and sword play, turned to pugilism. Prize fights were well attended.  Sparring with “Gentleman Jackson” at 13 New Bond Street was an honour aristocratic males sought with enthusiasm. There was no counterpart on the Continent for England’s love of boxing.

Posted in British history, Jane Austen, legends and myths, Living in the Regency, real life tales, Regency era, Victorian era | Tagged , , , , | 13 Comments

The “French” Influence on the Regency Era

With George III’s first bit of madness in 1788 to the death of George IV in 1830, the world experienced the French Revolution, the Napoleonic Wars, the Congress of Vienna, and the Age of Reform.

England found itself inundated with French refugees during the French Revolution. Thousands of French aristocrats arrived on English shores in the wake of the Terror. Estimates are set at 40,000 + French aristocrats coming through ports such as Brighton. Many arrived with nothing more than the clothes on their backs.

French émigrés left behind many of their valuables, but they brought tales of the Terror to English shores. There were, for example, stories of Victims’ Balls. These were parties given by the survivors of the Terror, those whose relatives had been executed. To be admitted one had to present a certificate to prove that one of the person’s relatives had been guillotined. When a male entered the party, he would bow his head as if presenting it to the guillotine. Women would wear a red ribbon about their necks as a symbol of the spilled blood.

The stories of horror turned many good Englishmen against the idea of Reform. Any steps toward thinking of changing the status of the working poor through governmental reform took on the language of treason. Add to the reality of the French Revolution the one taking place in America, and the idea of change in the electoral system took a GIGANTIC step backward.

In 1793, England declared war on France. It would be 1815 before peace would be declared. The war was very unpopular with the English public. The English educated class had held a long love affair with everything French. They spoke French with ease and adored French fashion and art. The great majority of the public, however, were very much anti-French. Part of this dislike of the French came from the lower classes’ dislike of the English upper classes’ fascination with the French.

history-of-fashion_Picture31Francophiles spoke French, indulged in French food and wine, and filled their houses with French furniture. Even George IV, the Prince Regent, decorated his houses in the French style. English Society had no intention of letting a little thing such as a war to interfere with their French obsession. Smugglers thrived, especially smugglers of French brandy and art, as well as luxury food stuffs.

A temporary peace arrived on English shores with the Treaty of Amiens in 1802. English high society kept the Channel busy as they streamed into Paris to scarf up all things French. Whig leader, Charles James Fox, was one of the first to arrive on French shore, along with the Duchess of Devonshire as part of his entourage. George IV’s future mistress, Lady Conyngham, was deemed the most beautiful woman in Paris at the time. It was quite fashionable to be presented to Napoleon. Fraternizing with the enemy was very much in vogue.

Madame Recamier was the most famous hostess of the English influx, but the peace held for barely fourteen months. The peace may not have lasted, but the English fascination with the French remained entrenched throughout the Regency. It was quite ironic to hear the English conducting business in the language of their enemy.

The Regency is noted for its elegance and achievements in the fine arts and architecture. This era encompassed a time of great social, political, and even economic change. War was waged with Napoleon and on other fronts, affecting commerce both at home and internationally as well as politics. Despite the bloodshed and warfare the Regency was also a period of great refinement and cultural achievement, shaping and altering the societal structure of Britain as a whole.

Posted in British history, Jane Austen, Living in the Regency, real life tales, Regency era, Victorian era | Tagged , , , , , | 3 Comments

Regency and Victorian England: Household Servants

“The dinner, too, in its turn, was highly admired; and he begged to know to which of his fair cousins the excellence of its cooking was owning. But here he was set right by Mrs. Bennet, who assured him, with some asperity, that they were vey well able to keep a good cook, and that her daughters had nothing to do in the kitchen.” From Chapter 13 of “Pride and Prejudice”

servants from Upstairs/Downstairs

servants from Upstairs/Downstairs

By the beginning of the 19th Century, keeping a servant or servants was a sign of prosperity, especially among the gentry and the quickly growing middle class. Physicians, lawyers, and other professionals found hiring servants improved their status within a community. 

In order to raise funds for the American War of Independence, the British government levied a tax of one guinea per male servant in 1777. This tax remained in place until 1937. Advertisements in newspapers listed available servants. Servants could be dismissed with either a month’s wages in hand or a month’s notice. Servants were expected to serve out his/her service prior to leaving. 

By religiously saving their wages, a servant, especially an upper servant, could retire in a degree of comfort. Male servants, who had left their positions, often turned to trade or the keeping of public houses. Upper female servants often remained in the household. Those with gentry ways could easily assimilate into a community. 

scene from Downtown Abbey

scene from Downtown Abbey

In September and May, mop fairs were held. This was a tradition, sometimes called a statute or hiring fair. Those being “sold” during the fair wore distinctive additions to their clothing, which indicated the position he/she sought.  A servant could also find a position through statute halls or through servant registries. This early “employment” agencies printed fliers that listed available servants. Unfortunately, these situations were prime areas for fraud. Some of the agencies charged exorbitant fees for nonexistent jobs. 

Generally, servants received a wage + an allowance for tea, sugar, and beer. Board wages were used to purchase food at public houses/inns when the servant was expected to travel between country homes and Town houses. In “The Writer’s Guide to Everyday Life in Regency and Victorian London,” Kristine Hughes says that a maid of all works would typically receive 6-8 pounds annually plus an allowance; a lady’s maid would receive 12-15 pounds + an allowance; a valet would receive 25-50 pounds + an allowance; a liveried footman 15-25 pounds + an allowance, and that “board wages amounted to about ten shillings per week for females, twelve shillings a week for males. Also a male was allowed a pot of ale per day and a woman a pint per day, in addition to the table beer served during meals. Tea money was paid to a servant in lieu of an employer providing daily tea and sugar.”

On days off from service, servants typically visited family and friends or a public house, which catered to the servant class. In grand house, special events were held purely for the servants. We have seen such activities in the Servant Ball during Season 2 of Downtown Abbey. Queen Victoria was known to host an annual Ghillie’s Ball for her servants at Balmoral Castle.  However, one must recall days off were not the rule of the day. Servants, generally, did not have “private” lives once they entered service. Female servants with suitors were quickly dismissed. 

Liveries were delivered on April 1 and October 1. 

The custom of distributing clothes -or what in the present day would be styled uniforms-  amongst the servants of the Crown- such as Judges, Ministers ,Stewards etc- date from a period nearly coeval with the Conquest.( circa 1066A.D.-jfw) This distribution was termed a “Livreé”: hence the more recent expression, “Livery.”

(Cussans,Page 311)

It ought to be remembered that during the late 18th century/early 19th century most household servants did not wear a distinctive  uniform, such as we are used to seeing in adaptations of fictional Edwardian households such as in Downtown Abbey andUpstairs, Downstairs. Female servants wore what was practical, and often wore cast-offs from their mistresses, though moralists detested this practise.  Sophie von La Roche wrote, during her travels in London in 1786 of the serving girls she saw in the streets of London:

…the maids, women of middle class and the children. The former almost all wear black taminy petticoats and heavily stitched, and over these long English Calico or linen frocks, though not so long and close-fitting to the body as our tailors and taste cut and point them. Further they mostly wear white aprons; though the servants and working women often appear in striped linen aprons

Jane Austen’s kinswoman by marriage, and friend of her aunt and uncle, Leigh Perrots, Mrs Lybbe Powys wrote in her diary of her visit to the Jackson family at Weasenham Hall in Norfolk in 1756:

“Never did a landlord seem so beloved, or indeed deserve to be so, for he is a most worthy man, and in however high a stile a man lives in in town, which he certainly does, real benevolence is more distinguishable in a family at their country -seat, and none do more good than where we now are. Then everything here is regularity itself , but the master’s method is, I take it, now become the method of the servants by use as well as choice.

“Nothing but death make a servant leave them. The old housekeeper has now been there one-and-fifty years; the butler two or three-and-thirty……I was surprised to see them all, except on Sundays, in green stuff gowns, and on my inquiring of Miss Jackson how they all happened to fix so on one particular colour, she told me a green camblet for a gown used for many years to be an annual present of her mothers to those servants who behaved well, and had been so many years in her family, and that now indeed, as they all behaved well, and had lived there much longer than the limited term, this was constantly their master’s New Year gift.

“I thought this in Mr Jackson a pretty compliment to his lady’s memory, as well as testimony of the domestics still deserving of his good opinion.”

According to Daniel Pool in What Jane Austen Ate and Charles Dickens Knew, footmen wore:

“…livery, or household uniform of fancy coat, knee breeches, stockings, and powdered hair, a costume that endured to the end of th 1800s. Because of their appearance at dinner and in public with the family, footmen were supposed to be the most “presentable” of the male servants. They were evaluated on the basis of the appearance of their calves in silk stocking, and they often gave their height when advertising for positions in the paper–it was considered absurd to have a pair of footmen who didn’t match in height. (Poole, pg. 221)

 

Posted in British history, Jane Austen, Living in the Regency, real life tales, Regency era, Victorian era | Tagged , , , , , | 8 Comments

The 19th Century Educational System (or Lack Thereof)

“Public” schools were founded through generous donations for the male children of the towns of Eton and Harrow, and they were originally open to all. The concept of the “grammar” school came from the fact that Latin and Greek grammar was the basis of the program. Eventually, these public schools began to operate as private schools for the children of rich patrons.

N7061898115TThese “public” schools were a social experiment in an era when education was patchwork at best.  No national school system existed at the beginning of the 19th Century. The rich hired a governess to teach their female children and a tutor to educate their sons until the boys could go off to Eton, Harrow, Oxford, and Cambridge.   Children of the poor were sent off to work the fields, or if fortunate, to an apprenticeship.

      “Eton College and Harrow School are both all-boy boarding schools. When the boys enter, they are 13 years old, and they spend five years before they graduate when they become 18 years old. Eton was established by King Henry VIII (1491-1541). Harrow started as an exclusive school for boys in 1243, but moved to the present location during the period of Queen Elizabeth I (1533-1603).

Until recently, most of the prime ministers came from Eton or Harrow. These schools used to teach their boys how to run the British empire. These days, they are interested in teaching them how to run international corporations. This does not appear to be an easy transition.”

Women were not taught Latin or Greek. From Making Home Life Attractive, we learn, “Gentlemen should not make use of classical quotations in the presence of ladies, without apologizing for or translating them. Even then, it should only be done when no other phrase can so aptly express their meaning. Much display of learning is pedantic and out of place in a drawing room. All topics especially interesting to gentlemen, such as the turf, the exchange, or the farm, should be excluded from general conversation.  Men should also remember that all ladies are not interested in politics, and dwell, of preference, upon such subjects as they are sure to be acquainted with. Never talk upon subjects of which you know nothing, unless it be for the purpose of acquiring information. Many young ladies and gentlemen imagine that, because they play a little, sing a little, draw a little, frequent exhibitions and operas, and so forth, they are qualified judges of art. No mistake is more egregious or universal. The young should never be critical. A young person of either sex can but appear ridiculous when satirizing books, people, or things: opinion, to be worth the consideration of others, should have the advantage of maturity.”

The idea of children not able to read their Bibles spearheaded the movement toward true public education. In 1811, the National Society for Promoting the Education of the Poor in the Principles of the Established Church was formed. By 1839, Parliament took up the cause of these “national” schools. In that year, Parliament granted 30,000 pounds to the running of these open schools.

The “national” schools ran on what was known as a monitorial system, meaning teachers taught monitors (selected students), who then taught the enrolled children. This system evolved into “training colleges,” another term for a teacher’s college.

In 1862, standards were implemented to set a “standardized” program for all children. These standards included the 3R’s.

Posted in British history, Jane Austen, Living in the Regency, real life tales, Regency era, Victorian era | Tagged , , , , , , | Comments Off on The 19th Century Educational System (or Lack Thereof)

Publishing Options for Women Writers in Jane Austen’s Time

 

Novels during the early Regency were geared toward the female reader; therefore, the door opened, if only a crack, for the female writer to step through. The female writers of the time assisted Jane Austen in several ways, among them the influence on her writing and building an audience for Austen’s early works.

The early female authors faced something that Austen did not. They faced public criticism, as women of the time, especially those of genteel birth, did not seek employment of any kind. Women were not to pursue fame and a career. They were discouraged by their husbands and families from publishing their works. Austen was fortunate to have a family who encouraged her writing, but even she published anonymously. Austen’s father, the Reverend Austen, even approached a publisher for Jane when she was but two and twenty. Later, Jane’s brother acted as her representative with the publisher under which she served.

Women of the period had limited means at their disposal under which they might see their works come to fruition:

(1) Publishing by subscription – Subscribers signed up to purchase a novel. When enough subscriptions were guaranteed, then the publisher released the book.

(2) Publishing by profit sharing – The publisher released the book at his expense. Copies were sold until a profit was made. Only then did the author received a fee for his work. If no profit was made, the author received nothing, but the pleasure of seeing her name in print.

(3) Publishing by selling the copyright – The author took a chance in selling her copyright to the publisher. She would receive a fee for the sale, but nothing beyond that. If the book  made a profit, only the publisher benefited.

(4) Publishing on commission – For this venture, the author paid all the costs for the book’s publication. The publisher acted as the author’s distributor. In the sales, the publisher would earn a 10% fee from the profits. If the book saw no profits, the loss rested on the author’s shoulders alone. This was the method Jane Austen used for her releases. Jane Austen published her first book at the age of four and thirty.

First Edition title page of Austen’s “Sense and Sensibility,” published in 1811

Posted in British history, Industry News/Publishing, Jane Austen, Living in the Regency, real life tales, Regency era | Tagged , , , | 6 Comments

Austen’s Publishing History

austen460Today is the 200th Anniversary of the publication of Jane Austen’s “Pride and Prejudice.” I thought in honor of the date we would take a quick look at the process of having her works published. Most of Austen’s story lines went through several revisions before the lady knew fruition. She reportedly made extensive changes in both “Sense and Sensibility” and “Pride and Prejudice.”

Sense and Sensibility was completed in 1795, but it did not know publication until 1811. (That is a sixteen year span. For authors who think they will write the next best seller and have it immediately caught up by an agent and publisher, this is a very sobering fact.)

Mansfield Park was finished in 1812 and was published two years later in 1814. (This appears to be Austen’s attempt at sentimentality. “Mansfield Park” does not enjoy the same level of popularity as Austen’s other novels.)

 

Pride and Prejudice knew a similar fate. Austen wrote the original manuscript in 1796. It was published in 1813. (Seventeen years of rejection. It makes me admire Austen more.)

Austen  began Northanger Abbey in 1798. The book was published posthumously in 1817.  (That time period is nearly two decades!)

Emma was finished in 1814 and published in 1815. Obviously, the success of Sense and Sensibility and Pride and Prejudice aided Austen in this process.

Finally, Persuasion was completed in 1815 and published posthumously in 1817.

Posted in British history, Industry News/Publishing, Jane Austen, Living in the Regency, real life tales, Regency era | Tagged , , , , , , , | 5 Comments