Reading Challenge #3 – Historical Fiction

The third delectable challenge to tempt you is the Historical Fiction Reading Challenge 2011. This event is hosted by Historical Tapestry and is similar to the previously mentioned challenges, except that one goes to Historical Tapestry to sign up and comment. The beauty of this challenge is that any type of historical fiction is accepted so, that’s right, all of the books you read for the above challenges will count for this one too! What a great deal! In this challenge your participation can range from Out of My Comfort Zone (2 books) up to Severe Bookaholism (20 books)

In all these challenges, book bloggers are obligated to post the challenge logo on pertinent reviews and to put a direct link to one’s reviews under the comments on the host site. Those who do not have book blogs can just comment on what we thought of the books.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Comments Off on Reading Challenge #3 – Historical Fiction

Jane Austen Reading Challenge II


The second challenge to choose from is the Jane Austen Mystery Reading Challenge 2011. Lovers of mysteries, Jane Austen and historical fiction can all enjoy this challenge. The challenge is to read all 11 Jane Austen mystery books by Stephanie Barron, that master (mistress) of the historical mystery. Ms. Barron has come out with a new JA mystery every year for the past 11 years and, indeed, the eleventh will release this year. To sign up, go to Austenprose and the sign up and commenting is similar to that of the Sense and Sensibility Challenge.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Comments Off on Jane Austen Reading Challenge II

January 25 – Robert Burns’s “Address to a Haggis”

 

 

Burns’s suppers are held worldwide by Scots on January 25, and no Burns supper would be complete without a “Haggis.” Before you read any further, you should know that “Haggis” is a traditional Scottish dish, considered by many the National Dish of Scotland, and the Scots make it from a pluck (a sheep’s stomach) and lights (the lungs, heart, and liver). That said, the following recipe is a summary of the one from Mistress Margaret Dods’ Cook and Housewife Manual, which was first published in 1826. In reality, Meg or Margaret Dods was the pseudonym of Christian Isobel Johnstone, a writer and editor who lived from 1781-1857. People originally considered the book a literary farce because Johnstone used the name of the fictional landlady of Cleikum Inn from Sir Walter Scott’s novel St. Ronan’s Well. Research, however, proved the book to be legitimate, and for many years it was considered a useful household manual.

Ingredients:
pluck and lights of a sheep
4-5 onions (chopped)
pepper, salt, cayenne pepper
2 cups finely ground oatmeal, toasted
beef gravy
450 g (or 1 lb.) beef suet
lemon juice

Procedure:
Soak the stomach in salted water overnight. Turn it inside out. Pour boiling water over it and scrape out any residue. Boil the pluck for at least 45 minutes. Then remove from the pot.
Wash the heart, liver and lungs (which should still be attached to each other). Pierce the heart and lungs to drain any blood remaining in the organs. Parboil the 3 organs, letting the windpipe hang from the pot. Change out the water for fresh.
Cut the liver in half. Remove the gristle. Then chop (a food processor) the heart, half liver and lungs into a very fine mixture. Blend in 2 cups of oatmeal and the onions. Add in the beef suet. Grate the other half of the liver into the mixture. Season to taste and use the mixture to stuff the stomach bag. Pour in the beef gravy. Be sure to leave some room because the oatmeal will swell. Add the juice of one lemon. Secure the bag’s opening to hold in the mixture. Return the pluck to the pot in which you originally boiled it. Prick the bag when it begins to swell and boil for three hours.

“Address to a Haggis”
Fair fá your honest, sonsie face, Great chieftan o’ the pudding-race!
Aboon them a’ yet tak your place, Painch, tripe, or thairm:
Weel are ye wordy o’a grace; As lang’s my arm.

The groaning trencher there ye fill; Your hudies like a distant hill,

Your pin wad help to mend a mill; In time o’ need,

While thro’ your pores the dews distill; Like amber bead.

His knife see rustic Labour dight, An’ cut ye up wi’ ready slight,

Trenching your gushing entrails bright, Like onie ditch;

And then, O what a glorious sight! Warm-reeking rich!

Then horn for horn, they stretch an’ strive: Deil tak the hindmost, on they drive,

Till a’ their weel-swall’d kytes belyve; Are bent like drums;

Then auld Guidmann, maist like to rive, ‘Bethankit!’ hums.

Is ther that owre his French ragout, Or olio that wad staw a sow,

Or fricassee wad make her spew, Wi perfect scunner,

Looks down wi’ sneering, scronfu’ view; On sic a dinner?

Poor devil! see him owre his trash, As feclless as a wither’d rash,

His spindle shank a guid whip-lash; His nieve a nit;

Tho’ bluidy flood or field to dash, Oh how unfit.

But mark the Rustic, haggis-fed, The trembling earth resound his tread,

Clap in his walie nieve a blade, He’ll make it whistle;

An’ legs, an’ arms, an heads will sned; Like taps o’ thrissie.

Ye pow’rs, wha make mankind your care, And dish them out their bill o’ fare,

Auld Scotland wants nae skinking ware, That jaups in luggies;

But if ye wish her gratfu’ prayer, Gie her a Haggis! (1796)

 

Needless to say, sheep lung is a bit hard to find in modern day supermarkets. That is because many Scottish sheep have been infected with Lung Worm, which makes the lungs inedible. Sandy Clark of the Scottish Agricultural College said, “…the changing climate and availability of the parasite is becoming a problem.” So, Scottish butchers are securing their sheep lungs from Irish farms instead. For vegetarians, such as I, there are meatless versions. Haggis is also available in the canned variety.


Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Comments Off on January 25 – Robert Burns’s “Address to a Haggis”

Jane Austen Reading Challenge


A trio of reading and viewing challenges are coming up during 2011, and they are all very interesting for Austen fans.

The first is the Sense and Sensibility Bicentenary Challenge 2011. As many Janeites know, this year marks the 200th anniversary of the publication of S&S. This challenge encourages fans to immerse themselves in all things S&S, including both books and films. You may sign up for the level of participation you want, ranging from Neophyte (1-4 selections) up to Aficionada (9-12 selections) To enroll, go to Austenprose and sign up before March 1, 2011. The official kickoff for the challenge is on January 26, when Laurel Ann Nattress, posts a review of The Three Weismanns of Westport. She will continue to post challenge-related reviews on the third Wednesday of each month throughout the year and she has a complete listing of books and films on her website.

After you have read or seen one of the selections, go to Austenprose and click on the S&S Challenge tab, then comment on the selection. If you have a reading or Austenite blog, be sure to post your blog address to connect to your review on your site. There will be prizes awarded and monthly giveaways, so make sure you comment on each of the Challenge reviews!

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Jane Austen Reading Challenge

Bicentenary Celebration of Sense and Sensibility

 


SENSE & SENSIBILITY BICENTENARY – GRAND CELEBRATION AT MY JANE AUSTEN BOOK CLUB

October 2011 will mark the bicentenary of the publication of Jane Austen’s Sense and Sensibility. My Jane Austen Book Club will dedicate a special space to the celebration and discussion of Austen’s first achievement as a published writer. Some expert Janeites have been invited to contribute to the discussion, and they have kindly and generously accepted. Each month a guest will deal with a theme, a character, a topic somehow linked to Sense and Sensibility. The discussion will be open to you all with your comments, questions and suggestions. There will be a monthly giveaway and you will have the chance to win a book or DVD connected to our celebration. Here’s the schedule of our virtual meetings. Take notes.

1. January Jennifer Becton Marriage and money in Sense and Sensibility

2. February Alexa Adams Sense and Sensibility on screen

3. March C. Allyn Pierson Inheritance laws and their consequences in Sense & Sensibility

4. April Beth Pattillo Lost in Sense and Sensibility

5. May Jane Odiwe Willoughby: a rogue on trial

6. June Deb @JASNA Vermont Secrets in Sense and Sensibility

7. July Laurie Viera Rigler Interview with Lucy Steele

8. August Regina Jeffers Settling for the Compromise Marriage

9. September Lynn Shepherd The origins of S&S: Richardson, Jane Austen, Elinore & Marianne

10. October Meredith @Austenesque Reviews Sense and Sensibility fanfiction

11. November Vic @Jane Austen’s World Minor characters in Sense and Sensibility

12. December Laurel Ann @Austenprose Marianne Dashwood: A passion for dead Leaves and other Sensibilities

For commenting on the site, you can will a copy of The Three Weissmanns of Westport, a modern day Sense and Sensibility.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Comments Off on Bicentenary Celebration of Sense and Sensibility

Pottery Barn and Jane Austen

Even the Pottery Barn knows the value of Jane Austen.
http://www.potterybarn.com/products/pride-prejudice-quote-jewelry-dish/?pkey=cvalentine-keepsakes

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | 2 Comments

Jane Austen and Feminism

Jane Austen and Feminism
by Regina Jeffers

In 1968, the Women’s Liberation Movement staged a demonstration at the annual Miss America Beauty pageant in Atlantic City, New Jersey. They protested the idea that the most important thing about a woman is how she looks. Women’s liberation attacked “male chauvinism, commercialization of beauty, racism and oppression symbolized by the Pageant.”(JoFreeman.com) I am a product of that particular generation. I was a teen in the 1960s and a young woman in 1970s. Generally, I was raised in the Southern states, and I thoroughly understand the “good ole boys” system. Recently, at my retirement recognition gathering at the high school where I taught for many years, instead of praising me for my dedication to my academic area or to my students, my principal stood up and said, “If you have ever served on a committee with Regina, you know that she has no problem in speaking her mind.” Well, that is something, but, obviously, not how one would like to be remembered after 40 years in the classroom. In other words, I had “ruffled his feathers” on more than one occasion by not always conforming to how he thought a woman should act. I have never been subservient to a male. That was my mother. I am a daughter of the women’s movement. So, like Jane Austen, while I write about romance and tradition and virtue, I still place my female characters in roles where they “defy” the never ending patriarchal society in which they live.

In 18th Century England, certain educated women began to question why men did not see women as rational creatures. Among those were Mary Astell and Catherine Macaulay, who discussed such issues as the lack of a female educational system and the absolute authority of males in the family unit. One must wonder if these ideas influenced a young Jane Austen. In each of Austen’s six main novels, the concept of marriage is told from a female perspective. Is Jane telling us that the male view is obsolete?

It would be difficult to call Austen a feminist because her point of view is very subtle. Yet, her message has been read by millions of women around the world, and I openly admit that it influenced me. But who influenced Jane? We shall never know for sure, but it is likely that one of those could have been Mary Wollstonecraft. In 1792 (when Jane was but an impressionable 16-year-old), Wollstonecraft released A Vindication of the Rights of Woman. As an English teacher, this was one of my favorite pieces to bring to my students for it has strong parallels to modern times. Wollstonecraft openly stated that both men and women have the potential to conduct themselves as reasonable and rational human beings. One sex did not have dominance over the other. Wollstonecraft also attacked earlier writers, especially John Milton and Rosseau, for advocating the subordinate position of women in a man’s life. The author’s idea that the 18th Century English educated their women only in how to attract (or “trap”) a man into marriage, but did nothing to equip them with the skills to be good wives and mothers was quite controversial. With Vindication’s release, new doors opened for women writers.

However, Wollstonecraft soon lost her life to childbirth. (BTW, her daughter was Mary Godwin, who eventually became the wife of Percy Shelley and the author of Frankenstein.) Afterwards, Wollstonecraft’s husband, William Godwin, wrote a sometimes embellished Memoir of his wife’s life. He told the world of the love affair that produced an illegitimate child and of her suicide attempts and of her rejection of Christianity. Wollstonecraft was labeled an atheist and a “whore.” Critics held a new weapon in discrediting her work, and indirectly, the writings of all women.

Unfortunately, Mary’s downfall brought close scrutiny on those who followed. A female writer could not be seen as advocating the overthrow of marriage rituals. In 1798, the Reverend Richard Polwhele published an anti-feminist satirical poem entitled “The Unsex’d Females.” In it, Polwhele argued that the “sparkle of confident intelligence” was proof that female writers were immodest and that it was a sign of the “corrupt” times that anyone would go so far to consider a woman’s work on the same level as a man’s. Please remember that it was that same year (1798) when the publisher Cadell refused Rev. Austen’s offer of his daughter Jane’s First Impressions manuscript.

Jane Austen does one thing better than any other female writer. She writes dominate female characters with spotless reputations. In each novel, one finds the seduced-and-abandoned plot embedded in the main story line, but Austen’s subject is not courtship. Kathryn B. Stockton of the University of Utah says, “Austen’s works are about ‘marriageship: the cautious investigation of a field of eligible males, the delicate maneuvering to meet them, the refined outpacing of rivals, the subtle circumventing of parental power and the careful management, which turns the idle flirtation into a firm offer of marriage with a good settlement for life. All this must be carried on in a way that the heroine maintains her self-respect, her moral dignity, and her character as daughter, sister, friend, and neighbor.'” For myself, I am more inclined to agree with G. K. Chesterton, who said, “Jane Austen could do one thing neither Charlotte Bronte or George Eliot could do: She could cooly and sensibly describe a man.”

In Persuasion, Austen wrote, “But let me observe that all histories are against you, all stories, prose and verse. If I had such a memory as Benwick, I could bring you fifty quotations in a moment on my side the argument, and I do not think I ever opened a book in my life, which had not something to say upon woman’s inconstancy. Songs and proverbs, all talk of woman’s fickleness. But perhaps you will say, these were all written by men.”
“…Men have had every advantage of us in telling their story. Education has been theirs in so much higher a degree; the pen has been in their hands. I will not allow books to prove any thing.”
After Wollstonecraft’s “downfall,” women writers, even those who did not express views of “female philosophers,” had difficulty finding a market for their writing and gaining respect for their talents in a male-dominated occupation. They had to stress the virtue of ladylike qualities and respectable lives. Rights for women could not be their focus.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | 2 Comments

Persuasion 1995 Movie Discussion

In describing Persuasion in his script’s introduction, Nick Dear said, “The story essentially describes an old order fading away into decadence, and a new tribe, a meritocracy, coming to the fore.” Persuasion has seen four renderings. The first was presented on four consecutive weeks from December 30, 1960, to January 20, 1961. Daphne Slater, who incidentally portrayed Elizabeth Bennet in 1952’s Pride and Prejudice, played Anne Elliot, while Paul Daneman took on the role of Frederick Wentworth. ITV presented the second adaptation in five parts from April 18 to May 16, 1971. This adaptation starred Ann Firbank and Bryan Marshall in the main roles. In April 1995, BBC-2 presented the third rendering. This one was later released to theatres. It brought us Amanda Root and Ciarán Hinds. In 2007, Rupert Penry Jones and Sally Hawkins took on the parts of Anne and Wentworth. As cinematic adaptations of Jane Austen’s novels go, the 1995 version of Persuasion has kept its critics at bay. For me, it is by far the superior film. In 2009, when I wrote Captain Wentworth’s Persuasion, it was Amanda Root and Ciarán Hinds that I saw in my mind’s eye as the book’s characters.

So, these are a hodge podge of my ramblings on this particular film adaptation. I would love to hear your own thoughts on this one, as well as any comments on the other versions of Persuasion. This is, after all, a movie discussion.
*In the 1971 version, Ann Firbank is always perfectly dressed, but Nick Dear wanted Root’s portrayal to show Anne’s movement from “dowdy” to “blossoming.” It amazes me that some wanted a more more glamorous actress to play Anne. At the time (and even now), I thought Amanda Root the perfect choice.
*Anne is portrayed as a “servant,” creating sympathy for her character. At Uppercross, she picks up toys and tends to the injured Little Charles. At Kellynch Hall, it is Anne who holds the keys to the house, very much as a housekeeper might. She catalogues the house’s belongings.
*Roger Michell uses several close ups of Anne, but they often off center. This makes the viewer see her as out of sync with her family.
*We never see Sir Walter in a natural setting, whereas Wentworth and Croft are.
*There is a sharp contrast between the sterile Kellynch Hall and the welcoming “home” of the Musgroves.
*Nick Dear creates a “caustic” Elizabeth Elliot, as she sprawls on her chair, laughs too loudly, and talks with her mouth full. This is one area that is often criticized in the film. This Elizabeth Elliot is less “ladylike” than the one presented by Austen.
*When Anne travels to Uppercross, she is deglamorized by riding with a pig and a goose in the open cart.
*Like we noted previously with Colin Firth’s character, Root is often shown staring out windows, essentially distancing herself from the others. She is preoccupied and uncomfortable.
*The scene where creditors crowd around Mr. Shepherd creates a sense of chaos. This is achieved through hand held tracking shots and a swish pan. Usually movement indicates strength and vitality, but not in this case.
*Besides establishing the historical context of the film, the “invented” opening sequence with Admiral Croft and the sailors rowing in unison is a powerful contrast to the indolence shown by Sir Walter at Kellynch Hall.
*The characters remain seated at Kellynch. There is no movement. It is a “dying” culture.
We see the same “staleness” in the Elliots’ Bath residence. Hand held tracking shots show them lounging on chaises longues.

*Nick Dear describes the scene where Anne, dressed in white and sitting among the sheet-covered furniture at Kellynch, as a “shroud for a dead house.”

*In the Kellynch dining room, the vast, over-decorated table dwarfs the Elliots.
The ship’s ward room is small, dark, and smoky, and it is filled with action-filled officers. A single, tight circling shot relays the cohesiveness of the group. This is in contrast to the previous dining room scene. The ward room’s table is covered with various hats all tossed together, indicating the group’s solidarity. Sir Walter’s table holds the iced-swan sculpture.
*A lack of real substance is shown in Lady Dalrymple’s caked on makeup and the use of backlighting.
*Only a “letter folded up into a paper boat” and concealed inside a copy of “the Navy List, 1806” elicits any emotional response from Anne while she is at Kellynch.
*The sun lights Anne’s face for the first time when she arrives at Uppercross.
*The swiftly moving paper boats are bringing Anne to her future. These boats are made for the children by Admiral Croft, a direct connection to Wenworth.
*The high angle swish pan shot of Wentworth’s desperate attempt to catch Louisa indicates his being out of step on land.
*Wentworth is separated from Anne by a table and three seated figures when she looks out the window for Mr. Elliot. There is a “gulf” between them.
*Nick Dear’s Anne is more assertive than the one in Austen’s novels. This plays to the more modern female viewer. She chases Wentworth from the concert room, sharply answers her father’s criticsm of Mrs. Smith, blocks Wentworth’s path in the Octagon Room, snipes at both Lady Russell and Wentworth when they question her marrying Mr. Elliot, and accepts Wentworth’s kiss on the the crowded street.
*We have a shot of Anne looking backwards at Kellynch. This leads to a lengthy pan shot bringing Uppercross into view. Austen does not give us the feeling of Kellynch being the past. This scene does.
*The camera shot of Anne’s face at Uppercross Cottage shows her pensiveness. We see her only in the cloudy mirror. This indicates her isolation.
*To show her leanness and her desperation, Anne is seen early on in loose-fitting dresses and large cloaks. In Bath, Anne wears form-fitting pelisses and spencers.
*In the 1971 version, Bryan Marshall wears Regency civilian wear, but Ciarán Hinds portrays the rugged, self-made man in his naval attire.
*William Elliot’s character is more villainous than the Austen version.
*This adaptation uses pieces of both of Austen’s endings for the novel.
*The kissing scene is sometimes criticized, but it summarizes a chapter of reflection from Austen’s novel. It shows the “lovers” making their own way in life. Their hands are clasped. (BTW, in the 1971 version, Anne and Wentworth kiss twice, but it is indoors.)
*The final scene was filmed at Portsmouth on the HMS Victory.
*The last shot of a ship silhouetted against a sunset is actually taken from the 1984 film, The Bounty.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on Persuasion 1995 Movie Discussion

Firth longs to play Darcy as a daddy in ‘Bridget Jones 3’ – Chicago Sun-Times

Firth longs to play Darcy as a daddy in ‘Bridget Jones 3’ – Chicago Sun-Times.

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Firth longs to play Darcy as a daddy in ‘Bridget Jones 3’ – Chicago Sun-Times

Golden Globe Winners Announced

 

BEST ACTOR DRAMA
Jesse Eisenberg, “The Social Network”; Colin Firth, “The King’s Speech”; James Franco, “127 Hours”; Ryan Gosling, “Blue Valentine”; Mark Wahlberg, “The Fighter.” (As a card carrying member of the Jane Austen Society of North America, I said, “It’s about time. Firth should have won last year for ‘The Single Man.'”)

WINNER BEST PICTURE BEST COMEDY OR MUSICAL
“Alice in Wonderland,” “Burlesque,” “The Kids Are All Right,” “Red,” “The Tourist.” 

BEST ACTRESS IN A FILM DRAMA
Halle Berry, “Frankie and Alice”; Nicole Kidman, “Rabbit Hole”; Jennifer Lawrence, “Winter’s Bone”; Natalie Portman, “Black Swan”; Michelle Williams, “Blue Valentine.” (This was an excellent movie, although one does not come out of the theatre feeling “refreshed.” It is very draining emotionally.)

WINNER BEST ACTOR IN A FILM COMEDY
Johnny Depp, “Alice in Wonderland”; Johnny Depp, “The Tourist”; Paul Giamatti, “Barney’s Version”; Jake Gyllenhaal, “Love and Other Drugs”; Kevin Spacey, “Casino Jack.”

WINNER BEST COMEDY OF TV
“30 Rock,” NBC; “The Big Bang Theory,” CBS; “The Big C,” Showtime; “Glee,” Fox; “Modern Family,” ABC; “Nurse Jackie,” Showtime.

WINNER BEST FILM DIRECTOR
Darren Aronofsky, “Black Swan”; David Fincher, “The Social Network”; Tom Hooper, “The King’s Speech”; Christopher Nolan, “Inception”; David O. Russell, “The Fighter.”

WINNER BEST SUPPORTING FILM ACTRESS
Melissa Leo, “The Fighter”; Helena Bonham Carter, “The King’s Speech”; Mila Kunis, “Black Swan”; Amy Adams, “The Fighter”; Jacki Weaver, “Animal Kingdom.” (Amy Adams looked gorgeous, but Helena Bonham Carter’s dress was ridiculous.)

WINNER BEST ACTOR TV COMEDY OR MUSICAL
Alec Baldwin, “30 Rock”; Steve Carell, “The Office”; Thomas Jane, “Hung”; Matthew Morrison, “Glee”; Jim Parsons, “The Big Bang Theory.”

WINNER BEST ACTRESS TV COMEDY OR MUSICAL
Toni Collette, “The United States of Tara”; Edie Falco, “Nurse Jackie”; Tina Fey, “30 Rock”; Laura Linney, “The Big C”; Lea Michele, “Glee.”

WINNER BEST SUPPORTING TV ACTRESS
Hope Davis, “The Special Relationship”; Jane Lynch, “Glee”; Kelly Macdonald, “Boardwalk Empire”; Julia Stiles, “Dexter”; Sofia Vergara, “Modern Family.”

WINNER BEST FILM SCREENPLAY
Danny Boyle, Simon Beaufoy, “127 Hours”; Lisa Cholodenko, Stuart Blumberg, “The Kids Are All Right”; Christopher Nolan, “Inception”; David Seidler, “The King’s Speech”; Aaron Sorkin, “The Social Network.”

WINNER ACTRESS TV MINISERIES OR MOVIE
Hayley Atwell, “Pillars of the Earth”; Claire Danes, “Temple Grandin”; Judi Dench, “Return to Cranford”; Romola Garai, “Emma”; Jennifer Love Hewitt, “The Client List.” (My sentimental favorite was Judi Dench, although both Romola Garai and Hayley Atwell were brilliant in their roles. I was surprised that “Pillars of the Earth” won nothing. It was one of the best of the season.)

WINNER ACTOR, TV MINISERIES OR MOVIE
Idris Elba, “Luther”; Ian McShane, “Pillars of the Earth”; Al Pacino, “You Don’t Know Jack”; Dennis Quaid, “The Special Relationship”; Edgar Ramirez, “Carlos.”

WINNER BEST ACTRESS, MUSICAL OR COMEDY
Annette Bening, “The Kids Are All Right”; Julianne Moore, “The Kids Are All Right”; Anne Hathaway, “Love and Other Drugs”; Angelina Jolie, “The Tourist”; Emma Stone, “Easy A.” (I would have taken Julianne Moore for the trophy. How some of these movies fit into the “musical or comedy” category makes no sense.)

WINNER BEST ANIMATED FILM
— Animated Film: “Toy Story 3,” “The Illusionist,” “How to Train Your Dragon,” “Despicable Me,” “Tangled.” (“Toy Story” was a sentimental favorite. I was partial to “Tangled.”)

WINNER ORIGINAL SONG
“Bound to You” (written by Samuel Dixon, Christina Aguilera, Sia Furler), “Burlesque”; “Coming Home” (written by Bob DiPiero, Tom Douglas, Hillary Lindsey, Troy Verges), “Country Strong”; “I See the Light,” (written by Alan Menken, Glenn Slater), “Tangled”; “There’s a Place for Us” (written by Carrie Underwood, David Hodges, Hillary Lindsey), “The Chronicles of Narnia: The Voyage of the Dawn Treader”; “You Haven’t Seen the Last of Me,” (written by Diane Warren), “Burlesque.”

WINNER BEST ACTOR DRAMA
Steve Buscemi, “Boardwalk Empire”; Bryan Cranston, “Breaking Bad”; Michael C. Hall, “Dexter”; Jon Hamm, “Mad Men”; Hugh Laurie, “House.” (Again, sentimentally, I would take Hugh Laurie, although his show has lost some momentum. However, I had bet on Michael C. Hall.

WINNER BEST SUPPORTING ACTOR, SERIES, MINISERIES OR MOVIE:
Scott Caan, “Hawaii Five-O”; Chris Colfer, “Glee”; Chris Noth, “The Good Wife”; Eric Stonestreet, “Modern Family”; David Strathairn, “Temple Grandin.”

WINNER BEST MINISERIES OR MOVIE “Carlos,” Sundance Channel; “The Pacific,” HBO; “Pillars of the Earth,” Starz; “Temple Grandin,” HBO; “You Don’t Know Jack,” HBO. (Remember this is the Foreign Press awards. Most of us in the U.S. would have chosen one of the others.)

WINNER BEST ACTRESS IN A DRAMA, TV
— Actress, Drama: Julianna Margulies, “The Good Wife”; Elisabeth Moss, “Mad Men”; Piper Perabo, “Covert Affairs”; Katey Sagal, “Sons of Anarchy”; Kyra Sedgwick, “The Closer.”

WINNER BEST SUPPORTING ACTOR WINNER, FILM:
— Supporting Actor: Christian Bale, “The Fighter”; Michael Douglas, “Wall Street: Money Never Sleeps”; Andrew Garfield, “The Social Network”; Jeremy Renner, “The Town”; Geoffrey Rush, “The King’s Speech.”

What did you think? Did your favorites win?

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Comments Off on Golden Globe Winners Announced