New Zodiac Signs, but I Am Still a Virgo

When news starting reaching the media outlets, that a 13th sign of the zodiac was likely and that most of us are not what we have always believed ourselves to be, I scoffed with good reason. It has seemed all my life that if one is to read the characteristics associated with a Virgo, that he was reading about me. I fit the profile completely. I certainly was not a Leo. My son has always been a Scorpio, but now he is a Libra. It is all very confusing.

So, here is the truth about the new zodiac sign. Scientists have said that it really is not a new discovery. In reality, these 13 signs have been “in existence” for over 2000 years. This new zodiac sign comes to us from the Babylonians, who once used the concept, but then thought otherwise. For some reason the Babylonians did not want Ophiuchus. If one is under this new sign, he will first have to learn to pronounce it and then change his bar pick up line. There will be no more, “What’s your sign?”
Here are the new divisions. I wonder what this change does to gemstones, etc., associated with the older signs.

Capricorn – Jan 20 to Feb 16

Aquarius – Feb 16 to Mar 11

Pisces – Mar 11 to Apr 18

Aries – Apr 18 to May 13

Taurus – May 13 to Jun 21

Gemini – Jun 21 to Jul 20

Cancer – Jul 20 to Aug 10

Leo – Aug 10 to Sep 16

Virgo – Sep 16 to Oct 30

Libra – Oct 30 to Nov 23

Scorpius – Nov 23 to Nov 29

Ophiuchus – Nov 29 to Dec 17

Sagittarius – Dec 17 to Jan 20
Now you know about the new zodiac sign. Which sign are you? Have you changed? Does this mean a “whole new you” for the New Year?

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Comments Off on New Zodiac Signs, but I Am Still a Virgo

Learn to Dance Like in Pride and Prejudice

This is an announcement from Orlando, Florida’s Shakespeare’s Theater. They are currently presenting Pride & Prejudice.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Our dance card will fill up quickly, so ask us to dance today!

Learn how to dance Regency style with the choreographer from Pride and Prejudice! This is your chance to charm Mr. Bingley, fall in love with Elizabeth, lavish your partner with affections, or scandalously conduct indiscreet conversations with your friends and neighbors. Shocking!

Choreographer W. Robert Sherry, an excellent beginner friendly instructor, will teach the regency style dances. No experience necessary and no partners required — the custom in the late 1700s was to change partners frequently — canned music, but it’s better than Mary Bennet on the piano. We suggest comfortable dress and shoes you can move in.

Thursday, March 3, 2011
Dancing begins at 5:30 p.m. and continues until 6:30 p.m. Stay for drinks, and Pride and Prejudice afterwards. Show starts at 7:30 p.m.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Comments Off on Learn to Dance Like in Pride and Prejudice

A Birthday Salute to Abigail Reynolds

Saturday, January 15, is Abigail Reynolds’s birthday. Happy Birthday, Abigail.
http://pf.kizoa.com/sflite.swf?did=1402227&k=P26353159&hk=1

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on A Birthday Salute to Abigail Reynolds

Introducing The Phantom of Pemberley

“Cozy” Up 2 a Great Mystery!

The Phantom of Pemberley: A Pride and Prejudice Mystery is my sixth Jane Austen book. I am more than a bit of a “Jane Austen geek.” I have loved Jane Austen’s works since I was a pre-teen.

If he has to kill a thousand men, the Phantom will kill and kill again!

Phantom is what is known as a “cozy mystery,” along the lines of what one would find with Agatha Christie or Sherlock Holmes. A “cozy” has very specific characteristics: is set in a country house or small town; is a domestic crime; has a gifted amateur who cross examines the suspects and after a clever explanation discloses the guilty person. It mostly focuses on solving the mental aspects of the crime.

So, we open the book to find Darcy and Elizabeth, married for a year and blissfully happy with plans for the future of the estate and their marriage. However, we know what happens when we tell God our plans. He has a hearty laugh and sends us a good dose of humility. Enter that humility in the form of the worst snowstorm in a decade. Add the appearances of Lydia Bennet Wickham for a planned visit and of Lady Catherine and Anne de Bourgh, both making an unexpected call at Pemberley, the first since Darcy and Elizabeth’s wedding. Of course, an eclectic mix requires a bit more than the Austen standard fare. Because of the storm, Lydia invites her fellow traveling companions from the public coach to stay at Pemberley. As readers we meet Nigel Worth, a country solicitor, and Evelyn Williams, a naval widow. Compound the mix of guests at Pemberley with a friend of Colonel Fitzwiliam, the future earl of Greenwall, who also finds himself stranded in Derbyshire with no place to stay. Therefore, against his better judgment, Darcy accepts Adam Lawrence, Viscount Stafford, and Lawrence’s mistress, Cathleen Donnel, at the estate.

You will curse the day you did not do all that the Phantom asked of you!

Snowed in for, at least, a week, Darcy and Elizabeth set about entertaining so varied a guest list, but entertainment becomes a minor problem. First, Elizabeth sees an unknown stranger along one of the fields surrounding the manor house, then Georgiana spots a like figure close to the cottagers’ huts. The Pemberley staff think it the Shadow Man, but even that legend does not explain the unusual thefts about the house, the appearance of a disembodied ghost in Georgiana’s room, a staged accident on the stairs, and a series of what appears to be unconnected murders. What Darcy has at Pemberley is a “phantom,” who is obviously set on revenge.

One of the things I enjoy when I write is exploring history and incorporating it into the story line. First, for Phantom, I used the legend of the Shadow Man or Hat Man, as he is sometimes called. Most cultures have a variation on this legend. The easiest way to

 

explain a Shadow Person is when one thinks he sees someone out of the corner of his eye and then turns his head to find nothing. I found it very interesting that Wes Craven spoke of a scary experience with a shadowy creature as a young boy. Some suggest that this incident was the inspiration for Freddy Krueger. To read more of Craven’s story and Shadow People go to http://www.unsolved-mysteries.com/paranormal/shadow_ghosts_hat_man.html

Next, finding out creative ways to dispose of the chosen victims was essential. I was very lucky in that women of the Regency era, quite literally poisoned themselves with their beauty products. During this era, white skin signified a life of leisure while skin exposed to the sun indicated a life of outdoor labor. In order to maintain a pale complexion, women wore bonnets, carried parasols, and covered all visible parts of their bodies with whiteners and blemish removers. Unfortunately, more than a few of these remedies were lethal. Into the nineteenth century, ladies used a whitening agent composed of carbonate, hydroxide, and lead oxide, which the body stored with each use, resulting in muscle paralysis or death. By the nineteenth century zinc oxide became widely used as a facial powder, replacing this more deadly mixture. Even in the early 1800s, we must ask the question: What price beauty? Hopefully, the red herring is not too obvious for those of you who devour mysteries.

I have planned some twists and turns to the story, which I pray will keep it interesting. For example, in Phantom, I play a bit more with the character of Anne de Bourgh. In Darcy’s Temptation, I gave Anne a life after Darcy’s desertion, but I found I did not like her much afterwards; and I wanted to like Anne. Therefore, in this one Anne finally gets a spine and seeks love in all the wrong places before finding what is important in a relationship: a apt lesson for a woman well on the shelf by Regency standards.

One of the things I found in writing this book is I became quite interested in the character of Adam Lawrence, a very “major” minor character in The Phantom of Pemberley. Lawrence has developed into what Francis Henning is to author Victoria Alexander. He makes an appearance in two other of my works. Therefore, I have written a novella about what happens to Lawrence in the future, six years after the close of Phantom. I hope to release three novellas together, all based around the minor characters in my other novels. Fans always ask what I would plan for certain characters. Now they will get a chance to find out. “His Irish Eve” is Lawrence’s story, and “His American Heart Song” is that of Lawrence Lowery from my “Touch” series. The third novella is in development.

In dreams, that voice calls to me and speaks my name. And do I dream again? For now I find the Phantom is there, inside my mind.

Come and join me at my website Regina Jeffers. Read excerpts from all my books.

“It is far harder to kill a phantom than a reality.” (Virginia Woolf)

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off on Introducing The Phantom of Pemberley

Austen Actors with January Birthdays

January brings us lots of “oldies, but goodies,” and I am not speaking of the actors being old in chronological years, although some are just that. I am speaking of some of the older adaptations of Austen films. We have actors/actresses from Pride and Prejudice (1958), Pride and Prejudice(1967), Sense and Sensibility (1971), Persuasion (1971), and Emma (1972). Five of our thirteen have appeared in one of the Pride and Prejudice adaptations, while three have been in Sense and Sensibility films. Joanna David is the only one this month who has appeared in more than one Austen adaptation. She was Elinor Dashwood in 1971 and Mrs. Gardiner in 1995. We also have two lovely Bond girls this month: Rosamund Pike and Gemma Arterton.

http://pf.kizoa.com/sflite.swf?did=1265322&k=P41991838&hk=1

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Austen Actors with January Birthdays

Austen Actors with No Birth Dates in Their Bios

Austen Actors with Unknown Birthdates
As acting is a business where “age” is an issue, some of our favorite Austen actors list no actual birthdate in their bios. We understand. Austen, too, lived in an age when youth and beauty were the criteria for marriage for a woman – a time when women were on the shelf at age five and twenty. Early 19th Century men were most “masculine” between the ages of 30 and 35. Sounds like Hollywood to me!! As such, we find some of our most endearing Austen actors without a definite birthdate, among them, Amanda Root, JJ Field, Simon Woods, Laurence Fox, Mark Dymond, Adrian Lukis, Elizabeth Garvie, and Mark Strong. We have located three such actors from Mansfield Park 1983, Northanger Abbey 2007, Pride and Prejudice 2005. We have two each from Lost in Austen, Becoming Jane, Pride and Prejudice 1980, Sense and Sensibility 1981, Sense and Sensibility 2008, Emma (TV) 1996, and Persuasion 1995. Six of 25 actors have appeared in multiple Austen adaptations: Peter Wight (Pride and Prejudice 2005 and Persuasion 2007); Irene Richard (Pride and Prejudice 1980 and Sense and Sensibility 1981); Lucy Robinson (Pride and Prejudice 2005 and Emma[TV] 1996); Sophie Thompson (Persuasion 1995 and Emma 1996); David Savile (Pride and Prejudice 1967 and Persuasion 1971); and Sylvestra Le Touzel (Mansfield Park 1983 and Northanger Abbey 2007).

<object width=”560″ height=”420″><param name=”movie” value=”http://pf.kizoa.com/sflite.swf?did=1293323&k=P82672504&hk=1″></param><param name=”wmode” value=”transparent”></param><param name=”allowFullScreen” value=”true”></param><embed src=”http://pf.kizoa.com/sflite.swf?did=1293323&k=P82672504&hk=1″ type=”application/x-shockwave-flash” wmode=”transparent” width=”560″ height=”420″ allowFullScreen=”true”></embed></object>

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Austen Actors with No Birth Dates in Their Bios

Northanger Abbey 1987 – Movie Discussion

When we read our favorite novels, we bring our own imagination to the experience. Film adaptations, however, leave less room for interpretation. We have all, at one time or another, been disappointed in the casting, not inherently evident to us at the time, of a particular actor in a role.

There have been only two film adaptations of Northanger Abbey. I chose the one from 1987, a BBC/A&E production, because I thought many of you might be less familiar with it, and my blog visitors would want to add it to their studies of all things Jane Austen.
Hopefully, our Austen Authors fans will comment on the costumes, the music and sound effects, the sites used in the film, and even some film errors (i.e., The film is set in 1794, but John Thorpe speaks of reading The Monk, which was published in 1796.). I would also love to hear your opinions of the 2007 version within this discussion. Northanger Abbey (1987) starred Katherine Schlesinger as Catherine Morland and Peter Firth ( not Colin’s brother) as Henry Tilney.

Published, along with Persuasion in December 1818, Northanger Abbey takes a satiric look at the Gothic novel. In reality, Northanger Abbey has never been a popular choice for modern readers, as Catherine Morland, the 17-year-old heroine, lacks the development we find in Emma Woodhouse or Elizabeth Bennet or Elinor Dashwood. Austen even says that Catherine is “in training for a heroine.” The 1987 cinematic adaptation of Austen’s novel serves as a bridge between those earlier cheaply-made Austen offerings and those of the 1990s. Although both Sense and Sensibility and Mansfield Park were also released in the 1980s, they mimicked the style of the earlier works, especially lacking on location filming. Northanger Abbey (1987) was one of the first to use on-location settings effectively.

This particular adaptation takes a number of liberties with the original text, most obviously the opening scene. Austen’s novel introduces us to Catherine Morland, chronicling her short life and her lack of accomplishments. The film, however, begins with a feeling of sexual awakening in the young Catherine. The viewer sees the girl reclining on a tree limb while reading a Gothic novel. We see Catherine’s “scandalous” white stocking-clad leg. We hear the female voice over reading aloud from the book: “the horrors of that evil chamber.” Sketches from the novel show us a dead body on the stairs and a male figure carrying a supinated woman’s body. Add the eerie sound effects and choral chanting, and we make the assumption that Austen discussed these Gothic images in her book, which is not true.

So, what else do we see in this adaptation that is not found in Austen’s novel?
* the character of the Marchioness de Thierry, General Tilney’s friend and confidant – Her back story of a husband being guillotined reminds us of Austen’s cousin’s story. The lady is the general’s source of gossip.

* a soft criticism of Ann Radcliffe and the Gothic premise for its sexual pandering – As opposed to the movie, in the novel, Austen seems more likely to be criticizing poorly “educated” readers of Mrs. Radcliffe. “The person, be it gentleman or lady, who has not pleasure in a good novel, must be intolerably stupid.”

*In Austen’s novel, we only become aware of Eleanor’s attachment to a young man in the last chapter. Note in the film, upon her arrival at the Abbey, Catherine finds the message sent to Eleanor from Thomas arranging a secret meeting. “The same day at 3:00. You and I beside the unknown woman.”

*In Austen’s Northanger Abbey, Catherine visits the Tilney residence in town twice to apologize for not walking out with Henry and Eleanor. The novel includes a scene at the opera, where Catherine gushes her apologies to Henry. The film combines these visits and omits the opera scene.

*Catherine burns her copy of The Mysteries of Udolpho in the film.

*The general and the Marchioness are seen in the background at the Upper Rooms and also entering the same building when Catherine and Mrs. Allen first arrive in Bath. In the novel, the general is not mentioned until after Catherine rides out with John Thorpe.

*The Tilney brothers enjoy taking snuff together in the film.

*In the adaptation, the general encourages Catherine’s acquaintance from the beginning (assumably based on information from the Marchioness). In the novel, he only encourages Catherine’s relationship with the Tilneys after Thorpe misleads him regarding Catherine’s wealth.

*Catherine in the film is discovered in Mrs. Tilney’s room in flagrante delicto. In Austen’s novel, she leaves the room “and a shortly succeeding ray of common sense added some bitter emotions of shame.” In addition, Mrs. Tilney’s forbidden bedroom is hideous and sinister in the film, where in the novel is sports bright and modern decor (for that time period).

*The film combines the evening entertainments when Mrs. Allen and Catherine visit the Upper Rooms with their later visit to the Lower Rooms into one scene.

*The film allows the Abbey to keep the element of mystery with dark corridors, high windows, winding stairs, etc. In the novel, Catherine is disappointed by how modern the Abbey is.

*Catherine, Eleanor, and the general visit Henry at Woodston in the novel, but the film does little to establish him as a clergyman (presumably because modern audiences would not see this as a desirable occupation for a potential husband).

*In the novel, Catherine recognizes Isabella’s deviousness in the letter when Isabella begs for the return of James’s affections. In this TV version, there is no such letter.

*In the adaptation, Henry chastises Catherine by saying, “Dearest Miss Morland, has reading one silly novel unbalanced your judgment so completely?” The novel has Henry saying, “Dearest Miss Morland what ideas have you been admitting?” Henry no longer prods Catherine to think for herself in the film version.

*Austen tells the reader that Catherine has not read any Gothic novels before meeting Isabella Thorpe. “It is so odd to me, that you should never have read Udolpho before.” The film begins with Catherine’s Gothic fantasies.

*In the film, James Morland introduces Catherine to Isabella after he comes to Bath.

*Henry rebels against his father in a scene where the predatory-like General Tilney ironically trains a hawk. Also in this scene, the general accepts the fact that a dowry of 400 pounds per year is adequate, after all.

I am ready to hear what you think of this adaptation. Please leave your comments, and I will check in regularly to hold our discussion.

P.S. – One might wish to check out Ashley Judd’s 1992 film Ruby in Paradise, which is considered by many as homage to Northanger Abbey.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Comments Off on Northanger Abbey 1987 – Movie Discussion

Scotland’s Nostradamus

The Brahan Seer, Kenneth Mackenzie (or Coinneach Odhar), is Scotland’s most famous prophet. Often referred to as the Scottish Nostradamus, Mackenzie lived in the 17th Century. Most experts believe that he was born on the Isle of Lewis (at Baile-na-Cille in the Parish of Uig) and that he later worked as a laborer on the Earl of Seaforth’s Brahan estate near Fortrose. Mackenzie is said to have been gifted with the “Sight.” He could predict futuristic events. Amazingly, many of those predictions have come true, with a high degree of accuracy.

What were some of the Brahan Seer’s predictions?
The Seer predicted the joining of the lochs in the Great Glen. The Caledonian Canal was built in the 19th Century.
He reportedly foretold of The Battle of Culloden in 1745. “Oh, Drumossie, thy bleak moor shall, ere many generations have passed away, be stained with the best blood of the Highlands. Glad am I that I will not see the day, for it will be a fearful period; heads will be lopped off by the score, and no mercy shall be shown or quarter given on either side.”
He spoke of “streams of fire and water” running beneath the streets of Inverness and into every home. In the 19th Century, gas and water pipes fulfilled this prediction.
The Seer told of a time when Scotland would once again have its own Parliament. He foretold of this occurring when men could walk dry shod from England to France. In 1994, the Channel Tunnel opened. A few years later, the first Scottish Parliament since 1707 took its seats.
He said, “There is a day coming when the jaw-bone of the big sheep will put the plough into the rafters and no man will drive cattle through Kintail. The sheep will become so numerous that the bleating of one shall be heard by another from Lochalsh to Kintail. You will not see it, but your children’s children will see it when they are forced to flee before the march of the great white army.” During what is known as the “Highland Clearances,” families were driven from the land, and it was given over to the sheep grazing.
“A village with four churches will get another spire, and a ship will come from the sky and moor at it.” In 1932, this incident proved correct when an airship was lashed to the spire of a new church after an emergency landing.
The most impressive of the Seer’s predictions was the elimination of the Seaforth clan. Reportedly, the Countess Seaforth requested Mackenzie’s sight in regards to her husband, who was away in Paris. Mackenzie was made, on threat of death, to tell Isabella, the wife, that the Earl was with another woman. He also told of the eventual end of the Seaforth line, with the last of them being deaf and dumb. Scarlet fever, when he was a child, left Francis Humberston Mackenzie, deaf and dumb. Francis inherited the title in 1783. All four of Francis’s male children died prematurely, and the line ended with his death in 1815. For his troubles, Kenneth was tried for witchcraft, found guilty, and burned in a tar barrel.
To compound this tale, another part of the prediction for the Seaforth line was that “His possessions shall be inherited by a white-coifed widow from the east, and she will kill her own sister.” When the male line of the Mackenzies died away, Mary, the eldest daughter and widow of Admiral Hood, returned from India, where she had been living. She wore the traditional Indian white mourning hood in honor of her husband. One day, Mary and her sister, Lady Caroline, were riding together in a carriage driven by Mary. The ponies bolted, and Mary could not control the coach. Caroline was thrown from the carriage and died from her injuries.
A stone by the lighthouse at Chanonry Point, near Fortrose, supposedly marks the place where the Brahan Seer died. The inscription reads, “This stone commemorates the legend of Coinneach Odhar, better known as the BRAHAN SEER. Many of his prophecies were fulfilled and tradition holds that his untimely death by burning in tar followed his final prophecy of the doom of the House of Seaforth.”

No one knows the truth for sure. However, the legend of the Brahan Seer remains. A Celtic stone, known as the Eagle Stone, stands in Strathpeffer, Ross-shire. Reportedly, the Seer predicted that if the stone fell down three times, that Loch Ussie would flood the valley below so that ships could sail to Strathpeffer. The stone has tumbled twice. Today, it sets in concrete to prevent a third fall.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Comments Off on Scotland’s Nostradamus

Pride and Prejudice 2005 – Movie Discussion

This is a film where the spectator enjoys a lesson in Voyeurism 101. We follow the story as we view the characters through windows, eavesdrop on them through doors, read over their shoulders, stand behind them while they are conversing, etc. From the opening shot to the closing kiss (in the American version), we are drawn into the Bennet family through the character of Elizabeth, portrayed by Keira Knightley. The opening shot establishes Elizabeth as being both “inside” the action, but also an “outside” observer through which the audience will view the story. Joe Wright, the director, uses camera angles and filmography to tell the story of Darcy and Elizabeth’s love. He gives us a story steeped in Romantic elements, which seems a bit odd to those who have been taught that Jane Austen rejected the concept of “self,” emphasized by Romanticism.

In that opening shot, Elizabeth is walking home reading what is thought to be Austen’s First Impressions. In other words, Elizabeth is reading “her story.” Reaching her home, (through the camera’s lens) we follow her around the house. We see that this is a “working” estate, rather than what we sometimes see in the more traditional “Heritage” films. Elizabeth walks behind the sheets hanging on the line. They obstruct our vision, but this also tells the viewer that Elizabeth’s perceptions are hampered.

In one of my favorite shots in the film, we see Elizabeth most intimately in the “mirror” sequence. Masterly, Wright summarizes three chapters of Austen’s novel with soft lighting and darkness, using both to show the passage of time. We find various blurred medium long shots and medium close-ups of Elizabeth, of Darcy, and of the letter. They provide the viewer with insights into Elizabeth’s internal turmoil. She turns suddenly when she realizes that she has misjudged Darcy, but he is gone. To Charlotte’s question of her health, Elizabeth responds, “I hardly know.” Hardly know what? Herself? Darcy? the Truth?

Another masterly crafted scene is the Netherfield Ball. The camera steps in to refocus the audience’s attention that this is a turning point in Darcy and Elizabeth’s relationship. The camera leaves the traditional set up and follows them in their movements. We whirl and complete the dance steps along with them. Then the camera “crosses the line” by moving more than 180 degrees. I must tell you when I first saw this, I nearly jumped out of my chair. One rarely sees this film technique used so well. The characters’ positioning from right to left in the frame reverses, telling the viewer that everything has changed for both of them. It is a leap from spatial reality to a dream. The characters complete each other. This scene forecasts the film’s resolution: Social isolation will ultimately unite them. They dance alone. Before, they were only going through the motions of social performances.

In the “Accomplished Lady” scene, the dialogue mixes idioms with archaic sounding sentence structure. Simon Woods (Bingley) says, “amazing you young ladies” and “you all paint tables….” The script says, “It’s amazing how young ladies…” and “They all paint tables….” Therefore, Caroline’s use of “She must have …” makes her appear more distant and impersonal. A look at the filmography of this scene shows Elizabeth surrounded by emblems of the ornate femininity that she rejects: a decorative vase, a framed portrait of a young woman in white, a bowl of flowers, etc. During this scene, both Darcy and Elizabeth remained seated. This gives them visual authority. The change in shot from character to character is often slightly off sync with the beginning and ending of each speech. This creates movement in an otherwise static scene. The final shot shows Caroline and Elizabeth separating, crossing behind Darcy, and sitting. They represent different potential mates for Darcy. Of course, any student of Austen knows that Wright combined two separate incidents from the novel into this one scene (the letter writing scene and talk of Bingley’s poor handwriting and the walking about the room scene).

At Pemberley, Elizabeth sees Darcy’s sensual side. She realizes his true worth through the beauty of his home. There is constant camera movement, which emphasizes the significance of the moment. The camera circles Elizabeth and then Darcy’s statue, showing her emerging feelings for Darcy. Did you notice the right to left tracking shot of (Chatsworth) Pemberley’s facáde? As Elizabeth moves through the house, she touches the various objects, giving her a “true” picture of Darcy. “I hope to afford you more clarity in the future.” Elizabeth peers through the door to see Darcy with Georgiana. His role as a loving brother softens Elizabeth’s opinion of him. Did you happen to notice that the music Elizabeth overhears Georgiana playing is the same as at the beginning of the film when she is walking “home.” In other words, Elizabeth is at home at Pember

Rosings Park’s murals show men laboring under tyrannical conditions – under the oppressive social order represented by Lady Catherine. The murals at Pemberley depict men and women in a pastoral setting. It is the ideal place for Darcy and Elizabeth’s love to grow.

Wright shows that Elizabeth needs to be in a natural setting. That is where she will bloom. In Derbyshire, Elizabeth stands on the bluff. She is part of the rugged landscape. She belongs in Derbyshire with Darcy. She sits on the roots of a 200+ year old tree (which is really in Nottingham). She must set down roots in this area. The free running deer represent Elizabeth’s new sense of freedom.

Darcy is seen as a social outsider. The film creates him as a Byronic hero. He is a reluctant social participant. Matthew Macfadyen’s body language and facial expressions suggest discomfort – a true dislike for social practices – an unhappiness rather than hauteur or censure. The film begins in the countryside at dawn. It ends with the second proposal in the same setting. Neither Elizabeth nor Darcy is dressed properly. They will, therefore, live their lives on their own terms.

As one can see, there are many areas of discussion on this film. It is quite different from the more traditional 1995 P&P, but that does not mean that it is not worthy in its own right. Keep in mind, that a 2-hour commercial film should not be compared to a nearly 6-hour “heritage” adaptation. I welcome your comments. I will check in regularly to respond.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | 6 Comments

Austen Actors with December Birthdays

December brings us several of our favorite actors from Jane Austen film adaptations. Enjoy the show.

name=”allowFullScreen” value=”true”></param><embed src=”http://pf.kizoa.com/sflite.swf?did=1232602&k=P29291238&hk=1″ type=”application/x-shockwave-flash” wmode=”transparent” width=”560″ height=”420″ allowFullScreen=”true”></embed></object>

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Austen Actors with December Birthdays