Euphemisms

Learn British English: English euphemisms visual » Learn British ... www.learnbritishenglish.co.uk

Learn British English: English euphemisms visual » Learn British …
http://www.learnbritishenglish.co.uk

Dictionary.com says a euphemism is “the substitution of a mild, indirect, or vague expression for one thought to be offensive, harsh, or blunt.”  Euphemisms are plentiful, some old and some of a more modern twists. Let us look at a few. 

Accouchement is a one-hundred year old term for childbirth. In the Regency Period in which many of my novels are set, I use the words “lying in” or “enceinte.” A physician might use the word “parturition.” Accouchement comes from the French word “accouter,” meaning “to put to bed.” In James Joyce’s Ulysses (1922), he says, “Meanwhile the skill and patience of the physician had brought about a happy accouchement.” 

Language Arts comes to us by combining language skills and communication arts. In a favorite play, Bel Kaufman’s Up the Down Staircase (1964), we find “Language Arts Dept. is the English office.” My undergraduate degree was in Language Arts Comprehensive 7-12, which permitted me to teach English, speech, journalism, and theatre in the American public school systems.

Ablutions, another word I often use in my novels, means to wash (sometimes ceremoniously as in purification, rather than for hygienic purposes). The word dates to the mid 1700s. 

Authentic Reproduction is a good example of double-talk. A reproduction is not authentic. 

Make love is a euphemism turned into a euphemism. It was originally the flowery language used by a gentleman to woo or to court his lady love. The Oxford English Dictionary gives us a reference to John Lyly and “a phrase now there is which belongeth to your Shoppe boorde, that is to make loud” (Euphues and His England, 1580). The OED did not use “make love” as a euphemism for sex until the 1976 supplement and then the earliest example given was from 1950.

Cripes is an euphemism for “Christ.” We also have Christopher Columbus, criminey, Jiminy Cricket, cricky. cracky, etc. 

Free Presentations in PowerPoint format for Euphemisms PK-12 languagearts.pppst.com

Free Presentations in PowerPoint format for Euphemisms PK-12
languagearts.pppst.com

Pluck is another word for courage. In A Classical Dictionary of the Vulgar Tongue (1796), Francis Grose indicates “pluck” and “guts” can be used interchangeably. “Pluck” is another word for “viscera.” From Mary Kingsley, Travels in West Africa (1897) we find this quote, “I saw…five unpleasantly looking objects stuck on sticks. They were the livers and lungs, and in fact the plucks of witch-doctors.” 

Monthlies is an older term for a woman’s menstrual cycle or period. I use it in my Regency based novels. If we return to James Joyce’s Ulysses, we discover, “That squinty one is delicate. Near her monthlies, I expect, makes them ticklish.” 

Criminal Conversation is the term for adultery in British common law and in the laws of some states in the U. S. I live in North Carolina, which still has this term upon the law books. John Edwards’ (senator and presidential candidate) late wife brought suit against Rielle Hunter for criminal conversation in the North Carolina courts. The “conversation” is an euphemisms for non-spoken intercourse. A British case of the mid 1800s involved Thomas Brudenell seventh Earl of Cardigan’s affair with Lady Frances, wife of Lord William Paget. Paget sued for 15,000 pounds in damages. 

Silly means feebleminded. It is a 16th Century word. The OED gives us this example, “The King’s uncle, being rather weak in intellect, was called Silly Billy” (Goldwin Smith, Lectures and Essays, 1881). 

Smallclothes can mean small articles of clothing (as in underclothing or handkerchiefs). In the 18th Century the word meant close-fitting breeches.

Posted in British history, euphemisms, Great Britain, Living in the Regency, Regency era | Tagged , | 4 Comments

Two More Winners of “The Prosecution of Mr. Darcy’s Cousin”

winner-is-badgeI am pleased to present two more winners with eBook copies of The Prosecution of Mr. Darcy’s Cousin: A Pride and Prejudice Mystery. You should have a prize notice in your emPoMDC Cover-2-2ail box. The winners are Vesper Meikle and June Williams. Congratulations!

Posted in British history, giveaway, Great Britain, Jane Austen, Living in the Regency, Regency era | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off on Two More Winners of “The Prosecution of Mr. Darcy’s Cousin”

Political History of England Under the Normans

The Norman Conquest www.bl.uk In 1066, the Normans invaded England. It was an event that was to transform the English language forever.

The Norman Conquest
http://www.bl.uk
In 1066, the Normans invaded England. It was an event that was to transform the English language forever.

The French influence upon England and its culture lasted some 300 years, creating changes in the political, social and cultural realms. 

Politically, England saw an acceleration of a “united” England and a spirit of nationalism. The acceptance of a centralized language and literature style sped up this process. The period also saw closer association with the Continent, a manipulation of England’s legal and governmental systems to reflect more localized control, and a great influence in the king’s power and the feudal system. 

Socially and cultural, a code of chivalry developed. There was an exaltation of women and a sense of religious ardor, bordering on mysticism. Normans introduced a different style of architecture and the control of literary English.

Essential Norman Conquest - An interactive day-by-day retelling of ... www.essentialnormanconquest.com

Essential Norman Conquest – An interactive day-by-day retelling of …
http://www.essentialnormanconquest.com

William of Normandy’s two sons followed his time on the throne. With the death of the second of those sons (Henry I), the country fell into a period of civil war and anarchy, which did not end until the accession of the Angevin Henry II in 1154. 

William and his wife Matilda of Flanders had at least nine children. The birth order of the boys is clear, but no source gives the relative order of birth of the daughters.

**Robert was born between 1051 and 1054, died 10 February 1134. Duke of Normandy, married Sybil of Conversano, daughter of Geoffrey of Conversano.
**Richard was born before 1056, died around 1075.
**William was born between 1056 and 1060, died 2 August 1100. King of England, killed in the New Forest.
**Henry was born in late 1068, died 1 December 1135. King of England, married Edith of Scotland, daughter of Malcolm III of Scotland. His second wife was Adeliza of Louvain.
**Adeliza (or Adelida, Adelaide) died before 1113, reportedly betrothed to Harold II of England, probably a nun of Saint Léger at Préaux.
**Cecilia (or Cecily) was born before 1066, died 1127, Abbess of Holy Trinity, Caen.
**Matilda was born around 1061, died perhaps about 1086. Mentioned in Domesday Book as a daughter of William.
**Constance died 1090, married Alan IV Fergent, Duke of Brittany.
**Adela died 1137, married Stephen, Count of Blois.
**(Possibly) Agatha, the betrothed of Alfonso VI of León and Castile. (Wikipedia)

Of the two sons who followed William I to the throne, William II was named his father’s heir in place of Robert (the eldest son), who received the Duchy of Normandy. William II accedes to the throne in 1087. He successfully squashed a baronial rebellion in Normandy (led by his uncle, Odo of Byeux, who supported Robert’s claim to the throne) in 1088 and withstood two invasion attempts (1091 and again in 1093) by Malcolm III of Scotland. During his reign, the Normans capture Carlisle from Scotland and Cumberland is annexed. William II suppressed a revolt in Northumbria in 1095 and a Welsh rebellion in 1098. He was killed in a hunting accident in the New Forest in 1100, although many suggest his brother Henry had William murdered. 

Henry I came to the throne with William II’s death. He ruled for 35 years. During his reign, England saw many important reforms. The King’s Council to settle disputes between the Crown and its tenants came into use. Upon coming to the throne, Henry issued a Charter of Liberties, which was a pledge of good governance. In 1101, he defeats his brother Robert’s attempt to steal the throne, forcing Robert to sign the Treaty of Alton. Even with the treaty, Henry must again face his brother in 1106. Robert was defeated at the Battle of Tinchebrai. Henry has his brother imprisoned in Cardiff Castle and assumes control of Normandy. With the death of his son and heir, William, Henry persuades the barons to accept his daughter Matilda as the successor. He died of food poisoning in 1135. 

On Henry I’s death, Stephen usurped the throne from Matilda, and a period of civil war ensued. This unrest continued until Henry of Anjou convinced the barons to recognize his claim to the throne in 1153.

“The towns of England commended their phenomenal growth, which was abetted by the financial needs of Richard I (1189-99) in going on the Third Crusade. Under John (1199-1216), a weak and vicious king, the long-drawn conflict between nobles and King reached a high pitch. The victory of the nobles bore fruit in the most noted of English constitutional documents, the Magna Carta (1215). This marked a striking step forward in the development of Parliament, which was to grow steadily in power. The baronial wars continued under Henry III (1216-1272), with a great popular leader rising in Simon de Montfort. 

“The conquest of Ireland was attempted by Richard de Clare. Attempts to force English control upon Scotland and Wales began in Saxon times, but conquest was not systematically attempted until Edward I (1271-1307) mdd a determined but unsuccessful attempt. This king is known as the English Justinian because of his expansion and reform of England’s courts and laws.” (History of English Literature: Part I – Early Saxon Through Milton, Hymarx Outline Series, Boston, MA)

During the Anglo-Norman era, the English people saw: (1) internal quarrels diminish: (2) an increase in taxes; (3) a well-organized government; (4) a stronger tie to the Continent and its culture; (5) a sense of nationalism; (6) a feudal system in which the lords of the land supplied the King his army [These lords met three times a year to advise the King in the implementation of new laws.]; (7) the use of Latin in written laws and records, while French was the language of the court; (8) the rise of chivalry; and (9) the rise of new monastic orders

Posted in Anglo-Normans, British history, Great Britain, real life tales | Tagged , , , , , | 7 Comments

The Ratcliffe Highway Murders as a Plot Point in “The Prosecution of Mr. Darcy’s Cousin” + an excerpt + another giveaway

When I began writing The Prosecution of Mr. Darcy’s Cousin: A Pride and Prejudice Mystery, I thought to use the actual Regency era case known as “The Ratcliffe Highway Murders” in the plot line for the although a suspect was identified, the man committed suicide and nothing was proved in court. P. D. James and T. A. Critchley discuss this case in great detail (and a bit of editorializing) in “The Maul and the Pear Tree.”

However, as I set up the story line for my novel, many changes needed to be made to the actual Ratcliffe mystery to fit my manuscript. Most importantly, the Ratcliffe murders occurred in December 1811. In my books, Major General Fitzwilliam (Colonel Fitzwilliam in the original Pride and Prejudice) married Miss Georgiana Darcy right after Napoleon escaped from Elba and right before the Major General returned to serve with Wellington at Waterloo. That moves my story to 1816.

The Major General and Mrs. Fitzwilliam have been married sixteen months and are the parents of a daughter. The major general resigned his commission and became a landed gentleman in Oxfordshire. Yet, doing so brings Fitzwilliam no success for 1816 was the “Year Without Summer,” when the ash from the Mount Tambora eruption spread across Europe, England and America, disturbing the weather and disrupting crops. Fitzwilliam knew much success as an Army officer, and this “failure” plays hard with his nature.

I used the concept of the mass hysteria associated with the Ratcliffe Murders in this book. What would happen if several gruesome murders occur in Wapping? What if the prime suspect is the son of an earl? Would justice prevail? Would the victims, part of the poor of London, know justice? There are bits of Jack the Ripper-like hysteria in the tale.

I did draw some on the Ratcliffe murders. My first victims are modeled after the linen draper, Timothy Marr, and his family, but that is the extent of the similarities. I created a mystery within a mystery within a mystery.

In the original Ratcliffe Highway murders, there were two households attacked by an unknown assailant. The occupants of the house were clubbed to death; seven people lost their lives, including an infant. There was an outcry by the London populace, and the government advertised a reward for information leading to the discovery of the murderer. The Times gave the crimes a position of prominence in their headlines.

No metropolitan police existed at the time. People depended upon magistrates, night watchmen, the Thames River Police, Bow Street Runners, etc. Jurisdiction was often overlooked. Crime scene investigation was nearly nonexistent. In the case of the Ratcliffe murders, hundreds of spectators tramped through the households to view the gruesome scene.

In the foreword of “The Maul and the Pear Tree,” James and Critchley say their “principal source [was] the Home Office paper (Domestic Series) now in the Public Record Office. Before the Metropolitan Police were set up, the Middlesex magistrates maintained a regular correspondence with the Home Secretary on criminal matters, and the bundles of papers for December 1811 and the early part of 1812 contain a wealth of material on the Ratcliffe Highway murders that has never before been assembled or, with the exception of a few documents referred to by Radzinowicz (Note: Sir Leon Radzinowicz was an academic criminologist and founder of the Institute of Criminology), published.” The fact that the Home Office became involved with the crimes speaks to the devastation Londoners felt. Not since the Gordon Riots was there such an outcry.

Ironically, there is no record of the resting place of the victims. The grave sites of the victims of the Ratcliffe murders were replaced with new buildings or the gravestones were removed. The bones of the accused (who committed suicide) were uncovered as part of an excavation for public utilities. Amateur criminologists claimed various bones from the site. “A scrapbook now in the rectory of St. George’s-in-the-East contains an undated entry about John Williams [the accused]. It ends: ‘His skull is at present in the possession of the owner of the Public House at the corner of Cable Street and Cannon Street Road.’” (James and Critchley, page 264)
______________________________________________

The Prosecution of Mr. Darcy’s Cousin: A Pride and Prejudice Mystery

Fitzwilliam Darcy is enjoying his marital bliss. His wife, the former Elizabeth Bennet, presented him two sons and a world of contentment. All is well until “aggravation” rears its head when Darcy receives a note of urgency from his sister Georgiana. In truth, Darcy never fully approved of Georgiana’s joining with their cousin, Major General Edward Fitzwilliam, for Darcy assumed the major general held Georgiana at arm’s length, dooming Darcy’s sister to a life of unhappiness.
Dutifully, Darcy and Elizabeth rush to Georgiana’s side when the major general leaves his wife and daughter behind, with no word of his whereabouts and no hopes of Edward’s return. Forced to seek his cousin in the slews of London’s underbelly, at length, Darcy discovers the major general and returns Fitzwilliam to his family.
Even so, the Darcys’ troubles are far from over. During the major general’s absence from home, witnesses note Fitzwilliam’s presence in the area of two horrific murders. When Edward Fitzwilliam is arrested for the crimes, Darcy must discover the real culprit before the authorities hanged his cousin and the Fitzwilliam name knew a lifetime of shame.

Kindle 
Amazon
Barnes and Noble 
Nook

____________________
Excerpt from The Prosecution of Mr. Darcy’s Cousin (Scene: Darcy rescued this cousin from a public house and brought Fitzwilliam to Darcy House. Fitzwilliam’s father, the Earl of Matlock, tracks his son to Darcy’s door.)

For the next hour, Edward offered an explanation to each of the earl’s accusations while Darcy attempted to soften the angry words spoken by both. It always was so. Matlock never recognized Edward’s strengths, only his second son’s faults.

Darcy did not approve of Edward’s self-absorption: In fact, he found the squalor into which the major general sank deplorable; however, he knew his cousin did not abandon his honor. Edward would suffer for his moments of self-pity. Darcy intervened to allay the earl’s most recent attack.

“At a minimum—all of which the major general may be accused is drinking too heavily and exercising poor judgment.”

The irony of those words would long haunt Darcy’s logical mind for as if he announced the next act of a Shakespearian tragedy, a second knock upon his door changed the room’s tenor.

He looked up to find Thomas Cowan framed by the open door, a painful expression upon the man’s features. Behind him, two cleanly dressed men created a formidable wall.

“Cowan?” Darcy remarked in curiosity. “What brings you and your acquaintances to Darcy House? I thought upon this day you were to search for a certain lady’s lover. I did not realize you meant another social call upon my household.”

Recognizing Cowan’s wariness, Darcy waved away his servants.

“It was my purpose, but Mr. Richards and Mr. Parker,” Cowan gestured to the men behind him, “called upon me this morning. It seems word of our visit to Wapping reached the ears of those of Bow Street via the Thames Police.”

A sharp unease settled in the pit of Darcy’s stomach; he realized Cowan symbolically placed himself between the Runners and the major general.

“Why would the Thames Police have a care for my cousin’s presence in Wapping?”

Darcy’s first thought was of a report of Edward’s altercation upon the docks, but Cowan’s expression cautioned of more shocking news.

Extending his arm in Darcy’s direction, Cowan handed over a folded newsprint.

“What is amiss, Darcy?” the earl demanded.

Darcy unfolded the paper and scanned the page for something of significance, which would affect his cousin, but nothing unusual jumped from the page to draw his attention.

“I fear I do not understand, Cowan.”

His friend pointed to the lead line: “Murder Most Foul.”

“Murder? A murder in Wapping?” Darcy whispered into the silent room.

His nerves remained tense.

“Murder?” the earl expelled in exasperation. “What murder? This is ridiculous. What could a murder in Wapping have to do with an earl’s son?”

The earl was on his feet and storming toward Cowan when Darcy stepped between the irascible Matlock and the former Runner.

“We should listen to what Mr. Cowan has to say, Sir,” Darcy cautioned.

Falling into the familiarity of their military roles, Edward asked, “What is the issue, Sergeant?”

Cowan smiled with the major general’s slip.

“During the past sennight, Sir, two gruesome murders occurred. All of London is astir with fear. Saunders Welch sent Mr. Richards and Mr. Parker to escort you to No. 4 Bow Street.”

Matlock blustered, the earl’s face turning red with anger.

“You think my son holds knowledge of this murder simply because he had too much to drink one night. With that type of logic, half of London should be under suspicion!”

“The innkeeper at the Sephora testified that Fitzwilliam stayed with him for more than a week, and the innkeeper has yet to observe the major general sober,” Cowan explained.

“The innkeeper also provided a statement that the major general returned to the Sephora covered in blood on the night of the first murder.”

Darcy attempted to reason with the Runners sent by Mr. Welch.

“We spoke to a dock overseer of an altercation involving my cousin and several crew serving on the ship Towson. The sailors meant to impress the major general into service. You were with me, Cowan, when the harbormaster, Mr. Belker, described the incident.”

“I gave Mr. Welch my statement, Darcy,” Cowan assured, “but as the Towson set sail, it will be difficult to question the ship’s captain or his men.”

“Even those in the infirmary?” Darcy asked.

“Even those in the infirmary,” Cowan confirmed. “They sailed with another ship to rejoin the Towson in Dover.”

“What proof then?” Matlock demanded. “If you, Darcy, and this Belker fellow describe a fight, what proof would draw a shadow across my son’s name?”

“Could you produce your sword, Sir? The one from your uniform,” Richards asked.

While the others argued, Darcy scanned the news story for details that might be connected to the major general.

“It says here a man, his wife and child were killed by a military-style sword. Their throats slit, even the child’s.”

Edward glanced to Cowan and Darcy.

“I have no idea of the sword’s whereabouts. It was not among my things when I awoke this morning. I assumed either Darcy or Cowan retrieved it when they carried me from the inn.”

“We gathered your purse, the watch Uncle presented you upon your enlistment, your gloves, and the Queen Anne pistol you carried,” Darcy admitted, but I took no notice of your sword Did you, Cowan?”

“No, Sir, but we hurried our perusal of the room because the carriage would not wait more than a quarter hour. We could have overlooked it.”

“This is preposterous!” Matlock exclaimed, appearing black with rage. “My son spent more than a decade in the King’s service in both America and upon the Continent. For God’s sake, he was with Wellington at Waterloo! Fitzwilliam received his latest commission at the hand of the Prince Regent!”

“You possess little choice, Sir,” Cowan cautioned. “Mr. Welch means to question any suspect. Concerned with the outcry, the Home Office offered a reward in the case. It would be best to make your statement.”

“Did the major general wear a uniform when you rescued him?” Mr. Parker asked.
Cowan answered before Darcy had time to form a response.

“Why would the major general’s clothing be of interest?”

Darcy recognized what Cowan wished him to know: Edward’s uniform could be used as evidence against the major general.

“I ordered it burned,” Darcy swore, although he knew his household staff washed his cousin’s filthy clothing. “Fleas and lice polluted the garment. I would not risk the life of my servants or of my infant children with the prospect of typhus or worst. We destroyed my cousin’s items as quickly as we could remove them from his back.”

“Was there evidence of blood upon the items?” Parker asked.

Darcy did not wish to lie, but he knew that even in a drunken state Edward could not commit willful murder. The deaths of war haunted his cousin, but Fitzwilliam would not lash out at an innocent family as part of his anguish.

“I cannot say for certain. My cousin’s clothes were caked with mud and dried dirt and human feces. I did not recognize blood as part of the stains.”

“We should depart,” Cowan suggested in a tone of false calmness. Edward shot a look of panic to Darcy.


“Surely there is another means for the major general to respond without creating a public spectacle,” Darcy concluded.

“I will escort my son to Bow Street,” Matlock declared with authority. “Fitzwilliam and I will follow you in my coach.”

Richards and Parker looked to Cowan for assistance.

“If you hold no objections, Sir, Richards and Parker will follow you. They have very strict orders,” Cowan explained.

“I mean to go with you also,” Darcy assured Edward. “We will clarify any misconceptions, and then you will return to Darcy House to reunite with Mrs. Fitzwilliam and the countess later today.”

“My God!” Edward exclaimed as his anguish returned. “What will Georgiana and mother think of this shame?”

GIVEAWAY: LEAVE A COMMENT BELOW TO BE ENTERED IN A GIVEAWAY OF 2 eBOOK COPIES OF “THE PROSECUTION OF MR. DARCY’S COUSIN.” THE GIVEAWAY ENDS ON FRIDAY MIDNIGHT EDST ON JULY 10, 2015.
_______________________________________
Regina Jeffers is an award-winning author of Austenesque, Regency, and contemporary novels. She is a retired English teacher and an often sought after consultant for media literacy and language arts.

Posted in British history, Great Britain, Jane Austen, Living in the Regency, real life tales, Regency era | Tagged , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

More Winners of “The Prosecution of Mr. Darcy’s Cousin”

winners_areCongratulations to Suzan and to Euridice, the latest winners of an eBook copy of The Prosecution of Mr. Darcy’s Cousin: A Pride and Prejudice Mystery

Posted in Austen Authors, British history, giveaway, Great Britain, Jane Austen, Living in the Regency, Regency era | Tagged , , , | 1 Comment

Another Set of Winners of “The Prosecution of Mr. Darcy’s Cousin”

winner-is-badgeCongratulations go out to drcopeland7294 and ladysusanpdx. These ladies will receive an eBook copy of The Prosecution of Mr. Darcy’s Cousin: A Pride and Prejudice Mystery

There are still eBooks copies available this week at 

2 copies at More Agreeably Engaged (ends Thursday, July 2)

2 copies at My Jane Austen Book Club  (ends Wednesday, July 1)

2 copies at For Love of Austen    (ends, Friday, July 3)

Beginning Wednesday, July 1 at Diary of an Eccentric.

 

Posted in British history, Great Britain, Jane Austen, Living in the Regency, Regency era | Tagged , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Procedure for a Trial in the House of Lords

Procedure for a Trial in the House of Lords

When I first began to write The Prosecution of Mr. Darcy’s Cousin, I set myself the task of learning more of the legal procedures practiced during the Regency Period. The trial in the book is for Major General Fitzwilliam (Colonel Fitzwilliam in the original Pride and Prejudice). We know from Austen’s book that Fitzwilliam is the second son of an earl. Because Major General Fitzwilliam does not sit in the House of Lords, his trial would take place in the court system of the time. But what if it were his father, the earl, who was accused of the crime? What might occur during such a trial?

Beyond its legislative function, the House of Lords may act as judge against one of its own. It served as a court of first instance in trials involving peers, for impeachment cases, and as a court of last result in the case of appeals. [Note: Trials for peers were abolished in 1948 and impeachment cases in 1806.]

A case coming before the House of Lords during the Regency and early Victorian era would practice its form of pomp, as such…

A Grand Jury would indict the peer, with the case appearing before the Court of King’s Bench. The Court judges could not accept a plea except that the crime in question was previously pardoned. If pardon was not pled, then the House of Lords issued a writ of certiorari, which commanded the King’s Bench Court to send the case up to the House of Lords The Lord High Steward presided, but all the members of the House of Lords could argue procedural disputes and vote upon his honour.

**The Lord Chancellor would enter the House in his robes. He would be preceded by the Sergeant, who carried the official mace. A statue passed during the reign of Henry VIII confirmed that the Lord Chancellor could preside over the House of Lords even if not a Lord himself. The Lord Chancellor also served as one of the King’s ministers; he attended the Royal Court. If he were a bishop, the Lord Chancellor received a writ of summons; if an ecclesiastic of a lower degree or a layman, he attended without summons.
John Scott, 1st Earl of Eldon served in the role of Lord Chancellor from 1801-1806; Thomas Erskine, 1st Baron Erskine from 1806-1807; Eldon again served from 1907-1827; John Copley, 1st Barron Lyndhurst finished out the reign of George IV from 1827-1830.
**Black Rod would carry the Lord High Steward’s staff and Garter with his sceptre. The Gentleman Usher of the Black Rod was at the time a retired senior officer of the Royal Navy or the British Army. He is an officer of the English Order of the Garter. His deputy is the Yeoman Usher of the Black Rod.
From 1765 – 1812: Sir Francis Molyneux, 7th Baronet served as Black Rod; From 1812 until 25 July 1832 Sir Thomas Tyrwhitt held the post.
**The Lord Chancellor would assume his seat on the Woolsack as Lord Speaker. In the 1300s, Edward III commanded his Lord Chancellor to sit upon a wool bale to symbolize the importance of wool to the economy of England during the Middle Ages. The Woolsack is a large wool-stuffed seat covered with a red cloth. It has no back or arms. The Lords’ Mace is placed on the rear of the Woolsack.
The House of Lords has two maces dating from the time of King Charles II and from William III. The maces are carried in and out of the two Chambers of Parliament at the beginning and the end of each day.
**Prayers would follow.
**Then the Clerk Assistant would go through a roll call of the peers, beginning with the junior Baron.
**The Clerk of the Crown in Chancery [who prepares royal warrants, letters patent, etc., under the direction of the Lord Chancellor] and the Deputy Clerk of the Crown [who has the custody of the Great Seal of the Realm] make three reverences.
**The Clerk of the Crown kneels and presents the commission to the Lord Speaker.
**The Lord Speaker gives the commission to the Deputy Clerk of the Crown, who is also upon bended knee.
**The two clerks retire with like reverences to the table.
**A call for silence follows.
**The Lord Speaker asks that the King’s commission be read. All persons in attendance must rise and be uncovered as the commission is read by the Deputy Clerk of the Crown.
**The Gentleman Usher of the Black Rod and the Garter Principal King of Arms make their reverences, cross to the woolsack, and sit upon the right hand of the Lord High Steward. Both hold the white staff and present it to the Lord Speaker while on their knees.
**The Lord Speaker would rise, make his reverences to the throne, and assume his seat on the upper step near the throne.
**He would deliver his staff to the Gentleman Usher of the Black Rod.
**The Sergeant-at-Arms would call for silence again.
**The Deputy Clerk of the Crown in the King’s Bench would read the writ of certiorari to remove the indictment and the record of the indictment.
**The Sergeant-at-Arms would make a proclamation for the Yeoman Usher to escort the defendant to the bar.
**The defendant would make three reverences upon approaching the bar and kneel until directed by the Lord High Steward to stand.
**The defendant would then make three reverences: to the Lord High Steward, the peers on the right and those on the left. They would return the reverence.
**The defendant was then directed to a stool upon which he sat. The stool was within the bar and near the defendant’s counsel.
**The Lord High Steward would read the charges against the man.
**The Deputy Clerk of the Crown asked the defendant how he pleaded: guilty or not guilty?
**The Deputy Clerk of the Crown asked the defendant “How will your lordship be tried?” to which the defendant would respond “By my peers.”
**The counsel for the prosecution and the counsel for the defense were announced.
**A proclamation was made for all persons who are to give evidence to appear.
**The court would permit His Grace the Lord High Steward to remove to the table. He was preceded by Garter and Black Rod.
**Black Rod sat on a stool at the corner of the table on the Lord High Steward’s right. Black Rod held the white staff.
**Garter sat on a stool on Black Rod’s right.
**The Sergeant sat at the lower end of the table on the same side.
**The counsel for the prosecution laid out the charges against the defendant.
**Then the trial would proceed, but not necessarily as we think of modern trials with first the prosecution and then the defense speaking. The prosecution would examine the evidence, but generally the defendant was responsible for his countering of the evidence, with points of law addressed as necessary.
**At the end, the counsel were directed to withdraw.
**Witnesses and observers of the proceedings would be directed to withdraw.
**The defendant retired to the custody of the Yeoman Usher.
**The Lord High Steward would return to his chair, if necessary.
**A protestation occurred by the Archbishop of Canterbury for himself and the other bishops in attendance, leaving before the judgment was announced.
**The Lord High Steward explains the methods of proof.
**The HOL is instructed to give their opinion of the guilt for the indictment.
**Observers were permitted into the chambers to view the final outcome.
**A proclamation for silence was again invoked.
**The Lord High Steward would stand and by list call every peer [beginning with the junior baron] to pronounce guilt or innocence.
**The peer would stand [uncovered], place his right hand upon his heart, and give his vote.
**The last to vote was the Lord High Steward.
**The prisoner would be returned to the bar by the Yeoman Usher.
**Sentence was pronounced.
**The defendant then retires.
**A proclamation was made to dissolve the commission.
**The Gentleman Usher of the Black Rod delivers the white staff to the Lord High Steward.
**The Lord High Steward stands uncovered. He holds the staff in both hands, breaks it in two pieces, and declares the commission dissolved.

Much of the procedural information of this post comes from “The Trial of James Thomas Earl of Cardigan Before the Right Honourable The House of Peers, In Full Parliament, For Felony, On Tuesday the 16th of February 1841” from ULAN Press.

____________________________

PoMDC Cover-2-2The Prosecution of Mr. Darcy’s Cousin: A Pride and Prejudice Mystery

Fitzwilliam Darcy is enjoying his marital bliss. His wife, the former Elizabeth Bennet, presented him two sons and a world of contentment. All is well until “aggravation” rears its head when Darcy receives a note of urgency from his sister Georgiana. In truth, Darcy never fully approved of Georgiana’s joining with their cousin, Major General Edward Fitzwilliam, for Darcy assumed the major general held Georgiana at arm’s length, dooming Darcy’s sister to a life of unhappiness.

Dutifully, Darcy and Elizabeth rush to Georgiana’s side when the major general leaves his wife and daughter behind, with no word of his whereabouts and no hopes of Edward’s return. Forced to seek his cousin in the slews of London’s underbelly, at length, Darcy discovers the major general and returns Fitzwilliam to his family.

Even so, the Darcys’ troubles are far from over. During the major general’s absence from home, witnesses note Fitzwilliam’s presence in the area of two horrific murders. When Edward Fitzwilliam is arrested for the crimes, Darcy must discover the real culprit before the authorities hanged his cousin and the Fitzwilliam name knew a lifetime of shame.

Kindle 
Amazon 
Barnes and Noble 
Nook 

Regina Jeffers’ Website 

Leave a comment to be part of a giveaway of an eBook copy of “The Prosecution of Mr. Darcy’s Cousin.” 

Posted in British history, Great Britain, Jane Austen, Living in the Regency, real life tales, Regency era | Tagged , , , , , , | 8 Comments

Winners of an Autographed Copy of “The Prosecution of Mr. Darcy’s Cousin: A Pride and Prejudice Mystery”

winner-is-badgeCongratulations to TaNeshia Jones and Fran Rossbach, who will receive an autographed copy of my latest released, The Prosecution of Mr. Darcy’s Cousin: A Pride and Prejudice Mystery. More winners to come over the next couple of weeks. 

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

The Setting for “The Prosecution of Mr. Darcy’s Cousin” + an Excerpt + Giveaway

Wapping - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia en.wikipedia.org Though Execution Dock is long gone, this gibbet is still maintained on the Thames foreshore by the Prospect of Whitby public house.

Wapping – Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
en.wikipedia.org
Though Execution Dock is long gone, this gibbet is still maintained on the Thames foreshore by the Prospect of Whitby public house.

Much of the action of my newest Austen-inspired novel, The Prosecution of Mr. Darcy’s Cousin, is set in Wapping. But what do we know of the area?

Wapping is a district in East London, in the Borough of Tower Hamlets. The north bank of the River Thames and the Highway (formerly called the Ratcliffe Highway) border the area. The Nazi bombings of England during World War II destroyed many of the original buildings.

The Saxons were the area’s first settlers. The settlement came together between the River Thames and Wapping Marsh. The people held a strong maritime history. Boat makers, sailors, and seafarer trades were those who thrived in the area. Construction and repair of ships became the source of employment.

Hangings of pirates and thieves were common in the area. Only after the gallows were moved farther down river did the area develop for many thought the ghosts of those killed upon the gallows haunted the land. Tower Hamlets lies east of the ancient walled City of London. During the 19th Century the population grew, made up of the poor and of immigrants. Villages clustered about London proper and along the main roads. Other areas of note are Shadwell, Poplar, Limehouse, and Ratcliffe. They all receive mention in the book.

The streets often twisted in upon themselves. Pelican Stairs, King James’s Stairs, Wapping Stairs, and New Stairs led down to the shoreline. The Thames served as the south border. The river brought the world to London’s doors: tea, muslin, spices, sugar, rum, coffee, cocoa, tobacco, etc. Sailors of all nationalities filled the streets of Wapping and the adjoining areas. More than 13,000 vessels claimed the docks of London. Before 1805, there were no such moorings, and the ships were subject to thieves. The losses during those early years were estimated as 500,000 pounds a year.

The smell was notable: the filth of so many living in close quarters and the filth of the Thames made the area not for the faint of heart. Inhabitants included rope makers, candle makers, marine storekeepers, rat catchers, seamstresses, brothel keepers, stevedores, sailors, bakers, butchers, keepers of public houses, lodging owners, boat builders, instrument makers, pawnbrokers, pirates, and publicans. Sailors lodged in cheap houses near the river, often 4-5 to a room. They all came to the greatest city on earth at that time seeking their fortunes.

___________________________________
PoMDC Cover-2-2The Prosecution of Mr. Darcy’s Cousin: A Pride and Prejudice Mystery
Fitzwilliam Darcy is enjoying his marital bliss. His wife, the former Elizabeth Bennet, presented him two sons and a world of contentment. All is well until “aggravation” rears its head when Darcy receives a note of urgency from his sister Georgiana. In truth, Darcy never fully approved of Georgiana’s joining with their cousin, Major General Edward Fitzwilliam, for Darcy assumed the major general held Georgiana at arm’s length, dooming Darcy’s sister to a life of unhappiness.

Dutifully, Darcy and Elizabeth rush to Georgiana’s side when the major general leaves his wife and daughter behind, with no word of his whereabouts and no hopes of Edward’s return. Forced to seek his cousin in the slews of London’s underbelly, at length, Darcy discovers the major general and returns Fitzwilliam to his family.

Even so, the Darcys’ troubles are far from over. During the major general’s absence from home, witnesses note Fitzwilliam’s presence in the area of two horrific murders. When Edward Fitzwilliam is arrested for the crimes, Darcy must discover the real culprit before the authorities hanged his cousin and the Fitzwilliam name knew a lifetime of shame.

LEAVE A COMMENT BELOW TO BE PART OF A GIVEAWAY OF 2 eBOOK COPIES OF “THE PROSECUTION OF MR. DARCY’S COUSIN.” The giveaway ends at midnight EDST on 28 June 2015. 

——————————————————–

Excerpt from The Prosecution of Mr. Darcy’s Cousin: A Pride and Prejudice Mystery

Darcy stared hard at the building where the women resided. In hindsight, he wondered if he should have accompanied Cowan. At the time, Darcy thought his friend meant for Darcy to prevent an escape from the shop’s front, but on second thought, that idea made little sense.

He doubted anyone with murder, as his intent, would risk meeting a locked shop door in his retreat. More likely, Cowan considered Darcy’s divided allegiance a detriment. He could not blame his friend: All Darcy wanted was to hold Elizabeth in his embrace and never permit her from his sight again.

The “theatre” surrounding his extended family exhausted Darcy. As unreasonable as it was to think, he wished all involved to Hades, as he cursed the sense of duty instilled in him from the time he was a wee lad.

“I should be seeking my wife and sister rather than staring into the dark pit of London,” he murmured in quelling accents.

He scowled with sudden keen-eyed interest when a noise from further up the street caught his attention. Shaken, Darcy slunk into the shadows, keeping his presence hidden. His heart lurched with anticipation–the noise was that of footsteps. Decisive, but muffled footsteps.

A night watchman, Darcy’s mind announced, but there was something different about the man who strode along the wooden walkway. Moving fluidly. Younger. And almost wary. Most who assumed the civic position were in their later years, Darcy thought.

As the man drew nearer, Darcy pressed his back to the building’s side. His heart stuttered to a halt when the cloaked figure paused before the small shop to survey the area. Where life teemed on the street upon which he and Cowan left their horses behind, Darcy realized how quiet this one appeared. Other than the man across from him, no one could be noted.

Without conscious thought, Darcy filled his lungs with the stagnant air as he studied the figure.

There was something very familiar about the man’s stance: commanding, in control, broad shoulders and a recognizable physical stature. The stranger turned his head to scan the area a second time, as a hundred questions filled Darcy’s mind: Was this their murderer? The East Side Slayer?

Had this enigma used the guise of a night watchman to gain entry into the other homes? Darcy wished he possessed a closer look at the stranger’s countenance—to look upon evil, but the cloak served its purpose in disguising the man’s features.

Why a cloak? True, it was a cool night as it was the first of November, but not so cold that a long cloak would be required.

The spider’s web of deceit associated with Fitzwilliam’s arrest began to make the necessary connections. Threats they overlooked. The violence of the attacks. Darcy’s mind spun with the possibilities. Nothing made sense; yet, his logical nature shunned the impracticality of not discovering a solution.

Fitzwilliam’s enemies followed his cousin to England’s shores, and until this very moment, Darcy held no indication of who they might be. Yet, one thing was for certain, the major general’s enemies did not deal in small deaths.

As if floating above the ground, the stranger swept his cloak about him and turned into the alleyway into which Cowan disappeared earlier. Even so, Darcy’s feet would not respond to his mind’s call for action, and so, Darcy asked his heart, “Should I follow? Is Cowan waiting in the narrow passage?”

However, Darcy heard no sounds of a struggle bursting forth from the noiseless street. Had the stranger subdued his friend? Should Darcy send up a warning? Could Cowan be lying in the alley’s dregs, the former Runner’s throat sliced from ear to ear? Or did the night watchman note Darcy’s presence and now waited for Darcy to follow in order to quash his curiosity?

Darcy’s fingertips dug into the building’s soft wood, as he attempted to quiet the rising panic claiming his breathing. No one tutored him in such wickedness: He remained a novice in the stratagems Thomas Cowan embraced.

Fear rolled through Darcy’s limbs, which hardened, inch-by-inch, securing his body to the wall. He could not move—could not make a sound. Could not swallow.
Even so, his eyes never left the place where the cloaked stranger entered the alley. He searched for any sign of activity.

“Move!” his mind ordered, but Darcy’s body would not respond. Dread held him impaled by its grasp. Yet, the sound of broken glass and a shriek of surprise freed his feet and set them into motion.

Posted in British history, Great Britain, Jane Austen, Living in the Regency, Regency era | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | 21 Comments

The Development of the English Language During the Anglo-Norman Period (1066-1350)

 Essential Norman Conquest - An interactive day-by-day retelling of ... www.essentialnormanconquest.com


Essential Norman Conquest – An interactive day-by-day retelling of …
http://www.essentialnormanconquest.com

French influence upon England came about with the Norman conquest in 1066. In the beginning, the Norman conquerors spoke nothing but French, actually holding the Anglo-Saxon language in contempt. What we now refer to as Norman French was used for the governing of England: spoken at court and in all public documents. Earl William of Normandy refused to impose his language, and so for a century, the Norman conquerors and the Anglo-Saxons populace avoided interactions.

Because of this divide, the old English language became a “cottage” language, practiced by artisans and peasants. The language lost some of its distinctive forms and minor inflections. Latin and Norman French dominated court interactions, but as the Normans were few and the English many, some mingling occurred by necessity of everyday life. The English people and the language prevailed. 

After the Norman Conquest, four languages were found in England: (1) the Northern section of England used Northumbrian; (2) the Midlands used Mercian; (3) the Southern section used West Saxon; and (4) the English Court used Norman French. 

The Norman Conquest www.bl.uk In 1066, the Normans invaded England. It was an event that was to transform the English language forever.

The Norman Conquest
http://www.bl.uk
In 1066, the Normans invaded England. It was an event that was to transform the English language forever.

The West Saxon tongue was replaced by Norman French in literary circles, and the question arose as to which language would become the literary standard. Needless to say, the English were not about to accept Norman French, so Mercian became the standard for several reasons.

(1) The Midland contained London, the capital city, the University of Oxford, and the royal court.

(2) The Midland area was accessible by those from both the northern and southern sections of the country. An understandable language used by both was a benefit to trade, etc.

(3) The Mercian language ushered in romantic tales of love and adventure to replace the somberness found in Anglo Saxon poetry. 

(4) The Teutonic inflections of Anglo Saxon speech disappeared from usage. 

(5) The Mercian language saw the introduction of Metrical Romances (tales in verse).  This tales included…

*** Tales centering on Charlemagne and his peers, chief of which is the Chanson de Roland 

*** Tales centering on Alexander and the Fall of Troy

Jonathan Jones : Europe u-knighted: King Arthur proves how European the British are www.pro-europa.eu Arthur of the Britons, defender of Albion against the invading hordes

Jonathan Jones : Europe u-knighted: King Arthur proves how European the British are
http://www.pro-europa.eu
Arthur of the Britons, defender of Albion against the invading hordes

*** Tales of heroes such as King Arthur and the Knights of the Round Table

Posted in Anglo-Normans, Anglo-Saxons, British history, Great Britain | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment