Life Below Stairs: English Servants Emigrating to Australia, Part II

Previously, we looked at how some servants chose to emigrate to Australia rather than to remain in England. You may find that discussion HERE: 

Life Below Stairs: English Servants Emigrating to Australia, Part I

Family-group-SLV-H2005.34103.jpg  An article entitled “Mistress and Maid” from The Victorian Magazine (Vol. XXVI, 1876, London, page 509) tells us “Australia offers to the young woman of the working class, high wages, a splendid climate, and greater liberty than she could enjoy at home, either in service or in a workshop, and these high wages can be earned without further qualification than strong health, strong arms, a willing mind and a good character.” The girls who emigrated found a much freer society than they had left behind in England. In Australia, they found a “fairer” situation, one removed from the petty aspirations and gross exploitations they met in set structure of household servants in England. They also found higher wages and better working conditions, as well as the possibility of an advantageous marriage. 

Although they were expected to clean their own rooms and wash their own clothes, servants in Australia in the 1870s made between £20 and £26 per year. Women cooks earned as high as £40. Governesses, especially in the rural areas of Australia, were considered a prize servant. They could earn between £80 and £100. 

girls-of-australia-learning-the-domestic-arts-1924

Jane Resture’s Oceania Page Girls of Australia learning the domestic arts. http://www.janesoceania.com/australia_history/index3.htm

One of the biggest differences was the ability of the servants to find a suitable marriage. The women received multiple marriage proposals, not always from gentlemen (for those high and in demand household servants), but at least from hard-working men who were looking for a woman to help build their land. These women could look forward to a handsome and comfortable house. The only “danger” was accepting a bushman who had yet to earn the fortune they claimed to possess. Multiple offers of marriage were not uncommon. Emigration could change a maid into a mistress. 

Posted in British history, servant life, Victorian era | Tagged , , , | 1 Comment

Life Below Stairs: English Servants Emigrating to Australia, Part I

Liverpoo.gif In the mid to late 1840s, many girls in service decided to make the arduous journey from England to Australian ports. One must remember that the journey took three to four months to complete, depending upon the weather and the winds. Clipper ships were still being used for such journeys for they were more economical than steam-driven ships. The clippers would export their “live lumber” and bring back a much needed import to English shores. Many died during the journey. Illness and harsh treatment was commonplace. It was not unusual to have 50 to 100 to die during the journey. Many of those deaths were babies of women who hoped for a better way for them and theirs. 

Some of the agents hired to gather candidates for the servant class presented the girls free passage. They also were not opposed to giving free passage to prostitutes. The girls were not promised protection on the journey, and many found themselves debauched by the men aboard ship. 

janilye-4794-full.gif In 1846, South Australia appointed matrons to oversee the girls in hopes of securing more appropriate candidates. This became a common practice. As many as fifty to sixty employers met with each of the “acceptable” girls. It cost about £20 per girl (train fare to Portsmouth, bedding, and fare) to bring a woman from England to Australia. Queensland and South Australia groups often absorbed the cost of the girls’ voyages to bring reliable help to their homes. These schemes were abandoned when governmental economic issues interfered with the practice. Even so, thousands of servant girls arrived in Australia thanks to these programs. 

“In the decade from 1878 to 1888, over 21,000 female servants went out to Queensland alone, a total surpassed only by the number of farm workers who emigrated to the same colony. Nevertheless, the demand remained so high, that is could never be wholly satisfied. Some girls elected to stop off even before they reached Australia, as there was always an eager queue of would-be employers waiting at Colombo, Batavia, and Thursday Island and, after the Suez Canal had been opened in 1869, at Malta, Port Said, and Aden, too. One young woman servant, who disembarked at Thursday Island, off the northern tip of Queensland, eventually amassed a fortune of £15,000 by becoming the owner of five pearl-fishing boats and of the island’s best hotel. For those who completed the voyage, adequate provision had been made for them to obtain suitable situations. In the early days, some girls had drifted into prostitution through the great temptations which prevailed in the pioneer towns with their great excess of single men. In 1841, Mrs. Caroline Chisholm, the wife of an Indian Army officer, established a home and registry office in Sydney and, later, at her own expense, took her first party of girls, who had been frightened by ‘foolish stories about blacks and robbers in the bush,’ up river on a steamer to a district called Hunters River, where all sixty girls soon found situations at double the wages they could have obtained in Sydney. She went on to establish four more homes and sent many servants out to famers in the bush. By the 1850s, New South Wales had also set up its own official depot, where servant girls could live in charge of a matron until they were hired. (Both publican and lodging house keepers were prohibited from hiring single girls for obvious reasons.)” (Frank E. Huggett, Life Below Stairs, Book Club Associates London. pages 139 -141) 

Posted in British history, business, commerce, servant life, Victorian era | Tagged , , , , , | 2 Comments

The Battle of the Bees: A Revolutionary War Skirmish Won by American Patriots and a Swarm of Bees

battle_of_the_bees

I live close to the town of Matthews, in the lower right-hand corner. The Battle of the Bees took place just a little north of Charlotte, about 7 miles, out Beattie’s Ford Road.

I live outside of Charlotte, North Carolina, and the Battle of Bees plays an important role in the region’s history. Also known as the Battle of McIntyre’s Farm, the Battle of Bees was a Revolutionary War incident, which occurred on October 3, 1780. When the British commander, Lord Charles Cornwallis, left Charlotte on 12 Oct. 1780, after a 16-day occupation, he was heard to say that the defiant and rebellious town was a ‘damned hornet’s nest.”‘Although the British were figuratively stung by unrelenting hostility and violent ambushes, one foraging party was stung, both, literally and figuratively, by Patriots and by bees in the skirmish at McIntyre’s Farm.

Cornwallis had ordered Major John Doyle to lead a foraging expedition into the countryside surrounding the town of Charlotte (Note: Both the town and the county were named for Charlotte of Mecklenburg-Strelitz, King George III’s royal consort.) Supplies were low, but the British did not take the mission lightly. Their 40 wagons were accompanied by 450 foot soldiers, as well as a cavalry detachment. Doyle’s contingent were trailed by 13 American patriots, under the command of Captain James Thompson. Thompson’s men kept out of sight as the British halted seven miles from town at McIntyre’s farm. There, some of the British remained behind to plunder the farm while Doyle and the rest of the party began to march on.

At the farm, some of the soldiers accidentally knocked over a beehive and were forced to scatter to evade the bees’ combined anger. Taking advantage of the situation, the Patriots attacked, killing a British captain, nine soldiers, and two horses. Because the Patriots fired from cover with great accuracy and constantly shifted their positions, it seemed to the startled Redcoats that they were under attack from a much larger force.

mcintyre_cabin

McIntye’s Cabin. Image from the Charlotte-Mecklenburg Historic Landmarks Commission. Available from http://www.cmhpf.org/Properties%20Foundation%20Reports/McIntyreFarm.html (accessed Sept. 3, 2018)

Thinking themselves under heavy attack and outnumbered, Doyle foolishly ordered his men to retreat. The Americans managed to kill some of the horses pulling the supply wagons, which created a road block, of sorts. A few of the British soldiers cut away the uninjured horses and made their escape. The American soldiers from the neighborhood took a turn at firing on the escaping Redcoats, creating more havoc. The Battle of McIntyre’s Farm was only one of several sharp clashes fought between Cornwallis and local Patriots around Charlotte. [The Battle of McIntyre’s Farm, NC Pedia]

Carolana.comCarolana.com provides a summary of this incident: 

After a week in Charlotte, Lt. General Charles, Lord Cornwallis needed to send out foraging parties to replenish his supplies. A large foraging party of 450 Provincials under the command of Capt. John Doyle moved out of Beattie’s Ford Road with sixty wagons. A local boy notified the McIntyre family that the Loyalists were coming.Then, the boy rode on and informed Capt. James Thompson of the local militia. Capt. Thompson quickly rounded up Capt. James Knox and thirteen farmers to harass Capt. Doyle’s troops, and then hid the riflemen in two locations at the McIntyre farm.

Capt. Thompson watched as Capt. Doyle’s men plundered McIntyre’s barns and raided their livestock pens. The Provincials tied their horses to the farm wagons while they went about their work. When the baggage wagons arrived they loaded bags of corn and oats onto them.

During the pillaging, the Loyalists accidentally knocked over some beehives and found themselves under attack by the swarming bees. One Loyalist officer stood in the doorway and laughed as the men swatted at the bees and ran from the danger.

As they were occupied, Capt. Thompson and his men approached the raiders. He yelled out that he would take out a captain he had spotted and that every man should quickly select their target. Capt. Thompson and a militiaman named Francis Bradley fired at the same time. Thompson’s shot found its mark and the man thought to be a captain fell dead. The enemy mounted their horses and formed a line, but Capt. Thompson and his men were able to reload and fire a second time.

Dogs were set loose on the Patriots and they pursued one group of Capt. Thompson’s men:

“The dogs came on the trail of these retreating men, and the leading one sprung upon the heels of a man who had just discharged his rifle. A pistol shot laid him dead, and the other dogs, coming up to him, paused, gave a howl, and returned.”

Capt. Doyle believed that his men were being attacked by a much larger force and ordered a speeedy retreat back to Charlotte. More of the local farmers showed up and began firing at the British from concealment, in a skirmish that resembled the start of the war at Concord, Massachusetts.

Later, Rev. William Henry Foote wrote:

“The leading horses of the wagons were some of them shot down before they ascended the hill by the branch, and the road was blocked up; and the retreat became a scene of confusion in spite of the discipline of the British soldiers, who drew up in battle array and offered to fight the invisible enemy that only changed their ground and renewed their fire.”

Capt. Doyle’s men rode so hard that “many of their horses fell dead in the streets.”

Eight Loyalists were killed, along with two horses. Twelve others were wounded.

Known Patriot Participants Known British/Loyalist Participants
Capt. James Thompson – Commanding Officer

Mecklenburg County Regiment of Militia detachment of two (2) known captains:
– Capt. James Thompson
– Capt. James Knox, with 13 local farmers:

Frank Bradley
Joh Dickson
Thomas Dickson
George Graham
James Henry
George Houston
Hugh Houston
John Long
Thomas McClure
John Robinson
Robert Robinson
Edward Shipley
George Shipley

Reinforced later by unknown number of more farmers

Capt. John Doyle – Commanding Officer

450 Provincials (likely the Volunteers of Ireland)

60 Cavalry (unit unknown)

40 Wagons

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

Posted in Act of Parliament, American History, British history, Georgian England, Georgian Era, history, research | Tagged , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Life Below Stairs – The ‘Pugs’ Procession of Precedence

maxresdefault A sense of status above stairs was to be expected among the aristocracy, but it was no less observed below stairs. For example, the lower servants often spoke poorly of the “Pug’s” Procession, which happened after the first course of supper below stairs. All the servants would eat the first course together, generally in enforced silence. However, when that first course ended, the upper servants would exit to either the house steward’s quarters or those of the housekeeper where their pudding would be served to them. Even when leaving the table, they rose and filed from the room in order of precedence within the household. During the Victorian era, butlers and upper servants associated with like servants from other fine houses in their “clubs.” Footmen had similar clubs where they met and socialized. At a social gathering, such as a country fête, the servants took on the status of their employer. A maid tending to a mere “Miss” would be lower on the line of precedence than the maid tending a member of the aristocracy. 

A smart servant, however, especially a footman or butler, could manage his day where he could find time for all sorts of leisure hours. A maid may be expected to carry a bucket of coals up and down the steps of the house, while a footman was entrusted with a silver salver containing a single letter. There was no accounting for chivalry. 

eb356c7c0710d4a18f15ee668eef300d1c851c223e5e3a6f1a79f5f786acd50e

As it was true that many had poor accommodations within the household, at least they were not out upon the streets. The servants had a roof over their heads.There were four meals provided each day – breakfast, dinner, tea, and supper. A resourceful servant might also salvage a bit of what was left over from the meals served to the master and his guests. Servants were given home-brewed beer at each meal. (This tradition began in the 1700s when imported tea was too expensive for the master to squander upon his servants.) The male servants received a pint and the females at half pint at each meal. In some households, instead of the beer a “beer allowance” was paid each day. It amounted to about 8d per day. Upper servants sometimes received wine with their meals. 

Servants generally received their wages upon a quarterly basis. According to the archives of the West Sussex Record Office regarding the estate books of the family seat of the Duke of Richmond’s Goodwood House (near Chichester, West Sussex), in 1888, the house steward received £100 per year, the groom of the chamber, £70; the valet, £60; and the butler £45. The footmen were paid between £26 and £34. The two housekeepers each received £60; the cook £60, the ladies’ maids, £26 to £28; the stillroom maid, £22; kitchen maids, £14 to £24; housemaids and laundry maids, £12 to £26; and the scullery maid £12. 

According to Banking in Bath in the Reign of George III, “As the customer base expanded, the subject of deposits by “the poorer sort” of person arose. This resulted in the appearance of a new kind of banking organisation in Bath when, in January 1815, the Provident Institution or Bank for Savings opened its doors in Trim Street. The Institution was supervised by a Committee and Trustees and invested deposits in Government 5% stocks which were held in the names of the individual depositors. Dividends were payable six-monthly. The Institution grew out of the success of a Servants Fund established in 1808. That fund was limited in size to £2000 and was consistently over-subscribed. The Bath Provident Institution had no limit to the size of its deposits and was one of the first such establishments in the country. A similar organisation, the Bristol Savings Bank, was founded in the same year having grown out of the success of the Prudent Man’s Friend Society.” Lady Isabella Douglas reportedly organized the first servants bank in Bath in 1808. “About a quarter to a half of all depositors in the early savings banks were servants: in York, 322 out of the first 670; in Lincoln 49 out of the first hundred; and in Bolton, 44 out of the first two hundred.(Horne, H. Oliver, A History of Savings Banks, Oxford University Press, 1947). A thrifty servant could save enough funds to begin his or her own business rather than to remain in service. 

servants-poster_large_graphic

Posted in British history, estates, Georgian England, Georgian Era, Living in the Regency, Living in the UK, Regency era, servant life, Victorian era | Tagged , , , , , , | 3 Comments

Life Below Stairs ~ Housing the Servants

It was not uncommon for an English aristocrat or a wealthy man of the gentry to own several properties: country estates and a London house in a fashionable area of London. In doing so, the owner employed a variety of servants to meet the needs of his household, as well as any guests he might entertain. Many took their valuables from their London homes when they returned to their country estates. Gold and silver plate. Chairs and other large furniture placed against the wall and draped with dust covers. Carpets rolled up. Drapes in hessian sacking. Sheets or brown paper over the art work/portraits. A majority of servants in tow. Those left behind to live on board wages in lieu of food. 

In the homes, there was a hierarchy of rooms available for the servants. The employer was often forced to supply “better” rooms to meet this hierarchy and an excessive consciousness of rank. The house would, for example, have a butler’s pantry with a specifically constructed repository for the valuable plate and a separate scullery if the plate was frequently in use. The butler would have a separate bedroom. 

The housekeeper would have a parlour of sufficient space to store all her homemade biscuits and preserves, as well as some of the china and glassware stored a china closet. Upper servants might eat in this parlour. Likely, a stillroom would be attached. In Victorian times, this room would have a lead sink, table, confectioner’s oven, etc., to make the cakes and biscuits. A room to store groceries may have been close by. This would need to be cool so food would not spoil. 

erddig

countryhousereader.wordpress. com BBC Programme: Servants – The True Story of Life Below Stairs

A lady’s maid would also require her own separate sitting room. There would be a place for sewing and ironing clothes. Some houses would have a separate room for brushing the dirt from the clothes, a knife room, a shoe room, a lamp room, etc. 

servantssml

community.dur.ac.uk Photographs of servants doing the laundry

In the servants’ hall, one would find an area for the servants to eat. The men’s quarters were separate from the women’s. These might be separate rooms or partitioned dormitories. The maids often slept two to a room in the attic. The butler, house steward, the cook, the lady’s maid(s), and the valet would have their own rooms. If guests were in the house, separate rooms would be required for equivalent servants traveling with his master. 

a_CompVic_ServantsHallTitle

The Servants Hall http://www.thecompletevictorian. com

servants_hall02

Household management and Servants of the Victorian Era http://www.avictorian.com

At the beginning of Queen Victoria’s reign, it was estimated that a gentleman would require £2500 to £3000 to support his staff. According to Frank E. Huggett’s Life Below Stairs (page 20), “…the estimated household expenses of the fourth Earl of Ashburnham were £2742 a year, say thirteen to eighteen times the salary of a country curate or one and twenty times the wages of a farm labourer. Of the total, £769 went on wages and house labour, £200 on servants’ beer and another £138 on liveries and hats, about 40 per cent in all. Despite the agricultural depression which breathed coldly on the fortunes of many landed proprietors in the 1870s and even more icy blast of estate duties some twenty years later, many of them continued to retain their fortunes – and their large staff of servants – to the end of the reign. The Duke of Westminster, who was one of the richest men in England, and the sixth Duke of Portland, each employed about three hundred servants, about the same number as the Queen herself, who had a separate staff of Indian cooks just to prepare a curry lunch each day whether anyone wanted to eat it or not. Some of the incredible waste in the royal kitchens is recalled by Gabriel Tschumi, who became an apprentice at Buckingham Palace in 1898. Dozens of pheasants, salmon, sturgeon, trout, foie gras, soufflés made with four or five dozen eggs all found their way from time to time into the rubbish bins in the cause of gastronomic perfection. A year before he started working there, twenty-four extra cooks had been brought from France to prepare the fourteen-course banquet in celebration of the queen’s diamond jubilee; the main course rosettes de saumon au rubis (cold salmon in claret jelly) had to be made three times before it received the approval of the Royal chef.” 

Posted in British history, buildings and structures, Georgian, Georgian England, Georgian Era, Great Britain, Living in the Regency, Living in the UK, real life tales, Regency era, Victorian era, William IV | Tagged , , , , | 2 Comments

Life Below Stairs: Rising with the Sun in Victorian England, Part II

Recently, we had a look at breakfast chores for servants in a Victorian household. See it HERE. Today, we carry on with other duties. 

About a half hour after the household staff consumed their meager meal, the family was summoned to morning prayers. The children and servants would join the head of the household. There a short Bible reading and perhaps an acknowledgement of a woman’s equality in the God’s sight. The latter years of the Victorian reign did away with this custom. 

images.jpgThe parlourmaid had previously set the table: linen cloth, polished cutlery, a mitre-shaped napkin, cups, saucers. Upon the table when the family sat to breakfast was jars of jam, whole honeycombs, bread, toast, rolls, butter, cream, sugar, etc. Victorians loved their food and consumed it readily. On the sideboard, one might find bacon, eggs, cutlets, chicken, fish, omelettes, kidneys, ham, tongue, game pies, potted meat, etc. According to Henry James’s travel book, English Hours, describes how the late century Victorians abandoned having servants waiting upon them at breakfast and served themselves. 

While the family fueled themselves for the day, the maids made the beds, cleaned the wash basins, emptied chamberpots, and tidied the bed chambers. The room was aired.One must recall that the Victorian era bed customarily held three mattresses. The straw-filled bottom mattress was turned once per week. The middle mattress was turned daily. It was filled with wool or horsehair. The feather-filled top mattress was not only turned daily,  but it was also beaten to eliminate lumps and then fluffed for comfort. 

When that was completed, carpets were swept, furniture and fixtures dusted, and mirrors polished. Carpets were regularly rolled up and beaten to remove dust. Soft wood (deal) floors were cleaned with a combination of soap, water, and potassium carbonate before being recovered with the carpet. Oak floors were polished with beeswax. 

Work was interrupted at eleven o’clock for a short tea break. This constant cleaning was to be finished by midday. The servants ate their “dinner” at one o’clock. The family had their midday meal between noon and one. This servant meal was more substantial than the morning one: meat, vegetables, rice or suet pudding (or an apple tart). The nursery staff could similar meal as those in the kitchen, but often they were presented with something less expensive, such as shepherd’s pie or plain broth. 

In aristocratic circles, the midday meal was served by liveried footmen. This meal was about being “seen” and being “relevant.” Expensive items were served to guests. The middle classes followed aristocratic ways, but with a more practical expenditures for the meal items. The table was set properly. The household donned a gown acceptable for company. Items such as jellies, creams, and pastries were placed upon the table so guests might serve themselves. Unlike the supper hour when gentlemen escorted the ladies to the table, at “lunch,” the women entered first, walking together two-by-two, and followed by the gentlemen. The guests would remove coats, gloves, etc., in the dining room, not before then. 

The parlourmaid served the luncheon. Salmon, beef, chicken, and lamb, followed by a pudding or a tart, and fresh fruit was be the usual faire. The Victorians did not tarry over their meals. Queen Victoria was said to finish a seven-course meal in 30 minutes. Returning to the drawing room after the meal, the guests donned their outwear and were gone from the house within another 20 minutes. By 2:30 in the afternoon, social calls began. 

961612_orig.jpeg

Posted in British history, Great Britain, servant life, Seven Years' War, Uncategorized, Victorian era | Tagged , , , , | 2 Comments

Life Below Stairs: Rising with the Sun in Victorian England ~ Part I

Servants needed to be up and about their business long before the Master and the Mistress. For example, lower servants were up at 5 A.M. and at work minutes later. Most did not waste time in their rooms for they were cold and draughty. Customarily, a half hour deferment was presented to the servants during the winter months, allowing them not to rise until 5:30. They would work some two hours before they sat to their own breakfast. 

The kitchenmaid was usually the first downstairs. Her first job was to clean or to blacklead the range and whiten the hearth and build a fire before a kettle could be set to boil. Ranges of the time were either “bright” or “black.” To keep the bright range “bright,” one had to polish it was liberal application of rotten-stone and sweet oil until it shine like a mirror. This mixture was applied by rubbing it on with a leather strip. A bright range had a alternate set of fire-bars for summer use. These cast iron bars were rubbed with mutton fat and wrapped in brown paper during the winter months. 

closed-range

victoriandecorating.blogspot.com The closed range was introduced and was widely available by the 1840’s. A metal hot-plate covered the fire box and had rings for pans and kettles to rest upon.

A black range was one made of cast-iron. The maid placed a cloth before the stove before she raked out the cinders and then swept the dust off the bars, the hobs and the hearth. She would take a piece of black lead (which came in solid block) and mix it with water in a small pan. Then she would apply it with a round-headed brush to all insides of the range. When the black lead dried, it was rubbed until it shined with a special polishing brush, with a little splay of bristles at the top for getting to tight ornamental work. The flues were swept clean once a week. This maid between two and eight shillings per week for her trouble.

images.jpg Karen Foy in Life in the Victorian Kitchen (©2014)tells us, “Cooking on a kitchen range was hard work, but those with a range were much more fortunate than the poorer classes, who still cooked over an open grate, but easier options had to be found. By the mid 1800s, kitchen ranges changed dramatically and the graft involved in both using and cleaning them was reduced, greatly improving the everyday life of the cook and the kitchen staff…. Like many other new and innovative creations, a glimpse of what the future might hold for Victorian cooks was witnessed at the Great Exhibition of 1851, where early versions of gas-powered were showcased.”

Servant precedence required that the upper servants rose around 6. The cook was required to prepare four different meals, each of separate dishes – those for the family, those for the servants, and those for the children. Parlourmaids (the Victorian substitute for a butler) set the table for the meal and often cleaned the room. The place setting contained knives, forks, and folded serviette. Rolls, bread, and toast were on platters. There were jars of jam, whole honeycombs, and butter dishes. A jug of cream and a sugar basin was in the middle of the table. Additional cups and saucers were kept at hand. Breakfast included bacon, eggs, kidneys, cutlets, fish, omelettes, and broiled chicken. Some households also served cold meats, such as tongue and ham. Game pies and potted meats might also be served. If no lady’s maid was employed in the household, tending the mistress was an additional duty. 

The children’s nurse provided the child/children two to seven mandatory meals/feedings Not all middle class mothers breast fed their babies. Wet nurses filled that duty. Nannies raised the children, who were often “out of sight – out of mind.” The mistress of the house customarily saw their children only during a thirty minutes or so meeting in mid afternoon, around tea time. The nurse’s duties included bathing the babies each morning, administering prescribed medicine and feeding the children. Usually, the child was given a mixture of milk and barley water. Older children also received a bath and nurses assisted in dressing them. Until the age of 7 or 8 boys were laced into stays. Girls wore them throughout their lives. Children customarily ate at 8 A.M. The meal was quite sparse: porridge or break and milk. Perhaps they would receive an egg on Sunday. Their parents had extensive choices for breakfast, and they ate at 9. 

For the remainder of the family, maids brought hot water for washing and tea with bread and butter for consumption to tide them over until breakfast. Lady’s maids laced up their mistresses. Then they assisted the women of the household with multiple petticoats, steel-hooped crinolines or horsehair bustles, long drawers or tight pantaloons, and dresses which contained 20 to 40 yards of material. Some parlourmaids even acted as valet for the master of the house. 

At 8, the servants (except the children’s nurse) sat to breakfast. The meal was often left overs from the previous evening’s meal. It was not extensive. At about 8:45, the family was summoned to the morning room/dining room. Often beforehand, the family and the servants prayed together or read the Bible together before they went about their days. 

Posted in British history, history, Living in the UK, servant life, Victorian era | Tagged , , , | 1 Comment

Life Below Stairs – Snobbery and Rules of Engagement

Upstairs, Downstairs

Upstairs, Downstairs

Previously, we looked at what a servant in an upper house, or even in a second-class household, of the late Regency Period or early Victorian times, might encounter. We spoke of wages, delineation of duties, and additional compensation. Today, we wish to examine the “snobbery” found among the servant class. As mentioned in yesterday’s article, the servants in upper households expected “tips” from the master’s guests. If he did not receive it, he might still exact his revenge on those who paid a second visit to the estate. On his return, a guest might find himself in a one of the draftier bedchambers or he might be met at the train in a cart rather than an estate carriage.

The servants expected the guests to conform to certain standards of gentility. Heaven help a stranger who appeared on a the doorstep and not dressed to the hilt. John James, in The Memoirs of a House Steward, tells a tale of how, in 1895, he mistook His Grace the Duke of Westminster for a servant. Apparently, Westminster wore shabbily care for clothing, and he was clean shaved, which was frowned upon in that time. James did not realize his mistake until he examined the man’s card.

Of course, below stairs, the servants commented freely on the master’s guests. “Behind the servants’ mask of perfect politeness and consummate gentility, there were dark thoughts and hidden feelings, another world to which only the still innocent children of the house were ever admitted, where rumours echoed from the lofty ceilings and were imagined and distorted into malicious gossip and false report. The roots of the servant grapevine were embedded deep in the foundation of each great London house. A fragment of conversation overheard by a footman at the dinner table or some actual confidence foolishly entrusted by some too ingenuous mistress to her maid, would be carried swiftly downstairs to the kitchen. From there it was transported lovingly up and down the neighboring area steps by the visiting butterman and butcher to be deposited with that day’s order on the great wooden tables in nearby kitchens, whence it could be disseminated to every part of the house by a word and a wink between the first and second footman or by a whispered conversation between two under housemaids who shared the same room, and sometimes the same bed, in the cold and draughty attic.” (Huggett, “Life Below Stairs”)

This situation reminds me of the chauffeur in the play Sabrina Fair (basis of the movie Sabrina, which starred Humphrey Bogart and Audrey Hepburn) who earns a fortune by simply listening to his employer conduct business in the backseat of the car and then buying and selling stocks based on Linus Larrabee’s knowledge of the stock market.

Some servants even followed their masters into battle. Yet, such devotion to the old ways died quickly as the servant class became more aware of the world in which they lived. The penny post might have brought down a feudal way of life. Although wages increased significantly in the later part of the 19th Century, it did not guarantee a servants’ loyalty. Also, the lower servants no longer accepted the strict unspoken rules of the household. One might find those below stairs sporting more freely among the servant dichotomy.

This information comes from a website I dearly adore. Wedding Castle – An Online History (KEY PEOPLE: The Life of Victorian Servants). http://www.webspinners.org.uk/weddingtoncastle2/new_page_77.htm

Below are examples of some of the rules that the servants had to follow

1 – When being spoken to, stand still, keeping your hands quiet, and always look at the person speaking.

2 – Never let your voice be heard by the ladies and gentlemen of the household, unless they have spoken directly to you a question or statement which requires a response, at which time, speak as little as possible.

3 – In the presence of your mistress, never speak to another servant or person of your own rank, or to a child, unless only for necessity, and then as little as possible and as quietly as possible.

4 – Never begin to talk to the ladies or gentlemen, unless to deliver a message or to ask a necessary question, and then, do it in as few words as possible.

5 – Whenever possible, items that have been dropped, such as spectacles or handkerchiefs, and other small items, should be returned to their owners on a salver.

6 – Always respond when you have received an order, and always use the proper address: “Sir”, “Ma’am”, “Miss” or “Mrs,” as the case may be.

7 – Never offer your opinion to your employer.

8 – Always “give room”: that is, if you encounter one of your betters in the house or on the stairs, you are to make yourself as invisible as possible, turning yourself toward the wall and averting your eyes.

9 – Except in reply to a salutation offered, never say “good morning” or “good night” to your employer.

10 – If you are required to walk with a lady or gentleman in order to carry packages, or for any other reason, always keep a few paces back.

11 – You are expected to be punctual to your place at mealtime.

12 – You shall not receive any Relative, Visitor or Friend into the house, nor shall you introduce any person into the Servant’s Hall, without the consent of the Butler or Housekeeper.

13 – Followers are strictly forbidden. Any member of the female staff who is found to be fraternizing shall be immediately dismissed.

14 – Expect that any breakages or damages in the house shall be deducted from your wages.


Servants’ Wages

In Victorian times, live-in servants, who had all their expenses (food, lodging, clothes etc) taken care of, earned as little as £10 a year, (which is only the equivalent of £77 in today’s money).

Here is a list of the average wages of servants (figures collected by the Board of Trade in the 1890s).

Between Maid            £10, 7s
Scullery Maid             £13
Kitchen Maid             £15
Housemaid                £16, 2s
Parlour Maid             £20, 6s
Cook                         £20, 2s
Lady’s Maid              £24, 7s
Cook / Housekeeper £35, 6s
Housekeeper             £52, 5s

In 1888 Butlers earned £45 per annum and had no expenses except clothes. They would make up their income from such perks as tradesman offering discounts to receive continued orders. Butlers would also collect the end of candles and one bottle of wine for every six opened.

Posted in British history, food and drink, Georgian Era, Great Britain, Living in the UK, real life tales, Regency era, Victorian era | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 4 Comments

Life Below Stairs ~ The Role of the Male Servant

Dinner in the Servants' Hall

Dinner in the Servants’ Hall

 

The English aristocrat often lived beyond his means. Maintaining country houses (often several of them) and a large Georgian town house in Mayfair took its toll on his purse strings. In addition to owning the property, Society forced him to maintain an extensive staff, which would see to his family’s needs.

 Rank among the serving class manifested itself in extra bedrooms and workrooms to meet the servant hierarchy. The house steward and the housekeeper were often given a sitting room in which the upper servants could dine. A work space was required for the steward to conduct his business. The butler oversaw an extensive pantry. A stillroom was necessary. Storerooms for groceries. A separate china closet. The scullery. The ladies’ maids required a separate room where they could do their mending and ironing. Don’t forget a knife room. A shoe room. A lamp room. A brushing room. A servants’ hall. Etc. Etc. Etc.

Even a modest staff was costly. Characteristically, a land owner maintained 40-50 servants. A large number of male servants was an indication of a man’s wealth. Employing males, instead of females, created a greater expense because a tax on male servants was introduced by Lord North in 1777. The tax was to be used for the cost of fighting the Americans and the war with the French. It cost a landowner £7 for each male servant if there were eleven or more in the household. Although it was gradually reduced over the years, the tax continued until 1937.

Running Footman

Compounding the issue of keeping powdered footmen increased by the duty placed on the hair powder. That tax remained in place from 1786 to 1869. Is it any wonder that some landowners forced their servants to use ordinary house flour to save on expenses. A smart footman might use the household flour and then claim the reimbursement for the expense of the duty.

Footmen and other male servants were provided tailored livery. In the mid 1800s, it would cost 3 guineas for a footman’s uniform. Typically, a footman received 2-3 suits per year. Only the wealthiest aristocrat could afford to employ a house steward, groom of the chambers, valet, cook, butler, under-butler, footmen, footboy, usher, page, “tiger,” coachmen, grooms, a man-of-all-work, gardeners, etc.

Footman

LibertaBooks tells us in their piece entitled “Footmen: The Curse of Manly Calves in Silk Stockings”… 

footmen in livery“The naming of footmen

“Gentry addressed footmen by Christian name. It might be their own name. It might not. Some families always used the same names for their footmen: the most senior might be “Charles”, the next “John” and so on. The approach was convenient for the employers who did not have to bother to learn the real names of real people.

“For the footmen, it probably felt demeaning, but what could they do? (Perhaps they followed some of Dean Swift’s advice for getting their own back?)

The curse of footmen — Dean Swift’s “advice”

Jonathan Swift, author of Directions to Servants

“Jonathan Swift’s satirical essay Directions to Servants (published posthumously in 1745) devotes many pages to its “advice” to footmen, including suggested excuses to use when absent for somewhat longer than the message requires, perhaps two, four, six, or eight hours, or some such trifle.

“My favourite is probably this, relating to service at table: Never wear Socks when you wait at Meals, on the Account of your own Health, as well as of them who set at Table; because as most Ladies like the Smell of young Men’s Toes, so it is a sovereign Remedy against the Vapours.

“Swift’s satire had little effect. A file of nine tall, matched footmen in silver and lace preceded the Countess of Northumberland’s sedan chair. It’s not clear what else her footmen actually did. (Footmen often created trouble among the maids, but it was always the female who was dismissed; a member of a matched set of footmen was too difficult to replace.)”

Footmen were chosen for their height and their handsomeness. Most were at least six feet tall. It was desirable to match the footmen in height (like the Rockettes). Most households had 3 footmen. The first footman, who was often called “James,” no matter what was his Christian name, usually acted as the lady’s footman. He would serve her breakfast, clean her shoes, take her dogs for a walk, stand behind her chair when she dined elsewhere, carry packages when she shopped, etc. The second footman served the afternoon meal. Often he completed valet duties for the eldest son. The third footman carried the coals and wood. The first and second footman served meals. They would accompany the carriage whenever it was used by any member of the household. The footmen were responsible for cleaning and polishing the silver.

The valet was usually at least 30 years of age. He was expected to have a superficial air of aristocracy about him. He saw to his master’s dress and was expected to be abreast of social gossip to aid his master in social engagements, etc. He did not wear livery. He would rise before his master. The aristocrat’s clothes were prepared, a bath drawn, and everything his master required for his ablutions prepared. He might also be required to dress the master, or he might need to know how to load a gun quickly so that his master could shoot with his friends.

The butler needed similar skills as the valet. He was responsible for the footmen, the custody of the plate, and the contents of the wine cellar. He also oversaw the brewing of the servants’ beer, the arrangement of the dining room, etc. Unlike our perceptions of the haughty butler who ruled a household with an iron hand, the Victorian butler was in a more lowly position. In reality, the valet, the house steward, and the groom of the chambers, all outranked him in the household. They also received higher pay.

The groom of the chambers was the one who attended the main door, opened doors for members of the household, filled inkpots, saw that everything the household members needed was within reach.

The house steward oversaw the transition from country estate to Town when the Season came around. He was responsible for all the servants. He maintained the household accounts.

Posted in British history, Georgian Era, Great Britain, Living in the Regency, real life tales, Regency era | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | 4 Comments

Birthdays and Jane Austen

This week I mark another birthday. That makes me a Virgo. 

Virgos expect perfection from themselves, and they may project those high standards on the other people in their lives. A Virgo hates when someone lets him or her down, even if the indiscretion is minor and unavoidable, like a last-minute cancellation. Virgos never want to disappoint the people in their lives, so they may spread themselves too thin and put themselves last.

Intelligent and a lifelong learner, Virgos love trying new things, reading books, and learning about the world. They will happily sign up for an adult-education course, and they consider an afternoon in bed with a book pretty much ideal. A Virgo prefers an evening with good friends to a huge party and values downtime just as much as socializing. This sign does not need to fill their calendar to be content.

Strictly Jane Austen Tours tells us,  “For centuries throughout Europe people had traditionally celebrated their name day as well as their birthday. By the Regency era, it had become more typical to celebrate a birthday, and this was due to changing religious practices that were symbolised by the royal family. … A young boy from a wealthy family in Regency Britain would often have his fifth birthday marked with a ‘breeching ceremony’; this was a grand occasion with relatives visiting to bestow gifts. For girls, their sixteenth birthday was considered the day they reached marriageable age and they were often given gifts such as fine jewellery, a trinket box, an enamel fan or fabric for a new gown in recognition of their social debut.” As to Jane Austen’s celebration of birthdays, we learn, “Austen’s correspondence with her sister offers some insight into how birthdays were noted and celebrated by families from the gentry. In a letter from Steventon, dated January 8 1799, she writes, ”I wish you joy of your birthday twenty times over.”  Much later, regarding her own birthday, she wrote: “My dearest Cassandra, I will keep this celebrated birthday by writing to you.”  This letter then details a drive with her brother Edward, assemblies and other amusements, but not an official birthday celebration.”

All this talk of birthdays got me thinking about the lack of birthday celebrations in Austen’s novels. It is quite disheartening to have others forget one’s birthday, but it was not so for Jane Austen and her family. We know Christmas had not the “glorious significance” as it does these days, but what of birthdays? Quite simply, as Anglicans, such humoring of a person, would have been frowned upon.

Sense-and-Sensibility-007Can you think of one person in Austen’s books who even mentions a birthday? The only one which springs to mind to me is Harriet Smith in Emma. Harriet speaks of hers and Robert Martin’s birthdays occurring within a fortnight, and those birthdays were separated only by one day.

As readers we know many of the characters’ ages. Lydia Bennet is but fifteen when we first meet her, but she is sixteen when she marries George Wickham. Marianne Dashwood is seventeen at the beginning of Sense and Sensibility and is nineteen when she marries Colonel Brandon. Fanny Price is a child when she first comes to Mansfield Park; yet, never once are her birthdays mentioned as a passing of time. Jane Fairfax is approaching one and twenty and the prospect of becoming a governess. Charlotte Lucas at seven and twenty has “become a burden to her family.” Elizabeth Elliot is nearly thirty and not married, and Anne Elliot is seven and twenty when Captain Wentworth returns to claim her. Catherine Morland turns eighteen just before Henry Tilney claims her as his wife. Even Elizabeth Bennet must have had a birthday somewhere in the year she had taken Mr. Darcy’s acquaintance. But when? There is no mention of her chronological aging, only her emotional aging. The closest we come to knowing something of Elizabeth’s age is when she admits to being twenty to Lady Catherine. But we do not know if she was nineteen when the book began and turned twenty some time between November when she dance with Mr. Darcy at the Netherfield Ball, or whether, like me, she is a September baby, turning one and twenty after she encounters Darcy again at Pemberley. Is such true for all of Austen’s characters? Austen wrote from her life experiences. If she did not “celebrate” such milestones, why would her characters? Tell me what you think. Am I being bizarre or is there some truth in this assumption?

Meanwhile, enjoy this list of September birthdays celebrated by some of our favorite Austen Actors. 


party-clip-art-balloons-different-coloursHappy September Birthday to these Fabulous Austen-Inspired Actors…

images September 1 – Aisling Loftus, who portrayed Charlotte Lucas in Pride and Prejudice and Zombies

Unknown-3henrySeptember 7 – Christopher Villers, who portrayed Tom Bertram in 1983 Mansfield Park

September 7 – Henry Maguire, who portrayed Jack Wickam in 2003’s Pride and Prejudice: A Latter Day Comedy

Unknown-4Unknown-5September 9 – Hugh Grant, who portrayed Edward Ferrars in 1995’s Sense and Sensibility

September 9 – Julia Sawalha, who portrayed Lydia Bennet in 1995’s Pride and Prejudice

Unknown-3September 10 – Colin Firth, who portrayed Fitzwilliam Darcy in 1995’s Pride and Prejudice Unknown-4

September 11 – Alan Badel, who portrayed Fitzwilliam Darcy in 1958’s Pride and Prejudice (11 September 1923 to 19 March 1982)

images-2September 15 – Sabina Franklyn, who portrayed Jane Bennet in 1980’s Pride and Prejudice Unknown-5

September 16 – Alexis Bledel, who portrayed Georgiana Darcy in Bride and Prejudice

imagesUnknown-3September 19 – David Bamber, who portrayed Mr. Collins in 1995’s Pride and Prejudice 

September 22 – Billie Piper, who portrayed Fanny Price in 2007’s Mansfield Park

Unknown-4September 22 – Rupert Penry Jones, who portrayed Captain Frederick Wentworth in 2007’s PersuasionUnknown-6

September 23 – Crispin Bonham Carter, who portrayed Charles Bingley in 1995’s Pride and Prejudice

2b03d4f0September 23 – Peter Settelen, who portrayed George Wickham
in 1980’s Pride and Prejudice 

hqdefault September 24 – Ryan Paevey, who portrayed Donovan Darcy in Unleashing Mr. Darcy

images-1 September 26 – Talulah Riley, who portrayed Mary Bennet in 2005’s Pride and Prejudice

2202857,tjUBdj3LNXhm0qAuo3TLB1ygUfTrZOGQXAeMS1OawmjRfXEvlZLprOD9Mx5Ha3GHNTcYybJh04GQPbBKSvfyoQ==Unknown-3September 26 – Edmund Gwenn, who portrayed Mr. Bennet in 1940’s Pride and Prejudice (26 September 1877 to 6 September 1959)

September 27 – Gweyneth Paltrow, who portrayed Emma Woodhouse in 1996’s film version of Emma

Unknown-4September 29 – Greer Garson, who portrayed Elizabeth Bennet in 1940’s Pride and Prejudice (29 September 1904 to 6 April 1996)

Posted in film adaptations, Georgian England, Georgian Era, Jane Austen, reading, real life tales, Regency era, research | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 19 Comments