George William Finch-Hatton, 10th Earl of Winchilsea, 5th Earl of Nottingham (1791–1858) was an English politician known for duelling with Prime Minister Wellington.
Hatton, born at Kirby Hall, Northamptonshire, on 19 May 1791, was grandson of Edward Finch-Hatton, and son of George Finch-Hatton (1747–1823) of Eastwell Park, near Ashford, Kent, M.P. for Rochester 1772–84, by his wife whom he married in 1785, Lady Elizabeth Murray, eldest daughter of David Murray, 2nd Earl of Mansfield. She died 1 June 1825.
George William, the elder son, was educated at Westminster School and Christ’s College, Cambridge, where he proceeded B.A. in 1812. On 13 October 1809, he became a captain in the Ashford regiment of Kentish local militia, on 14 December 1819 commenced acting as a lieutenant of the Northamptonshire regiment of yeomanry, and on 7 September 1820 was named a deputy-lieutenant for the county of Kent. His cousin, George Finch, 9th Earl of Winchilsea and fourth earl of Nottingham, having died on 2 August 1826, he succeeded to these peerages.
He presided at a very large and influential meeting held on Penenden Heath, Kent, on 10 October 1828, when strongly worded resolutions in favour of Protestant principles were carried. In his place in the House of Lords, he violently opposed almost every liberal measure which was brought forward. He was particularly noted as being almost the only English nobleman who was willing to identify himself with the Orange party in Ireland, and he was accustomed to denounce in frantic terms Daniel O’Connell, Maynooth, and the system of education carried out in that college.
Occasionally he took the chair at May meetings at Exeter Hall, but his intemperate language prevented him from becoming a leader in evangelical politics. The Catholic Relief Bill of 1829 encountered his most vehement hostility, and ultimately led to a duel with the Duke of Wellington. Lord Winchilsea, in a letter to the secretary of King’s College London, wrote that the duke, “under the cloak of some coloured show of zeal for the Protestant religion, carried on an insidious design for the infringement of our liberties and the introduction of popery into every department of the state.”
The duke replied with a challenge. The meeting took place in Battersea Fields on 21 March 1829, the duke being attended by Sir Henry Hardinge, and his opponent by Edward Boscawen, 4th Viscount Falmouth. The duke fired and missed; he claimed he did so on purpose. However, the duke was known as a poor shot and accounts differ as to whether he purposefully missed. Winchilsea kept his arm by his side at the command to “fire” then quite deliberately raised his arm in the air and fired. He then apologised for the language of his letter. It is almost certain that Winchilsea and Falmouth had agreed on their course of action, as the letter of apology was already prepared.
He was a very frequent speaker in the Lords, and strenuously opposed the Reform Bill and other Whig measures. He was gazetted lieutenant-colonel commandant of the East Kent regiment of yeomanry 20 December 1830, named a deputy-lieutenant for the county of Lincoln 26 September 1831, and created a D.C.L. of Oxford 10 June 1834.
He died at Haverholme Priory, near Sleaford, Lincolnshire, 8 January 1858.
He was the writer of a pamphlet entitled Earl of Winchilsea’s Letter to the “Times,” calling upon the Protestants of Great Britain to unite heart and soul in addressing the Throne for a Dissolution of Parliament, 1851.
He was responsible for the phrase Kentish Fire meaning prolonged derisive cheering.
Winchilsea was married three times:
first, on 26 July 1814, to Georgiana Charlotte, eldest daughter of James Graham, 3rd Duke of Montrose, she died at Haverholme Priory 13 February 1835;
secondly, on 15 February 1837, to Emily Georgiana, second daughter of Sir Charles Bagot, G.C.B., she died at Haverholme Priory 10 July 1848;
thirdly, on 17 October 1849, to Fanny Margaretta, eldest daughter of Edward Royd Rice of Dane Court, Kent.
So many colourful characters and events in the Regency period that I’d never heard of thanks to you and Rachel Knowles I’m getting to know and enjoy this period in my history that I never really gave a thought to and I’ve missed out on so much. Thanks again for sharing and enlightening me on this delightful period. 😀
The contrasts are fascinating in the Regency. I have studied many other eras, but I always return to the early 1800s in England. (Not bad for a Yank, Brian.)
When next I chat to Her Majesty I shall insist that she recognizies you as she did Mrs Brad Pitt with an honorary Damehood, indeed you are more than worthy of such an honour.
To digress for a momet Rgeina, do Americans normally find the expression ‘Yank’ insulting? I’ve been roundly abused, castigated by a Blogger for using the term! He had no qualms initially in calling me a ‘Limey’ which I do believe is a derogatory expression and when I replied using the word Yank he quite went to town on me. It’s all rather amusing actually and I do think I’ve found one of those “Ugly Americans” that abounded back in the 50’s and 60’s, I’m having a grand time baiting him, I was about to say a gay old time but one really shouldn’t say that these days should one 🙄 😛 😀