Mars vs. Venus Part III

This is more on the differences between males and females:
Women not on the pill, find masculine features attractive, but women on the pill find feminized male faces more attractive.
When men sweat, pheromones, which have no odor themselves, are mixed with the sweat to attract the opposite sex.
Males see a female’s waist to hip ratio instinctively when meeting the woman for the first time. It probably has something to do with childbearing and whether a woman might conceive easily.
Large amounts of dopamine and oxytocin surge in a woman’s body when she is talking/bonding with her partner.
Women pay more attention to the tone of a person’s voice and his body language when interpreting meaning. Men are likely to miss these cues to meaning because they need precision in word choice.
Obviously, the woman’s nurturing center of the brain is more developed than a man’s, while his sexual center is more developed.
Women show their teeth when smiling. Men do not. In a man, showing one’s teeth is considered a weakness.
Women can recall the spoken word exactly. They have a better blood supply to that part of the brain. Men remember the “gist” of the conversation.
Women have a stronger sense of smell, and the chocolate cravings are natural for they also taste sugar better. Men have a better sense of taste for salty and bitter foods/drinks.
Women are physically and neurologically mature at 17; men not until age 22-24.
Women have better finger dexterity than a man, but he has better eye-hand coordination.

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Mars vs. Venus Part III

Till the Clouds Roll By (1946)

This morning, like so many of you, I awoke an hour earlier than necessary because of the time change to Eastern Standard Time. At first, I considered turning over and going back to sleep, but I flipped on the TV to see if anything of importance happened overnight in the news. Finding nothing to keep my eyes open, I began a search with the remote. When I landed on Turner Classic Movies, I stopped. Here was a film from the golden age of movies of which I was not aware…actually had never seen it before. It was Till the Clouds Roll By, released in 1946 (before I was born), a film about the life of Jerome Kern. Kern was the genius behind these Broadway classics: Showboat, Roberta, and Sweet Adeline.

The film was loaded with some of Kern’s finest pieces. Some of these were featured:
“Ol’ Man River”
“Can’t Help Lovin Dat Man”
“A Fine Romance”
“Smoke Gets in Your Eyes”
“The Way You Look Tonight”
“Long Ago (and Far Away)”
“I Won’t Dance”
“Make Believe”
“Bill”
“The Last Time I Saw Paris”

The movie starred Robert Walker as Jerome Kern, but it had smaller bit parts for some of Hollywood’s finest, some of whom appeared in cameo parts, while others played characters in Kern’s life.
Among them were Frank Sinatra, Dinah Shore, Esther Williams, Angela Lansbury, Lena Horne, Van Heflin, Kathryn Grayson, June Allyson, Tony Martin, Van Johnson, and Judy Garland. Add to that the dancing talents of Gower Champion and Cyd Charisse.
So, although my body clock still needs readjusting, I do not regret the moments of watching the film version about a man whose music we still sing after all these years. It was an enjoyable way to start my day.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on Till the Clouds Roll By (1946)

Mars vs. Venus – Part II

Here are some other distinct differences between males and females of which writers must be aware in developing characters:

Women learn quickly in a cooperative setting, where men need competition. For YA authors, this means differences in a classroom setting (all female vs. traditional classrooms)
Women need the emotional bonding of hearing a man talk to them and to listen to them to be “turned on.” Men react to visual responses: nudity, sexy underwear, etc.
Women are interested in developing relationships; men are interested in the baser forms of recreation.
Women like to talk through their problems; men rarely speak of their problems to anyone.
Being more right brained, women are more in tune with their emotions. They will, therefore, cry more often. Men have difficulty accessing the right brain centers, which control grief or sadness or depression. A man will seldom cry because of this. Plus, society looks down on a man who cries, saying he must “act like a man.”
For women, testosterone levels control her depression (literally, reducing her irritability, and her nervousness. Men with high testosterone levels, rarely suffer from sadness.

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Mars vs. Venus – Part II

Mars vs. Venus Part I

Today on the TV show, The Doctors, they answered questions from audience participants on male/female stereotypes and comparisons. As a writer, those differences are forever part of one’s psyche. One cannot have an Alpha male responded as if he is a female. So, understanding some of the basics about male/female relationships is important.

Whereas men have excellent abstract orientation, women, for example, need landmarks to orient themselves. That is why women do not read maps well.
On the show today, they showed an experiment that proved that women can multi-task better than men. Men are more linear. They must stay with one task at a time – until it is completed.
Women seek acceptance, where men seek respect.
Men who lie do it to cover up something or to build up their ego. Women lie to make someone feel better.
Women in a committed relationship report that they reach fulfillment only 20% of the time, where men say they satisfy their partners completely 55% of the time.
When a group of women eat out, they will divvy up the bill by calculating who owes what. Men, in a similar situation, will compete for the “honor” of paying the entire bill. They will toss money on the table and pretend they would not like some change.
When listening to a person of authority will maintain a neutral face, while women will show up to six distinct expressions.
Women can speak and listen at the same time. Men are totally lost in this type of situation.
Women smile more (showing their teeth) than men do.
Women talk through their stress, while men close up and withdraw to deal with his stress.

Posted in Uncategorized | 3 Comments

A Book in a Month???

(by Abigail Reynolds) It’s almost NaNoWriMo! NaNoWriMo is the (Inter)National Novel Writing Month, celebrated each year in November. Anyone who wants can join in the fun, even if you’ve never written anything before. The goal is to write 50,000 words of a novel between November 1-30. Yes, that’s about 1800 words a day, which is far more than most authors write, but that’s the point of it. It’s a chance for people who have never dared to write before to set a pen to paper, as well as for more practiced writers to give themselves a push and a challenge. For a good summary of what NaNoWriMo is about, check their website.

But why do NaNoWriMo instead of writing on my own schedule? Because it works. My worst enemy as a writer is myself. I write a sentence, then second-guess it. Did I show, not tell? Did I use an adverb where I shouldn’t? Is this phrase evocative enough? Then I erase the sentence and start again… and again and again. NaNoWriMo helps me avoid that trap. So what if I told instead of showed, or used an adverb or a speech tag? It’s words, and it counts towards that 1800 words a day! So what if it’s bad? So I keep what I wrote instead of erasing it. Then, in December, I go back and improve it. But I can’t improve and edit something I haven’t written in the first place, hence NaNoWriMo. It gets me through that first draft. Yes, it’s awful, but at least I have something to work from later.

Meantime, NaNoWriMo gives me a kick in the pants. I can’t decide not to write that day, because I know I’ll have to post online how many words I’ve done and all my writing buddies will see it. There’s no “I’m not in the mood” or “I don’t have time.” More importantly, there’s a certain energy that goes along with writing in the company of others. It’s inspirational.

In our Austen community, we have a variety of authors of all stripes – published, unpubbed, and ones who have never dared show a word of what they’ve written to anyone – who participate in JaAuNaNoWriMo. Yes, that’s Jane Austen NaNoWriMo. We also have complete newcomers to writing. The more, the merrier! If you’ve ever thought about writing, this is the time to give it a try. You’ll get lots of encouragement… without ever having to show anybody what you’ve written. No fear of criticism, no angst, just lots of fun, support, and writing. Who knows where that could lead?

So who is in and what are you planning to write? It doesn’t matter if it’s not Austen-related. I’m wavering between two stories, both Regency, one a variation and one a sequel. Sign up on the NaNoWriMo site – it’s free, and you get some cool stuff including a free copy of your story from CreateSpace. I love NaNoWriMo writing buddies! My username there is littorina if you want to be buddies.

Does anyone know if there’s already a JaAuNaNoWriMo group? If not, we could start a thread in the NaNoWriMo forums for Austen-related fiction. I’ll be posting follow ups here every week or two about how I’m doing, and I hope to hear from some of you as well!

Well, Abigail Reynolds convinced me. I have two projects. First, I wish to finish A Touch of Cashémere, the third book in my touch series. Secondly, I need to produce a short story for Ulysses Press’s new project entitled, The Road to Pemberley. If I can accomplish both by the end of November, I will have had a successful month. Come on. Join in. We all can go crazy together.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Comments Off on A Book in a Month???

Borders eBook Reader

My latest book, The Phantom of Pemberley, is part of the promotion for Borders new eBook Reader, KoBo.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on Borders eBook Reader

Jane Austen and Zombies

Why are Zombies being mixed with my Jane Austen?

Most people seem to agree that zombies and other monsters are an open testament to a troubled time. Zombies found their peak in George Romero movies, and they reflect whatever we might fear. These monster stories cover everything from pure horror to campy humor. Bela Lugosi appeared in 1932’s White Zombie, based upon traditional Caribbean voodoo, which was followed in 1943 by I Walked with a Zombie, also a Caribbean voodoo story line. Zombie stories were very popular during the Great Depression. So what does this hodge podge of information say about “Zombies”?

It says that zombies and similar monsters represent different things in different times. Zombie stories in the 1950s symbolized the Cold War; in the 1980s, they represented pollution. Beth Accomando in “Zombies Invade NPR,” says, “Zombies are the blank canvas to reflect whatever scares us, be it racism, disease, or the end of the world.” She goes on to say, zombies “reflect the fact that people are currently in crisis mode.”

Unlike vampire stories, which have been found in literature for hundreds of years, zombie stories are a relatively new phenomena. Haitian folklore involving the raising of the dead by a voodoo master appears to be the basis of zombie stories; and, like the folklore, troubled times seem to raise the dead. Nowadays, zombies symbolize the global economic recession and a world in turmoil. Where vampire story lines touch on “divisive” issues, zombies satirize the demise of contemporary culture. 1994’s Interview with a Vampire reflected our country’s varied opinions on AIDS; 1968’s Night of the Living Dead demonstrated our angst during the Vietnam era, even going so far as to dehumanize the combatants. The Vietnamese were “a faceless people, who wished to do us harm” – such as portrayed by the zombies.

Currently, we are being bombarded by countless zombie stories: Breathers: A Zombie’s Lament, which is a novel turned into a movie and being produced by Diablo Cody of Juno fame; Zombieland, which starred Woody Harrelson and Abigail Breslin; World War Z, a novel by Max Brooks, which has been turned into a movie by Marc Foster, director of Quantum of Solace; Resident Evil 5, a zombie video game, and Michael Jackson’s “Thriller,” which is being made into a Broadway show. Zombies plus subgenre combinations seem to be the way of publishers. For example, Star Wars: Death Troopers is a mix of zombies and science fiction. In fact, a romance anthology, entitled My Zombie Valentine, exists.

One of the ideas, which I found very unique, came from Illogic Tree, which purports that American politics set the trends for zombie and vampire films. Quite simply, zombies are popular when a Republican is in office because “Republicans fear the revolt of the masses.” And likewise, vampire films are popular with a Democrat in office because “Democrats are often fearful of upper-class America and believe the rich are bleeding the country dry.” Illogic Tree even using statistics to prove their point that vampires are “blue” and zombies are “red.” According to the article, 183 zombie films were produced in the seven years that Bush was in office (beginning in 2000). During Clinton’s era, we saw Bram Stoker’s Dracula, Interview with a Vampire, Blade, and Dracula: Dead and Loving It, as well as many other less popular offerings. Who knows whether this idea is true, but is it not just fascinating?

Again, how do zombies fit in with my Jane Austen? Lev Grossman in “Zombies are the New Vampires” says, “Apparently no one is safe from the shambling, newly marketable armies of the dead — not even Jane Austen. The author of Pride and Prejudice and Zombies, Seth Grahame-Smith, tells a tale about a strangely familiar English family called the Bennets, who are struggling to marry off five daughters, while at the same time fighting off wave after wave of relentless, remorseless undead — since, as the novel’s classic first line tells us, ‘It is a truth universally acknowledged that a zombie in possession of brains must be in want of more brains.’”

Grossman continues, “It is surprising how easily Austen’s novel succumbs to the conventions of a zombie flick. Much of Austen’s work is about using wit and charm and good manners to avoid talking about ugly realities like sex and money. In Grahame-Smith’s version, zombies are just another one of those ugly realities. ‘What was so fun about the book is the politeness of it all,’ says Grahame-Smith. ‘They don’t even like to say the word zombie, even though their country is besieged by zombies. They’re everywhere, and people are literally being torn apart before their very eyes, and other than the very few, like Elizabeth Bennet, who face this problem head on, they would almost rather not talk about it.’”

Grossman goes on to say, “If there’s something new about today’s zombie, it’s his relatability. Sure, he’s an abomination and a crime against all that is good and holy. But he exemplifies some real American values too. He’s plucky and tenacious — you can cut off his limbs and he’ll keep on coming atcha. And he’s humble. You won’t find zombies swanning around and putting on airs like some other monsters. They’re monsters of the people. So, down with vampires. Long live (or is it die?) the zombie: the official monster of the recession.”

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Comments Off on Jane Austen and Zombies

Jane Austen and Vampires

What is a Mashup?

When I first became aware of the term “mashup,” I automatically thought of the music industry with its remixes and creative imaginings of oldies and the classics. By definition, a “mashup” is creating a new entity from two or more unrelated sources. Although some believe this subgenre has hit its peak, mashups still garner a substantial chunk of the market. That fact probably lies in the reality that a reader of paranormal would find mixing a Jane Austen classic with vampires intriguing. Many authors are finding a new market, whether they write science fiction, fantasy, paranormal, mystery, or humor. Recently, we have seen mixes of William Shakespeare, Mark Twain, Leo Tolstoy, and Louisa May Alcott. It is not just Jane Austen. There is a crossover appeal, very much like the steampunk genre. Think about Hemingway or Flaubert or F. Scott Fitzgerald; there are endless possibilities because the past is always in the process of being reinvented.

Is Jane Austen spinning in her grave because of all the sequels, variations, and mashups? Maybe, because I sometimes write the genre, I do not believe so. Austen wrote in an era when women could not openly express their imaginations without censure. We must not forget that Austen loved stories of all kinds, as well as a bit of gossip and scandal, and she possessed a “twisted” sense of humor. In the movie Becoming Jane, Anne Hathaway refers to it as “ironical.”

How does one mix together Jane Austen and Vampires?

Vampires first appeared in literature in 18th Century poetry before becoming one of the stock figures of Gothic fiction when Polidori published The Vampyre (1819), which was reportedly influenced by the life of Lord Byron. Dracula did not appear until 1897.

One finds the roots of vampire fiction in the early 1700s when the Serbian monarchy exhumed the remains of suspected vampires. In 1748, August Ossenfelder released the short German poem “Der Vampir,” which had strong erotic overtones. Goethë’s “Die Braut von Korinth” and Bürger’s “Lenore” followed, each with vampiric elements. In English literature, Robert Southey’s “Thalaba the Destroyer” (1797) was one of the first examples. Lord Byron’s “The Giaour” (1813) and Samuel Taylor Coleridge’s “Christabel” (1816) followed. Even in Emily Brontë’s Wuthering Heights, Heathcliff’s housekeeper accuses him of being a vampire.

Dracula remains the definitive description of the vampire in popular fiction. In it, Dracula’s “disease” is a contagious demonic possession, with undertones of sex, blood, and death. All of these elements probably struck a cord with Victorian England, where tuberculosis and syphilis were common fears. A decade before, in 1888, the British press had sensationalized Jack the Ripper’s reign in East London. Stoker’s Abraham Van Helsing became the model for all other vampire hunters. Some believe Stoker wrote Dracula to subtly criticize Victorian stuffiness, and others agree it was a social commentary on Stoker’s friend Oscar Wilde and his legal situation. Images, themes, and even actual phrases from Wilde’s trial for sexual inversion appear in the book. Count Dracula symbolizes an aristocrat, who socializes with middle and lower class people to survive – creating an image of the British aristocracy having to interact with the changes occurring in the wealthy middle class. Note how the middle class vampire hunters are the powerful characters in the book. Also, notice how all the vampires in the book are female, except Count Dracula. Vampirism allows Lucy and the others female vampires to dominant, and Dracula’s reign represents the British fear of being “contaminated” by an outside force.

Modern vampires have evolved from those repulsive figures: They are romantic and sexy bad boys, a stark contrast to Eastern European folklore. Christian symbols no longer repel them. Anne Rice’s Lestat De Lioncourt makes both a fanatically religious girl and a nun his victims. The moon does not influence them, nor are they only sustained by drinking blood. Modern vampires can fly, can feed off energy, and can “sparkle” in the sunshine. Modern vampires may possess unusual talents and may be very passionate about things other than blood. Bonnie Anderson says in “Vampire Showdown: Bram Stoker’s Count Dracula Verses Anne Rice’s Lestat,” that “The true fans of horror no longer want to be frightened by the mere fantasy of the fearsome. We want what scares us to our very core: Ourselves. We want to see ourselves dressed up and romanticized, satirized, and suffering and sinning. And then we want to see it again.”

There have been vampires in every film genre, even children’s works: the Count on Sesame Street. Exhibiting self-control is a recent trait of vampires. Modern vampires are more sympathetic to humans. Our current vampires are less monstrous – downright sexy, in fact, and infinitely more human. Contemporary vampirism is about desire. Romance with the undead is intense and forever and perfect. These are female-centered story lines featuring a powerful love, which surpasses the limits of mortality.

So, why is vampire literature so popular and in what way does Jane Austen fit? Beyond the broody, often lonely, male as a main character, vampire stories welcome anachronism. They are striking examples of the juxtaposition of past and present. Vampire stories of old were sources of terror, but contemporary vampirism is seen as desire. They are female-centered narratives, containing a powerful love that transcends the limits placed upon it. In a time after the World Trade Center disaster, we are less likely to make heroes out of those who hide their thoughts and feelings; so recent vampires must become infinitely more human. I mean, let’s face it, unless one is a vampire, there are no longer impediments to marriage. Today, Las Vegas is our Gretna Greene. Vampires who are sympathetic to humans, but whose goal is a relationship and respect are all the rage. As the majority of the readers of vampire literature are women, some believe it is a post-feminist way of taking on power: Women standing up and demanding respect. There is an allure of the forbidden, and the virtue of the individual prevails as a major theme. Now, look back at each of the boldfaced phrases. Are they not part of Austen’s Pride and Prejudice?

Teens embrace the concept of vampirism as an alluring idea – to be young and beautiful forever. Were women in Austen’s time not on the shelf by their early twenties? Remember that Anne Elliot had lost “her bloom” by age 27? Plus, teens think of themselves as immortal. They exist in a time of surging hormones, and they love the idea of power over another. And as a post-menopausal woman myself, the concept of being “hot blooded” appeals to me. Paranormal romance is about power. The females are tough chicks, who kill demons and hunt vampires.

And let us remember that the Twilight series has its roots in classic literature. If you have not noticed the similarities before, let me point out that Twilight is Pride and Prejudice. New Moon finds its basis in Romeo and Juliet. Wuthering Heights becomes Eclipse, and Breaking Dawn mixes The Merchant of Venice and A Midsummer Night’s Dream. Vamplit has the allure of the forbidden. It is quite simply a love story. The current audience for vamplit is a mix of those who grew up on Dark Shadows, Anne Rice’s series, Buffy the Vampire Slayer, X-Files, and Harry Potter.

So, why is Austen so easy to adapt to these subgenres? I would say because her works allow modern authors to insert their ideas into Austen’s point of view. Jane Austen was a forward-looking writer, who wrote thematic masterpieces. Although she writes intriguing characters, Austen’s strength lies in how the theme permeates every word. And is it fair to parody Austen? We must remember that the Lady wrote her own parody of Ann Radcliffe’s The Mysteries of Udolpho.

Regina Jeffers speaks of Vampire Darcy’s Desire. In this book, I tried to keep certain elements of Jane Austen’s Pride and Prejudice. Wickham, the book’s vampire, still tries to seduce Georgiana, and he still takes Lydia to Northumberland (where Newcastle is located). Darcy, a dhampir, desires Elizabeth as a man, and he knows he must break the “curse” upon his family in order to make her his wife. When Darcy first meets Elizabeth, he is withdrawn from society, is generous and protective of his sister, and dutifully oversees his estate. Yet, to this mix of Jane Austen, I have added the folk elements of the Baobhan Sith (Scottish female vampires), a traditional Scottish folk song entitled “Lord Thomas and Fair Ellender,” references to Celtic gods, vampiric legends, apotropaics, and bits of Stoker’s Van Helsing.

Vampire Darcy’s Desire presents Jane Austen’s Pride and Prejudice as a heart-pounding vampire romance filled with passion and danger. Tormented by a 200-year-old curse and his fate as a half-human/half-vampire dhampir, Fitzwilliam Darcy vows to live forever alone rather than to inflict the horrors of his life on an innocent wife. But when he comes to Netherfield Park, Elizabeth Bennet captivates him as no other ever has. Uncontrollably drawn to each other, they are forced to confront the seductive power of forbidden love, while dark forces are at work all around them. Most ominous is the threat from George Wickham, the purveyor of the curse, a demon who vows to destroy each generation of Darcys.

Join us tomorrow for a look at Jane Austen and Zombies.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Comments Off on Jane Austen and Vampires

Austen a Poor Grammarian

One of my former students who attends UNC-Chapel Hill sent me a notice on my Facebook page. It was an article about Jane Austen and her grammatical errors. Now, as I often jokingly called myself The Grammar Goddess in the classroom and as he knows I am a Jane Austen freak, the young man wished to point out the contradiction.

The Associated Press news article by Jill Lawless chronicles the work of Oxford University professor Kathryn Sutherland, who credits much of Austen’s style, especially in Emma and Persuasion, to her editor at that time William Gifford. Although this news may be upsetting to some Austen purists, Sutherland goes on to say that the study shows that Austen was better at writing dialogue than her edited pieces display.

To read the entire article, go to http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20101023/ap_on_en_ot/eu_britain_jane_austen.

There has been a push to bring Austen’s work into current media. To see her actual offerings go to the following website. Austen’s handwritten manuscripts will go online Monday at http://www.janeausten.ac.uk, the result of a three-year project to digitize the author’s unpublished work.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Comments Off on Austen a Poor Grammarian

A New Sherlock Holmes

I am very psyched because tomorrow evening one of my favorite British actors (Benedict Cumberbatch) will portray one of my favorite literary characters (Sherlock Holmes) in Masterpiece Mystery on PBS. Although his name may not be familiar, I am sure Cumberbatch’s face will be for he has been in several of my favorite period dramas:

Cambridge Spies (2003) played Edward Hand (starring with Tom Hollander, Toby Stephens, Rupert Penry Jones)

Starter for 10 (2006) played Patrick Watts (starring with James McAvoy, Dominic Cooper, Simon Woods, and Lindsay Duncan) – one of my personal favorites!!!

Amazing Grace (2006) – played William Pitt (starring with Ioan Guffudd, Romola Garai, Albert Finney, Michael Gambon, Rufus Sewell, Ciarán Hinds, and Toby Jones)

Atonement (2007) – played Paul Marshall (starring with James McAvoy, Keira Knightley, Brenda Blethyn, Vanessa Redgrave, and Romola Garai)

The Other Boleyn Girl (2008) – played William Carey (starring with Natalie Portman, Scarlett Johansson, Eric Bana, and Eddie Redmayne)

Appearing with Cumberbatch in Sherlock is Martin Freeman as Dr. Watson and Rupert Graves as Inspector Lestrade. There will be 3 episodes, one 90-minute episode showing on Oct. 24, 31, and Nov. 7. From the writers of Doctor Who, Sherlock is co-created and written by Mark Gatiss and Steven Moffat.

As every modern fictional detective is basically derived from Sherlock Holmes, I am looking for a more traditional Holmes than the one Robert Downey, Jr., portrayed in the recently released Guy Ritchie version (a sequel is due in 2011). I am a cozy mystery fan, and Sherlock Holmes’s stories have fascinated me since I was a child.

“Sherlock fever” has followed Cumberbatch to the National Theatre, where he was, until recently, appearing in Terence Rattigan’s After the Dance. Although the run was already sold out on the back of strong reviews, long queues for returns and day tickets began forming early in the morning once Sherlock started airing on BBC1.

According to internet reports, Cumberbatch’s updated version of the fictional Victorian detective has even, apparently, become a fashion icon, as “Sherlock chic” (as it’s already been dubbed) hits the catwalks and fashion stores. Savile Row tailors have reported a jump in enquiries from gentlemen keen to copy the extra-long tailored coats sported by the actor, Debenhams menswear has announced a surge in enquiries for similar coats, and designer Paul Costelloe has already stepped up to meet demand, offering tailored coats and scarves based on the series. And for the women? Sherlock, it seems, is well in tune with the sartorial zeitgeist. “Capes are going to be massive,” says Emma Elwick, market editor of Vogue. “There is something elegant and dramatic in the swoosh of a cape.”

The series has even been raised in the Commons, with coalition Culture Secretary Jeremy Hunt telling the House: “It was a very good example of the BBC at its best, investing in new programming.” That’s music to an embattled BBC’s ears, and with such a wide cultural impact, not to mention the 7.3 million viewers who tuned into last Sunday’s final episode (in which we finally met Holmes’s nemesis Moriarty), it’s hardly surprising then that the BBC plans to re-commission Sherlock. No official announcement has been made yet – timings and availability have still to be thrashed out, and all that – but Sherlock producer Sue Vertue and her husband, Steven Moffat, appeared on the BBC Breakfast sofa earlier this week to say the words that fans had been waiting for. “There will be more,” announced Vertue. “We’re having a meeting to talk about how many and when really.” (From an August 12, 2010 article in The Independent entitled “The Ideal Holmes Show”)
http://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/tv/features/the-ideal-holmes-show-benedict-cumberbatch-is-a-revelation-as-supersleuth-sherlock-holmes-2049982.html

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on A New Sherlock Holmes