Matthew Macfadyen to Take Lead in Tale of Jack the Ripper

Having tackled the Tudors, the BBC is taking on the Yorks and the Lancasters in what promises to be an epic BBC1 drama about the War of the Roses.

In a twist on the male-dominated lens through which history is frequently viewed, the epic serial about one of the bloodiest periods in English history will be told from the point of view of powerful women who “shaped their men and who shaped history in the process”.

They include queens, mothers, lovers and “witches” and the drama reminds viewers that at the time women could still be burned at the stake for sorcery.

The War of the Roses is an adaptation of Philippa Gregory’s best-selling series of books The Cousin’s War and is part of a renewed focus on BBC1 drama.

The BBC said that it is yet to cast the drama or decide the number of episodes.

Other casting announcements made by Stephenson included Matthew Macfadyen taking the lead role in Tiger Aspect’s new Jack the Ripper drama Ripper Street and Hayley Atwell to star in Willliam Boyd’s Restless.

For additional news on the new productions, see the Wednesday, January 12, 2012, edition of The Guardian. http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2012/jan/11/bbc1-war-of-the-roses-drama?newsfeed=true&mid=577

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Comments Off on Matthew Macfadyen to Take Lead in Tale of Jack the Ripper

Cheryl Bolen’s “With His Lady’s Assistance” – Book 1 in Regent Mysteries

“With His Lady’s Assistance” is the first book in Cheryl Bolen’s Regent Mysteries Series. It is only available in eBook format: Amazon Kindle, Barnes & Noble’s Nook, and Smashwords. If you are unfamiliar with Ms. Bolen’s works, you writes for Harlequin Historicals and Zebra Historicals. She has released some eight Regency novels and several novellas. Bolen has received  numerous nominations and awards.

Personally, I like Bolen’s works. I have read several of them, including

 

Book Blurb: To help him mingle in the highest echelons of English society to investigate threats on the Prince Regent’s life, super spy Captain Jack Dryden must feign an engagement to the exceedingly plain spinster, Lady Daphne Chalmers. Together they embark on an investigation which brings them into grave peril – and makes the captain reevaluate the skinny maiden who has a most amorous effect upon him.

* * *

With His Lady’s Assistance is a delightful blend of humor, romance, and mystery, a romp through Regency society, sprinkled with appealing characters and colorful figures from British history. Protecting the eccentric Prince Regent from an unknown assassin has never been so entertaining. –  In Print

This book combines humor, romance, and mystery. Although I knew early on who the assassin might me, I am not the typical mystery reader, and I usually spot the “red herring” early on. That did not take away from the pleasure of reading this book. The characters are likeable, and they invoke our empathy. Those who read Regencies know immediately that the second son of a country squire cannot aspire to the likes of an earl’s daughter. Captain Jack Dryden is England’s finest spy, and Lady Daphne Chalmers is Society’s “adorable” spinster. They are an unlikely match, which makes them the perfect couple.

It is a bit refreshing to permit Daphne to see the “debauchery” of the beau monde through Jack’s eyes. Captain Dryden is not beyond physical relationships with a woman he desires, but he does expect to honor his marriage vows. We see Society holds no such guidelines for behavior. Jack’s “Puritanical” views appear out of sync with Daphne’s acceptance of what goes on among the ton. In fact, the Prince Regent has chosen Daphne because she has seen him in a VERY compromising situation and has told no one. Her ability to be discreet is as important as Daphne’s impeccable connections.

Bolen’s use of real-life characters adds authenticity to the story line. Princess Caroline, George IV’s estranged wife, is shown in a most deplorable fashion, but the actions fit what history tells us of the woman.

The novel has 31 chapters and the pacing is a bit slow. For example, there is a whole chapter leading up to an attack on Princess Charlotte (the Prince Regent’s daughter), but in reality, that attack occurred previously and was talked about at a ball. The book could use some closer editing. There are scenes which do not advance the main plot. That being said, I would recommend the book to those who enjoy a lighter touch in a Regency romance. The main characters are not snipping at each other throughout which was a welcome change in a Regency plot.  I would give the book a 4 out of 5 stars.


Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | 3 Comments

The Six Princesses – Part III – Princess Elizabeth

Princess Elizabeth

The Princess Elizabeth was born at Buckingham Palace on 22 May 1770. Her parents were the reigning British monarchs, George III and Queen Charlotte. Frederick Cornwallis, the Archbishop of Canterbury christened her in the Great Council Chamber at St. James Palace on 17 June 1770. Her godparents were The Hereditary Prince of Hesse-Cassel, The Princess of Nassau-Weilburg and The Crown Princess of Sweden (paternal first cousins once-removed).

Elizabeth was a plump girl with artistic tendencies. However, she was often ill. She was often bled for “a scrofulous abscess on her left side.” Because of her frequent illnesses, rumors of concealed pregnancies plagued her. Later, it was disclosed that Elizabeth likely suffered from a mild case of porphyria. The Princess’ upbringing was very sheltered and she spent most of her time with her parents and sisters. King George and Queen Charlotte were keen to shelter their children, particularly the girls. However, in 1812, Princess Elizabeth purchased The Priory at Old Windsor in Berkshire as her private residence.

In 1797, Elizabeth had to appeal to her eldest brother for a loan. She was six hundred pounds in debt. One of the first things that George IV did when he became Prince Regent was to provide larger allowances for his sisters, who had previously received only 1000 pounds per year. Elizabeth was one of George’s two sisters who defied their mother and attended George IV’s first state opening of Parliament after assuming the Regency. His sisters’ moral support was important to allay the propaganda spread against him by his estranged wife Princess Caroline. 

The stout Princess Elizabeth (known to her sisters as Fatima), whose great love of children made it all the more sad that she did not marry until she was forty-eight, sought the support of George, Prince of Wales, in her desire to marry and escape her family. In 1808 she desperately wanted to accept the offer of marriage made by the Duke of Orleans (later King Louis Philippe of France), but his Catholicism and the queen’s opposition confounded her hopes.

When the Duke of Kent had been in Canada (1794), he met the sons of Philippe Égalité, the Duke of Orleans. Philippe had signed his brother’s death warrant. His brother was the King of France, but in the end, he, too, died on the guillotine. The eldest of his sons, Louis Philippe, came to England in 1807, where he renewed his friendship with the Duke of Kent. Soon, he and Elizabeth had agreed to marry, but Queen Charlotte lividly refused. Elizabeth applied to her brother for assistance, but George IV was not Regent and his father was still in command of his senses.

Louis Philippe

Louis Philippe, eventually, traveled to Naples and Sicily, where he married a granddaughter of Empress Maria Theresa. He succeeded to France’s throne in 1830. Elizabeth was eight and thirty when he withdrew to the Continent. Louis married Marie-Amélie, who bore him eight children.

After this incident, Elizabeth accepted her likely spinsterhood. She lived at her cottage on Kew Green. Yet, in 1818, Elizabeth received a proposal from the Hereditary Prince of Hesse-Homburg. She wrote to the Prince Regent regarding the matter. “In our situation, there is nothing but character to look to. I wish to accept his offer. I am no longer young, and fairly feel that having my own home will be a comfort in time.”

The Hereditary Prince was reportedly less than clean with his bodily ablutions. He also stank of tobacco and garlic. Literally, men had to be hired to clean the Prince for his wedding, but Elizabeth wrote, “I am so contented with my lot that I can never be too thankful. Single I should have been wretched.” She was eight and forty at the time.

Elizabeth’s early married life consisted of her thoroughly cleaning her husband’s home, as well as training Frederick VI to better care of his appearance. When her father-in-land passed and Frederick succeeded his father as Landgraf of Hesse-Homburge, Elizabeth shocked many by permitting her mother-in-law to preceed her in ceremonies. Her husband Landgravine inherited many debts, and Elizabeth assumed the fund-raising responsibilities. Remarkably, she did so without hurting her husband’s pride. She outlived both her eldest brother and husband. She died on 10 January 1840 at age 69.

Part IV of the Princess Diaries continues next week.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , | 6 Comments

The Six Princesses – Part II – Princess Augusta Sophia

Princess Augusta Sophia

Princess Augusta Sophia was born at Buckingham House, St. James Park, London, the sixth child and second daughter of George III and his wife Queen Charlotte. Frederick Cornwallis, The Archbishop of Canterbury christened the young princess on 6 December 1768 in the Great Council Chamber at St. James Palace. Her godparents were Prince Charles of Mecklenburg (her maternal uncle, who was visiting England), The Queen of Denmark and The Hereditary Duchess of Brunswick-Luneberg (her paternal aunts). When only a month old, Lady Mary Coke declared her “the most beautiful infant I ever saw.”

The family life of the daughters of George III was not, prior to the king’s first serious illness in 1788, an unhappy one. They were spared the strict educational regime and harsh discipline which fell to the lot of their brothers, and under the supervision of a well-loved governess, Lady Charlotte Finch, received lessons in English, French, geography, music, and art. Despite (or perhaps because of) the size of her family Queen Charlotte was not benignly maternal, and her daughters were scared of her, while the king was highly emotionally attached to them, preferring them to his sons, and was reluctant for them to marry and leave home.

Princess Augusta in 1782

A succession of foreign princes made tentative attempts to become suitors to the princesses, but the queen repelled most of their offers, and many were not even passed on to the potential brides. Charlotte, the princess royal, whom the queen held responsible for the conduct of her sisters (who in turn regarded her as a ‘tell-tale’), was the first to succeed in marrying. In 1796 Prince Friedrich of Wurttemberg (1754-1816), a 42-year-old widower whose first wife had died in suspicious circumstances, made an offer; the king gave reluctant consent to the match, and the wedding took place on 18 May 1797. Unfortunately, the Princess Royal’s escape from her parents did not open the door for her sisters.

Princess Augusta reported had been a great comfort to her mother during the trying times of the King’s illness. She even slept in a tent bed in the Queen’s room as company and as protection from the King’s ramblings. However, Princess Augusta Sophia was three and forty when George III was finally declared insane in 1811. The following year, she wrote her brother, the Prince Regent, and begged him to arrange a secret marriage for her with an English military officer with whom she had been in love for years.

Augusta had met an Irish career officer called Brent Spencer. He was the son of a country squire and had joined the army when he was but seventeen. Spencer had served with the Duke of York in Holland in 1799. Later, he served with distinction in Egypt, before returning to England in 1805, where he appointed equerry to the King and given a promotion to major general. In 1807, Spencer led a surprise attack on Copenhagen, and served in the Peninsular War as second in command to Sir Arthur Wellesley (the future Duke of Wellington). Upon his retirement in 1811, Spencer was made a general. After his years of service, he bought a small estate at Lee, close to Windsor.

In 1812, Augusta wrote her appeal to her brother. She shared with George IV how her affections had remained true for the twelve years of her acquaintance with Spencer. She begged the Prince Regent to sanction a waiver of the Royal Marriage Act and to intercede with Queen Charlotte. “I am certain the Queen cannot approve if she merely thinks of my birth and station, but when she considers the character of the man, the faithfulness and length of our attachment, the struggles that I have been compelled to make, never retracting from any of my duties, I am sure that she will say that long and great has been my trial, and correct has been my conduct. I am proud of possessing the affection and good opinion of an honest man and highly distinguished character, and I am sure that what you can do to make us happy, you will not leave undone.”

We are not aware of what measures George IV took in behalf of his sister, but he always loved his sisters thoroughly. When his daughter, Charlotte, died in childbirth, he chose Spencer to carry the news to Windsor. Spencer was installed as a Knight of the Bath in 1817. His relationship with Princess Augusta could never be a public one, and the couple appeared to accept the situation. When Queen Charlotte died in 1818, Augusta inherited a house and farm at Frogmore. She moved to the property after her father’s death in 1820.

We can only hope that Augusta found some happiness at this point in her life. Perhaps, Spencer attended upon her there. He died in 1828, while Augusta lived on until 1840.

Return tomorrow for Part III on Princess Elizabeth.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , | 4 Comments

A Princesses’ Life is Not All It’s Cracked Up to Be

With the marriage of Kate Middleton to her Prince William, the public’s view of life in the Royal Court became more idealized. However, those of us who study the Royals of the Regency Period know that being a princess does not necessarily mean someone lives “happily ever after.” Meet The Princess Royal, Charlotte Augusta Matilda, the eldest daughter of George III of England.

Queen Charlotte with her first daughter, Princess Charlotte

George III and Queen Charlotte beget a total of 15 children: nine sons and six daughters. Life in the royal household was anything but ideal. Reportedly, the boys were often beaten for the least infraction, but they also had their “freedom.” So, despite George III’s “whip hand,” the king’s sons were given money and their own residences, some receiving these liberties as early as age eleven. The King’s daughters, however, were kept at home under the watchful eye of both parents. The diarist, Fanny Burney, wrote, “Never in tale or fable were there six sister Princesses more lovely.” However, late marriages and spinsterhood plagued all six.

One of the issues that kept the daughters out of the marriage ring was their parents’ insistence that the girls marry men whose politics aligned with the King and Queen’s. Therefore, the princesses were rarely out in Society. Obviously, the girls could not be seen dancing with someone of the Whigs party. Only the daughters of loyal Tories were ever invited to Windsor. Queen Charlotte remained quite adamant in that matter.

Princess Charlotte in 1769

Most experts agree that Queen Charlotte’s allegiance to her husband doomed the girls. Although King George III loved his daughters, he did not want them to marry. Repots say that before in went mad in 1788 that the King apologized to his daughters for not finding them appropriate husbands. The King’s madness and the French Revolution kept the girls at home until their mother’s watchful eye. Queen Charlotte feared her husband’s illness may have passed to her children, and she watched them carefully for early signs of the disease.

Several hopefuls applied for the girls, but each was turned away. Charlotte Augusta Matilda, the oldest of the daughters and known as the Princess Royal to distinguish her from her mother, was two and twenty when her father displayed signs of his madness in 1788. No talk of marriage was possible during these trying times. However, when the King took a turn for the better in 1789, the royal court received new offers of marriage. Denmark, Brunswick, Wurttemberg, and Orange sent inquiries, but the King continued to turn down all offers.

Frederick I of Wurttemberg

The Prince of Wales attempted to arrange a marriage for the Princess Royal to the heir to the Duke of Oldenburg, but those plans were thwarted. Finally, at the age of nine and twenty, the Hereditary Prince of Wurttemberg approached her father about a possible match. Immensely fat, the Prince was no great prize. He was forty when they married. He had been married previously, and after bearing an illegitimate child in Russia, his wife had died under “suspicious” circumstances. The former Princess had been George III’s niece, daughter to his sister Augusta, Duchess of Brunswick. Therefore, King George insisted on clearing the Prince’s name before he would allow his daughter to marry the man.

On 18 May 1797 (after the Prince had been cleared), the Princess Royal, age 30, and her groom, Prince Frederick, who had turned forty, were finally permitted to marry. Princess Charlotte left England, never to see her dear father again. Charlotte was happy in her new home, and although her only child was stillborn, she happily became stepmother to her husband’s children. Prince Frederick succeeded his father as the reigning Duke of Wurttemberg on 22 December 1797. Charlotte courageously faced the ravages of the European continent during the Napoleonic era. Having previously fled the French several times, she received the conquering Napoleon with dignity when he marched into Wurttemberg in 1805. Duke Frederick ceded Montbeliard to France before assuming the titled of Elector of Wurttemberg, but Napoleon named Frederick King of Wurttemberg on 26 December 1805. Electress Charlotte became Queen on 1 January 1806. The action further alienated the former Princess Royal from her English family. Wurttemberg had joined Napoleon’s short-lived Confederation of the Rhine, which made the country an enemy of England and George III.

Queen Charlotte of Wurttemberg

To reciprocate, the new Queen arranged a match between her stepdaughter Catherine and Napoleon’s brother Jerome, which made Catherine Queen of the new Kingdom of Westphalia. In 1813, with Napoleon’s losses, Wurttemberg changed sides in the continuing conflict. In 1814, George IV invited his sister Charlotte to England for the victory celebrations, but Frederick refused to permit her to go. He remained affronted by his wife’s family abandonment. Charlotte pretended an illness rather than to embarrass all involved with her refusal to attend.

When Frederick died in 1816, Charlotte maintained that she had been happy with the man. To honor her marriage vows, she wore black for the rest of her days. The Dowager Queen of Wurttemberg lived out her days in Stuttgart. Occasionally, she hosted visits from her brothers, the Duke of Kent, the Duke of Sussex, and the Duke of Cambridge, as well as Princess Augusta Sophia. By proxy, she was godmother to her niece, Princess Victoria of Kent, the future Queen Victoria. The year before she died in 1828, she returned to England for surgery for dropsy. Unfortunately, for her sisters, Charlotte’s successful marriage did nothing for their own prospects. The King and Queen used the dangers in which Charlotte found herself during the Napoleonic era as reason not to permit her sisters of making an appropriate match.

Return tomorrow for a look at Charlotte’s sisters and their disastrous attempts at finding love.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , | 8 Comments

Sally Smith O’Rourke’s “The Man Who Loved Jane Austen”

The Man Who Loved Jane Austen by Sally Smith O’Rourke, Kensington Books (copyright 2006), ISBN 0-7582-1037-X

Front and Back Flaps: What if you found a 200-year-old love letter written from a fictional character to the writer who created him? And what if, next to that letter, was another addressed to this character…from the author herself? Truth may be stranger than fiction, but one woman is about to find out what happens when fiction becomes truth…

New York artist Eliza Knight certainly did not realize it at the time, but her life changed when she bought the old, beat-up vanity table one lazy Sunday afternoon. Tucked away behind the mirror she found two letters, one sealed, but one already opened:

“May 12th, 1810. Dearest Jane, the Captain has found me out. I am being forced to go into hiding immediately. But if I am able, I shall still be waiting at the same spot tonight. Then you will know everything you wish to know. F. Darcy.”

F. Darcy? Fitzwilliam Darcy, the fictional hero of Jane Austen’s Pride and Prejudice? Even more mysterious was the other letter, sealed and never read – from Jane to Darcy. Could this man, possibly the most romantic character even written and the hero of Eliza’s favorite novel, have been a real person? Eliza’s initial guarded curiosity turns to astonishment as scientific testing confirms the sealed letter was indeed addressed by Jane Austen. But she is completely baffled by the revelation that the other letter, though proven to be from the same time period, was written by an American.

Caught between the routine of her present life and the intrigue of these incredible discoveries from the past, Eliza decides to look deeper. Her research leads to a majestic, 200-year-old estate where she meets the one man who may hold the answer. But he also has a secret, one he has kept hidden for years. Now, as the real story of Fitzwilliam Darcy unfolds, Eliza finds her life has become a modern-day romance, one that perhaps only Jane Austen herself could have so eloquently written.

O’Rourke’s novel alternates between the past and the present. Eliza meets a man named Fitzwilliam Darcy in Virginia. What she does not know is the current F. Darcy has had an unusual experience on a horse buying trip to England. He jumps his hunter over the barrier and travels back to Jane Austen’s time. The sealed letter can bring Eliza a fortune, but it might be difficult for Darcy to explain how he met Jane Austen and fell in love. He wants the letter as a symbol of requited love.

I found it clever to include Jane Austen as one of the book’s characters, and I enjoyed O’Rourke’s look at Austen’s life. (When the movie “Becoming Jane” came out, I thought of many of the scenes from this novel. There is a similar attitude.) One can find expert plotting, and this is an easy read that pays tribute to Jane Austen’s ideals of romantic love. (As in many modern adaptations, there is some sexual content.)

Ms. O’Rourke will be one of our guest bloggers on AustenAuthors.net in March. I hope everyone will join us then.

Again, this is one of my favorite Austen-inspried books. Although it is 5 years old, one might still find it on used books sites. It does have a new cover and can be found on Amazon and B&N.

Posted in Uncategorized | 7 Comments

Another Look at Melissa Nathan’s “Pride and Prejudice and Jasmin Field”

Pride and Prejudice and Jasmin Field by Melissa Nathan, Avon Books (copyright 2000), ISBN 0-06-018495-7

Back Cover: It starts out as a lark for Jasmin Field, the charming, acerbically witty columnist for a national women’s magazine. She joins a host of celebrities gathering in London to audition for the season’s most dazzling charity event: a one-night-only stage production of Jane Austen’s immortal Pride and Prejudice, directed by and starring the Academy-Award winning Hollywood heartthrob Harry Noble. And nobody is more surprised than Jasmin herself when she lands the lead role of handsome Harry’s love interest, Elizabeth Bennet. But things start to go very wrong very quickly. Ms. Field’s delicious contempt for the arrogant, overbearing Harry Noble goes from being wicked fun to infuriating. Her brief moment of theatrical glory looks as if it’s going to be overshadowed by the betrayal of her best friend, the disintegration of her family and the implosion of her career. And suddenly she can’t remember a single one of her lines. But, worst of all, Harry Noble – who, incidentally looks amazing in tight breeches – has started to stare hard at Jazz with that sort of a glimmer in his eyes…

One of the reasons I was initially attracted to this book was that Jasmin Field is a journalist, of sorts. She writes a social column for Hoorah, a woman’s “trashy” magazine. Having trained in journalism, I liked the idea. Jazz’s slant on life is a modern version of Elizabeth Bennet’s observations. This is a story that speaks to the questions of judgments and beliefs. All the elements of Jane Austen’s original are available, sometimes to the detriment of the story line – for example, the Charlotte Lucas/Mr. Collins story is a bit ridiculous. However, Nathan handles her homage to Austen with a quiet humor reminiscent of the original. There are problems with changes in point of view (sometimes within a paragraph), as well as use of profanity and sexual encounters. Yet, Nathan’s acerbic wit is contagious. (I should mention at this point that Ms. Nathan succumbed to cancer several years past. Personally, I would have liked to see what other Austen story lines that Nathan might have added to the contemporary adaptations. I also own Nathan’s Persuading Annie, which is a modern version of Austen’s Persuasion. I will discuss that one later on.)

One of my favorite scenes in this book occurs when Harry and Jazz are rehearsing a scene for the play. Jazz explains to Harry about Mr. Darcy’s motivations in Pride and Prejudice. I have always thought it was a magnificent analysis of Fitzwilliam Darcy.

Acting with Harry was an amazing experience. Jazz entirely forgot herself. Because he was so utterly convincing as Darcy, her reactions, which had been so tame with Brian, were now highly charged. The rest of the cast stopped talking and started silently watching what was going on. Whenever Harry gave Jazz an idea or suggested trying her delivery a different way, she knew instinctively what he was getting at and what he was trying to get out of her. And they were always both delighted with the result. She was buzzing with excitement. This was thrilling! Jazz loved the way Harry was making Lizzy stronger by the minute. And after a while, he even started accepting her ideas. She managed to convince him to make his Darcy more pained.

“The man’s in love, for goodness sake,” she said at one point.

“Why should that pain him?” asked Harry. “He still thinks he’s superior to her. And is still arrogant enough to assume she would accept his hand.”

Jazz answered as if he was an idiot. “Because he still thinks he can’t marry her – it would go against every one of his principles. And his principles are his whole identity. He’s going through constant inner turmoil every time he sees her. He’s fighting himself whenever she’s there. This is the only woman he has ever felt so powerfully attracted to. Physically as well as emotionally. He’s never even fancied a woman before. Darcy has never been out of control before – it’s terrifying, confusing and amazing all at the same time. Lizzy makes all the other women he can get – and let’s face it, he can get all of them – pale into insignificance. She’s the only woman who has ever answered him back, who has ever made him think twice about what he says, who has ever made him reconsider his lifelong principles. And yet she’s from a repulsive lower-class stock. It’s like a terrible awakening for him. And every time he sees her he is more aware of the increasingly agonizing dilemma he is in. He’s getting more hopelessly devoted and yet more aware of the impossibility of marriage to her at the same time. It’s – it’s living hell.”

Like Debra White Smith’s “First Impressions,” this book is no longer available, but if one can find it on a used book site, it is well worth the read. I would give it a 4 out of 5 stars.

Posted in Uncategorized | 9 Comments

Review of Debra White Smith’s Contemporary Jane Austen “First Impressions”

When I am not writing my own novels, I read voraciously. Therefore, one of my New Year Resolutions is to share with my friends some of what I have read. For this first review, I have chosen Debra White Smith’s First Impressions. This book is part of Smith’s backlist, but it is worth doing a search for it. Ms. Smith is a minister, and her Austen Series are modern adaptations of Jane Austen’s novels, each with a religious message.  Besides First Impressions, which is a contemporary version of Pride and Prejudice, one may find Possibilities (Persuasion), Amanda (Emma), Northpointe Chalet (Northanger Abbey), and Reason and Romance (Sense and Sensibility). I absolutely loved Possibilities and will address it in the future. Smith will be a guest  blogger on AustenAuthors.net in March. Please stop by to interact with her.

When Eddi Boswick is cast as Elizabeth, the female lead in a local production of “Pride and Prejudice,” she hesitates. Dave, the handsome young rancher cast as Darcy, seems arrogant and unpredictable. Accepting the challenge of playing opposite him, Eddi soon realizes that he is difficult to work with on and off the set. When a tornado springs out of nowhere, Dave protects Eddi…much to her chagrin. And he is shocked to discover an attraction for the feisty lawyer he can’t deny. Sparks fly when Eddi misinterprets his interest and discovers the truth he’s trying to hide.

First Impressions, by Debra White Smith – from Harvest House Publishers (copyright 2004) ISBN 0-7369-0872-2

The first in her Austen Series, Smith dedicates this novel to Dr. Michael Murphy, the professor who first introduced her to Jane Austen. In this novel, Smith begins by providing her readers with a “Cast” of characters. Please note that for each she says her characters are “based on” Austen’s, which means that an Austen lover will see the similarities, but Smith has not insisted that the characters “do everything” as the Austen originals. Nor do they react in the same manner as Austen’s beloved characters, a purposeful choice which I appreciated. Even in an “inspirational” series, translating Austen’s characters into contemporary situations is not possible. Obviously, the restraints on marriage and relationships which colored the Regency Period are not an issue in the modern world. Las Vegas is the modern answer to Gretna Green.

Smith masterly tells the story through her dialogue. Although her description is first rate, her dialogue is spotless. Coming from a theatre background, I appreciate advancing the story with dialogue rather than long passages of narration. However, it is apparent from the beginning that Smith makes no attempt to replicate Austen’s style. The characters are relatable, and it eloquently speaks to the role of religion in a person’s life. The challenges and rewards of love are the main theme.

If you are an Austen fan and are familiar with the scene where Mr. Darcy tells Charles Bingley that Elizabeth Bennet is “tolerable, but not handsome enough” to tempt him. Then this is Smith’s version of that event. (Dave’s aunt Madelynne DeBloom is conducting  a reading of Pride and Prejudice to determine parts in the upcoming production.)

A cautious precognition suggested Eddi should stop eavesdropping. She rubbed her fingertips along the buttons on her linen jacket. A daredevil streak challenged her to ignore caution just this once.

What has caution gotten me so far? she asked. An empty townhouse with a dog pound refugee and two resentful felines to keep me warm at night. She crossed her legs and gazed past the honeysuckle-laden trellis to a woodpecker that was determined to pound his beak into the oak at the porch’s corner. All the while she pined for any signal of interest from the renegade rancher.

“Oh, so we’re not commenting on the lawyer?” Calvin teased. “Why not?”

Dave remained silent. Eddi looked down and pulled at the top of a piece of broccoli.

“Whatsa matter?” Calvin blurted. “Are you afraid of her?”

A caustic laugh bounced around the porch. “Yeah, right,” Dave retorted.

“Or maybe you’re worried she’s too smart for you! Ha!” Calvin laughed. “That’s a good one.”

Eddi snapped her attention from the broccoli to the porch’s corner. Calvin slid his chair back and his legs disappeared.

“Oh, shut up, ” Dave groused. “If you must know, Eddi Boswick would have to be way more classy to keep my attention for long.”

If you are a Jane Austen lover, you will enjoy this novel. It is worth the read to see how Smith handles the “second proposal” scene. My only objection when I first read this novel was it was a bit “preachy” in the middle regarding Linda Boswick and Rick Wallace’s relationship. Linda and Rick are the Lydia Bennet and George Wickham characters in Smith’s novel. Of course, after I realized that Ms. Smith was the founder of Real Life Ministries, the emphasis on abortion issues made more sense.

I would give this book 4.5 stars out of 5. Although it is currently out of print, I would encourage you to pick up a used copy on Amazon or another media outlet.

Posted in Uncategorized | 6 Comments

1816: The Year Without Summer


The Year Without a Summer (also known as the Poverty YearYear There Was No Summer, and Eighteen Hundred and Froze to Death) was 1816, in which severe summer climate abnormalities resulted in major food shortages. Much of the cause of this anomaly is blamed on the volcanic eruption of Mount Tambora (located on the island of Sumbawa, Indonesia) in April 1815.

Rated a 7 on the Volcanic Explosivity Index, the Tambora eruption had ash falls as far away as Borneo, Sulawesi, Java, and the Maluku islands. Most who died from the eruption came from starvation and disease. 71,000+ people died. Some 12,000 killed from the explosion.

In Europe, people were still recovering from the devastation of the Napoleonic Wars. Food shortages were already prevalent. In the UK and France, food riots were common. Switzerland declared a national emergency because of famine. Abnormal rainfall swelled European rivers. 100,000 Irishmen perished from a combination of a famine and a major typhus epidemic.

In New England, the corn crop failed. Because of supply and demand, the cost of wheat and grains skyrocketed. In Hungary, the population experienced brown snow. Italy had red snow. Volcanic ash is believed to be the cause. The rice crop in China failed due to the summer’s low temperatures. Summer snowfalls occurred in several of China’s provinces. In tropical Taiwan, snow was also reported.

J. M. W. Turner celebrated the spectacular sunsets during this period, likely caused by high levels of ash. People have noted the yellow tinge that is predominant in his paintings, such as Chichester Canal circa 1828.

The crop failures of the “Year without a Summer” may have helped shape the settling of the “American Heartland,” as many thousands of people (particularly farm families who were wiped out by the event) departed New England for what is now western and central New York and the upper Midwest in search of a more profitable land.

Chichester Canal, circa 1828 by J.M.W. Turner

Among those who left Vermont were the family of Joseph Smith. This move precipitated a series of events which culminated in the publication of the Book of Mormon and the founding of the Church of Jesus-Christ of Latter-day Saints.

Mary Shelley

In July 1816 “incessant rainfall” during that “wet, ungenial summer” forced Mary Shelley, John William Polidori, Lord Byron and their friends to stay indoors for much of their Swiss holiday.

John William Polidori

They decided to have a contest to see who could write the scariest story, leading Shelley to write Frankenstein, the Modern Prometheus and Polidori to write The Vampyre In addition, their host, Lord Byron was inspired to write a poem, “Darkness,” at the same time.

 

The events of April 1815 play a part in my next novel The Disappearance of Georgiana Darcy (scheduled for release in March 2012), which begins in July 1815, after Wellington vanquishes Napoleon at Waterloo.


 

Posted in Uncategorized | 5 Comments

The Decadent Prince Regent

George IV

Those of us who regularly “study” the period know as the Regency are well aware of the hedonistic nature of George IV, but many are unaware of the extent of the Prince Regent’s decadent ways.

In truth, George IV, the Prince of Wales, possessed his charms. He was a man of enormous charm, gentlemanly manners, high intelligence, and elegance of address. He was often referred to as “The First Gentleman of Europe.” Yet, he was also a drunkard and a lecher.

 

Carlton House


The Prince lived at Carlton House, a massive structure off Pall Mall. His circle of friends were notorious for their actions. The group included politicians, scholars, courtesans, and society hostesses. Among the most powerful of the group was Charles James Fox (renown for his opposition to George III), Georgiana, the Duchess of Devonshire, the playwright Richard Brinsley Sheridan, and King of the Dandies, Beau Brummell.

Beau Brummell

However, there were more eccentric member of the Prince’s entourage.  Colonel George Hanger married a gypsy girl, who was dubbed “the lovely Aegypta of Norwood.” In the end, the girl deserted Hanger for a bandy-legged tinker. The colonel gambled away his fortune and was imprisoned for his debts.  Lady Lade, the wife of Sir John Lade, and the reputed mistress of the Duke of York, had early on been employed as a servant in a brothel. She was reportedly the mistress of “sixteen-string Jack,” a well known highwayman. Sir John had his own eccentricities. He liked to dress and speak like a groom. Considering he managed the Prince’s stables, I suppose this most appropriate.

On a whim, the Prince ignored rules of etiquette. For example, at one of the Duke of Clarence’s famous parties, George IV gave precedence to his brother’s mistress Mrs. Jordan over a Duchess at dinner. The Prince Regent refused to invited his wife Princess Caroline to a fest celebrating the beginning of his Regency. George’s sisters freely welcomed many of his mistresses, most notably the Ladies Hereford and Jersey, but they refused to acknowledge his last mistress, Lady Conyngham.

George once wrote to Mrs. Fitzherbert, the woman most identify as the Prince Regent’s “great love,” a forty-two page letter in which he begged her to be his mistress. He even staged an attempted suicide to convince the lady.

George IV’s brothers were equally as decadent (except possibly the Duke of Kent). The Duke of Clarence had ten illegitimate children by the before-mentioned Mrs. Jordan. The Duke of Cumberland was rumored to have been guilty of incest. The Duke of York had an infamous affair with Mary Anne Clarke, which involved the sale of army commissions.

Georgiana, the Duchess of Devonshire, shared her home with her husband’s mistress, Lady Elizabeth Foster. The Duke fathered three children by his wife and two by his mistress. Meanwhile, Georgiana gave Lord Grey two children.

Lord Melbourne (the future Prime Minister) was reportedly fathered by Lord Egrement. Lady Melborne’s six children were rumored to have a variety of fathers. “Harleian Miscellany” was the term used to describe the Countess of Oxford, Lady Harley’s many children.

Lord Melbourne

 

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on The Decadent Prince Regent