Life Below Stairs – Part 4 – The Work Never Ends

Up before dawn, the servants of an aristocratic household found the work tedious. Likely, the lower servants worked two hours before he/she was permitted to sit to his own meager breakfast.

The kitchen maid began her day with lighting the cooking fire. To do so in a cast iron stove, she must first rake out the cinders and sweep the bars, the hobs, and the hearth free of dust. She would then clean the stove with a round-headed brush and black lead mixed with some water to make a “paste.”  When the black lead dried, it was polished with a special brush, which was designed to get into the groves of the ornamental work. At least one weekly, she also swept away the accumulated soot from the flues. Generally, she was expected to bring the cook the woman’s morning tea.

The housemaids began their days with cleaning the carpets. An unusual ritual included scattering wet sand or damp tea leaves over the carpets before they swept them. They cleaned the main hall and receiving rooms thoroughly and set fires in the hearths (after cleaning the grates). After morning prayers, the housemaids cleaned the bedchambers: changed bed linens, emptied chamberpots and baths, swept the carpets, dusted the furnishings, washed and polished wooden floors, etc. One must recall that there were three mattresses on a Victorian bed. The bottom one was filled with straw and was turned once weekly. The middle one was filled with wool or horsehair. It was turned daily. The top mattress was filled with feathers. Please recall that the housemaids were supposed to finished with their work by mid day.

Upper servants (cook, lady’s maid, governess, parlour maid, and nurse) usually got an extra hour sleep while others began their days as early as 5 A.M. The cook was responsible for 4 meals daily for the master and mistress and their guests, the children, and the other servants. She prepared a different type of meal for each group. All the servants, minus the nursery staff, sat down to breakfast shortly after 8 A.M. They would dine on leftovers of yesterday’s roast or cold meat pie and a slice of bread, along with a weak tea or home brewed beer. A tea break for the servants came at approximately 11 A.M. The cook would meet regularly with the mistress to discuss the menus for the day. The servants had their “dinner” between midday and one o’clock. Generally, it was a roast and vegetables with a rice or suet pudding. Beer was served with the meal. The nursery staff were given a shepherd’s pie or mutton stew. The master and mistress and the older children had a luncheon served by liveried footmen. This was a more formal meal than was breakfast. The course was usual fish, which was followed by hot dishes and then a sweet dessert or fresh fruit. The ladies would be out the door for afternoon social calls. 

Parlour maids, which replaced butlers during the Victorian era, set the table in the dining room, as well as to oversee the removal of the leftovers. Occasionally, the parlour maid acted as a valet to the master of the house. Parlour maids, like footmen, were chosen for their height and good looks, and they were often a target for unfaithful husbands. At about 9 each morning, the parlour maid would summon the family, the children, and the other servants to family prayers in the drawing room. (If you recall, Edmund Bertram and Mary Crawford discuss this practice in Jane Austen’s Mansfield Park.) Before she called the household to prayers, the parlour maid had set the table with linen and silverware. She had also placed bread, toast, butter, jam, and honey on the table, along with a cream and sugar for tea. After the prayers, she brought in the covered breakfast dishes. They family would then choose from hot and cold dishes: eggs, bacon, kidneys, kippers, fish, tongue, potted meat, etc.

The ladies’ maid woke her mistress and helped the lady of the house with her ablutions and dress. Remember that women of the  Victorian Period wore tightly laced corsets or stays, several petticoats, steel-hooped crinolines, tight pantaloons, and dresses with yards and yards and yards of material.

Nursery maids swept and cleaned the day nursery and lit the hearth for warmth. The governess saw to the children. Upper class ladies rarely visited their children in the nursery for longer than 30 minutes per day. With infants, a wet nurse was engaged. Ladies of quality never breast fed their children. Governesses were occasionally accused of using a bit of laudanum to keep the children in order. The first duty of the day was to bath and feed the babies/children. A mixture of milk and barley water was used for the infants. The governess was also responsible for administering prescribed medicines and purges of castor oil, senna, or peppermint. They took the children out for morning and afternoon excursions. Older children were bathed and dressed. Even little boys wore stays until the age of 7 or 8. Breakfast was a porridge or gruel. It was quite bland when compared to what the parents ate.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Comments Off on Life Below Stairs – Part 4 – The Work Never Ends

Life Below Stairs – Part 3 – The Role of the Male Servants

Dinner in the Servants' Hall

The English aristocrat often lived beyond his means. Maintaining country houses (often several of them) and a large Georgian town house in Mayfair took its toll on his purse strings. In addition to owning the property, Society forced him to maintain an extensive staff, which would see to his family’s needs.

Rank among the serving class manifested itself in extra bedrooms and workrooms to meet the servant hierarchy. The house steward and the housekeeper were often given a sitting room in which the upper servants could dine. A work space was required for the steward to conduct his business. The butler oversaw an extensive pantry. A stillroom was necessary. Storerooms for groceries. A separate china closet. The scullery. The ladies’ maids required a separate room where they could do their mending and ironing. Don’t forget a knife room. A shoe room. A lamp room. A brushing room. A servants’ hall. Etc. Etc. Etc.

Even a modest staff was costly. Characteristically, a land owner maintained 40-50 servants. A large number of male servants was an indication of a man’s wealth. Employing males, instead of females, created a greater expense because a tax on male servants was introduced by Lord North in 1777. The tax was to be used for the cost of fighting the Americans and the war with the French. It cost a landowner £7 for each male servant if there were eleven or more in the household. Although it was gradually reduced over the years, the tax continued until 1937.

Running Footman

Compounding the issue of keeping powdered footmen increased by the duty placed on the hair powder. That tax remained in place from 1786 to 1869. Is it any wonder that some landowners forced their servants to use ordinary house flour to save on expenses. A smart footman might use the household flour and then claim the reimbursement for the expense of the duty.

Footmen and other male servants were provided tailored livery. In the mid 1800s, it would cost 3 guineas for a footman’s uniform. Typically, a footman received 2-3 suits per year. Only the wealthiest aristocrat could afford to employ a house steward, groom of the chambers, valet, cook, butler, under-butler, footmen, footboy, usher, page, “tiger,” coachmen, grooms, a man-of-all-work, gardeners, etc.

footman

Footmen were chosen for their height and their handsomeness. Most were at least six feet tall. It was desirable to match the footmen in height (like the Rockettes). Most households had 3 footmen. The first footman, who was often called “James,” no matter what was his Christian name, usually acted as the lady’s footman. He would serve her breakfast, clean her shoes, take her dogs for a walk, stand behind her chair when she dined elsewhere, carry packages when she shopped, etc. The second footman served the afternoon meal. Often he completed valet duties for the eldest son. The third footman carried the coals and wood. The first and second footman served meals. They would accompany the carriage whenever it was used by any member of the household. The footmen were responsible for cleaning and polishing the silver.

The valet was usually at least 30 years of age. He was expected to have a superficial air of aristocracy about him. He saw to his master’s dress and was expected to be abreast of social gossip to aid his master in social engagements, etc. He did not wear livery. He would rise before his master. The aristocrat’s clothes were prepared, a bath drawn, and everything his master required for his ablutions prepared. He might also be required to dress the master, or he might need to know how to load a gun quickly so that his master could shoot with his friends.

The butler needed similar skills as the valet. He was responsible for the footmen, the custody of the plate, and the contents of the wine cellar. He also oversaw the brewing of the servants’ beer, the arrangement of the dining room, etc. Unlike our perceptions of the haughty butler who ruled a household with an iron hand, the Victorian butler was in a more lowly position. In reality, the valet, the house steward, and the groom of the chambers, all outranked him in the household. They also received higher pay.

The groom of the chambers was the one who attended the main door, opened doors for members of the household, filled inkpots, saw that everything the household members needed was within reach.

The house steward oversaw the transition from country estate to Town when the Season came around. He was responsible for all the servants. He maintained the household accounts.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on Life Below Stairs – Part 3 – The Role of the Male Servants

Mary Balogh’s “Slightly Married”

 Okay, I confess. I am a big Mary Balogh fan. In reality, Slightly Married is the first book by Balogh that I read. After that, I read just about everything she has written. This “Slightly” series and its spinoff, the “Simply” series remains my favorites.  The “Slightly” series involves the Bedwyn family: Wulfric, the Duke of Bewcastle, Rannulf, Alleyn, Aidan, Freyja, and Morgan. We are introduced to the siblings in Balogh’s A Summer to Remember.

Slightly Married by Mary Balogh (copyright April 2003); ISBN 0-440-24104-9; A Dell Book

Book Blurb: Meet the Bedwyns…six brothers and sisters—men and women of passion and privilege, daring and sensuality…Enter their dazzling world of high society and breathtaking seduction…where each will seek love, fight temptation, and court scandal…and where Aidan Bedwyn, the marriage-shy second son, discovers that matrimony may be the most seductive act of all.…

Like all the Bedwyn men, Aidan has a reputation for cool arrogance. But this proud nobleman also possesses a loyal, passionate heart—and it is this fierce loyalty that has brought Colonel Lord Aidan to Ringwood Manor to honor a dying soldier’s request. Having promised to comfort and protect the man’s sister, Aidan never expected to find a headstrong, fiercely independent woman who wants no part of his protection…nor did he expect the feelings this beguiling creature would ignite in his guarded heart. And when a relative threatens to turn Eve out of her home, Aidan gallantly makes her an offer she can’t refuse: marry him…if only to save her home. And now, as all of London breathlessly awaits the transformation of the new Lady Aidan Bedwyn, the strangest thing happens: With one touch, one searing embrace, Aidan and Eve’s “business arrangement” is about to be transformed…into something slightly surprising.

If you are looking for a book full of action and swashbuckling, this is not the book for you. This is a book containing well-developed characters placed in believable situations. Balogh takes the traditional Regency “marriage of convenience” story and adds a few new twists. She takes characters of different temperaments and views of life and brings them together in a fulfilling love story – a love begun in honor and duty and ending in passion.

Aidan Bedwyn does the honorable thing by offering to marry the down and out Eve Morris and, therefore, say her and her rag-tag group of misfits who depend on Eve for survival. Personally, I fell in love with Aidan from the beginning. He is not handsome (his hook nose is mentioned repeatedly), but he possesses a manliness that women would find  appealing. I love how Eve stands up to Bewcastle and the Bedwyn’s aunt, Lady Rochester.

I felt especially sad for both Aidan and Wulfric who are thrust into their roles simply because of birth order. Wulfric, as the first born, is deprived of his childhood as he is groomed to be the Duke of Bewcastle. As the second born, Aidan, who has the knowledge and the interest to make the estate wealthy, is sent to war. There is depth in Balogh’s character development. Yet, she does not “tell” her readers what she wants them to know. She “shows” them the multi-levels of characterization by Aidan’s and Eve’s actions and dialogue. Aidan’s stern facade crumbles as he falls in love with Eve Morris, who is a complex tangle of contradictions.

I would give this novel a 4.5 stars out of 5. It made me what to read the rest of the stories (which I will include in later reviews).

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | 3 Comments

Would you visit “Napoleonland”? French Planned Theme Park Celebrates Waterloo and Trafalgar

French plan ‘Napoleonland’ theme park which will stage daily re-enactments of Battles of Waterloo and Trafalgar

  • £180million park to be built on site of famous battle and create 3,000 jobs
  • Park is being billed as a rival to Disneyland and could open in 2017
  • Napoleon has no national museum despite being the second most famous Frenchman after Charles De Gaulle

By ROB COOPER

Last updated at 9:39 AM on 20th January 2012

Celebrated: Napoleon Bonaparte will be commemorated with a new theme park to be built at the site of the Battle of Montereau - if funding can be securedCelebrated: Napoleon Bonaparte will be commemorated with a new theme park to be built at the site of the Battle of Montereau – if funding can be secured.

After almost 200 years, the last thing you would think the French want is a daily reminder of the devastating military defeats at Waterloo and Trafalgar.

But now a theme park is being planned in honour of Napoleon Bonaparte – and will stage daily re-enactments of the victories for Wellington and Nelson.

Dubbed ‘Napoleonland’, the attraction is likely to be built on the site of one of the military leader’s most famous victories.

If funding is secured for the £180million park it is expected to create 3,000 jobs and could ultimately emerge as a rival to Disneyland.

There are plans to build it at the site where Napoleon defeated the Austrians in the Battle of Montereau in 1814 in Montereau-Fault-Yonne just south of Paris.

The six-day battle was the nation’s last military victory over the Austrians.

The Battle of Waterloo, which put an end to Napoleon’s rule in France, is expected to be recreated on a daily basis and visitors may even be able to take part in the reenactments.

They will also be able to take in a water show recreating the Battle of Trafalgar.

A museum, a hotel, shops, restaurants and a congress are all expected to be built at the park.

Planners are also hoping to recreate the killing of Louis XVI, France’s last King, who died after being guillotined during the Revolution.

And in another attraction visitors may be able to ski around the bodies of soldiers and horses frozen on the battlefield.

Napoleon is the second most famous French and much-celebrated leader after Charles De Gaulle – so it remains to be seen how much room his countrymen give over to Lord Nelson’s victory at the Battle of Trafalgar.

French politician Yves Jego, who is backing the project, hopes that construction work can get underway in 2014 and the park open its doors in 2017.

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2089267/French-plan-Napoleonland-theme-park-stage-daily-reenactments-Battles-Waterloo-Trafalgar.html#ixzz1kESu6wSH

Posted in Uncategorized | 4 Comments

Ah, Politics…

Living on the border between North and South Carolina, of late, we have been inundated with politics. Between the SC Primary and the Democratic National Convention coming to Charlotte in September, we have heard our share of political rhetoric. Here is a bit of humor to lighten the mood…

Ah, politics!

1. In my many years I have come to a conclusion that one useless man is a shame, two is a law firm and three or more is a congress. – John Adams

2. If you don’t read the newspaper you are uninformed, if you do read the newspaper you are misinformed. – Mark Twain

3. Suppose you were an idiot. And suppose you were a member of Congress. But then I repeat myself. – Mark Twain

4. I contend that for a nation to try to tax itself into prosperity is like a man standing in a bucket and trying to lift himself up by the handle. – Winston Churchill

5. A government which robs Peter to pay Paul can always depend on the support of Paul. – George Bernard Shaw

6. A liberal is someone who feels a great debt to his fellow man, which debt he proposes to pay off with your money. – G. Gordon Liddy

7. Democracy must be something more than two wolves and a sheep voting on what to have for dinner. – James Bovard, Civil Libertarian (1994)

8. Foreign aid might be defined as a transfer of money from poor people in rich countries to rich people in poor countries. – Douglas Casey, Classmate of Bill Clinton at Georgetown University

9. Giving money and power to government is like giving whiskey and car keys to teenage boys. – P.J. O’Rourke, Civil Libertarian

10. Government is the great fiction, through which everybody endeavors to live at the expense of everybody else. – Frederic Bastiat, French economist (801-1850)

11. Government’s view of the economy could be summed up in a few short phrases: If it moves, tax it. If it keeps moving, regulate it. And if it stops moving, subsidize it. – Ronald Reagan (1986)

12. I don’t make jokes. I just watch the government and report the facts. – Will Rogers

13. If you think health care is expensive now, wait until you see what it costs when it’s free! – P.J. O’Rourke

14. In general, the art of government consists of taking as much money as possible from one party of the citizens to give to the other. – Voltaire (1764)

15. Just because you do not take an interest in politics doesn’t mean politics won’t take an interest in you! – Pericles (430 B.C.)

16. No man’s life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is in session. – Mark Twain (1866)

17. Talk is cheap…except when Congress does it. – Anonymous

18. The government is like a baby’s alimentary canal, with a happy appetite at one end and no responsibility at the other. – Ronald Reagan

19. The inherent vice of capitalism is the unequal sharing of the blessings. The inherent blessing of socialism is the equal sharing of misery. – Winston Churchill

20. The only difference between a tax man and a taxidermist is that the taxidermist leaves the skin. – Mark Twain

21. The ultimate result of shielding men from the effects of folly is to fill the world with fools. – Herbert Spencer, English Philosopher (1820-1903)

22. There is no distinctly Native American criminal class…save Congress. – Mark Twain

23. What this country needs are more unemployed politicians. – Edward Langley, Artist (1928-1995)

24. A government big enough to give you everything you want, is strong enough to take everything you have. – Thomas Jefferson

25. We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to public office. -Aesop

FIVE BEST SENTENCES

1. You cannot legislate the poor into prosperity, by legislating the wealth out of prosperity

2. What one person receives without working for…another person must work for without receiving.

3. The government cannot give to anybody anything that the government does not first take from somebody else.

4. You cannot multiply wealth by dividing it.

5. When half of the people get the idea that they do not have to work because the other half is going to take care of them, and when the other half gets the idea that it does no good to work because somebody else is going to get what they worked for, that is the beginning of the end of any nation!

Can you think of a single reason for not sharing this?

Neither could I…….


Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | 4 Comments

Life Below Stairs – Part II – Snobbery and Rules of Engagement

from "Upstairs, Downstairs"

Yesterday, we looked at what a servant in an upper house, or even in a second-class household, of the late Regency Period or early Victorian times, might encounter. We spoke of wages, delineation of duties, and additional compensation. Today, we wish to examine the “snobbery” found among the servant class. As mentioned in yesterday’s article, the servants in upper households expected “tips” from the master’s guests. If he did not receive it, he might still exact his revenge on those who paid a second visit to the estate. On his return, a guest might find himself in a one of the draftier bedchambers or he might be met at the train in a cart rather than an estate carriage.

The servants expected the guests to conform to certain standards of gentility. Heaven help a stranger who appeared on a the doorstep and not dressed to the hilt. John James, in The Memoirs of a House Steward, tells a tale of how, in 1895, he mistook His Grace the Duke of Westminster for a servant. Apparently, Westminster wore shabbily care for clothing, and he was clean shaved, which was frowned upon in that time. James did not realize his mistake until he examined the man’s card.

Of course, below stairs, the servants commented freely on the master’s guests. “Behind the servants’ mask of perfect politeness and consummate gentility, there were dark thoughts and hidden feelings, another world to which only the still innocent children of the house were ever admitted, where rumours echoed from the lofty ceilings and were imagined and distorted into malicious gossip and false report. The roots of the servant grapevine were embedded deep in the foundation of each great London house. A fragment of conversation overheard by a footman at the dinner table or some actual confidence foolishly entrusted by some too ingenuous mistress to her maid, would be carried swiftly downstairs to the kitchen. From there it was transported lovingly up and down the neighboring area steps by the visiting butterman and butcher to be deposited with that day’s order on the great wooden tables in nearby kitchens, whence it could be disseminated to every part of the house by a word and a wink between the first and second footman or by a whispered conversation between two under housemaids who shared the same room, and sometimes the same bed, in the cold and draughty attic.” (Huggett, “Life Below Stairs”) This situation reminds me of the chauffeur in the play Sabrina Fair (basis of the movie Sabrina, which starred Humphrey Bogart and Audrey Hepburn) who earns a fortune by simply listening to his employer conduct business in the backseat of the car and then buying and selling stocks based on Linus Larrabee’s knowledge of the stock market.

Some servants even followed their masters into battle. Yet, such devotion to the old ways died quickly as the servant class became more aware of the world in which they lived. The penny post might have brought down a feudal way of life. Although wages increased significantly in the later part of the 19th Century, it did not guarantee a servants’ loyalty. Also, the lower servants no longer accepted the strict unspoken rules of the household. One might find those below stairs sporting more freely among the servant dichotomy.

This information comes from a website I dearly adore. Wedding Castle – An Online History (KEY PEOPLE: The Life of Victorian Servants). http://www.webspinners.org.uk/weddingtoncastle2/new_page_77.htm

Below are examples of some of the rules that the servants had to follow

1 – When being spoken to, stand still, keeping your hands quiet, and always look at the person speaking.Housemaid

2 – Never let your voice be heard by the ladies and gentlemen of the household, unless they have spoken directly to you a question or statement which requires a response, at which time, speak as little as possible.

3 – In the presence of your mistress, never speak to another servant or person of your own rank, or to a child, unless only for necessity, and then as little as possible and as quietly as possible.

4 – Never begin to talk to the ladies or gentlemen, unless to deliver a message or to ask a necessary question, and then, do it in as few words as possible.

5 – Whenever possible, items that have been dropped, such as spectacles or handkerchiefs, and other small items, should be returned to their owners on a salver.

6 – Always respond when you have received an order, and always use the proper address: “Sir”, “Ma’am”, “Miss” or “Mrs,” as the case may be.

7 – Never offer your opinion to your employer.

8 – Always “give room”: that is, if you encounter one of your betters in the house or on the stairs, you are to make yourself as invisible as possible, turning yourself toward the wall and averting your eyes.

9 – Except in reply to a salutation offered, never say “good morning” or “good night” to your employer.

10 – If you are required to walk with a lady or gentleman in order to carry packages, or for any other reason, always keep a few paces back.

11 – You are expected to be punctual to your place at mealtime.

12 – You shall not receive any Relative, Visitor or Friend into the house, nor shall you introduce any person into the Servant’s Hall, without the consent of the Butler or Housekeeper.

13 – Followers are strictly forbidden. Any member of the female staff who is found to be fraternizing shall be immediately dismissed.

14 – Expect that any breakages or damages in the house shall be deducted from your wages.


Servants’ Wages

In Victorian times, live-in servants, who had all their expenses (food, lodging, clothes etc) taken care of, earned as little as £10 a year, (which is only the equivalent of £77 in today’s money).

Here is a list of the average wages of servants (figures collected by the Board of Trade in the 1890s).

Between Maid            £10, 7s
Scullery Maid             £13
Kitchen Maid             £15
Housemaid                £16, 2s
Parlour Maid             £20, 6s
Cook                         £20, 2s
Lady’s Maid              £24, 7s
Cook / Housekeeper £35, 6s
Housekeeper             £52, 5s

In 1888 Butlers earned £45 per annum and had no expenses except clothes. They would make up their income from such perks as tradesman offering discounts to receive continued orders. Butlers would also collect the end of candles and one bottle of wine for every six opened.

1800s advertisement

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , | Comments Off on Life Below Stairs – Part II – Snobbery and Rules of Engagement

Kate Huntington’s The Captain’s Courtship

We have a small used book store in my community. I love to frequent local merchants and being in a book store is nearly as divine as being in a library. Surround me with books, and I am a happy woman. One of the things I like about this store is the proprietor keeps copies of some of the more traditional Regency writers. I chose Kate Huntington’s book simply based on her name. I am from Huntington, West Virginia, so the lady’s name caught my eye. I originally bought His Lordship’s Holiday Surprise and A Rogue for Christmas to read over the holidays. I enjoyed both so much that I returned for several more of Huntington’s titles.

Book Blurb: A Desperate Fortune Hunter: Vanessa Whittaker must become betrothed by the end of her first London season – or else resign her fate and that of her family to the poorhouse. Encouraging the sole attentions of well-heeled elderly men, the raven-tressed beauty scorns the most handsome young noblemen Society has to offer, including wounded war hero Captain Alexander Logan. But it isn’t long before Vanessa’s resolve slowly crumbles under this dashing rogue’s irresistibly wicked spell!

A Daring Captain: Against his father’s wishes, Captain Alexander Logan intends to return to his regiment, even if it means wooing a pretty fortune hunter. Surely then his father will hasten to send him away to the military. Yet, Alex has not reckoned on taking so much pleasure in matching wits with the delectable Miss Whittaker, who is determined to ignore his amorous advances. But two can play on the battlefield of love. Soon, Alex sets out to teach Vanessa a lesson and reap his own rewards from a sham courtship that is quickly laying siege to two unsuspecting hearts.

The Captain’s Courtship by Kate Huntington (A Zebra Regency Romance – Kensington Publishing Company – copyright 1999)

Okay, if you are not old enough to remember Regency romances without “sex,” this book may not be for you. I am no prude. Some of my books contain sex scenes, some contain references to possible sexual interludes, and some have none. I do not write sex scenes simply to include one. That is probably because I spent much of my time reading books like Ms. Huntington’s. There is still sexual tension. Plenty of it, in fact.

Although Huntington’s use of the “fake engagement” is a tried and true entanglement in Regencies, this novel has a bit of a twist. It seems fresh. The dialogue is realistic – as if it was one that a person might overhear. Although there are several contrived plot twists, the storyline develops logically. It is well-crafted and, generally, follows the traditional format set by Georgette Heyer. The characters are fully developed and are worth rooting for. Both the hero and the heroine exhibit noble intentions: he for saving her family and her for not trying to “milk” him for his fortune.

There were some points that bothered me. For example, I do not understand why the family chooses to repair a house that cannot be theirs. Captain Logan gives Vanessa 2000 pounds to portray his betrothed. There are only females in the family. She and her sisters return home to save an estate that they cannot inherit. Secondly, using Sir Gregory Bainbridge to ruin Vanessa’s reputation made sense as a plot device. It did not make sense to have Bainbridge and Robert Langtry, her childhood sweetheart, being friends at the end of the book.

I did love the scene on the docks when Vanessa rushes to Logan’s side before he sets sail for the Continent. It was sweetly done and very satisfying.

Only one of Ms. Huntington’s titles are currently available in an eBook format. To Tempt a Gentleman has a 2005 copyright. The rest of her titles are available from used book outlets. Yet, they are worth checking out if one wishes to read a Regency with more plot than steam. I give the book a 4 out of 5 stars.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Comments Off on Kate Huntington’s The Captain’s Courtship

Royal Princesses – Part VI – George III’s Descendants – Princess Amelia

Princess Amelia was born on 7 August 1783, at the Royal Lodge, Windsor, the youngest of George III and Queen Charlotte’s fifteen children, as well as the only of her siblings born at Windsor Castle. Called “Emily” by her affectionate father,  Amelia was born after the early deaths of her two elder brothers: Octavius (23 February 1779 – 3 May 1783) and Alfred (22 September 1780 – 20 August 1782).  The death of these two princes left a gap of almost six years between Amelia and her nearest surviving sibling, Princess Sophia. She was twenty-one years younger than her eldest sibling George and nearly seventeen years younger than her eldest sister Charlotte.

Amelia was christened at the Chapel Royal, St. James Palace by John Moore, The Archbishop of Canterbury, on 17 September 1783. Her godparents were The Prince of Wales (Amelia’s eldest brother), The Princess Royal (her eldest sister), and The Princess Augusta Sophia (her second eldest sister). Compared to the carefully planned education that Charlotte, Augusta, and Elizabeth had been given, the education given to Mary, Sophia, and Amelia was based solely on what had come before. Amelia was only five years old when her father suffered his first bout of madness As a consequence of her father’s declining health, she never experienced the closeness and affection that had characterized the family during her eldest sisters’ early years.

Being the fifteen child, Amelia was never “healthy.” She spent much of her childhood at Worthing with a tubercular knee. In 1801, Amelia was left at Weymouth for the sea air. With her was her governess, Miss Jane Gomm, and the King’s equerry, Colonel the Honourable Sir Charles FitzRoy, a descendant of Charles II. FitzRoy was 39 and Amelia only 18. A lover of romantic novels, the princess fell in love with the man. Mary tried to counsel her sister, but Amelia would have none of it. FitzRoy even lent Amelia 5000 pounds. Her letters regarding the affair survive. She takes full responsibility for pursuing the man.

Most people believe that although rumors exist of a secret marriage, FitzRoy was careful to keep his position. Amelia, however, began to sign her letters with “Amelia F.R.” and even had those initials engraved on her silver.  In 1807, the King became aware of the rumors. Miss Gomm took much of the blame for “looking the other way.” Reportedly, the Queen had agreed to the match “the moment the King was dead.” The correspondence between Amelia and FitzRoy continued.

By 1808, Amelia was making inquiries into how to thwart the Royal Marriage Act. She would have to wait until she was five and twenty before she could act. That or pray that her father would go permanently mad and George IV would permit her to marry her beloved. She drafted letters to both the Privy Council and to the Prince Regent. She said, “I would never marry where I could not give my affections, and General FitzRoy possesses all my affection.” However, the letters were never sent.

Amelia’s health deteriorated, and she convinced herself that her mother wanted her to die because the Queen forbade Amelia from telling the King about FitzRoy. In 1809, leaving FitzRoy behind, she returned to Weymouth for her health. During her time at Weymouth, Mary refused to give her sister the comfort of speaking of FitzRoy. Eventually, she was brought home to Windsor to die.

Amelia settled with Mary at Augusta Lodge in Windsor. As she had only repaid General FitzRoy one thousand pounds, Amelia wished to make him her heir. Amelia wrote to Prinny and asked him to intercede with the Queen, who wished for Amelia to leave her wealth to the Ladies of the Castle. She was in great discomfort when Princess Augusta arranged for FitzRoy to visit with Amelia.

Amelia had a special keepsake made for her father. It was mourning ring with some of her hair sealed within and the inscription “Amelia” and “Remember Me” on the back. Amelia died at the age of seven and twenty (1810). Prinny had difficulty carrying out her will: she had left her jewels to FitzRoy and had made him her residuary legatee. The Prince of Wales finally convinced FitzRoy to give the jewels to Mary. The general wrote of Amelia, “She was the adored and departed angel.” He married eventually.

If you enjoyed this series, try Laura Purcell’s “Which Daughter of George III Are You?” Quiz. Visit http://quizilla.teennick.com/quizzes/22967157/which-daughter-of-george-iii-are-you

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | 4 Comments

Royal Princesses – Part V – George III’s Descendants – Princess Sophia

Sophia Matilda was born on 3 November 1777, the twelfth child and fifth daughter of George III and Queen Charlotte. She was equally as beautiful as Mary and likely more intelligent. Sophia is said to have been the people’s favorite. Unfortunately. Sophia had inherited the family malady and often suffered from “spasms,” bouts of depression, and a throat malady that made it hard for her to swallow. Like her father, Sophia’s constitution was stronger than many expected. She lived to age 72.

Much of Sophia’s story is pure conjecture. Reportedly, she bore a General Thomas Garth an illegitimate son in 1800. Lord Glenbervie published the rumors of the child’s birth in his Journal. Supposedly, Glenbervie learned of the child from the Princess of Wales, whose “fondness” for the Royal Family had gone by the wayside. Glenbervie wrote, “The foundling which was left at the Taylors is now in a manner admitted by the Court to be Princess Sophia’s, and, as the story goes, by General Garth.”

Garth was a British Army officer and chief equerry to King George III. The child was called Thomas. Anthony Camp in Royal Mistresses and Bastards (London 2007, pages 313-323) challenges the idea of Sophia maternal attempts.

In his Memoirs, Charles Greville wrote, “The Princesses lived at the Lower Lodge. Pss. Sophia, however, was unwell, and was removed to the Upper Lodge, and a few days after the K. and Queen went to town, leaving the Pss. there. Garth, who was one of the King’s equerries, remained also, and his bedroom at the Lodge was just over hers. Nine months from that time she was brought to bed. The old King never knew of it. The Court was at Weymouth when she was big with child. She was said to be dropsical, and then suddenly recovered. ”

The March 15th, 1829, version in the Morning Chronicles claimed Sophia gave birth during the royal family’s annual move from Windsor to Weymouth for their summer holiday. During the journey, Sophia took ill in Andover. Yet, once she reached Weymouth, she had recovered completely. Mysteriously, a male child was placed with a family named Taylor, who had just had their own son. He lived lived with the family until age 4, when General Garth removed the child to be brought up as his own.

Rumors also existed of a secret marriage, which would have been illegal because of the Royal Marriage Act. Garth was 38 years Sophia’s senior. Supposedly, he had a large port-wine colored birthmark that marred his countenance. He had a house called Ilsington in Puddletown, which was often visited by the Royal Family en route from London to Weymouth. With a reputation for devotion to the Royal Family, the Prince Regent placed Garth in charge of his renegade daughter Princess Charlotte. When she was in residence at Ilsington, Charlotte wrote to her friend Margaret Mercer Elphinstone that Garth spoiled “his son,” who was at Harrow at the time. Charlotte even insinuated that Garth put the young man in Charlotte’s way as a possible suitor.

The boy Thomas had an unsuccessful army career and found himself in deep debt. In 1829, he precipitated additional scandal by attempting blackmail. By that time, the story of Garth and Princess Sophia had taken on a life of its own. People now considered General Garth as a loyal servant who agreed to cover up an incestuous relationship between Sophia and her brother, the Duke of Cumberland, who was never a people’s favorite. Hoping to drive Cumberland from England, the newspapers printed the story. However, Cumberland brought his son and wife over from Hanover and faced the allegations head on.

Even worse than the Cumberland tale is the suspicion that Sophia’s child might have belonged to her father. When she was living in the Upper Lodge, George III was living there also. Not mad at the time, the monarch had had several episodes previously and would go mad again the following year. People consider this a strong possibility because of General Garth’s total devotion to his monarch. This would certainly explain why Sophia’s brothers and sisters closed ranks to protect her.

Part 6 concludes the series tomorrow with Princess Amelia.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | 16 Comments

Royal Princesses – Part IV – George III’s Descendants – Princess Mary

Princess Mary was born, on 25 April 1776, at Buckingham Palace. Mary was christened on 19 May 1776, in the Great Council Chamber at St. James Palace, by Frederick Cornwallis, The Archbishop of Canterbury. Her godparents were Landgrave Frederick of Hesse-Cassel (her first cousin once-removed); The Duchess of Saxe-Gotha-Altenburg (her cousin’s wife); and Princess Charles of Mecklenburg-Strelitz (her third cousin once-removed). As we have learned previously, each of King George’s daughters possessed a distinct personality. Princess Mary, “Minny” to her sisters, was said to be the prettiest of the bunch. Mary was known as the family “nurse.” When her younger sister Amelia was dying,  it was Mary who traveled to Weymouth to tend the girl. As the Regency came into place with George III’s madness, Mary wrote daily report to her bother regarding their father’s condition. Mary stressed how Queen Charlotte’s presence upset her husband, and it was with her suggestion that the daughters visit their father instead.

Like her sisters before her, Mary resisted her mother’s manipulations. The Queen had insisted that her daughters share her cloistered existence at Windsor. Mary, however, as the oldest unmarried Princess, opened the Grand Ball at Carlton House for the 1814 victory celebration. She danced with the Duke of Cumberland.  Later, she opened her brother’s fete for Arthur Wellsley, the Duke of Wellington. On that evening, she danced with the Duke of Devonshire. She was considered the best of George III’s daughters when it came to social situations.

Around 1796, Mary had fallen in love with the Dutch prince Frederick, while he and his family lived in exile in London. Frederik was a son of  William V, Prince of Orange,  the Dutch stadholder, and younger brother to the future King William I of the Netherlands.  However Frederik and Mary never wed because George III had stipulated that her elder sisters must marry first. In 1799, Prince Frederik died of an infection while serving in the army, and Mary was allowed to go into official mourning.

In 1815, Mary’s cousin William Frederick, Duke of Gloucester, presented himself as a possible suitor.  They married on 22 July 1816. On that day, the Prince Regent granted the Duke the style of His Royal Highness by Order in Council. The Duke had been encouraged to stay single so that he might become a suitable groom for Princess Charlotte of Wales, heir to the throne. He was the “just in case” – just in case no foreign match could be found for Charlotte. Both he and Mary were age 40 at the time of their marriage; therefore, no children came of their joining.

Ironically, the Duke of Gloucester had been one of the reasons George III had put the Royal Marriage Act in place. William Frederick was the son of George III’s brother Prince William Henry, Duke of Gloucester and Edinburgh. However, his mother was one of the illegitimate daughters of Sir Edward Walpole and Walpole’s low class mistress. William Frederick was known as “Silly Billy” within the family because of his lack of both charm and intelligence. Mary wrote, “I do not know what other people feel when going to be married, but, as yet, I have done nothing but cry.”

Mary likely had very good reason to shed a few tears. Gloucester shocked his dear family by coming out as a Whig. Although he permitted his wife to attend her family in times of distress, Mary found it more difficult to escape her husband’s tight hold for pleasanter times. Gloucester allowed Mary to support her sisters during her mother’s death. (He actually went abroad to leave his wife to her duties.) He even gave her permission to participate in attending her father. Yet, when she wished to enjoy her family celebrations, Gloucester did not approve. He was an Evangelical and did not believe in Sunday travel. Mary’s husband thoroughly disapproved of the decadent Prince Regent. The man even barred his wife the use of the downstairs reception rooms at their home for entertaining. Poor Mary had to receive guests in her rooms on the uppermost floors of the house.

The Duke of Gloucester died in 1834. Mary dutifully nursed her husband through his illness. Mary lived to the ripe old age of 80. She outlived all of George III’s fifteen children. Mary passed away on 30 April 1857 at Gloucester House, London.

Part V continues tomorrow with Princess Sophia.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | 8 Comments