In the lead up to Christmas 1914, there were several peace initiatives. The Open Christmas Letter was a public message for peace addressed “To the Women of Germany and Austria,” signed by a group of 101 British women suffragettes at the end of 1914 as the first Christmas of World War I approached.

Emily Hobhouse authored the Open Christmas Letter and circulated it for signatures.
License details
This image (or other media file) is in the public domain because its copyright has expired.

The Open Christmas Letter was written in acknowledgment of the mounting horror of modern war and as a direct response to letters written to American feminist Carrie Chapman Catt, the president of the International Woman Suffrage Alliance (IWSA), by a small group of German women’s rights activists. Published in January 1915 in Jus Suffragii, the journal of the IWSA, the Open Christmas Letter was answered two months later by a group of 155 prominent German and Austrian women who were pacifists. The exchange of letters between women of nations at war helped promote the aims of peace, and helped prevent the fracturing of the unity, which lay in the common goal they shared: suffrage for women.

The decision by some suffragists to speak out against the war split the women’s suffrage movement in the United Kingdom. Most British women were in favour of a quick solution to the conflict and were inclined to work toward that end in any way such as by helping fill positions abandoned by men off at war. Others were nationalistic and sought to make certain that British women were seen as patriotic, as doing their part, so that the men in power would think more highly of them and subsequently pass woman suffrage legislation. A minority of women advocated peace vociferously and worked with international peace organisations or with refugee aid societies. All suffragists from the most strikingly militant to the most actively pacifist agreed not to disrupt the nation at war in their promotion of women’s suffrage. Toward the end of the war, British politicians rewarded them with a partial victory: suffrage for property-holding women aged 30 and older.

From 1906 until mid-1914, the Labour Party in the United Kingdom was the party seen as most supportive of women’s suffrage—the right of women to vote. Suffragettes and other women’s rights activists organised to elect Labour candidates and to push for legislation that expanded the rights of women. In August 1914 when the world became embroiled in war, the British women activists were sharply divided into two camps: the majority who wished to work with their country’s war effort, and a minority who opposed the conflict. Millicent Garrett Fawcett of the National Union of Women’s Suffrage Societies (NUWSS) wished to have the NUWSS members work for the war so that the men in politics would view the women with greater respect and would thus be more amenable to granting them the right to vote. However, the NUWSS membership included those who were against war. When Fawcett turned the NUWSS to war work, eleven pacifist members resigned, later to join the Women’s International League for Peace and Freedom (WILPF).

Like the NUWSS, the more militant Women’s Social and Political Union (WSPU) led by Emmeline and Christabel Pankhurst chose to cease their obstructive activism for women’s votes and instead advocated the alignment of British women to the cause of war. However, in October 1914, Sylvia Pankhurst travelled to Glasgow and spoke out against the war, becoming one of the first suffragettes to do so. She said that “peace must be made by the people and not by the diplomats.” Though pacifist, Pankhurst held with her mother and sister to the general agreement that suffragettes would abstain from militant activism for the duration—she arranged for activist women to join with the War Emergency Worker’s Committee and fill some of the positions that had been abandoned by men leaving for war.

In Jus Suffragii in December 1914, Carrie Chapman Catt published a letter that she had received earlier from Anita Augspurg, Lida Gustava Heymann, and several other German women activists including presidents of woman suffrage societies in Germany. The letter was entitled “To the International Woman Suffrage Alliance, through its president, Mrs. Chapman Catt.”[5] It began, “To the women of all nations warm and hearty greetings in these wretched and bloody times.” The German women expressed that the “criminally rekindled war” should not separate women from all countries who had previously been united “by the common striving for the highest object—personal and political freedom.” They stated that “True humanity knows no national hatred, no national contempt. Women are nearer to true humanity than men.”

Catt published another letter from German women’s rights activist Clara Zetkin, one that expressed the desire for all women not to let “the thunder of guns and the shouts of the jingoes” make them forget that the rise of civilisation amongst the European countries held much in common. Zetkin wrote that the women of the world should guard their children against the “hollow din” of “cheap racial pride” which filled the streets, and that “the blood of dead and wounded must not become a stream to divide what present need and future hope unite.”

n response to the letters from Germany, Emily Hobhouse organised the writing and signing of a peace-promoting letter from British women: the Open Christmas Letter. In the 1900s, Hobhouse campaigned against and worked to change the appalling conditions inside the British concentration camps in South Africa built for Boer women and children during the Second Boer War. She saw in the German letters the opportunity for maintaining vital international relations among women who could help mitigate the damage that war would bring. She wrote what she called a “Letter of Christmas Greeting” in November 1914 and circulated it for signatures of women who wished for peace. Pankhurst and Helen Bright Clark were among the first to sign Hobhouse’s plea for continued sisterhood among the women of the world.

Others among the 101 signers were Margaret Ashton, Margaret Bondfield, Eva Gore-Booth, Esther Roper, Maude Royden, Helena Swanwick, and a wide range of women united by the wish for “undiminished sisterly relations” and a swift end to hostilities. Included among the women were some who were members of the Women’s Labour League, and some of the Independent Labour Party. One of the listed women was “Mrs. M. K. Gandhi” but it is unknown whether Kasturba Gandhi, the wife of Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi, asked that her name be included. At least one of the signers was an American: Florence Edgar Hobson was the New York-born wife of English Liberal social theorist and economist John A. Hobson.

The Message
Under the heading “On Earth Peace, Goodwill towards Men,” the letter’s salutation addressed “Sisters” and began, “Some of us wish to send you a word at this sad Christmastide, though we can but speak through the Press…” The women of the UK were prevented from direct communication with the women of Germany because of the war. Instead, they sent their missive to America, which was at that time a neutral nation. The letter continued, “The Christmas message sounds like mockery to a world at war, but those of us who wished and still wish for peace may surely offer a solemn greeting to such of you who feel as we do.” The letter mentioned that, as in South Africa during the Second Boer War (1899–1902) and in the Balkan Wars of 1912–1913, “the brunt of modern war falls upon non-combatants, and the conscience of the world cannot bear the sight.”

“Is it not our mission to preserve life? Do not humanity and common sense alike prompt us to join hands with the women of neutral countries, and urge our rulers to stay further bloodshed? …
Even through the clash of arms, we treasure our poet’s vision, and already seem to hear

“A hundred nations swear that there shall be
Pity and Peace and Love among the good and free.”

May Christmas hasten that day..

The Response
In the spring of 1915, the letter was answered in kind by 155 Germanic feminists including Augspurg and Heymann, who had sent the earlier letter from Germany. Margarethe Lenore Selenka, Minna Cauer, and Helene Stöcker were among the German signers; Rosa Mayreder, Marianne Fickert, Ernestine Federn, and Ernestine von Fürth were in the group of Austrian signers. The response was entitled “Open Letter in Reply to the Open Christmas Letter from Englishwomen to German and Austrian Women” and was published in Jus Suffragii on 1 March 1915. The letter began:

“To our English sisters, sisters of the same race, we express in the name of many German women our warm and heartfelt thanks for their Christmas greetings, which we only heard of lately.

This message was a confirmation of what we foresaw—that women of the belligerent countries, with all faithfulness, devotion, and love to their country, can go beyond it and maintain true solidarity with the women of other belligerent nations, and that really civilised women never lose their humanity..

For more information on this event, visit

Diana Overby’s Presently in the Past – https://dianaoverbey.wordpress.com/2012/12/21/open-christmas-letter-december-1914/

Many of these details can be found at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_Christmas_Letter