Persuasion 1995 Movie Discussion

In describing Persuasion in his script’s introduction, Nick Dear said, “The story essentially describes an old order fading away into decadence, and a new tribe, a meritocracy, coming to the fore.” Persuasion has seen four renderings. The first was presented on four consecutive weeks from December 30, 1960, to January 20, 1961. Daphne Slater, who incidentally portrayed Elizabeth Bennet in 1952’s Pride and Prejudice, played Anne Elliot, while Paul Daneman took on the role of Frederick Wentworth. ITV presented the second adaptation in five parts from April 18 to May 16, 1971. This adaptation starred Ann Firbank and Bryan Marshall in the main roles. In April 1995, BBC-2 presented the third rendering. This one was later released to theatres. It brought us Amanda Root and Ciarán Hinds. In 2007, Rupert Penry Jones and Sally Hawkins took on the parts of Anne and Wentworth. As cinematic adaptations of Jane Austen’s novels go, the 1995 version of Persuasion has kept its critics at bay. For me, it is by far the superior film. In 2009, when I wrote Captain Wentworth’s Persuasion, it was Amanda Root and Ciarán Hinds that I saw in my mind’s eye as the book’s characters.

So, these are a hodge podge of my ramblings on this particular film adaptation. I would love to hear your own thoughts on this one, as well as any comments on the other versions of Persuasion. This is, after all, a movie discussion.
*In the 1971 version, Ann Firbank is always perfectly dressed, but Nick Dear wanted Root’s portrayal to show Anne’s movement from “dowdy” to “blossoming.” It amazes me that some wanted a more more glamorous actress to play Anne. At the time (and even now), I thought Amanda Root the perfect choice.
*Anne is portrayed as a “servant,” creating sympathy for her character. At Uppercross, she picks up toys and tends to the injured Little Charles. At Kellynch Hall, it is Anne who holds the keys to the house, very much as a housekeeper might. She catalogues the house’s belongings.
*Roger Michell uses several close ups of Anne, but they often off center. This makes the viewer see her as out of sync with her family.
*We never see Sir Walter in a natural setting, whereas Wentworth and Croft are.
*There is a sharp contrast between the sterile Kellynch Hall and the welcoming “home” of the Musgroves.
*Nick Dear creates a “caustic” Elizabeth Elliot, as she sprawls on her chair, laughs too loudly, and talks with her mouth full. This is one area that is often criticized in the film. This Elizabeth Elliot is less “ladylike” than the one presented by Austen.
*When Anne travels to Uppercross, she is deglamorized by riding with a pig and a goose in the open cart.
*Like we noted previously with Colin Firth’s character, Root is often shown staring out windows, essentially distancing herself from the others. She is preoccupied and uncomfortable.
*The scene where creditors crowd around Mr. Shepherd creates a sense of chaos. This is achieved through hand held tracking shots and a swish pan. Usually movement indicates strength and vitality, but not in this case.
*Besides establishing the historical context of the film, the “invented” opening sequence with Admiral Croft and the sailors rowing in unison is a powerful contrast to the indolence shown by Sir Walter at Kellynch Hall.
*The characters remain seated at Kellynch. There is no movement. It is a “dying” culture.
We see the same “staleness” in the Elliots’ Bath residence. Hand held tracking shots show them lounging on chaises longues.

*Nick Dear describes the scene where Anne, dressed in white and sitting among the sheet-covered furniture at Kellynch, as a “shroud for a dead house.”

*In the Kellynch dining room, the vast, over-decorated table dwarfs the Elliots.
The ship’s ward room is small, dark, and smoky, and it is filled with action-filled officers. A single, tight circling shot relays the cohesiveness of the group. This is in contrast to the previous dining room scene. The ward room’s table is covered with various hats all tossed together, indicating the group’s solidarity. Sir Walter’s table holds the iced-swan sculpture.
*A lack of real substance is shown in Lady Dalrymple’s caked on makeup and the use of backlighting.
*Only a “letter folded up into a paper boat” and concealed inside a copy of “the Navy List, 1806” elicits any emotional response from Anne while she is at Kellynch.
*The sun lights Anne’s face for the first time when she arrives at Uppercross.
*The swiftly moving paper boats are bringing Anne to her future. These boats are made for the children by Admiral Croft, a direct connection to Wenworth.
*The high angle swish pan shot of Wentworth’s desperate attempt to catch Louisa indicates his being out of step on land.
*Wentworth is separated from Anne by a table and three seated figures when she looks out the window for Mr. Elliot. There is a “gulf” between them.
*Nick Dear’s Anne is more assertive than the one in Austen’s novels. This plays to the more modern female viewer. She chases Wentworth from the concert room, sharply answers her father’s criticsm of Mrs. Smith, blocks Wentworth’s path in the Octagon Room, snipes at both Lady Russell and Wentworth when they question her marrying Mr. Elliot, and accepts Wentworth’s kiss on the the crowded street.
*We have a shot of Anne looking backwards at Kellynch. This leads to a lengthy pan shot bringing Uppercross into view. Austen does not give us the feeling of Kellynch being the past. This scene does.
*The camera shot of Anne’s face at Uppercross Cottage shows her pensiveness. We see her only in the cloudy mirror. This indicates her isolation.
*To show her leanness and her desperation, Anne is seen early on in loose-fitting dresses and large cloaks. In Bath, Anne wears form-fitting pelisses and spencers.
*In the 1971 version, Bryan Marshall wears Regency civilian wear, but Ciarán Hinds portrays the rugged, self-made man in his naval attire.
*William Elliot’s character is more villainous than the Austen version.
*This adaptation uses pieces of both of Austen’s endings for the novel.
*The kissing scene is sometimes criticized, but it summarizes a chapter of reflection from Austen’s novel. It shows the “lovers” making their own way in life. Their hands are clasped. (BTW, in the 1971 version, Anne and Wentworth kiss twice, but it is indoors.)
*The final scene was filmed at Portsmouth on the HMS Victory.
*The last shot of a ship silhouetted against a sunset is actually taken from the 1984 film, The Bounty.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on Persuasion 1995 Movie Discussion

Firth longs to play Darcy as a daddy in ‘Bridget Jones 3’ – Chicago Sun-Times

Firth longs to play Darcy as a daddy in ‘Bridget Jones 3’ – Chicago Sun-Times.

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Firth longs to play Darcy as a daddy in ‘Bridget Jones 3’ – Chicago Sun-Times

Golden Globe Winners Announced

 

BEST ACTOR DRAMA
Jesse Eisenberg, “The Social Network”; Colin Firth, “The King’s Speech”; James Franco, “127 Hours”; Ryan Gosling, “Blue Valentine”; Mark Wahlberg, “The Fighter.” (As a card carrying member of the Jane Austen Society of North America, I said, “It’s about time. Firth should have won last year for ‘The Single Man.'”)

WINNER BEST PICTURE BEST COMEDY OR MUSICAL
“Alice in Wonderland,” “Burlesque,” “The Kids Are All Right,” “Red,” “The Tourist.” 

BEST ACTRESS IN A FILM DRAMA
Halle Berry, “Frankie and Alice”; Nicole Kidman, “Rabbit Hole”; Jennifer Lawrence, “Winter’s Bone”; Natalie Portman, “Black Swan”; Michelle Williams, “Blue Valentine.” (This was an excellent movie, although one does not come out of the theatre feeling “refreshed.” It is very draining emotionally.)

WINNER BEST ACTOR IN A FILM COMEDY
Johnny Depp, “Alice in Wonderland”; Johnny Depp, “The Tourist”; Paul Giamatti, “Barney’s Version”; Jake Gyllenhaal, “Love and Other Drugs”; Kevin Spacey, “Casino Jack.”

WINNER BEST COMEDY OF TV
“30 Rock,” NBC; “The Big Bang Theory,” CBS; “The Big C,” Showtime; “Glee,” Fox; “Modern Family,” ABC; “Nurse Jackie,” Showtime.

WINNER BEST FILM DIRECTOR
Darren Aronofsky, “Black Swan”; David Fincher, “The Social Network”; Tom Hooper, “The King’s Speech”; Christopher Nolan, “Inception”; David O. Russell, “The Fighter.”

WINNER BEST SUPPORTING FILM ACTRESS
Melissa Leo, “The Fighter”; Helena Bonham Carter, “The King’s Speech”; Mila Kunis, “Black Swan”; Amy Adams, “The Fighter”; Jacki Weaver, “Animal Kingdom.” (Amy Adams looked gorgeous, but Helena Bonham Carter’s dress was ridiculous.)

WINNER BEST ACTOR TV COMEDY OR MUSICAL
Alec Baldwin, “30 Rock”; Steve Carell, “The Office”; Thomas Jane, “Hung”; Matthew Morrison, “Glee”; Jim Parsons, “The Big Bang Theory.”

WINNER BEST ACTRESS TV COMEDY OR MUSICAL
Toni Collette, “The United States of Tara”; Edie Falco, “Nurse Jackie”; Tina Fey, “30 Rock”; Laura Linney, “The Big C”; Lea Michele, “Glee.”

WINNER BEST SUPPORTING TV ACTRESS
Hope Davis, “The Special Relationship”; Jane Lynch, “Glee”; Kelly Macdonald, “Boardwalk Empire”; Julia Stiles, “Dexter”; Sofia Vergara, “Modern Family.”

WINNER BEST FILM SCREENPLAY
Danny Boyle, Simon Beaufoy, “127 Hours”; Lisa Cholodenko, Stuart Blumberg, “The Kids Are All Right”; Christopher Nolan, “Inception”; David Seidler, “The King’s Speech”; Aaron Sorkin, “The Social Network.”

WINNER ACTRESS TV MINISERIES OR MOVIE
Hayley Atwell, “Pillars of the Earth”; Claire Danes, “Temple Grandin”; Judi Dench, “Return to Cranford”; Romola Garai, “Emma”; Jennifer Love Hewitt, “The Client List.” (My sentimental favorite was Judi Dench, although both Romola Garai and Hayley Atwell were brilliant in their roles. I was surprised that “Pillars of the Earth” won nothing. It was one of the best of the season.)

WINNER ACTOR, TV MINISERIES OR MOVIE
Idris Elba, “Luther”; Ian McShane, “Pillars of the Earth”; Al Pacino, “You Don’t Know Jack”; Dennis Quaid, “The Special Relationship”; Edgar Ramirez, “Carlos.”

WINNER BEST ACTRESS, MUSICAL OR COMEDY
Annette Bening, “The Kids Are All Right”; Julianne Moore, “The Kids Are All Right”; Anne Hathaway, “Love and Other Drugs”; Angelina Jolie, “The Tourist”; Emma Stone, “Easy A.” (I would have taken Julianne Moore for the trophy. How some of these movies fit into the “musical or comedy” category makes no sense.)

WINNER BEST ANIMATED FILM
— Animated Film: “Toy Story 3,” “The Illusionist,” “How to Train Your Dragon,” “Despicable Me,” “Tangled.” (“Toy Story” was a sentimental favorite. I was partial to “Tangled.”)

WINNER ORIGINAL SONG
“Bound to You” (written by Samuel Dixon, Christina Aguilera, Sia Furler), “Burlesque”; “Coming Home” (written by Bob DiPiero, Tom Douglas, Hillary Lindsey, Troy Verges), “Country Strong”; “I See the Light,” (written by Alan Menken, Glenn Slater), “Tangled”; “There’s a Place for Us” (written by Carrie Underwood, David Hodges, Hillary Lindsey), “The Chronicles of Narnia: The Voyage of the Dawn Treader”; “You Haven’t Seen the Last of Me,” (written by Diane Warren), “Burlesque.”

WINNER BEST ACTOR DRAMA
Steve Buscemi, “Boardwalk Empire”; Bryan Cranston, “Breaking Bad”; Michael C. Hall, “Dexter”; Jon Hamm, “Mad Men”; Hugh Laurie, “House.” (Again, sentimentally, I would take Hugh Laurie, although his show has lost some momentum. However, I had bet on Michael C. Hall.

WINNER BEST SUPPORTING ACTOR, SERIES, MINISERIES OR MOVIE:
Scott Caan, “Hawaii Five-O”; Chris Colfer, “Glee”; Chris Noth, “The Good Wife”; Eric Stonestreet, “Modern Family”; David Strathairn, “Temple Grandin.”

WINNER BEST MINISERIES OR MOVIE “Carlos,” Sundance Channel; “The Pacific,” HBO; “Pillars of the Earth,” Starz; “Temple Grandin,” HBO; “You Don’t Know Jack,” HBO. (Remember this is the Foreign Press awards. Most of us in the U.S. would have chosen one of the others.)

WINNER BEST ACTRESS IN A DRAMA, TV
— Actress, Drama: Julianna Margulies, “The Good Wife”; Elisabeth Moss, “Mad Men”; Piper Perabo, “Covert Affairs”; Katey Sagal, “Sons of Anarchy”; Kyra Sedgwick, “The Closer.”

WINNER BEST SUPPORTING ACTOR WINNER, FILM:
— Supporting Actor: Christian Bale, “The Fighter”; Michael Douglas, “Wall Street: Money Never Sleeps”; Andrew Garfield, “The Social Network”; Jeremy Renner, “The Town”; Geoffrey Rush, “The King’s Speech.”

What did you think? Did your favorites win?

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Comments Off on Golden Globe Winners Announced

New Zodiac Signs, but I Am Still a Virgo

When news starting reaching the media outlets, that a 13th sign of the zodiac was likely and that most of us are not what we have always believed ourselves to be, I scoffed with good reason. It has seemed all my life that if one is to read the characteristics associated with a Virgo, that he was reading about me. I fit the profile completely. I certainly was not a Leo. My son has always been a Scorpio, but now he is a Libra. It is all very confusing.

So, here is the truth about the new zodiac sign. Scientists have said that it really is not a new discovery. In reality, these 13 signs have been “in existence” for over 2000 years. This new zodiac sign comes to us from the Babylonians, who once used the concept, but then thought otherwise. For some reason the Babylonians did not want Ophiuchus. If one is under this new sign, he will first have to learn to pronounce it and then change his bar pick up line. There will be no more, “What’s your sign?”
Here are the new divisions. I wonder what this change does to gemstones, etc., associated with the older signs.

Capricorn – Jan 20 to Feb 16

Aquarius – Feb 16 to Mar 11

Pisces – Mar 11 to Apr 18

Aries – Apr 18 to May 13

Taurus – May 13 to Jun 21

Gemini – Jun 21 to Jul 20

Cancer – Jul 20 to Aug 10

Leo – Aug 10 to Sep 16

Virgo – Sep 16 to Oct 30

Libra – Oct 30 to Nov 23

Scorpius – Nov 23 to Nov 29

Ophiuchus – Nov 29 to Dec 17

Sagittarius – Dec 17 to Jan 20
Now you know about the new zodiac sign. Which sign are you? Have you changed? Does this mean a “whole new you” for the New Year?

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Comments Off on New Zodiac Signs, but I Am Still a Virgo

Learn to Dance Like in Pride and Prejudice

This is an announcement from Orlando, Florida’s Shakespeare’s Theater. They are currently presenting Pride & Prejudice.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Our dance card will fill up quickly, so ask us to dance today!

Learn how to dance Regency style with the choreographer from Pride and Prejudice! This is your chance to charm Mr. Bingley, fall in love with Elizabeth, lavish your partner with affections, or scandalously conduct indiscreet conversations with your friends and neighbors. Shocking!

Choreographer W. Robert Sherry, an excellent beginner friendly instructor, will teach the regency style dances. No experience necessary and no partners required — the custom in the late 1700s was to change partners frequently — canned music, but it’s better than Mary Bennet on the piano. We suggest comfortable dress and shoes you can move in.

Thursday, March 3, 2011
Dancing begins at 5:30 p.m. and continues until 6:30 p.m. Stay for drinks, and Pride and Prejudice afterwards. Show starts at 7:30 p.m.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Comments Off on Learn to Dance Like in Pride and Prejudice

A Birthday Salute to Abigail Reynolds

Saturday, January 15, is Abigail Reynolds’s birthday. Happy Birthday, Abigail.
http://pf.kizoa.com/sflite.swf?did=1402227&k=P26353159&hk=1

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on A Birthday Salute to Abigail Reynolds

Introducing The Phantom of Pemberley

“Cozy” Up 2 a Great Mystery!

The Phantom of Pemberley: A Pride and Prejudice Mystery is my sixth Jane Austen book. I am more than a bit of a “Jane Austen geek.” I have loved Jane Austen’s works since I was a pre-teen.

If he has to kill a thousand men, the Phantom will kill and kill again!

Phantom is what is known as a “cozy mystery,” along the lines of what one would find with Agatha Christie or Sherlock Holmes. A “cozy” has very specific characteristics: is set in a country house or small town; is a domestic crime; has a gifted amateur who cross examines the suspects and after a clever explanation discloses the guilty person. It mostly focuses on solving the mental aspects of the crime.

So, we open the book to find Darcy and Elizabeth, married for a year and blissfully happy with plans for the future of the estate and their marriage. However, we know what happens when we tell God our plans. He has a hearty laugh and sends us a good dose of humility. Enter that humility in the form of the worst snowstorm in a decade. Add the appearances of Lydia Bennet Wickham for a planned visit and of Lady Catherine and Anne de Bourgh, both making an unexpected call at Pemberley, the first since Darcy and Elizabeth’s wedding. Of course, an eclectic mix requires a bit more than the Austen standard fare. Because of the storm, Lydia invites her fellow traveling companions from the public coach to stay at Pemberley. As readers we meet Nigel Worth, a country solicitor, and Evelyn Williams, a naval widow. Compound the mix of guests at Pemberley with a friend of Colonel Fitzwiliam, the future earl of Greenwall, who also finds himself stranded in Derbyshire with no place to stay. Therefore, against his better judgment, Darcy accepts Adam Lawrence, Viscount Stafford, and Lawrence’s mistress, Cathleen Donnel, at the estate.

You will curse the day you did not do all that the Phantom asked of you!

Snowed in for, at least, a week, Darcy and Elizabeth set about entertaining so varied a guest list, but entertainment becomes a minor problem. First, Elizabeth sees an unknown stranger along one of the fields surrounding the manor house, then Georgiana spots a like figure close to the cottagers’ huts. The Pemberley staff think it the Shadow Man, but even that legend does not explain the unusual thefts about the house, the appearance of a disembodied ghost in Georgiana’s room, a staged accident on the stairs, and a series of what appears to be unconnected murders. What Darcy has at Pemberley is a “phantom,” who is obviously set on revenge.

One of the things I enjoy when I write is exploring history and incorporating it into the story line. First, for Phantom, I used the legend of the Shadow Man or Hat Man, as he is sometimes called. Most cultures have a variation on this legend. The easiest way to

 

explain a Shadow Person is when one thinks he sees someone out of the corner of his eye and then turns his head to find nothing. I found it very interesting that Wes Craven spoke of a scary experience with a shadowy creature as a young boy. Some suggest that this incident was the inspiration for Freddy Krueger. To read more of Craven’s story and Shadow People go to http://www.unsolved-mysteries.com/paranormal/shadow_ghosts_hat_man.html

Next, finding out creative ways to dispose of the chosen victims was essential. I was very lucky in that women of the Regency era, quite literally poisoned themselves with their beauty products. During this era, white skin signified a life of leisure while skin exposed to the sun indicated a life of outdoor labor. In order to maintain a pale complexion, women wore bonnets, carried parasols, and covered all visible parts of their bodies with whiteners and blemish removers. Unfortunately, more than a few of these remedies were lethal. Into the nineteenth century, ladies used a whitening agent composed of carbonate, hydroxide, and lead oxide, which the body stored with each use, resulting in muscle paralysis or death. By the nineteenth century zinc oxide became widely used as a facial powder, replacing this more deadly mixture. Even in the early 1800s, we must ask the question: What price beauty? Hopefully, the red herring is not too obvious for those of you who devour mysteries.

I have planned some twists and turns to the story, which I pray will keep it interesting. For example, in Phantom, I play a bit more with the character of Anne de Bourgh. In Darcy’s Temptation, I gave Anne a life after Darcy’s desertion, but I found I did not like her much afterwards; and I wanted to like Anne. Therefore, in this one Anne finally gets a spine and seeks love in all the wrong places before finding what is important in a relationship: a apt lesson for a woman well on the shelf by Regency standards.

One of the things I found in writing this book is I became quite interested in the character of Adam Lawrence, a very “major” minor character in The Phantom of Pemberley. Lawrence has developed into what Francis Henning is to author Victoria Alexander. He makes an appearance in two other of my works. Therefore, I have written a novella about what happens to Lawrence in the future, six years after the close of Phantom. I hope to release three novellas together, all based around the minor characters in my other novels. Fans always ask what I would plan for certain characters. Now they will get a chance to find out. “His Irish Eve” is Lawrence’s story, and “His American Heart Song” is that of Lawrence Lowery from my “Touch” series. The third novella is in development.

In dreams, that voice calls to me and speaks my name. And do I dream again? For now I find the Phantom is there, inside my mind.

Come and join me at my website Regina Jeffers. Read excerpts from all my books.

“It is far harder to kill a phantom than a reality.” (Virginia Woolf)

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off on Introducing The Phantom of Pemberley

Austen Actors with January Birthdays

January brings us lots of “oldies, but goodies,” and I am not speaking of the actors being old in chronological years, although some are just that. I am speaking of some of the older adaptations of Austen films. We have actors/actresses from Pride and Prejudice (1958), Pride and Prejudice(1967), Sense and Sensibility (1971), Persuasion (1971), and Emma (1972). Five of our thirteen have appeared in one of the Pride and Prejudice adaptations, while three have been in Sense and Sensibility films. Joanna David is the only one this month who has appeared in more than one Austen adaptation. She was Elinor Dashwood in 1971 and Mrs. Gardiner in 1995. We also have two lovely Bond girls this month: Rosamund Pike and Gemma Arterton.

http://pf.kizoa.com/sflite.swf?did=1265322&k=P41991838&hk=1

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Austen Actors with January Birthdays

Austen Actors with No Birth Dates in Their Bios

Austen Actors with Unknown Birthdates
As acting is a business where “age” is an issue, some of our favorite Austen actors list no actual birthdate in their bios. We understand. Austen, too, lived in an age when youth and beauty were the criteria for marriage for a woman – a time when women were on the shelf at age five and twenty. Early 19th Century men were most “masculine” between the ages of 30 and 35. Sounds like Hollywood to me!! As such, we find some of our most endearing Austen actors without a definite birthdate, among them, Amanda Root, JJ Field, Simon Woods, Laurence Fox, Mark Dymond, Adrian Lukis, Elizabeth Garvie, and Mark Strong. We have located three such actors from Mansfield Park 1983, Northanger Abbey 2007, Pride and Prejudice 2005. We have two each from Lost in Austen, Becoming Jane, Pride and Prejudice 1980, Sense and Sensibility 1981, Sense and Sensibility 2008, Emma (TV) 1996, and Persuasion 1995. Six of 25 actors have appeared in multiple Austen adaptations: Peter Wight (Pride and Prejudice 2005 and Persuasion 2007); Irene Richard (Pride and Prejudice 1980 and Sense and Sensibility 1981); Lucy Robinson (Pride and Prejudice 2005 and Emma[TV] 1996); Sophie Thompson (Persuasion 1995 and Emma 1996); David Savile (Pride and Prejudice 1967 and Persuasion 1971); and Sylvestra Le Touzel (Mansfield Park 1983 and Northanger Abbey 2007).

<object width=”560″ height=”420″><param name=”movie” value=”http://pf.kizoa.com/sflite.swf?did=1293323&k=P82672504&hk=1″></param><param name=”wmode” value=”transparent”></param><param name=”allowFullScreen” value=”true”></param><embed src=”http://pf.kizoa.com/sflite.swf?did=1293323&k=P82672504&hk=1″ type=”application/x-shockwave-flash” wmode=”transparent” width=”560″ height=”420″ allowFullScreen=”true”></embed></object>

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Austen Actors with No Birth Dates in Their Bios

Northanger Abbey 1987 – Movie Discussion

When we read our favorite novels, we bring our own imagination to the experience. Film adaptations, however, leave less room for interpretation. We have all, at one time or another, been disappointed in the casting, not inherently evident to us at the time, of a particular actor in a role.

There have been only two film adaptations of Northanger Abbey. I chose the one from 1987, a BBC/A&E production, because I thought many of you might be less familiar with it, and my blog visitors would want to add it to their studies of all things Jane Austen.
Hopefully, our Austen Authors fans will comment on the costumes, the music and sound effects, the sites used in the film, and even some film errors (i.e., The film is set in 1794, but John Thorpe speaks of reading The Monk, which was published in 1796.). I would also love to hear your opinions of the 2007 version within this discussion. Northanger Abbey (1987) starred Katherine Schlesinger as Catherine Morland and Peter Firth ( not Colin’s brother) as Henry Tilney.

Published, along with Persuasion in December 1818, Northanger Abbey takes a satiric look at the Gothic novel. In reality, Northanger Abbey has never been a popular choice for modern readers, as Catherine Morland, the 17-year-old heroine, lacks the development we find in Emma Woodhouse or Elizabeth Bennet or Elinor Dashwood. Austen even says that Catherine is “in training for a heroine.” The 1987 cinematic adaptation of Austen’s novel serves as a bridge between those earlier cheaply-made Austen offerings and those of the 1990s. Although both Sense and Sensibility and Mansfield Park were also released in the 1980s, they mimicked the style of the earlier works, especially lacking on location filming. Northanger Abbey (1987) was one of the first to use on-location settings effectively.

This particular adaptation takes a number of liberties with the original text, most obviously the opening scene. Austen’s novel introduces us to Catherine Morland, chronicling her short life and her lack of accomplishments. The film, however, begins with a feeling of sexual awakening in the young Catherine. The viewer sees the girl reclining on a tree limb while reading a Gothic novel. We see Catherine’s “scandalous” white stocking-clad leg. We hear the female voice over reading aloud from the book: “the horrors of that evil chamber.” Sketches from the novel show us a dead body on the stairs and a male figure carrying a supinated woman’s body. Add the eerie sound effects and choral chanting, and we make the assumption that Austen discussed these Gothic images in her book, which is not true.

So, what else do we see in this adaptation that is not found in Austen’s novel?
* the character of the Marchioness de Thierry, General Tilney’s friend and confidant – Her back story of a husband being guillotined reminds us of Austen’s cousin’s story. The lady is the general’s source of gossip.

* a soft criticism of Ann Radcliffe and the Gothic premise for its sexual pandering – As opposed to the movie, in the novel, Austen seems more likely to be criticizing poorly “educated” readers of Mrs. Radcliffe. “The person, be it gentleman or lady, who has not pleasure in a good novel, must be intolerably stupid.”

*In Austen’s novel, we only become aware of Eleanor’s attachment to a young man in the last chapter. Note in the film, upon her arrival at the Abbey, Catherine finds the message sent to Eleanor from Thomas arranging a secret meeting. “The same day at 3:00. You and I beside the unknown woman.”

*In Austen’s Northanger Abbey, Catherine visits the Tilney residence in town twice to apologize for not walking out with Henry and Eleanor. The novel includes a scene at the opera, where Catherine gushes her apologies to Henry. The film combines these visits and omits the opera scene.

*Catherine burns her copy of The Mysteries of Udolpho in the film.

*The general and the Marchioness are seen in the background at the Upper Rooms and also entering the same building when Catherine and Mrs. Allen first arrive in Bath. In the novel, the general is not mentioned until after Catherine rides out with John Thorpe.

*The Tilney brothers enjoy taking snuff together in the film.

*In the adaptation, the general encourages Catherine’s acquaintance from the beginning (assumably based on information from the Marchioness). In the novel, he only encourages Catherine’s relationship with the Tilneys after Thorpe misleads him regarding Catherine’s wealth.

*Catherine in the film is discovered in Mrs. Tilney’s room in flagrante delicto. In Austen’s novel, she leaves the room “and a shortly succeeding ray of common sense added some bitter emotions of shame.” In addition, Mrs. Tilney’s forbidden bedroom is hideous and sinister in the film, where in the novel is sports bright and modern decor (for that time period).

*The film combines the evening entertainments when Mrs. Allen and Catherine visit the Upper Rooms with their later visit to the Lower Rooms into one scene.

*The film allows the Abbey to keep the element of mystery with dark corridors, high windows, winding stairs, etc. In the novel, Catherine is disappointed by how modern the Abbey is.

*Catherine, Eleanor, and the general visit Henry at Woodston in the novel, but the film does little to establish him as a clergyman (presumably because modern audiences would not see this as a desirable occupation for a potential husband).

*In the novel, Catherine recognizes Isabella’s deviousness in the letter when Isabella begs for the return of James’s affections. In this TV version, there is no such letter.

*In the adaptation, Henry chastises Catherine by saying, “Dearest Miss Morland, has reading one silly novel unbalanced your judgment so completely?” The novel has Henry saying, “Dearest Miss Morland what ideas have you been admitting?” Henry no longer prods Catherine to think for herself in the film version.

*Austen tells the reader that Catherine has not read any Gothic novels before meeting Isabella Thorpe. “It is so odd to me, that you should never have read Udolpho before.” The film begins with Catherine’s Gothic fantasies.

*In the film, James Morland introduces Catherine to Isabella after he comes to Bath.

*Henry rebels against his father in a scene where the predatory-like General Tilney ironically trains a hawk. Also in this scene, the general accepts the fact that a dowry of 400 pounds per year is adequate, after all.

I am ready to hear what you think of this adaptation. Please leave your comments, and I will check in regularly to hold our discussion.

P.S. – One might wish to check out Ashley Judd’s 1992 film Ruby in Paradise, which is considered by many as homage to Northanger Abbey.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Comments Off on Northanger Abbey 1987 – Movie Discussion