Editing~The Most Dreadful Word in the English Language: Words Which People Often Confuse

 

As an author, I come across words all the time, which people frequently confuse. Do I sometimes make errors in these choices? Heck, yes. Do I attempt to eliminate the errors prior to a book’s release? ABSOLUTELY! Among those are

Affect = a verb meaning to influence
Effect = a noun meaning result
Effect = a verb meaning to cause an action
The explosive sound affected the crowd’s behavior.
The Cavs fans had little effect on the Miami Heat’s play.
The administration has effected how we see ourselves as students.

Agree To = used when referring to things
Agree With = used when referring to people
We agreed to the changes in policy.
We agreed with the experts in the field.

Amount = an indefinite quantity (cannot be counted)
Number = a quantity which can be counted
The amount of news consumed by individuals each day varies.
The number of people at the malls on Black Friday increased.

Amuse means to entertain or to hold someone’s attention. Bemuse means to bewilder, to confuse or to become lost in thought.

Backward is ALWAYS used; never use Backwards.
She stumbled backward into the arms of the man she loved.

Envelop = means to surround
Envelope = the paper wrapper for a letter

Ensure = to guarantee or to make certain
Insure = to purchase protection for life, health, etc.
Even an expensive stereo system cannot ensure good quality sound.
I will insure the package’s contents when I ship it.

Lead = a soft, heavy material
Lead = to guide, show the way, to be in command of
Led = past tense of the verb “lead”

Passed = is a verb
Past = is never a verb (can be a preposition, a noun, or an adjective)
He passed his test.
I walked past the cemetery on my way here.
In my past, I have done things of which I am not proud.
In the past year, my career has changed dramatically.

Intra meaans within or inside of, where Inter refers to between or with each other.

Interesting means to arouse curiosity or to excite attention; Intriguing means to beguile or puzzle.

Do not use where when the words in which are needed. Use where if you mean to point out a direction or a location, and in which when the reference is not to a direction or location.  For example: The teacher handed out an outline in which (not where) he listed the course requirements.

Poor = lack of financial stability
Pore = (verb) meaning to study or read; (noun) meaning small openings in the skin
Pour = to flow in a continuous stream

Precede = means to go before
The man preceded his wife in death
Proceed = means to continue
He could not proceed with the experiment

respectfully = in an honorable manner
respectively = listing person or things in order
Matthew MacFadyen has played Mr. Darcy and Aramis is Pride & Prejudice and The Three Musketeers, respectively.

Last = means “final”
The last week of the Winter Olympics features my favorite sport: ice skating.
Past = means “previous”
The past two weeks crawled by.

Emerge = to rise from obscurity
Sarah Palin emerged as a legitimate candidate, with whom people would align themselves after the 2008 elections.
Immerge = disappear into or plunge into
Alvin Green immerged quickly into the ranks of obscure candidates.

altogether = wholly; entirely
It is altogether too hot for December.
all together = every person or thing in the same place at the same time
We were all together at Christmas time.

all ready = everyone or everything is prepared or available for use
The PRHS players are all ready for the state championship game.
already = previously (in time)
We have already completed the last draft of the manuscript.

all right = giving permission; better than before
He said he felt all right after his bout with the flu.
It was all right with Mom that we stayed until the end of the game.
Alright is not a word!!!

So, what words and phrases confuse you? Do you have some such as “lie” and “lay,” which forever plague you?

Posted in Industry News/Publishing, writing | Tagged | 7 Comments

The Highland Lady: Elizabeth Grant

At the beginning of the 19th Century, Edinburgh, Scotland, held its position as one of the world’s intellectual centers. The Scottish Enlightenment held a reputation for developing some the most gifted minds of the period. One of the leaders of the group was Francis Jeffrey, a Scottish lawyer, and founder of the Edinburgh Review. Among the earliest contributors to the Whig magazine was Sydney Smith, Henry Brougham, John Murray, and Sir Walter Scott.

GrantMemoirsOne of the more controversial tenets of the movement was the idea of universal education. The “Highland Lady,” Elizabeth Grant (1797-1886) of Rothiemurchus, was an early success of the movement. Elizabeth Grant was a writer and social observer. She was the eldest child of Sir John Peter Grant. In her early years, Grant was educated at home, much to the standard of the day. Unlike some of her contemporaries, Grant had the opportunity to meet many “movers and shakers” of the Highland scene and society. From these familial acquaintances, Grant absorbed details not normally in the realm of an “educated” lady. After her life, the Memoirs of a Highland Lady (1898) were published, after the original manuscript was loaned to the National Library of Scotland by one of the lady’s descendants.

Spending much of time in Edinburgh, Elizabeth met and socialized with a variety of eminent people, all of whom she recorded in sharp detail. In 1827, she and her family moved to Bombay so her father might avoid his financial troubles. When she was younger, Elizabeth had fallen in love with a young man of which her father disapproved. Sir John had argued with the boy’s father, and Grant would not permit his daughter’s joining to his enemy’s sons. While in India, Elizabeth married Colonel Henry Smith of Baltiboys, Co Wicklow. She lived in Ireland for over 50 years. GrantHighlandHer The Highland Lady in Ireland: Journals 1840-1850 brings readers a different look at the potato famine. Likewise, Grant’s A Highland Lady in France 1843-1845 detailed her time on the Continent.

For Colonel Smith, theirs was a marriage of convenience. Smith was the second son with no great inheritance to his name, and he had chronic and acute asthma. He was also 17 years older than Elizabeth Grant. Grant was two and thirty at the time and possessed a small dowry so finding a “gentleman” husband was an acceptable consequence for her. Surprisingly, Henry lived a long time, and the marriage was a “happy” one.

Several days before the marriage, word arrived that Henry’s brother John passed, without issue, in Paris, and Henry was the new master of the estate at Baltiboys.  From Jim Corley and History Articles, we learn, “Well before that, however, a marriage agreement had been drawn up between the couple. It should be kept in mind that even in the event of Henry’s death the estate in Co. Wicklow could never be owned by Elizabeth, but would be held in trust by trustees. A son or daughter would be heir to the property, and in the event of no children the estate would pass to the nearest male relative. In the possibility, indeed probability, of the demise of her husband, Elizabeth would be well looked after. She would get an annuity of £230. She would have an entitlement from the Military Fund of the East India Company. A sum of £4,000 would be provided for any children of the union. A further £6,000 would become available on her death. certSums of £4,000 and £3,000 were to be immediately directed to the trustees. Provision for the maintenance and education was arranged for any boys till the age of 21 and girls also to 21 or until they married. If Henry were to expire in India Elizabeth was to be paid 8,000 rupees to provide passage to England and she would be left all household furniture, jewels, plate, books, linen, china, uisce (whiskey), and other liquors. £6,000 had been secured on the lands of Kinloss in Scotland by Elizabeth’s father Sir John Peter Grant to the three younger children of his marriage, of whom Elizabeth was one.

“While still in their first year of wedded life, they were advised by their doctor that if husband Henry were to remain in the oppressive climate of India in the pursuit of his career, he faced certain death in the not too distant future. A decision was made, therefore, to return to the more suitable climate of Europe and, in particular, Baltiboys. So it was that on the 4th of November 1829, they headed for home in a sailing ship, the Childe Harold.”

O their return journey, the Colonel and  Mrs Smith visited Napoleon’s tomb. Of it she writes, “The tomb was saddening; ‘after life’s fitful fever’ to see this stranger grave; in a hollow, a square iron railing on a low wall enclosed the stone trap entrance to a vault, forget-me-nots were scattered on the sod around, and the weeping willow drooped over the flag. The ocean filled the distance. It would have been better to have left him there, with the whole island for his monument.” They reached Portsmouth at the end of April 1830. Since they had departed Bombay almost five months had passed

Again from Crowley, we discover, “A few weeks later they arrived in Ireland. Baltiboys House was in a bad state as were its tenants. The previous owner, Henry’s brother John, had fled abroad at the time of the 1798 rebellion. The estate had been neglected. Within a short time plans were drawn up for a new house (these plans are still extant ). The tenants’ lot was improved. They had some employment in building the new mansion, and later on draining their farms. Thousands of trees were sown. An effort was made to do away with small uneconomical holdings, without raising too many hackles. When the potatoes rotted in the mid 1840,s the Smiths were not found wanting in their efforts to relieve their hungry tenants.

“Remember the all important Marriage Settlement made in Bombay in 1829? Well, it was still a binding legal document and came into unexpected prominence many years later. On Henry Smith’s death their only son, Jack, inherited the house and estate at Baltiboys. Jack was married in June 1871 to Frances Harvey, (a relation of the Capt. Harvey R. N. who fought alongside the great Nelson), but died a mere 2 years and 5 months later. Two months after his death his little girl Elizabeth was born. Because Jack had made no will in favour of his mother, this baby was now mistress of the house and estate. Her grandmother was now just a tenant where for 40 years she had held sway. Without Elizabeth’s knowledge there was an auction of her property. All her fine cows were gone. As were her pigs and poultry, horses and carts, implements, beehives, frames, plants from greenhouse, tubs and watering pots and so on. All had belonged to her son Capt. Smith. The scandal of an auction could have been prevented by John J. Hornidge of Russelstown, she felt, but he was bent on doing his utmost for the young widow and orphan child, and the deed was done before she knew of it. Mr Hornidge then tried to sell the house furniture. The Smith solicitor, Mr Cathcart, was contacted to see if this auction could be stopped. Mr Cathcart came down with the Marriage Settlement made in India in 1829. He pointed out the part that stated that in the event of Henry Smith’s death all furniture, plate et cetera would go to his wife Elizabeth. The plans for auction were abandoned. The Highland Lady continued to live at Baltiboys. She purchased a horse and cart, 2 wheelbarrows, spades, rakes, a shovel, plough, harrow, cow, pig, 6 hens, 3 Aylesbury ducks, and had work on her hands for many a year to come. Her jointure paid the rent on Baltiboys, and she took in grazing cattle to pay the workmen and housemaids. Her daughter-in-law Frances was very kind to her and had not allowed her brougham to be sold nor the double harness Jack had given her for it. Frances herself had to buy Jack’s watch, rings, pictures, books, sword and so on. Such was the law.
Aunt Bourne had died and left most of her estate to Mrs Smith. Her share came to £30,000, with which she released her family from liabilities, lent £10,000 to the Bermingham estate in Tuam, Co. Galway, at five and a half % per annum, purchased the townland of Lacken, also land at Golden Hill. Later on her daughter Annie and her 10 children came to live at Baltiboys.”

In her memoirs, Elizabeth speaks of her early education. She writes, “It is curious that I have no recollection of learning anything from and body except thus by chance as it were, though I have understood that I was a little wonder, my Aunts having amused themselves in making a sort of show of me.” Unlike other young girls of her time, Elizabeth’s nursery was full of educational toys: small bags of beans to count, books such as Puss in Boots, Riquet, Blue Beard, Cinderella, colorful prints. A procession of private tutors instructed her and her sisters, including one for the pianoforte, one for the harp, one for French, another for Italian, one for drawing, another for writing and ciphering, and one for dancing.  Her brothers had tutors for chemistry, math and natural philosophy, and even a metaphysician as a tutor.

***There is a wonderful review of Grant’s works on “I Prefer Reading.”

Posted in British history, legends and myths, Living in the Regency, Regency era, Victorian era | Tagged , , | 2 Comments

Characteristic of the Gothic in My Austen-Inspired Novels

First, those who read Gothic novels know that Horace Walpole started the phenomenon with his The Castle of Otranto way back in 1764. We define a Gothic novel based on the characteristics we find in Walpole’s work. With the March release of my eighth Jane Austen-inspired novel, I thought I would take a look back at what some consider Gothic influences in my works.

1. The setting is always based on an old castle. The castle may be occupied or not. It should contain secret passageways or secret rooms. (The Phantom of Pemberley, The Disappearance of Georgiana Darcy, and the upcoming The Mysterious Death of Mr. Darcy). Ruined sections of the castle are often used as part of the story line. (The Disappearance of Georgiana Darcy). The darkened passageways and staircases adds to the mysterious flavor of the work. (The Phantom of Pemberley and The Mysterious Death of Mr. Darcy). In more modern works, we find an old house or mansion. (Vampire Darcy’s Desire)
2. Speaking of mysteries, obviously, a true Gothic is laced with the fear of the unknown. This is usually enhanced by the plot involving an “unknown” secret (Vampire Darcy’s Desire), an “unknown” relative, an inexplicable event (The Mysterious Death of Mr. Darcy), or, best of all, a unexplained disappearance (The Phantom of Pemberley and The Disappearance of Georgiana Darcy).
3. Characters often have dream visions (Vampire Darcy’s Desire) or an omen of death occurs. Shadowy figures appear, but are often mistaken for a nightmare. (The Phantom of Pemberley)
4. An ancient prophecy is connected to the castle or the people who live there. (Vampire Darcy’s Desire and The Disappearance of Georgiana Darcy). The prophecy is not readily explainable.
5. Supernatural elements are found in the book. (Vampire Darcy’s Desire and The Mysterious Death of Mr. Darcy)
6. Women at the mercy of a powerful male. (The Phantom of Pemberley)

The male manipulates the woman into committing an intolerable act. (Vampire Darcy’s Desire) The women in Gothic novels usually respond by crying or screaming. The woman is often a sympathetic character because her life is less than pristine. (The Phantom of Pemberley)
7. Emotions are readily displayed by the characters – terror, surprise, anger, etc. (The Phantom of Pemberley, The Mysterious Death of Mr. Darcy, The Disappearance of Georgiana Darcy,  and Vampire Darcy’s Desire)
8. The text is loaded with the metonymy of a movie. There is a book entitled How to Read Literature Like a Professor. One of the chapters deals with “rain.” What we find is when it rains in literature or in the movies, someone is likely to die. That is metonymy, where something like rain equals death. It is an extended metaphor. (Vampire Darcy’s Desire)


JeffersDofGDThe Disappearance of Georgiana Darcy
A Pride and Prejudice Mystery
By Regina Jeffers

A thrilling novel of malicious villains, dramatic revelations, and heroic gestures that stays true to Austen’s style

Darcy and Elizabeth have faced many challenges, but none as dire as the disappearance of Darcy’s beloved sister, Georgiana. After leaving for the family home in Scotland to be reunited with her new husband, Edward, she has disappeared without a trace. Upon receiving official word that Georgiana is presumed dead, Darcy and Elizabeth travel to the infamous Merrick Moor to launch a search for his sister in the unfamiliar and menacing Scottish countryside. Suspects abound, from the dastardly Wickham to the mysterious MacBethan family. Darcy has always protected his little sister, but how can he keep her safe from the most sinister threat she has ever faced when he doesn’t even know if she’s alive? Written in the language of the Regency era and including Austen’s romantic entanglements and sardonic humor, this suspense-packed sequel to Pride and Prejudice recasts Darcy and Elizabeth as a husband-and-wife detective team hunting for truth amid the dark moors of Scotland.

JeffersPhantom
The Phantom of Pemberley
A Pride and Prejudice Murder Mystery
By Regina Jeffers

HAPPILY MARRIED for over a year and more in love than ever, Darcy and Elizabeth can’t imagine anything
interrupting their bliss-filled days. Then an intense snowstorm strands a group of travelers at Pemberley, and terrifying accidents and mysterious deaths begin to plague the manor. Everyone seems convinced that it is the work of a phan-tom—a Shadow Man who is haunting the Darcy family’s grand estate.
Darcy and Elizabeth believe the truth is much more menacing and that someone is trying to murder them. But Pemberley is filled with family guests as well as the unexpected travelers—any one of whom could be the culprit—so unraveling the mystery of the murderer’s identity forces the newlyweds to trust each other’s strengths and work together.

Written in the style of the era and including Austen’s romantic playfulness and sardonic humor, this suspense-packed sequel to Pride and Prejudice recasts Darcy and Elizabeth as a husband-and-wife detective team who must solve the mystery at Pemberley and catch the murderer—before it’s too late.

JeffersVDDVampire Darcy’s Desire
A Pride and Prejudice Adaptation
By Regina Jeffers

In Austen’s original novel, Darcy and Elizabeth are compelled to overcome countless obstacles — but that’s nothing compared to what they face in Vampire Darcy’s Desire. This inventive, action-packed novel tells of a tormented Darcy who comes to “Netherfield” to escape the intense pressure on him to marry. Dispirited by his family’s 200-year curse and his fate as a half-human/half-vampire dampir, Darcy would rather live forever alone than inflict the horrors of a vampire life on a beautiful wife. Destiny has other plans. Darcy meets Elizabeth and finds himself yearning for her as a man and driven to possess her as a vampire. Uncontrollably drawn to each other, their complex relationship forces them to confront their pride and prejudice like never before and to wrestle with the seductive power of forbidden love. Meanwhile, dark forces are at work all around them. Most ominous is the threat from George Wickham, the purveyor of the curse, a demon who vows to destroy each generation of Darcys and currently has evil intentions for the vulnerable Georgiana.

TMDOMD2coverThe Mysterious Death of Mr. Darcy
A Pride and Prejudice Mystery
By Regina Jeffers

A thrilling story of murder and betrayal filled with the scandal, wit and intrigue characteristic of Austen’s classic novels

Fitzwilliam Darcy is devastated. The joy of his recent wedding has been cut short by the news of the sudden death of his father’s beloved cousin, Samuel Darcy. Elizabeth and Darcy travel to Dorset, a popular Regency resort area, to pay their respects to the well-traveled and eccentric Samuel. But this is no summer holiday. Danger bubbles beneath Dorset’s peaceful surface as strange and foreboding events begin to occur. Several of Samuel’s ancient treasures go missing, and then his body itself disappears. As Darcy and Elizabeth investigate this mystery and unravel its tangled ties to the haunting legends of Dark Dorset, the legendary couple’s love is put to the test when sinister forces strike close to home. Some secrets should remain secrets, but Darcy will do all he can to find answers—even if it means meeting his own end in the damp depths of a newly dug grave.

With malicious villains, dramatic revelations and heroic gestures, The Mysterious Death of Mr. Darcy will keep Austen fans turning the pages right up until its dramatic conclusion.

Posted in gothic and paranormal, Industry News/Publishing, Jane Austen, legends and myths, Regency era, Ulysses Press, Victorian era, writing | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Characteristic of the Gothic in My Austen-Inspired Novels

Male vs. Female Perspective in Writing

When I write a Pride and Prejudice sequel/adaptation, I do so from Darcy’s point of view, rather than from Elizabeth’s. When I speak of Austen’s Persuasion, I speak of Wentworth’s thoughts. When I am writing of the Realm, I do so as a member of this British covert unit. So, what does this mean in terms of how I approach a tale? It means that I must know something about the differences in how a male and a female views the world. For example, a woman would say, “I bought an indiglo-colored gown with a cornsilk netting.” However, a man might respond, “She bought a blue dress with some sort of beige-colored scratchy material attached.” With this in mind, let us take a look at some of the basis differences, which affect the plot line.

*Women are better at judging a person’s character. A man excels in judging cause and effect.
*Women seek acceptance; men seek respect.
*Women see “romance” as the building of tension (eye contact, whispered words, gentle caresses, etc.). For men, desire equals instant gratification.
*Women lie to make someone feel better. Men tell lies as a cover up, as a way to build their own egos, or as a means to expedite an issue.
*Women prefer an emotional bonding (talk about it). Men hate to jump through a woman’s “hoops” just to get what he wants.
*Women are more likely to conform to the group/situation’s rules regarding sex. Men will seek sex even if the group has outlawed it.
*When women dine out, they carefully divide the check for what each owes. Men will often compete to pay the whole bill, or they will throw money on the table to cover the tab.
*Women are competitive about the degree of attractiveness among their acquaintances. They are also competitive about morals and about domestic abilities. Men are highly competitive about job, social/professional status, and income.
*Women can speak and listen at the same time. Men have no idea how to accomplish this.
*Women will use words such as “Always” and “Never” when they argue. This allows a man to prove the woman’s points have no basis.
*Women choose blank greeting cards. Men choose ones already loaded with words so they do not have to write anything beyond their names.
*Women have a better recall of the spoken word than do men.
*Women are more than likely to show their teeth when they smile.
*Women leave a relationship because they are emotionally unfulfilled. A man feels he has failed if “his woman” is unhappy.
*Women ask questions. Men make statements.
*Women use words such as “could,” “would,” and “shall.” Men prefer the word “will.”
*Women nod their heads to show they are listening. Men take that as agreement to their ideas. Little do they know, an argument will ensue later.
*When a man seeks a mistress, he wants only the “status” of doing so. Often, he has no desire to leave his wife. A woman gives a man her heart and her body.
*Men will challenge and interrupt more often than women.
*Men will speak more bluntly than women. They are also more likely to use risqué language.
*When speaking with female friends, women are likely to call each other by their given names and discuss intimate details of their lives. In an all-male gathering, men discuss life in general (no specifics), make crude jokes, and are likely to call each other by some derogatory nickname.
*Women not on hormone replacement or the Pill find more masculine features attractive (the cave man effect). Women on the Pill, etc., find “softer” male faces more attractive.
*Women need a “connection” to allow themselves to be vulnerable. For men, sex is the connection of choice. They use sex to display their vulnerable side.

Posted in Industry News/Publishing, writing | Tagged , , , | 4 Comments

Eccentrics of the Regency Period Series: “The Golden Ball” or Edward Hughes Ball Hughes

280px-Alfred_Guillaume_GabrielEdward Hughes Ball Hughes, also known as “The Golden Ball,” was an English dandy infamous for his extravagant lifestyle. Born in May 1798, Hughes was educated at Eton and Trinity College, Cambridge. He spent some time in the 7th Hussars but left arm life to enjoy his fortune. He quickly attracted the attention of the Haut Ton. Hughes was a handsome man known for his chocolate-colored coach and his invention of the black cravat.

In 1823, Hughes made a mésalliance by unexpectedly marrying Maria Mercandotti, a 16-year-old Spanish dancer, who left a theatre full of patrons waiting in vain to see her. William Harrison Ainsworth reportedly said, “The damsel is gone, and no wonder at all/that, bred to the dance, she is gone to a Ball.” The couple later separated and was divorced in 1839.

In 1824, Hughes purchased Oatlands Palace (near Weybridge) from the Duke of York for the exorbitant price of £180,000. Later, the sale of the grounds for housing lots, which created the modern community of Oatlands, was a profitable venture for Hughes. He and young wife went to live in Greenwich, where he kept an “open” house and played whist for five-pound points. Hughes achieved the reputation as one of the great gamblers of the day. He was said to have spent a night in the garden betting on the outcome of games of battledore and shuttlecock.

Hughes mounting gambling debts and extravagant living forced him to move to France in 1829 to avoid his creditors. His affairs were left in the hands of his solicitors, Freere and Forster, who sent Hughes an allowance upon which to live. He was far from destitute, however; according to a governmental report, Hughes was one of the foreign investors in the Second Bank of the United States. In 1832, his holding amounted to $51,000 in stock.

In 1835, Hughes came into the possession of the manor of Sidmouth. In 1835, he helped finance a new sea wall for the town. In 1839, a law was passed by Parliament allowing Hughes to tear down the market and build a new one. An 1846 law confirmed that the new market had been built and that no one could sell anything in the manor except at the market, unless they paid a toll at the market building.

Many stories were told about Hughes’ origins and family, most of them untrue. For example, one tale said he was the son of a slop seller. His grandmother Ruth (c. 1731 – 1800), after her first husband, a Mr. Ball, had died, married Admiral Edward Hughes. Admiral Hughes advanced the career of his wife’s eldest son, Captain Henry Ball (c. 1754-1792), who served under Hughes as captain of his flagship in India, but Henry predeceased him. Admiral Hughes died in 1794 without issue, and Hughes, son of Ruth’s second son David Ball (c. 1760-1798), inherited the Hughes money (40,000 pounds a year, an enormous fortune, and especially so without the encumbrance of an expensive country house to maintain) upon turning 21; he adopted the Hughes last name at that time. Ball Hughes’ mother’s name was Sarah; she later remarried, to a man named Thomas Johnson.

Hughes’ older sister Catherine Ball was a socialite, journalist, and novelist who eventually styled herself the “Baroness de Calabrella” after acquiring property in Italy. She married an older man, Rev. Francis Lee, at the age of 16 in 1804, without her mother’s permission, and was separated from him in 1810 on charges of adultery; her lover, Captain George de Blaquiere, was successfully sued by Lee for criminal conversation. She was later a friend of the Countess of Blessington  and married the Countess’ first patron, Thomas Jenkins. Another sister, Ruth, married Houlton Hartwell, son of Admiral Francis Hartwell, in 1812; he was one of the Prince Regent’s chaplains. A third sister, Sydney, married Sir John Ignatius Burke, 10th Baronet of Glinsk. There was a fourth sister, Elizabeth Ball.

PastedGraphic2-2012-12-27-08-33Hughes had several several relationships while in France, although it is unclear whether he actually remarried. With actress Eliza Breugnot Momborne he had three children: Edward Seymour; Adeline Eleanor, and Sydney Matilda. Edward Seymour died in 1867 in Dieppe after his horse fell on him; d’Orsay had made a portrait of him as a young man. Hughes later had several children with Anne Henriette de Dauvet: Edward Edmund Hughes Ball Hughes and Kate Henrietta Edwardine Hughes Ball Hughes.

Hughes was exceedingly handsome, generous, and entertained lavishly. Lord William Pitt-Lennox, a rival dandy, declared that Hughes tried too hard to be the toast of the ton. Pitt-Lennox said of Hughes, “Brummell sets the fashion; Ball Hughes merely follows it.” Hughes, for example, was known to dislike hunting, but he nevertheless kept a string of hunters because he saw doing so as “trendy.” He also disliked music while maintaining a box at Covent Garden. He knew little of racing but always attended Ascot and Goodwood. Pitt-Lennox was also to have said of Hughes, “[His] manner in public was too coxcombical; he screwed his mouth up, and lisped or drawled forth his words, while his manner of walking was so affected that he looked as if he was on stilts, and had swallowed the kitchen poker.”

Posted in British history, Jane Austen, Living in the Regency, real life tales, Regency era | Tagged , , , , , | 6 Comments

Living in Regency England – Heating the House

From the Georgian Period forward, the majority of the London townhouses were heated by coal rather than wood. Thus, members of Society and visitors to the City “enjoyed” the ever-preent film of coal dust in the air. In the late 17th and early 18th Century, the fireplaces remained wood-burning elements within the households. These fireplaces were designed with wide chimneys and a brick hearth.

Fireback in the house of Jeanne d'Arc in Domrémy

Fireback in the house of Jeanne d’Arc in Domrémy

When coal came into use, a free-standing iron or steel basket was placed in the fireplace. These baskets usually had an iron fireback behind it. After 1750, these iron baskets occurred regularly in both country, as well as city, households. Quite often, down drafts drove smoke from these coal baskets into the rooms, and the heat escaped up the chimneys (i.e., the constant “smog” in London).  A fireplace fireback is a heavy cast iron, sized in proportion to the fireplace and the fire, which is placed against the back wall of the fireplace. The metal is heated by the fire, and then that heat is radiated into the room. The thick iron keeps the heat which would otherwise be lost and returns it to the room. A fireback may increase the fire’s efficiency by as much as 50%. The thicker the fireback, the longer (and softer) the radiative effect. The fireback also protected the back of the fireplace from heat and flames.

 

18th Century firedogs

Stove “grates” became popular in early to mid 18th centuries. These stove grates combined the coal basket, the fireback, and firedogs.  The first fireplaces in Tudor homes consisted of a pair of fire dogs, which raised the ends of the burning logs to improve the burning efficiency. By the end of the 18th Century, the first fire baskets came into use, which helped to contain and manage the fire, improving efficiency.

From Russell Taylor at Building Conservation, we learn, “Chimneys and flues are subjected to intense heating and cooling cycles, condensation and aggressive chemical reactions caused by hot flue gases. Above the roof line the chimney stack is exposed to the full force of the weather. To withstand such conditions, maintenance and repairs need to be of the highest standard, and it is important that design elements of such significance are conserved properly. Yet works are often badly executed by unqualified contractors using inappropriate materials and ill-conceived methods. The result can be damaging to the character and fabric of the building, and may even be dangerous.

“Although flues have been in use since ancient times, many early domestic fires were open hearths where the smoke billowed around inside the building. The widespread adoption of flues in the late medieval period coincided with an increase in the use of brick, which is better able to withstand the temperature of a domestic fire than stone because it is a fired material. Even in stone building areas brick was often used for the chimneys and flues, particularly from the 19th century onwards.

“The earliest chimneys were large, crude structures serving a single fire, but as more fireplaces were required, chimneys became smaller and more efficient, combining several flues, each serving a separate fire.

“At first the usual domestic fuel was wood, but coal was used surprisingly early – in London from the mid-17th century and everywhere except rural areas by the mid-18th century. The change to coal resulted in smaller fireplaces as more heat is given off by a smaller quantity of fuel, and grates were required because coal, being denser than wood, will not burn unless there is an oxygen supply under it.

“In the 17th and 18th Centuries, when coal was the principal fuel used, grates were really simple baskets combining fire-dogs and fire-back in a single unit. Then came cast iron hob-grates and finally the various types of register grates based on principles established by Count Rumford in 1797. These grates had a narrow throat for more efficient flue draught, the fire was pushed forward to the front of the hearth and the sides were splayed to radiate heat more efficiently. Register grates became the standard from then on.

“By the 18th century most chimneys were built with 12″ flues, and this size was reduced still further following Count Rumford’s innovations. As a result the usual dimension for a brick flue came to be just 9 x 9″ (one brick by one brick) and the wall between the flues, the ‘withe’, was usually 4½” (half a brick). Brick dimensions often also govern the dimensions of quite elaborately shaped stacks so for any replacement bricks the original Imperial sizes must be precisely matched.

“Flues are lined with ‘parging’, a render mix used to prevent gases escaping through mortar joints and cracks in the structure. Parging is always somewhat roughly executed and is usually of the same mix as the brick mortar, because it is done piecemeal as the chimney stack rises. However, special mixes were also used and are found in older and larger flues. The first edition of McKay’s Building Construction in 1944, for example, recommended a mix of one part lime to three parts sand with ox hair, mixed at the rate of one pound of hair to three cubic feet of mortar. An alternative mix comprised one part lime to two parts sand and one part cow dung.”

The cast iron hob grate was the first major improvement to the 3-part stove grate. Early hob grates were used in modest homes as early as 1720.

Late Georgian Cast Iron Hob Grate from the Caroon Foundry

Late Georgian Cast Iron Hob Grate from the Caroon Foundry

Original hob grates were made from cast iron with hobs either side used for heating and cooking and were fitted into the chimney breast. Hob grates are often known as register grates, the difference being register grates have a register plate on the back to protect the back brickwork of the chimney, control emissions and airflow from the fire. Today “register grates” are popularly known as “hob grates” despite having the register plate on the back. The name “register grate” came because the original hob grate design with a register plate on the back was registered/ patented/ copyrighted.

Regency Cast Iron Hob Grate

Regency Cast Iron Hob Grate

Original hob grates were first used during the reigns of King George I – IV (1740-1830) and in the Regency period (1811-1820) where the Prince Regent ruled due to his father King George III’s sickness. Hob grates were popular during these periods as they were an effective way of cooking and heating at the same time. The two hobs either side of the grate allowed for plenty of room for cooking utensils and at the same time the fire would radiate heat into the room. Hob grates were used right up until the Edwardian period although the functionality of being able to cook on the hobs died out as new technologies became available. During the Edwardian period and Art Nouveau hob grates tended to have changed in style somewhat, the main difference being that they often had tiles placed in them.

The hob grates allowed for smaller coal baskets and more efficiency. The cast iron versions radiated more heat into the rooms. They came into being around 1750. The top and front were made of one single iron casting, while the remainder of the apparatus was a thin sheer iron. Being economical to produce, hob grates soon became the standard in townhouses and smaller rooms in great mansions. In poorer Georgian houses, the hob grate served as a cooking stove.

Count Rumford

Count Rumford

In 1796, Benjamin Thompson, Count Rumford, the polymathematical founder of the Royal Institution, wrote a pamphlet called Chimney Fireplaces. In it, Rumford described the advantages of a narrower chimney throat. Rumford applied his knowledge of heat to the improvement of fireplaces. He made them smaller and shallower with widely angled covings so they would radiate better. And he streamlined the throat, or in his words “rounded off the breast” so as to “remove those local hindrances which forcibly prevent the smoke from following its natural tendency to go up the chimney…” Rumford “put his money where his mouth was” by installing new grates in his Brompton Row, Knightsbridge, residence. “Rumford Stoves,” which brought the heat source closer to the opening and which canted the sides to increase radiation, quickly became popular among wealthy aristocrats, including the Marquis of Salisbury.

The Rumford fireplace created a sensation in London when he introduced the idea of restricting the chimney opening to increase the updraught. He and his workers changed fireplaces by inserting bricks into the hearth to make the side walls angled and added a choke to the chimney to increase the speed of air going up the flue. It effectively produced a streamlined  air flow, reducing turbulence  so the smoke would go up into the chimney rather than lingering and often choking the residents. Many fashionable London houses were modified to his instructions, and became smoke-free as well as more efficient. Thompson became a celebrity when news of his success became widespread. In an age when fires were the principal source of heat, this simple alteration in the design of fireplaces was copied everywhere .

Plan of Rumford fireplace

Section of Rumford fireplace

Rumford fireplaces were common from 1796, when Count Rumford first wrote about them, until about 1850. Jefferson had them built at Monticello, and Thoreau listed them among the modern conveniences that everyone took for granted. There are still many original Rumford fireplaces, often buried behind newer renovations. He also invented a cast iron stove, which competed successfully with the famous Benjamin Franklin stove. Both devices gave much more control over the air flow into the fire, and were both much more efficient users of fuel. Such stoves were expensive, but saved so much fuel as to justify the cost of installation very quickly.

Further improvements were slow coming. In the 1820s and 1830s stove grates and hob grates, continued to follow the patterns of the late 1780s.

 

 

Posted in British history, Jane Austen, Living in the Regency, real life tales, Regency era | Tagged , , , , , , | 9 Comments

Eccentrics of the Regency Period Series: Charles Stanhope, Lord Petersham

Charles Stanhope, Viscount Petersham

Charles Stanhope, Viscount Petersham

Eccentricity was not social suicide during the Regency, as long as Society’s pundits had given their approval. Occasionally, eccentricity was considered quite fashionable. During the Regency, Lord Petersham was as popular as Beau Brummell, but we know little of him because little has written of him other than the occasional paragraph in a period journal. He was described by Princess Lieven as the “maddest of all the mad Englishmen.”

Charles Stanhope, 4th Earl of Harrington (8 April 1780 – 3 March 1851) was an English peer and man of fashion. He was Viscount Petersham until he assumed the position as the Earl in 1829. At age 15, Petersham entered the Coldstream Guards in 1793, and later became Captain of the 10th Regiment of (Light) Dragoons in 1799. In 1803, he was made a major in the Queen’s Rangers, and a Lieutenant Colonel in the 3rd West India Regiment in 1807. He was made Lord of the Bedchamber to King George III until 1820, and continued in that role from 1820 to 1829 for King George IV.

from the Victoria and Albert Museum

from the Victoria and Albert Museum

Petersham never appeared in public before 6 P.M. The Prince Regent emulated Petersham’s affected manners, especially the viscount’s “fashion,” his tea drinking, and his addiction to snuff. Petersham owned 365 snuff boxes, one for each day of the year.

from the Victoria and Albert Museum

Said to resemble Henry VI, Petersham purposely grew a small pointed beard to emphasize the similarity. He designed many of his clothes. It was the Petersham who introduced “Cossack” trousers to Society. These trousers had nipped-in waists and ankles, with balloon legs in the middle, and made of garish striped material. He gave his name to the Harrington hat and the Petersham overcoat. Petersham was a man of many moods and whims. For example, he once decided he preferred a particular shade of brown above all other colors. This affection reportedly started as a tribute to a widow named Mary Browne, but the color brown became his trademark long after his love affair with the lady had ended. He was famous for the brown color of his coach, his harness, his coachman’s top hat and spurs, his clothing, and his servants’ livery. He even ordered a brown sild embroidered coat to wear at Court.

Petersham was equally known for his obsession with expensive trivia. From The Eclectic Magazine, we find this description of Petersham’s apartments: “The room into which we are ushered was more like a shop than a gentleman’s sitting-room. All around the walls were shelves, upon which were placed the canisters containing congou, pekoe, souchong, bohea, gunpowder, Russian, and many other teas, all the best of their kind; on the other side of the room were beautiful jars, with names in gilt letters, of innumerable kinds of snuff, and the necessary apparatus for moistening and mixing. Other shelves and many tables were covered with a great number of magnificent snuff boxes; for Lord Petersham had perhaps the finest collection in England, and was supposed to have a fresh box for every day of the year. I heard him, on the occasion of a delightful old light-blue Sévres box he was using being admired, say in his lisping way, ‘Yes, it is a nice summer box, but it would not do for winter wear.'”

Unlike his contemporary Beau Brummell, Petersham enjoyed the company of women. Lady Frances Webster’s husband attempted to horsewhip Petersham on the street in retribution for the viscount’s affair with his wife.

Maria Foote

Maria Foote

At age 50, he acceded to the Stanhope family title. He finally married in 1831 to Maria Foote, the Covent Garden actress and ex-courtesan, who was 17 years his junior. Their affair had met with the 3rd Earl’s disapproval and had been the gossip of London and Derbyshire. The 4th Earl of Harrington commissioned William Barron to landscape the park at Elvaston Castle, his father’s Gothic’s confection by James Wyatt. Lewis Cottingham redecorated Wyatt’s original entrance hall. Renamed the Hall of the Fair Star, it was dedicated to the chivalrous pursuit of love. The new Countess was in her element in this make-believe world of chivalry. They lived quite happily in their “love nest” and were said to host some of Society’s “jolliest” parties.

Posted in British history, Jane Austen, legends and myths, Living in the Regency, real life tales, Regency era | Tagged , , , , | 3 Comments

To Horse! Regency Side Saddles

I recently wrote a scene for Book 5 of my “Realm” series, A Touch of Mercy, in which the heroine must ride side saddle and be unseated from the ride. Therefore, I spent a good deal of time checking other sources for details. Below, you find some of the facts I discovered. 

15th Century saddle

15th Century saddle

A pillion is a mostly British English term for a secondary pad, cushion, or seat behind the main seat or saddle on a horse, motorcycle, bicycle or moped. A passenger in this seat is said to “ride pillion” or may themselves be referred to as a “pillion.” The word is derived from the Scottish Gaelic for a “little rug,” pillean, which is itself from the Latin pellis for “animal skin.” One or more pelts would often have been used as a secondary seat on horseback; the usage has carried over to motorcycles. A pillion was placed behind the man’s regular saddle for him to carry the woman behind him.

Facing to the side on the pillion placed the woman in a precarious position. The woman had no control over the horse, she was merely a passenger seated by the man. In the 9th Century a planchette, a small footrest, was added to the pillion. The planchette improved balance, but the woman still had no control over the animal upon which she rode.

Anne of Bohemia, wife of Richard II, introduced this Classical Greek pillion with the attached planchette style to England in 1382, and it remained the standard for several centuries. Eventually, a raised cantle and a horn in the center front were added. In the 16th Century, Catherine de Medici, Queen consort of France from 1547 until 1559, as the wife of King Henry II of France, insisted on changes to her side saddle. Catherine suggested a horn in the front over which to hook her knee and to face forward for the beginning changes. Later, she suggested a second horn to the left of the central one, which further improved balance.  She also had the planchette removed and replaced with the single slipper stirrup, which could be made of metal or wood and covered with fabric.

1799 side saddle

1799 side saddle

Two centuries passed before the side saddle saw additional changes. Unfortunately, the important changes occurred after the Regency Period. Regency ladies still suffered from frequent falls. Only the most expert horsewoman could maintain her balance over rough roads or with any speed. In addition, Regency side saddles sported a long leather skirt, which prevented the woman from controlling the horse with her leg and foot. The slipper stirrup often placed the woman in danger for it she fell from the saddle, she could be dragged behind the horse. It was also precarious to sit with one weight too far to the left. Balance remained an issue.

Toward the end of the eighteenth century some women, such as Catherine the Great and Marie Antoinette, chose to ride astride, but it was not popular among the nobility. Marie Antoinette relinquished the idea when she became queen. In 1805, a Milanese riding master, Federigo Mazzuchelli, made the ridiculous claim that women could not ride astride because they had more rounded thighs than men. Men and woman alike accepted Mazzuchelli’s assertion as the absolute truth. His book Scuola Equestre remained a popular and was widely circulated on the Continent.

Needless to say, women could not easily mount the side saddle without the assistance of a riding block or with a gentleman’s assistance. If she tried to pull herself into the saddle by catching the horn and hoisting herself up, the lady would likely find herself lying flat upon the floor. A woman would place her foot in the joined hands of her gentleman escort or the groom to be lifted to the saddle. Women always rode with an accompanying gentleman or a groom.

Behind the side saddle, it was common to place a heavy weight linen canvas to prevent slippage. The side saddle was also padded heavily to fit the specific horse. This protect the female rider and helped to prevent saddle galls, sores on the horse’s back caused by abrasions. Most Regency side saddles were customized for the women who rode upon them AND the horses who carried them.

Because the woman could not cue the horse equally on its right and left flanks, she normally carried a short whip or a thin leather-covered cane to cue the horse on the right. If the leather skirt was shortened, the lady could use a single spur on the left side. The riding habits Regency women wore often rose above the ankle and exposed skin if she rode too quickly. Such behavior would be considered scandalous. Therefore, women often sewed ribbons into the hems of their skirts to tie to their boots to keep the skirt tail in place. Again, this could place the woman in danger, especially if the ribbon wrapped itself about the spur or the slipper stirrup and the woman took an unexpected fall.

In 1830, Charles Pellier came up with the leaping head/horn. The leaping head was an additional pommel, which curved downward. Women placed their left knee under the leading head, which improved balance. Later improvements included a flatter seat, a safety stirrup (approximately 1850), and a balance or Sefton girth (1880).

The Oregon Regency Society has a wonderful post with FABULOUS diagrams of side saddles. Please visit http://oregonregency.blogspot.com/2011/09/riding-sidesaddle-very-horsey-post.html for more details, as does Christy English on English Historical Fiction Authors http://englishhistoryauthors.blogspot.com/2012/10/noblewomen-and-horseback-riding-in.html .

Posted in British history, Industry News/Publishing, Living in the Regency, Regency era | Tagged , , , | 7 Comments

Plough Monday and Molly Dancing: British Traditions

The Oxford Dictionary of English Folk Lore describes a plough jag as, “One of the three main types of mumming play, found only in the East Midlands, and first reported in the 1820s. Performances were concentrated on Plough Monday,  but could take place at any time over the Christmas/New Year period, and were typically by teams of male farm workers who, in addition to performing the play around the neighbourhood, dragged a plough with them, and were thus often called by local names such as Plough Jags, Plough Bullocks, and so on. Plough plays invariably include the combat/cure sequence of the more widespread Hero-Combat type of play, but their main feature, which distinguishes them, is a ‘wooing’ section. Either a ‘Lady’ (played by a man) is wooed by a series of suitors or, more commonly, a Recruiting Sergeant entices the Lady’s farm worker lover away and she then accepts the Fool’s advances. Much of the wooing is expressed in sung dialogue.”

Plough Monday was “the first Monday after Twelfth Day (6 January) and in rural communities this was traditionally the day on which farm workers prepared to go back to work after the Christmas break, and to start the all-important task of ploughing the fields ready for sowing later in the year. The day itself had its own customs, including one in which one of the farm lads had to get into the kitchen and place one of the tools of his trade at the screen, or fireplace, before the maid had put the early morning water on to boil (see Tusser, 1580/1878 edn.: 180).

More common, however, was some form of ceremony involving a plough. In many areas there was a ‘common plough,’ housed in the church, which could be used by any smallholder too poor to own one himself. At New Year or Plough Monday the plough would be blessed by the parish priest and then decorated and paraded around the neighbourhood by the ploughboys of the local farms. Money collected by these men went to maintain the ‘plough lights,’ which were candles kept burning in the church to ensure continued divine blessing on this essential operation in the farming cycle. The Reformation of the church in the 16th century abolished both the lights and the plough blessing, and also removed the ecclesiastical sanction for the plough procession, but the latter continued, or was revived, by the farm workers who then collected money on their own behalf—to be spent on drink and merrymaking. The procession and plough were the main focus, but the custom took on divergent forms, with some teams performing versions of plough plays, others simply dancing and singing or reciting rhymes. The first known reference to the plough procession dates from January 1413, in Durham, but it is not until the 18th century that informative descriptions of the custom become available.”

Molly Dancing was “a customary dance tradition performed by men at the Christmas/New Year/ Plough Monday season in East Anglia in the 19th century and up to about the Second World War. It therefore comes under the classification of ceremonial dance, but Molly dancing was not as well developed or complex as other dance forms such as Morris or Sword dancing and has therefore received much less attention. The performance was sometimes dismissed as ‘just jigging about,’ but was loosely based on 19th-century social dances. Molly dancers wore ordinary clothes, decorated with ribbons and rosettes, and usually had blackened faces, and had at least one man dressed in women’s clothes, while in some teams they all wore female clothes. They danced in the village street and collected money door to door and from passers-by, who sometimes joined in.

“The earliest references so far discovered are found in local newspaper accounts for the 1820s, although the word ‘Molly’ in this context does before 1866. There are definite affinities with Plough Monday plough customs, and it is probable that Molly dancing developed from these, and like the ploughboys, Molly dancers had a reputation for being rough and ready, and even somewhat threatening. There has been renewed interest in recent years, and there are now many revival Molly dance teams. There are several possible derivations for the word ‘Molly’. It could well be simply a form of ‘Morris’, as many customary dance or drama customs were locally termed ‘morris dances’. However, ‘Molly’ is also common as a dialect word for a man dressed as a woman.

From the Old Glory: Molly Dancers and Musicians (http://old-glory.org.uk/index.htm), we learn, “There would also be gangs of Molly dancers, sometimes accompanying the plough gangs.  Old Glory was formed in 1994 to revive the tradition of Molly dancing in East Suffolk.  Molly dancing traditionally only appeared during the depths of winter and is regarded by many people as the East Anglian form of Morris.  It is characterized by blackened faces, heavy boots (usually hobnailed) and the presence of a ‘Lord’ and a ‘Lady,’ two of the men specially attired respectively as a gentleman and his consort, who lead the dances.  There are other characters in Old Glory, such as the ‘umbrella-man,’ who acts as announcer, a ‘box-man’ carrying a collecting box, the ‘broom-man,’ who clears the way for the dancers, and the ‘whiffler,’ whose job it is to marshal the dancers.  Blackening faces was a form of disguise, since the dancers could not afford to be recognised.  Some of those people from whom they had demanded money with menaces would have been their employers.  Molly dancing is by nature robust and, some would say, aggressive.  These qualities are emphasised by the sound of the hobnailed boots worn by the dancers, which were the normal form of footwear for farm workers in the East of England right up until the second half of the twentieth century.

There is very little known about the dances that Molly dancers of the early part of the twentieth century would have performed, other than that they resembled country dances, but danced using a slow, heavy step, and with much swinging about in pairs.  We have constructed our own dances, based on such information as we have, and we have developed our own distinctive style – the ‘Waveney Valley’ tradition.  The Molly dancers of Old Glory are all men, whilst the musicians are all women.  The musicians play a variety of traditional instruments, invariably including at least one four-stop melodeon in the ‘Suffolk key’ of C.”

The word ‘mumming’ causes confusion, as it can refer to a number of relatively distinct customs, and many visiting custom  have borne the name, but by far the most widespread is the mumming play. In late medieval times, it was the fashion amongst the nobility to stage elaborate ‘mummings’ which involved dressing up or disguising, such as wearing dragon, peacock, and swan heads, or dressing as angels. Other reports show that it was not only at court that people liked to disguise themselves at Christmas, and there were several occasions when attempts were made to ban mummings and disguisings to prevent masked young men roaming the streets getting up to mischief. A New Year custom, apparently confined to the Yorkshire area, involved parties of disguised people entering people’s houses on New Year’s Eve, without knocking as the doors had generally been left unlocked. The residents had to guess their identity, and once they did so offered food and drink to the visitors before they moved on to another house. The custom was almost exactly the same as that which is still going strong (also called mumming or mummering) in Newfoundland. ‘At Wakefield and Stanby (Yorkshire) the mummers enter a house, and if it be in a foul state they proceed to sweep the hearth, and clean the kitchen range, humming all the time “Mum-m-m”’ (Henderson, 1866: 54). In Barton, Cambridgeshire, up to about 1914, boys with blackened faces, calling themselves ‘mummers’, paraded the village singing a verse which has echoes from the mumming play (Porter, 1974: 72); and, in addition, some Christmas Eve carol-singers in the West Riding of Yorkshire were also called mummers, as were those who carried the wassail cup around in the Cleveland area.”

Burton_upon_Stather

Enquiries with the North Lincolnshire Museum yielded the following information. (http://www.folkplay.info/Forum/TD_Forum_6_Burton_upon_Stather.htm)- Burton upon Stather Plough Jags: A Photographic Query

The photo of plough jags from Burton-upon-Stather has appeared in three publications. The first is North Lincolnshire. A pictorial history by Kevin Leahy and David Williams published by North Lincolnshire Council in 1996 on page 61 with the following caption, and is probably where the scanned image came from;

“Burton-upon-Stather Plough Jags, 1907. Plough plays, representing death and resurrection, have their roots in the village culture of the Middle Ages. This simple ceremony was an allegory of the burial and growth of seed. The plays were preceded by a procession which included the terrifying hobby-horse, and Besom Betty. They were performed on Plough Monday which was the first Monday in January. Newspaper reports of the 1870s and 1880s record the decline of the plays, although some, as at Burton-on-Stather, lingered on into the twentieth-century.”

The second was in 1996 in The Parish of Burton upon Stather with Normanby and Thealby by Geoffrey Robinson M.B.E., on page 60 with the following caption;

“The annual Festival of the Plough Jacks (corrupted to Jags) took place on or about Monday, January 9th. Its origin was embodied in the idea of invoking a blessing on the ploughman and his plough. In the 1850/60’s the Sheffield family took a prominent part in encouraging the entertainment when a plough was drawn through a large fire kindled in the courtyard of Normanby Park. Jarvis writes that ‘many a barrel of beer was given by the squire on these occasions, but like many a good thing, got out of hand’. A fatal accident occurred in connection with the event and the glamour of the Plough Festival ceased.”

He has since given his large collection of photographs to the Museum. The third was Twentieth Century Lincolnshire in the History of Lincolnshire Series edited by Dennis Mills on page 354 in 1989 with this caption;

“The Burton-upon-Stather (or Burton Stather) Plough Jags, 1907. They are said to have been ‘a double gang, who often split up to work a village quickly, gathering together at the best and likeliest houses’. According to Mrs.E.H.Rudkin, they were ‘Four Hat Men, two Besom Betties, two Niggers, two Hobby Horses, one Doctor, one Soldier, one Lady’. Source: D.N. Robinson Collection.”

Posted in British history, gothic and paranormal, legends and myths, Living in the Regency, real life tales, Regency era, Victorian era | Tagged , , , , , | 7 Comments

Would You Recognize a Hunky Punk?

High-Ham-8389“Hunky Punk” is a West Country (UK) word for grotesque carvings on the side of English buildings, especially churches. The word originated in Somerset and is ascribed to the Old English word “hunkers,” which means haunches and “punchy,” which means short-legged. Unlike a gargoyle, which drains water through its mouth, a hunky punk has no architectural purpose. Hunky punks are decorative elements used for balance. For example, on the corner of a church, along the coping ridge below any castellations, one might find three hunky punks and one gargoyle. All four elements appear to be gargoyles, but the roof likely only drains in one direction; therefore, there is only one true gargoyle.

Some term a hunky punk as a short squatting figure found only on Somerset churches. Hunky punks come in many sizes and shapes. Recognized in spiritual architecture throughout the world, they are mostly found on buildings built in the middle to late medieval period.

York Minster

York Minster

“Some theories consider that the balance of good and evil created in church design to remind worshippers of the narrow path they tread was present in everything. This meant that for every good and benign creature, such as a saint or an animal to signify purity, there had to be an opposite to bring out the fear of evil. In York Minster, for example, the carvings in the Chapter house, which are particularly disgusting and obscene and which were supposedly created as caricatures of the then Dean and Chapter, were put there above the seats to create an opposite to each occupant, who we might like to assume was not in fact the foul person their carvings made them out to be.” The church tower at Isle Abbots (in Somerset) has eight Hunky Punks: a person playing the bagpipes, an Oriental lion dog, a goat, a dragon, a Chinese dragon, a primitive dragon, a winged lion, and a lion.

Isle Abbots

Isle Abbots

A hunky punk is a type of Grotesque. “A grotesque is a carved figure, usually of a mytholigical creature, demon, or strange beast, used as an ornamental feature in church decoration. The term is sometimes confused with gargoyle, which is a special type of carved beast used to decorate a drainpipe. Grotesques can be found almost anywhere inside or outside a church, but are often used to decorate a frieze just under the eaves or as projecting carvings on a tower. Grotesques might depict human figures or faces, demons, animals, or other mythical creatures, often with exaggerated fierce of humourous expressions. Some are obviously meant to lampoon real local characters or represent church patrons.” (from Britain Express)

Posted in British history, gothic and paranormal, legends and myths, real life tales | Tagged , , , | 4 Comments