During the Reign of George IV: The Red Lady of Paviland 1823, The World’s First Human Fossil Found

The Red Lady of Paviland is a fairly complete Upper Paleolithic-era human male skeleton dyed in red ochre. Discovered in 1823 it is the first human fossil to have been found anywhere in the world, and at 33,000 years old is still the oldest ceremonial burial of a modern human ever discovered anywhere in Western Europe. The bones were discovered between 18 and 25 January 1823 by Rev. William Buckland, during an archaeological dig at Goat’s Hole Cave; one of the limestone caves between Port Eynon and Rhossili, on the Gower Peninsula, south Wales.

Buckland believed the remains to be those of a female, dating to Roman Britain. However, later analysis of the remains showed them to have been of a young male, and the most recent re-calibrated radiocarbon dating in 2009 indicates that the skeleton can be dated to around 33,000 years before present (BP). The other key paleolithic sites in the UK are Happisburgh, Pakefield, Boxgrove, Swanscombe, Pontnewydd, Kents Cavern, and Creswell Crags.

Discovery
In 1822, Daniel Davies and the Rev John Davies, respectively surgeon and curate at Port Eynon on the south coast of Gower, explored the cave and found animal bones, including the tusk of a mammoth. The Talbot family of Penrice Castle was informed and Miss Mary Theresa Talbot, then the oldest unmarried daughter, joined an expedition to the site and found ‘bones of elephants’ on 27 December 1822.

220px-William_Buckland_c1845 William Buckland, Professor of Geology at Oxford University and a correspondent of that well-connected family, was contacted. He arrived on 18 January 1823 and spent a week at Goat’s Hole – a week in which his famous discovery took place.

Later that year, writing about his find in his book Reliquiae Diluvianae (Evidence of the Flood), Buckland stated:

“I found the skeleton enveloped by a coating of a kind of ruddle … which stained the earth, and in some parts extended itself to the distance of about half an inch [12 mm] around the surface of the bones … Close to that part of the thigh bone where the pocket is usually worn surrounded also by ruddle [were] about two handfuls of the Nerita littoralis [periwinkle shells]. At another part of the skeleton, viz in contact with the ribs [were] forty or fifty fragments of ivory rods [also] some small fragments of rings made of the same ivory and found with the rods … Both rods and rings, as well as the Nerite shells, were stained superficially with red, and lay in the same red substance that enveloped the bones.

When Buckland first discovered the skeleton in 1823, he misjudged both its age and its sex. As a creationist, Buckland believed no human remains could have been older than the Biblical Great Flood, and thus wildly underestimated its true age, believing the remains to date back to the Roman era.

Buckland believed the skeleton was female in large part because it was discovered with decorative items, including perforated seashell necklaces and jewellery thought to be of elephant ivory but now known to be carved from the tusk of a mammoth. These decorative items combined with the skeleton’s red dye caused Buckland to mistakenly speculate the remains belonged to a Roman prostitute or witch.

Findings
The “lady” has since been identified as a man, probably no older than 21. His are the oldest anatomically modern human remains found in the United Kingdom, as well as the oldest known ceremonial burial in Western Europe. The skeleton was found along with a mammoth’s skull, which has since been lost. Scholars now believe he may have been a tribal chieftain. The next human remains found in Britain, of Cheddar Man, are much younger and separated by the period of the Ice Age.

By the time a second archaeological excavation was undertaken to Paviland Cave in 1912, it was recognized through comparison with other discoveries that had been made in Europe, that the remains were from the Palaeolithic – although before carbon dating was invented in the 1950s there was no way of determining the actual age of any prehistoric remains. Early carbon dating has tended to underestimate the age of samples and as radio carbon dating techniques have developed and become more and more accurate so the age of the Red Lady of Paviland has gradually been pushed back.

In the 1960s Kenneth Oakley published a radiocarbon determination made on the actual bones of the ‘Red Lady’ at 18,460 ± 340 BP. Tests made in 1989 and 1995 suggested he lived about 26,000 years ago (26,350 ± 550 BP, OxA-1815) at the end of the Upper Paleolithic Period. In 2007 a new examination of the remains by Dr Thomas Higham of Oxford University and Dr Roger Jacobi of the British Museum suggested they were 29,000 years old.

In 2009 a recalibration of the test results suggested an age of 33,000 years. Although now on the coast, at the time of the burial the cave would have been located approximately 70 miles inland, overlooking a plain. When the remains were dated to some 26,000 years ago it was thought the Red Lady lived at a time when an ice sheet of the most recent glacial period, in the British Isles called the Devensian Glaciation, would have been advancing towards the site, and that consequently the weather would have been more like that of present day Siberia, with maximum temperatures of perhaps 10°C in summer, -20° in winter, and a tundra vegetation. The new dating however indicates he lived at a warmer period.

Bone protein analysis indicates that the “lady” lived on a diet that consisted of between 15% and 20% fish, which, together with the distance from the sea, suggests that the people may have been semi-nomadic, or that the tribe transported the body from a coastal region for burial. Other food probably included mammoth, the woolly rhinoceros and reindeer.

When the skeleton was first found, Wales had no museum in which to keep it, so it was housed at Oxford University, where Buckland was a professor. In December 2007 it was loaned for a year to the National Museum Cardiff. Subsequent excavations of the area in which the skeleton was found have yielded more than 4,000 flints, teeth and bones, and needles and bracelets, which are on exhibit at Swansea Museum and the National Museum in Cardiff.

Red Lady Arts Project
The story of the Red Lady was the focus of an arts project supported by a Steps to New Music Award from the Arts Council of Wales and premiered in Carmarthen, west Wales, on 1 April 2010. The project featured a cantata, “Y Dyn Unig” (The Lonely Man), composed by Andrew Powell, with libretto by Menna Elfyn, for tenor, harp, mixed choir, children’s chorus and brass band. The work was first performed by Robyn Lyn (tenor), Royal Harpist Claire Jones, Cor Seingar and the Burry Port Town Band, was conducted by Craig Roberts and presented by science author Mark Brake.

Posted in British history, George IV, Living in the Regency, real life tales, Regency era, Regency personalities, South Wales, Wales | Tagged , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Regency Economic Disaster: The Great Stock Exchange Fraud of 1814

The Great Stock Exchange Fraud of 1814 was a hoax or fraud centered on false information about the then-ongoing Napoleonic Wars, affecting the London Stock Exchange in 1814.

The du Bourg Hoax
On the morning of Monday, 21 February 1814, a uniformed man posing as Colonel du Bourg, aide-du-camp to Lord Cathcart, arrived at the Ship Inn at Dover, England, bearing news that Napoleon I of France had been killed, and the Bourbons were victorious. Requesting that this information be relayed on to the Admiralty in London via semaphore telegraph, “Colonel du Bourg” proceeded on toward London, stopping at each inn on the way to spread the good news. At about noon, confirmation for the news of peace arrived in the form of another coach, which circulated throughout London, bearing three French officers who distributed leaflets celebrating the Bourbon victory.

Effects on the Stock Market
Rumors of Napoleon’s defeat had been circulating throughout the month, and the combined events had a significant impact on the London Stock Exchange. The value of government securities soared in the morning, after the news from Dover began to circulate among traders at the Exchange. Lacking official confirmation of the news, prices began to slide after the initial rush, only to be further propped up at noon by the French officers and their handbills.

However, the entire affair was a deliberate hoax. In the afternoon, the government confirmed that the news of peace was a fabrication. The affected stocks’ prices immediately sank to their previous levels.

Investigation
The Committee of the Stock Exchange, suspecting deliberate stock manipulation, launched an investigation into the hoax. It was soon discovered that there had been a sale that Monday of more than £1.1 million of two government-based stocks, most of it purchased the previous week. Three people connected with that purchase were charged with the fraud: Lord Cochrane, a Radical member of Parliament and well-known naval hero, his uncle the Hon. Andrew Cochrane-Johnstone, and Richard Butt, Lord Cochrane’s financial advisor. Captain Random de Berenger, who had posed both as du Bourg and as one of the French officers, was soon arrested, and a guilty verdict was returned against all three charged in the case. The chief conspirators were sentenced to twelve months of prison time, a fine of £1,000 each, and an hour in the public pillory. Lord Cochrane was also stripped of his naval rank and expelled from the Order of the Bath.

Culpability of Lord Cochrane
Though convicted of the fraud, Lord Cochrane continued to assert his innocence. In 1816, he brought an (unsuccessful) charge of “partiality, misrepresentation, injustice and oppression” against Lord Ellenborough, the presiding judge in his case. Popular opinion certainly backed Cochrane; his sentencing was followed by his re-election to the House of Commons for Westminster, and, due to public outcry over his treatment, the punishment of the pillory was officially discontinued in Britain.

Lord Cochrane continued to petition the government for redress; in 1832, he was granted a free pardon, including reinstatement to his rank of Rear Admiral. Restoration of the Order of the Bath and other honors followed in the subsequent decades, and, in 1877, a Select Committee found that his treatment since 1832 constituted “nothing less than a public recognition by those Governments of his innocence.”

Literary References
Security speculation based on allegedly accurate news delivered by semaphore telegraph forms a plot event in the novel The Count of Monte Cristo (published 1844).

The Great Stock Exchange Fraud forms the basis for the 11th novel in Patrick O’Brian’s Aubrey–Maturin series, The Reverse of the Medal (published 1986).

Lord Cochrane is a central figure in the end of my Jane Austen-inspired novel, Captain Wentworth’s Persuasion (published March 2010). JeffersCWP

Note! In the terminology of 1814, stocks refer to interest-bearing securities of the type that are today called bonds.

Posted in British history, buildings and structures, Great Britain, Living in the Regency, Napoleonic Wars, political stance, real life tales, Regency era, Regency personalities | Tagged , , | 1 Comment

Regency Happenings: The London Beer Flood of 1814

The London Beer Flood happened on 16 October 1814 in the parish of St. Giles, London, England. At the Meux and Company Brewery[1] on Tottenham Court Road, a huge vat containing over 135,000 imperial gallons (610,000 L) of beer ruptured, causing other vats in the same building to succumb in a domino effect. As a result, more than 323,000 imperial gallons (1,470,000 L) of beer burst out and gushed into the streets. The wave of beer destroyed two homes and crumbled the wall of the Tavistock Arms Pub, trapping teenage employee Eleanor Cooper under the rubble.

History
The brewery was among the poor houses and tenements of the St Giles Rookery, where whole families lived in basement rooms that quickly filled with beer. At least seven people drowned in the flood or died from injuries.

The brewery was eventually taken to court over the accident, but the disaster was ruled to be an Act of God by the judge and jury, leaving no one responsible. The company found it difficult to cope with the financial implications of the disaster, with a significant loss of sales made worse because they had already paid duty on the beer. They made a successful application to Parliament reclaiming the duty which allowed them to continue trading.

The brewery was demolished in 1922, and today, the Dominion Theatre occupies a part of the site of the former brewery. In 2012, a local tavern the ‘Holborn Whippet’ has started to mark this event with a specially created vat of Porter brewed especially for the day.

Known Drowning Fatalities
Name…………….Age
Clint Scroggins……52
Eleanor Cooper….15-16
Hannah Bamfield…….4
Catherine Butler…..63
Elizabeth Smith……27
Mary Mulvey……….30
Thomas Mulvey………3

Posted in British history, buildings and structures, food and drink, Great Britain, Living in the Regency, real life tales, Regency era, Regency personalities | Tagged , , , | 9 Comments

Late Regency Happening: The Controversial Beerhouse Act of 1830

The Beerhouse Act 1830 (11 Geo 4. and 1 Will 4. c. 64) was an Act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom, which liberalized the regulations governing the brewing and sale of beer. It was modified by subsequent legislation and finally repealed in 1993. It was one of the Licensing Acts 1828 to 1886.

The precursor to the Beerhouse Act was the Alehouse Act 1828 (9 Geo.4 c.61), which established a General Annual Licensing Meeting to be held in every city, town, division, county and riding, for the purposes of granting licences to inns, alehouses and victualling houses to sell exciseable liquors to be drunk on the premises.

Enacted two years later, the Beerhouse Act enabled anyone to brew and sell beer on payment of a licence costing two guineas, or £2.10 in modern currency. The intention was to increase competition between brewers, and it resulted in the opening of hundreds of new beerhouses, public houses and breweries throughout the country, particularly in the rapidly expanding industrial centres of the north of England. According to the Act itself, the Parliament considered it was “expedient for the better supplying the public with Beer in England, to give greater facilities for the sale thereof, than was then afforded by licences to keepers of Inns, Alehouses, and Victualling Houses.”

The Act’s supporters hoped that by increasing competition in the brewing and sale of beer, and thus lowering its price, the population might be weaned off more alcoholic drinks such as gin. But it proved to be controversial, removing as it did the monopoly of local magistrates to lucratively regulate local trade in alcohol, and not applying retrospectively to those who already ran public houses. It was also denounced as promoting drunkenness.

By 1841 licences under the new law had been issued to 45,500 commercial brewers. One factor in the Act was the dismantling provisions for detailed recording of licences, which were restored by subsequent regulatory legislation: the Wine and Beerhouse Act 1869 and the Wine and Beerhouse Act Amendment Act 1870. The Bill itself was often amended, notably in 1834 and 1840.

The final remaining provisions of the Act were repealed by Parliament on 11 November 1993, by the Statute Law (Repeals) Act 1993 (1993 c. 50), s. 1(1), Sch. 1 Pt. XIII GroupI. The passage of the Act during the reign of King William IV led to many taverns and public houses being named in his honour; he remains “the most popular monarch among pub names.”

Posted in British history, food and drink, Georgian Era, real life tales, Regency era | Tagged , , | 1 Comment

During the Reign of George IV: Apple Time with Cox’s Orange Pippin

In North Carolina, it is “apple time,” with loads of Apple Festivals across the state. Check out this article from The New York Times about Creigton Calhoun, Jr., of Pittsboro, NC, who “keeps ancient apples fresh and crisp.”

Mr. Calhoun is the author of a recently revised compendium of 1,800 antique apple varieties, called “Old Southern Apples.” He is also one of a cadre of collectors across the country who are passing on their own rare apples, through scions and grafted trees, to younger men and women starting nurseries or preservation orchards, or simply planting a few trees in the backyard.

He has given his collection to young growers like David C. Vernon, who now sells more than 400 heirloom apple varieties at Century Farm Orchards, in Reidsville, N.C., a farm that has been in his family since 1872.

“Lee taught me how to graft and provided me with most of his old varieties,” said Mr. Vernon, 40, who teaches high school chemistry.

Mr. Calhoun has also planted 800 trees — two of each in his collection — at Horne Creek Living Historical Farm in Pinnacle, N.C., north of Winston-Salem, in the northwestern Piedmont. Visitors can now see the difference between a semi-dwarf, free-standing tree and a dwarf tree of the same variety, espaliered or trained against wires. (Visit the NY Times website for the complete article.)

All that being said, you know I must relate even a topic such as “apples” to the Regency Period, for I write about the Regency in my novels. So, here is one of the apple cultivars, which began during the reign of George IV.

Cox’s Orange Pippin is an apple cultivar first grown in 1825, at Colnbrook in Buckinghamshire, England, by the retired brewer and horticulturist Richard Cox. Though the parentage of the cultivar is unknown, Ribston Pippin seems a likely candidate. The variety was introduced for sale by the 1850s by Mr. Charles Turner, and grown commercially from the 1860s, particularly in the Vale of Evesham in Worcestershire, and later in Kent.

220px-Cox_orange_renette2 Cox’s Orange Pippin is highly regarded due to its excellent flavor and attractive appearance. The apples are of medium size, orange-red in colour deepening to bright red and mottled with carmine over a deep yellow background. The flesh is very aromatic, yellow-white, fine-grained, crisp and very juicy. Cox’s flavour is sprightly subacid, with hints of cherry and anise, becoming softer and milder with age. When ripe apples are shaken, the seeds make a rattling sound as they are only loosely held in the apple’s flesh.

One of the best in quality of the English dessert apples; Cox’s Orange Pippin may be eaten out of hand or sliced. Not recommended for cooking, it cooks to a fine froth. Cox’s Orange Pippin is often blended with other varieties in the production of cider.

According to the Institute of Food Research, Cox’s Orange Pippin accounts for over 50% of the UK acreage of dessert apples. The tree is a moderate grower and is annually productive. However it can be difficult to grow in many environments and tends to be susceptible to diseases such as scab, mildew and canker. A testament to this is the fact that it is rarely grown commercially in North America. A number of sports of Cox’s Orange Pippin have been discovered over subsequent years and propagated. These retain “Cox” in their names, e.g., Cherry Cox, Crimson Cox, King Cox, Queen Cox. In addition to the cultivation of Cox sports, apple breeders have hybridised Cox with other varieties to improve vigour, disease resistance and yield while attempting to retain the unique qualities of Cox’s flavor.

Descendent Cultivars
Cultivar name (female parent × male parent)

Acme (Cox’s Orange Pippin x Unknown)
Alkmene (Cox’s Orange Pippin × Geheimrat Doktor Oldenburg)
Allington Pippin (Cox’s Orange Pippin × King of the Pippins)
Anna Boelens (Cox’s Orange Pippin × Freiherr von Berlepsch)
Arthur W. Barnes (Gascoyne’s Scarlet × Cox’s Orange Pippin)
Barnack Orange (Cox’s Orange Pippin × Barnack Beauty)
Barry (McIntosh × Cox’s Orange Pippin)
Bountiful (Cox’s Orange Pippin × Lane’s Prince Albert)
Carswell’s Honeydew (Cox’s Orange Pippin × Unknown)
Carswell’s Orange (Cox’s Orange Pippin × Unknown)
Charles Ross (Cox’s Orange Pippin × Peasgood Nonesuch)
Clopton Red (Cox’s Orange Pippin × Unknown)
Cobra (Cox’s Orange Pippin × Bramley’s Seedling)
Downton Pippin (Cox’s Orange Pippin x Golden Pippin)
Dukat (Golden Delicious × Cox’s Orange Pippin)
Dunning (Cox’s Orange Pippin × McIntosh)
Eden (John Standish × Cox’s Orange Pippin)
Edith Hopwood (Cox’s Orange Pippin × Unknown)
Ellison’s Orange (Cox’s Orange Pippin × Calville Blanc d’Ete)
Elstar (Golden Delicious x Cox’s Orange Pippin)
Fiesta (Cox’s Orange Pippin x Idared)
Francis (Cox’s Orange Pippin × Unknown)
Freyburg (Cox’s Orange Pippin x Golden Delicious)
Gloucester Cross (Cox’s Orange Pippin × Unknown)
Golden Nugget (Golden Russet x Cox’s Orange Pippin)
Hereford Cross (Cox’s Orange Pippin × Unknown)
Herefordshire Russet (Cox’s Orange Pippin x Idared)
High View Pippin (Sturmer Pippin x Cox’s Orange Pippin)
Holstein (Cox’s Orange Pippin x Unknown)
Ingrid Marie (Cox’s Orange Pippin x Unknown)
James Grieve (Cox’s Orange Pippin x Potts’ Seedling)
Jupiter (Cox’s Orange Pippin x Starking Delicious)
Karmijn de Sonneville (Cox’s Orange Pippin x Jonathan)
Kent (Cox’s Orange Pippin x Jonathan)
Kidd’s Orange Red (Cox Orange Pippin x Red Delicious)
King George V (Cox’s Orange Pippin x Unknown)
Langley Pippin (Cox’s Orange Pippin x Gladstone)
Laxton’s Advance (Cox’s Orange Pippin × Gladstone)
Laxton’s Epicure (Wealthy x Cox’s Orange Pippin)
Laxton’s Exquisite (Cellini x Cox’s Orange Pippin)
Laxton’s Fortune (Cox’s Orange Pippin x Wealthy)
Laxton’s Pearmain (Cox’s Orange Pippin x Wyken Pippin)
Laxton’s Superb (Wyken Pippin x Cox’s Orange Pippin)
Laxton’s Triumph (King of the Pippins x Cox’s Orange Pippin)
Lynn’s Pippin (Cox’s Orange Pippin x Ellison’s Orange)
Meridien (Cox’s Orange Pippin x Falstaff)
Merton Beauty (Ellison’s Orange x Cox’s Orange Pippin)
Merton Charm (McIntosh x Cox’s Orange Pippin)
Merton Russet (Sturmer Pippin × Cox’s Orange Pippin)
Merton Worcester (Cox’s Orange Pippin x Worcester Pearmain)
Millicent Barnes (Gascoyne’s Scarlet x Cox’s Orange Pippin)
Nuvar Cheerful Gold (Cox’s Orange Pippin x Golden Delicious)
Nuvar Freckles (Golden Delicious x Cox’s Orange Pippin)
Orangenburg (Cox’s Orange Pippin x Esopus Spitzenburg)
Pixie (Cox’s Orange Pippin x Sunset)
Polly Prosser (Cox’s Orange Pippin x Duke of Devonshire)
Prince Charles (Lord Lambourne x Cox’s Orange Pippin)
Prins Bernhard (Jonathan x Cox’s Orange Pippin)
Red Windsor (Cox’s Orange Pippin x Alkmene)
Rival (Peasgood’s Nonsuch x Cox’s Orange Pippin)
Rosy Blenheim (Blenheim Orange x Cox’s Orange Pippin)
Rubens (Cox’s Orange Pippin x Unknown)
Rubinette (Golden Delicious x Cox’s Orange Pippin)
Ruby (Thorrington) (Cox’s Orange Pippin x Unknown)
Saint Cecilia (Cox’s Orange Pippin x Unknown)
Saint Everard (Cox’s Orange Pippin x Margil)
Sunburn (Cox’s Orange Pippin x Unknown)
Suntan (Cox’s Orange Pippin x Court Pendu Plat)
Sunset (Cox’s Orange Pippin x Unknown)
Sweetie Darling/East Malling A 3022 (Cox’s Orange Pippin x Northern Spy)
Tydeman’s Late Orange (Laxton’s Superb x Cox’s Orange Pippin)
Tydeman’s October Pippin (Cox’s Orange Pippin x Ellison’s Orange)
William Crump (Cox’s Orange Pippin x Worcester Pearmain)
Winter Gem (Cox’s Orange Pippin x Grimes Golden)
Winston/Winter King (Cox’s Orange Pippin x Worcester Pearmain)

More Information Than You Need to Know About Apples…
Apple Cultivars

Dessert and Dual Purpose Apples
Adams Pearmain, Ambrosia, Antonovka, Arkansas Black, Ashmead’s Kernel, Aurora Golden Gala, Baldwin, Ben Davis, Blenheim Orange, Beauty of Bath, Belle de Boskoop, Braeburn, Brina, Cameo, Cornish Gilliflower, Cortland, Cox’s Orange Pippin, Cripps Pink (Pink Lady), Discovery, Egremont Russet, Elstar, Empire, Esopus Spitzenburg, Fuji, Gala, Ginger Gold, Golden Orange, Golden Delicious, Granny Smith, Gravenstein, Grimes Golden, Haralson, Honeycrisp, Idared, James Grieve, Jazz, Jersey Black, Jonagold, Jonathan, Karmijn de Sonnaville, King Byerd, Knobbed Russet, Liberty, Macoun, McIntosh, Mutsu, Newtown Pippin, Nicola, Opal, Papirovka, Paula Red, Pink Pearl, Pinova, Ralls Genet, Rambo, Red Delicious, Redlove Era, Rhode Island Greening, Ribston Pippin, Rome, Roxbury Russet, Rubens (Civni), Sekai Ichi, Spartan, Stayman, Sturmer Pippin, Summerfree, SweeTango, Taliaferro, Tompkins King, Topaz, Wealthy, York Imperial, Zestar

Cooking Apples
Bramley, Calville Blanc d’hiver, Flower of Kent, Golden Noble, Norfolk Biffin, Northern Spy

Cider Apples
Brown Snout, Dabinett, Foxwhelp, Harrison Cider Apple, Kingston Black, Redstreak, Styre

Posted in British history, food and drink, George IV, Great Britain, Living in the Regency, Regency era, Regency personalities | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on During the Reign of George IV: Apple Time with Cox’s Orange Pippin

Happenings During the Reign of William IV: The Anatomy Act 1832

The Anatomy Act 1832 (2 & 3 Will. IV c.75) was a United Kingdom Act of Parliament that gave freer license to doctors, teachers of anatomy, and bona fide medical students to dissect donated bodies. It was promulgated in reaction to public fear and revulsion of the illegal trade in corpses.

Background
Before 1832, the Murder Act 1752 stipulated that only the corpses of executed murderers could be used for dissection. By the early nineteenth century, the rise of medical science, occurring at the same time as a reduction in the number of executions, had caused demand to outstrip supply.

As early as about 1810 an anatomical society was formed, to impress on the government the necessity for an alteration in the law. Among the members were John Abernethy, Charles Bell, Everard Home, Benjamin Brodie, Astley Cooper and Henry Cline. The efforts of this body gave rise to an 1828 select committee to report on the question. Details of the evidence are recorded in the minutes of this body.

The report of this committee led to the Bill, but public revulsion and fear at the recent West Port murders sensitised opinion in favour of a change in the law. In 1831, public outcry at the activities of the London Burkers caused further pressure for a Bill.

Passage of the Bill
Public sentiment notwithstanding, there was substantial opposition to the Bill.
… they tell us it was necessary for the purposes of science. Science? Why, who is science for? Not for poor people. Then if it be necessary for the purposes of science, let them have the bodies of the rich, for whose benefit science is cultivated.
— William Cobbett

In 1829 the College of Surgeons petitioned against it, and it was withdrawn in the House of Lords owing to the opposition of the Archbishop of Canterbury William Howley.
In 1832 a new Anatomy Bill was introduced, which, though strongly opposed by Hunt, Sadler and Vyvyan, was supported by Macaulay and O’Connell, and finally passed the House of Lords on the July 19, 1832.

Provisions of the Act
The Act provided that anyone intending to practise anatomy must obtain a licence from the Home Secretary. As a matter of fact only one or two teachers in each institution took out this licence and were known as licensed teachers. They accepted the whole responsibility for the proper treatment of all bodies dissected in the building for which their licence was granted.

Regulating these licensed teachers, and receiving constant reports from them, were four inspectors of anatomy, one each for England, Scotland, Ireland and London, who reported to the Home Secretary and knew the whereabouts of every body being dissected. The principal provision of the act was Section 7 which stipulated that a person having lawful possession of a body may permit it to undergo anatomical examination provided no relative objected. The other sections were subsidiary and detailed the methods of carrying this into effect.

Section 16 repealed parts of sections 4 and 5 of the Offences against the Person Act 1828 (which in turn replaced an Act of Henry VIII, which provided that the bodies of murderers were to be hung in chains or dissected after execution. It provided instead that they were to be either hung in chains or buried within the precincts of the last prison in which the deceased had been confined. The provision for hanging in chains was shortly repealed by the Hanging in Chains Act 1834 and the whole section was repealed and replaced by section 3 of the Offences against the Person Act 1861.

The Act, provided for the needs of physicians, surgeons and students by giving them legal access to corpses that were unclaimed after death, in particular those who died in prison or the workhouse. Further, a person could donate their next of kin’s corpse in exchange for burial at the expense of the donee.

Occasionally a person, following the example of Jeremy Bentham, left their body for the advancement of science, but even then, if his relatives objected, it was not received.
The act was effective in ending the practice of resurrectionists who robbed graves as a means of obtaining cadavers for medical study.

Gunther von Hagens was accused of (but not charged with) breaking the Act because of performing televised autopsy in 2002.

Fear of the Act’s provision that paupers’ bodies could be sold for medical research without their consent, protest riots took place as late as a decade after its implementation. An anatomical theatre in Cambridge was vandalised late in 1833 “by an angry mob determined to put a stop to the dissection of a man; this wave of popular protest alarmed the medical profession who resolved to hide its activities from the general public, and to a greater or lesser extent it has been doing so ever since.”

Repeal
The Act was repealed by the Anatomy Act 1984 which was, in turn, repealed by Human Tissue Act 2004. Access to corpses for the use of medical science in the UK is now regulated by the Human Tissue Authority. However in Scotland this is still governed by amendments (under the Human Tissue (Scotland) Act 2006) to the existing Anatomy Act, and Scotland will retain an Inspector of Anatomy. It is thought that the provisions of the original 1832 Anatomy Act are the basis of modern thinking on the subject.

Posted in British history, real life tales, Victorian era, William IV | Tagged , , , , , , | 1 Comment

The Murder Act 1751

The Murder Act 1751 (25 Geo 2 c 37) was an Act of the Parliament of Great Britain.

Provisions
The Murder Act included the provision “for better preventing the horrid crime of murder” “that some further terror and peculiar mark of infamy be added to the punishment,” and that “in no case whatsoever shall the body of any murderer be suffered to be buried,” by mandating either public dissection or “hanging in chains” of the cadaver. The act also stipulated that a person found guilty of murder should be executed two days after being sentenced unless the third day was a Sunday, in which case the execution would take place on the following Monday.

In 1828 this Act was repealed, as to England, by section 1 of the 9 Geo 4 c 31, except so far as it related to rescues and attempts to rescue. The corresponding marginal note to that section says that effect of this was to repeal the whole Act, except for sections 9 and 10.

Section 1
This section was repealed by section 1 of, and the Schedule to, the Statute Law Revision Act 1871.

Section 9
This section provided that any person who, by force, set at liberty or rescued, or who attempted to set at liberty or rescue, any person out of prison who was committed for, or convicted of, murder, or who rescued or attempted to rescue, any person convicted of murder, going to execution or during execution, was guilty of felony, and was to suffer death without benefit of clergy. This death penalty was reduced to transportation for life by the Punishment of Offences Act (1837).

Section 11
This section was repealed by section 1 of, and the Schedule to, the Statute Law Revision Act 1871.

Posted in British history, Georgian Era, real life tales | Tagged | 2 Comments

Victorian Celebrity: John Nelson Darby, Father of Modern Dispensationalism and Futurism

JohnNelsonDarby John Nelson Darby (18 November 1800 – 29 April 1882) was an Anglo-Irish evangelist, and an influential figure among the original Plymouth Brethren. He is considered to be the father of modern Dispensationalism and Futurism in the English vernacular. He produced a translation of the Bible based on the Hebrew and Greek texts called The Holy Scriptures: A New Translation from the Original Languages by J. N. Darby.

Biography
Early Years

John Nelson Darby was born in Westminster, London, and christened at St. Margaret’s on 3 March 1801. He came from an Anglo-Irish landowning family seated at Leap Castle, King’s County, Ireland. He was the nephew of Admiral Henry D’Esterre Darby, and his middle name was given in recognition of his godfather and family friend, Lord Nelson.

Darby was educated at Westminster School and Trinity College, Dublin, where he graduated Classical Gold Medallist in 1819. Darby embraced Christianity during his studies, although there is no evidence that he formally studied theology. He joined an inn of court, but felt that being a lawyer was inconsistent with his religious belief. He therefore chose ordination as an Anglican clergyman in Ireland, “lest he should sell his talents to defeat justice.”

In 1825, Darby was ordained deacon of the established Church of Ireland and the following year as priest.

Middle Years
Darby became a curate in the Church of Ireland parish of Delgany, County Wicklow, and distinguished himself by convincing Roman Catholic peasants in the Calary area to abandon the Catholic Church. The well-known gospel tract “How the Lost Sheep was Saved” gives his personal account of a visit he paid to a dying shepherd boy in this area, painting a vivid picture of what his work among the poor people involved.

He later claimed to have won hundreds of converts to the Church of Ireland. However, the conversions ended when William Magee, the Archbishop of Dublin, ruled that converts were obliged to swear allegiance to George IV as rightful king of Ireland.

Darby resigned his curacy in protest. Soon after, in October 1827, he fell from a horse and was seriously injured. He later stated that it was during this time that he began to believe that the “kingdom” described in the Book of Isaiah and elsewhere in the Old Testament was entirely different from the Christian church.

Over the next five years, he developed the principles of his mature theology—most notably his conviction that the very notion of a clergyman was a sin against the Holy Spirit, because it limited the recognition that the Holy Spirit could speak through any member of the Church. During this time he joined an interdenominational meeting of believers (including Anthony Norris Groves, Edward Cronin, J. G. Bellett, and Francis Hutchinson), who met to “break bread” together in Dublin as a symbol of their unity in Christ.

By 1832, this group had grown and began to identify themselves as a distinct Christian assembly. As they traveled and began new assemblies in Ireland and England, they formed the movement now known as the Plymouth Brethren.

It is believed that John Nelson Darby left the Church of Ireland around 1831. He participated in the 1831–33 Powerscourt Conference, an annual meeting of Bible students organized by his friend, the wealthy widow Lady Powerscourt (Theodosia Wingfield Powerscourt).

At the conference Darby publicly described his ecclesiological and eschatological views, including the pretribulation rapture. For about 40 years William Kelly (1821–1906) was his chief interpreter and continued to be a staunch supporter until his own death. Kelly in his work “John Nelson Darby as I knew him” stated that “a saint more true to Christ’s name and word I never knew or heard of.”

Darby saw the invention of the telegraph as a sign that the end of the world was approaching; he called the telegraph an invention of Cain and a harbinger of Armageddon.

Darby defended Calvinist doctrines when they came under attack from within the Church in which he once served. His biographer Goddard states, “Darby indicates his approval of the doctrine of the Anglican Church as expressed in Article XVII of the Thirty-Nine Articles” on the subject of election and predestination.

Darby said, “For my own part, I soberly think Article XVII to be as wise, perhaps I might say the wisest and best condensed human statement of the view it contains that I am acquainted with. I am fully content to take it in its literal and grammatical sense. I believe that predestination to life is the eternal purpose of God, by which, before the foundations of the world were laid, He firmly decreed, by His counsel secret to us, to deliver from curse and destruction those whom He had chosen in Christ out of the human race, and to bring them, through Christ, as vessels made to honour, to eternal salvation.”

Later Years
Darby traveled widely in Europe and Britain in the 1830s and 1840s, and established many Brethren assemblies. He gave 11 significant lectures in Geneva in 1840 on the hope of the church (L’attente actuelle de l’église). These established his reputation as a leading interpreter of biblical prophecy. The beliefs he disseminated then are still being propagated (in various forms) at such places as Dallas Theological Seminary and by authors and preachers such as Hal Lindsey and Tim LaHaye.

In 1848, Darby became involved in a complex dispute over the proper method for maintaining shared standards of discipline in different assembles that resulted in a split between Open Brethren, which maintained a congregational form of government and Exclusive Brethren.

After that time, he was recognized as the dominant figure among the Exclusives, who also came to be known as “Darbyite” Brethren. He made at least 5 missionary journeys to North America between 1862 and 1877. He worked mostly in New England, Ontario, and the Great Lakes region, but took one extended journey from Toronto to Sydney by way of San Francisco, Hawaii, and New Zealand.

A Geographical Index of his letters is currently available and lists where he traveled. He used his classical skills to translate the Bible from Hebrew and Greek texts into several languages. In English he wrote a Synopsis of the Bible and many other scholarly religious articles. He wrote hymns and poems, the most famous being, “Man of Sorrows.” He was also a Bible Commentator. He declined however to contribute to the compilation of the Revised Version of the King James Bible. He died 1882 in Sundridge House, Bournemouth and is buried in Bournemouth, Dorset, England.

Later influence
If one accepted Darby’s view of the secret rapture… Benjamin Wills Newton pointed out, then many Gospel passages must be “renounced as not properly ours.”…this is precisely what Darby was prepared to do.

Too traditional to admit that biblical authors might have contradicted each other, and too rationalist to admit that the prophetic maze defied penetration, Darby attempted a resolution of his exegetical dilemma by distinguishing between Scripture intended for the Church and Scripture intended for Israel…

The task of the expositor of the Bible was, in a phrase that became the hallmark of dispensationalism, “rightly dividing the word of truth.”

Darby is noted in the theological world as the father of “dispensationalism”, later made popular in the United States by Cyrus Scofield’s Scofield Reference Bible.

Charles Henry Mackintosh, 1820–1896, with his popular style spread Darby’s teachings to humbler elements in society and may be regarded as the journalist of the Brethren Movement. Mackintosh popularised Darby, although not his hyperdispensational approach, more than any other Brethren author.

In the early twentieth century, the Brethren’s teachings, through Margaret E. Barber, influenced the Little Flock of Watchman Nee and Witness Lee. Darby is sometimes credited with originating the “secret rapture” theory wherein Christ will suddenly remove His bride, the Church, from this world before the judgments of the tribulation. Some claim that this book was the origin of the idea of the “rapture.”

Dispensationalist beliefs about the fate of the Jews and the re-establishment of the Kingdom of Israel put dispensationalists at the forefront of Christian Zionism, because “God is able to graft them in again,” and they believe that in His grace he will do so according to their understanding of Old Testament prophecy. They believe that, while the ways of God may change, His purposes to bless Israel will never be forgotten, just as He has shown unmerited favour to the Church, He will do so to a remnant of Israel to fulfill all the promises made to the genetic seed of Abraham.

Criticism
Charles Haddon Spurgeon, Pastor of the Metropolitan Tabernacle and contemporary of Darby published criticism of Darby and Brethrenism. His main criticism was that Darby and the Plymouth Brethren rejected the vicarious purpose of Christ’s obedience as well as imputed righteousness. He viewed these of such importance and so central to the gospel that it led him to this statement about the rest of their belief.

James Grant wrote: “With the deadly heresies entertained and taught by the Plymouth Brethren, in relation to some of the most momentous of all the doctrines of the gospel, and to which I have adverted at some length, I feel assured that my readers will not be surprised at any other views, however unscriptual and pernicious they may be, which the Darbyites have embraced and zealously seek to propagate.”

Works
**The Holy Bible a new translation by J.N. Darby, a parallel edition, Bible Truth Publishers: Addison, Illinois.
**The Writings of J. N. Darby courtesy of Stem Publishing
**The Holy Scriptures (A New Translation from the Original Languages by J. N. Darby) courtesy of Stem Publishing
**A Letter on Free Will by J.N. Darby, Elberfeld, 23 October 1861
**The Collected Writings Of J. N. Darby, Ecclesiastical No. 1, Volume 1: The Character Of Office In The Present Dispensation

Posted in British history, real life tales, religion, Victorian era | Tagged , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Happenings During the Reign of William IV: Kitty Wilkinson, The Saint of the Slums

220px-Kitty_Wilkinson Kitty Wilkinson (Catherine Wilkinson) (1786–1860) was an Irish migrant, “wife of a labourer,” who became known as the Saint of the Slums. In 1832, during a cholera epidemic, she had the only boiler in her neighbourhood, so she invited those with infected clothes or linens to use it, thus saving many lives. This was the first public washhouse in Liverpool. Ten years later with public funds her efforts resulted in the opening of a combined washhouse and public baths, the first in the United Kingdom.

Personal Life
Wilkinson was born Catherine Seaward in County Londonderry, Ireland, and at the age of nine was coming to Liverpool with her parents; unfortunately, their ship ran aground in the Mersey and her father and younger sister drowned. At twelve years of age she went to work at a cotton mill in Caton, Lancashire, where she was an indentured apprentice.

At age 20 she left the mill and returned to live with her mother in Liverpool, where they both were in domestic service. Shortly thereafter she married a sailor, Emanuel Demontee. Demontee permitted Kitty’s mother to live with them. After two children in quick succession, her husband drowned at sea. Therefore, she returned to domestic service. But shortly thereafter, upon being gifted with a mangle, she set herself up as a laundress. In 1823, she married Tom Wilkinson, a warehouse porter, and they continued to live at the Denison Street house that she rented.

Crusade
In 1832, cholera broke out in Liverpool. Wilkinson took the initiative to offer the use of her boiler, house and yard to neighbours to wash their clothes, at a charge of 1 penny per week, and she showed them how to use a chloride of lime to get them clean. Boiling killed the cholera bacteria. Once these activities came to their attention, Wilkinson was supported by the District Provident Society and William Rathbone.

Convinced of the importance of cleanliness in combating disease, she pushed for the establishment of public baths where the poor could bathe. In 1842 the combined public baths and washhouse was opened on Upper Fredrick Street in Liverpool, and in 1846 Wilkinson was appointed superintendent of the public baths.

In 1846 the Mayoress presented Wilkinson with a silver teapot from Queen Victoria en-scribed “The Queen, the Queen Dowager, and the Ladies of Liverpool to Catherine Wilkinson, 1846.” Wilkinson died in Liverpool and was buried in the St. James Cemetery with the inscription:

CATHERINE WILKINSON. Died 11 November 1860, aged 73. Indefatigable and self-denying She was the Widow’s friend. The support of the Orphan. The fearless and unwearied nurse of the sick. The originator of Baths and Wash-houses for the poor. ‘For all they did cast in of their abundance; but she of her want did cast in all that she had, even all her living.’ St. Mark, 12th Chapter, 44th Verse.

Biographies
In 1910 “The Life of Kitty Wilkinson” was published by Winifred Rathbone, which provided a more accurate story of her life than previously available in “Catherine of Liverpool” in Chambers’ Miscellany, Vol III.

Posted in British history, Ireland, real life tales, William IV | Tagged , , | Comments Off on Happenings During the Reign of William IV: Kitty Wilkinson, The Saint of the Slums

Happenings During the Reign of William IV: Asiatic Cholera Pandemic

12 February – Second cholera pandemic begins to spread in London, starting from East London. It is declared officially over in early May but deaths continue. It will claim at least 3000 victims. In Liverpool, Kitty Wilkinson becomes the “Saint of the Slums” by promoting hygiene.

Hand bill from the New York City Board of Health, 1832. The outdated public health advice demonstrates the lack of understanding of the disease and its causes.

Hand bill from the New York City Board of Health, 1832. The outdated public health advice demonstrates the lack of understanding of the disease and its causes.

The second cholera pandemic (1829-1849), also known as the Asiatic Cholera Pandemic, was a cholera pandemic that reached from India to Europe, Great Britain and the Americas.

History
This pandemic began, like the first, with outbreaks along the Ganges River delta in India. From there the disease spread along trade routes to cover most of India. By 1828 the disease had traveled to China and reached the southern tips of the Ural Mountains in 1829. It reached England in December 1831: appearing in Sunderland, Gateshead and Newcastle. In London, the disease claimed 6,536 victims; in Paris, 20,000 died (out of a population of 650,000), with about 100,000 deaths in all of France. In 1832 the epidemic reached Russia, Quebec, Ontario, Detroit and New York. It reached the Pacific coast of North America between 1832 and 1834.

Legacy
Norwegian Poet Henrik Wergeland wrote a stage-play inspired by the pandemic, which had reached Norway. In The Indian Cholera, he criticized British colonialism for spreading the pandemic.

As a result of the epidemic, the medical community developed a major advance, the intravenous saline drip. It was developed from the work of Dr Thomas Latta of Leith, near Edinburgh. Latta established from blood studies that a saline drip greatly improved the condition of patients and saved many lives by preventing dehydration. But, he was one of the many medical personnel who died in the epidemic.

Posted in British history, real life tales, William IV | Tagged , , , | 2 Comments